12015-10-15T00:00:46 *** PaulCapestany has quit IRC
22015-10-15T00:00:48 *** PaulCape_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
32015-10-15T00:02:54 *** jcorgan_ is now known as jcorgan
42015-10-15T00:16:05 *** Thireus1 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
52015-10-15T00:17:39 *** Thireus has quit IRC
62015-10-15T00:17:45 *** d_t has quit IRC
72015-10-15T00:34:14 *** Ylbam has quit IRC
82015-10-15T00:53:39 *** CodeShark has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
92015-10-15T00:59:06 *** moli has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
102015-10-15T01:01:59 *** molly has quit IRC
112015-10-15T01:02:26 *** molly has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
122015-10-15T01:04:39 *** moli has quit IRC
132015-10-15T01:05:45 *** Guest78786 is now known as pigeons
142015-10-15T01:11:43 *** belcher has quit IRC
152015-10-15T01:24:08 *** baldur has quit IRC
162015-10-15T01:24:25 *** baldur has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
172015-10-15T01:27:35 *** trippysalmon has quit IRC
182015-10-15T01:30:23 <nanotube> https://bitcoin.org/en/download <- suggest that the "over 20GB" part toward the bottom should probably be updated to "over 50GB", or point to some resource that tracks blockchain size for future-proofness, to avoid giving misleading info.
192015-10-15T01:33:16 <gmaxwell> hah. last time that got bumped I suggested removing the explicit size claim!
202015-10-15T01:34:26 <Luke-Jr> I think there's an open issue for that since some weeks ago :/
212015-10-15T01:36:44 <gmaxwell> I wonder if we shouldn't periodically write out a opaque file that gives a hash of a block 100 back or so, which acts like a persistant validation bypass, so that if you resync a pruned node it can skip the expense.
222015-10-15T01:37:01 <gmaxwell> big problem with pruning right now is that the frequent leveldb corruption some users expirence make it quite a gamble.
232015-10-15T02:04:19 <morcos> gmaxwell: can you elaborate on that? what expense are you skipping? validation?
242015-10-15T02:06:09 <morcos> are you basically talking about your own private checkpoint?
252015-10-15T02:17:07 *** d_t has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
262015-10-15T02:40:46 *** wumpus has quit IRC
272015-10-15T02:44:39 <Luke-Jr> local UTXO commitments for pruned bootstrapping would be handy, but dangerous
282015-10-15T02:49:08 * Luke-Jr ponders that each release is 1 GB of hosted data for him XD
292015-10-15T02:52:18 *** moli has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
302015-10-15T02:55:39 *** molly has quit IRC
312015-10-15T02:58:50 <Luke-Jr> there were no changes to bitcoin-cli in 0.11.1, right?
322015-10-15T03:23:57 *** petertodd has quit IRC
332015-10-15T03:24:59 *** petertodd has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
342015-10-15T03:25:23 *** petertodd is now known as Guest52664
352015-10-15T03:30:37 <Luke-Jr> answer: OPENSSL_no_config :|
362015-10-15T03:39:27 <cfields> Luke-Jr: that fixes possible crashes (or exit()s) due to faulty local openssl config
372015-10-15T03:40:04 <Luke-Jr> right
382015-10-15T03:40:13 <cfields> i don't think it should cause any abi issues?
392015-10-15T03:54:01 <Luke-Jr> no, but it's a reason to bump -cli pkg to 0.11.1
402015-10-15T04:06:52 <midnightmagic> btcdrak: is there some other place from the gitian sigs to find your pubkey? Or have other people in core signed it?
412015-10-15T04:07:09 <btcdrak> petertodd signed it
422015-10-15T04:07:17 <btcdrak> it's on the public keyservers
432015-10-15T04:09:00 <midnightmagic> sometimes i think my comments are being filtered through some kind of cthulhu filter before they end up in front of everyone else's eyes.
442015-10-15T04:13:28 <michagogo> midnightmagic: huh?
452015-10-15T04:22:46 *** lightningbot has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
462015-10-15T04:30:17 *** PaulCape_ has quit IRC
472015-10-15T04:30:42 *** PaulCapestany has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
482015-10-15T04:33:39 <nanotube> midnightmagic: how did you know about my cthulhu filter? i was told it was undetectable. >_____>
492015-10-15T04:41:35 <midnightmagic> michagogo: eh. I had a big rant typed out but it doesn't matter. I just hate using public key servers. They're full of sigspam and the maintainers are too stubborn to stop using shortform keyids. Also, I am only okay with transitive trust sigs: via that, and places where btcdrak has direct control over, I triangulate key validity and mark local trust accordingly.
502015-10-15T04:42:43 <btcdrak> midnightmagic: you sound eccentric :-P
512015-10-15T04:42:51 <midnightmagic> I fully expect virtually nobody here has actually verified anything about my keys except they're sitting there on pgp.mit.edu after someone who's not-me uploaded them there.
522015-10-15T04:43:26 <midnightmagic> btcdrak: Well what's the point in using PGP keys at all if nobody does any verification on them right?
532015-10-15T04:43:39 <btcdrak> midnightmagic: just teasing you :)
542015-10-15T04:43:43 <midnightmagic> :-P
552015-10-15T04:44:07 <midnightmagic> And thereby you point out my hypocrisy! lol I love it.
562015-10-15T04:51:24 <jcorgan> meh, pgp web of trust is overrated
572015-10-15T05:01:41 *** CodeShark has quit IRC
582015-10-15T05:42:38 *** da2ce7 has quit IRC
592015-10-15T05:42:56 *** equil_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
602015-10-15T05:45:50 *** Thireus1 has quit IRC
612015-10-15T05:46:17 *** Ylbam has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
622015-10-15T05:46:47 *** da2ce7 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
632015-10-15T06:13:14 *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
642015-10-15T06:29:44 *** Thireus has quit IRC
652015-10-15T06:36:05 *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
662015-10-15T06:43:09 *** Thireus has quit IRC
672015-10-15T06:54:07 <da2ce7> hello, what happend to pr https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6788
682015-10-15T06:54:15 <da2ce7> the diff and history are insane.
692015-10-15T06:54:34 <da2ce7> (or is it just a github bug?)
702015-10-15T06:57:18 *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
712015-10-15T07:02:40 <jonasschnelli> da2ce7: github / force push / delete / bug
722015-10-15T07:03:13 <jonasschnelli> the merge itself is tiny: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/3b1279fdb269727f4fd964df0c238401467930ea
732015-10-15T07:21:16 *** AtashiCon has quit IRC
742015-10-15T07:30:08 *** AtashiCon has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
752015-10-15T07:34:11 *** d_t has quit IRC
762015-10-15T07:39:49 *** ParadoxSpiral has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
772015-10-15T07:42:42 *** ParadoxSpiral_ has quit IRC
782015-10-15T08:32:03 *** dgenr8 has quit IRC
792015-10-15T08:32:20 *** dgenr8 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
802015-10-15T08:39:22 <michagogo> Posted: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3ou1im/bitcoin_core_version_0111_released/
812015-10-15T08:40:11 <Luke-Jr> probably posting soon: http://luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitcoin-ljr/
822015-10-15T08:40:22 <Luke-Jr> anything I should change before I do?
832015-10-15T09:10:32 <btcdrak> where is the news of 0.10.3 also?
842015-10-15T09:23:03 <Luke-Jr> btcdrak: backports are only barely supported :P
852015-10-15T09:23:25 <GitHub16> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 1 new commit to 0.9: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/460ccfb7b1d63ef251ee5a881408190f4d41ce20
862015-10-15T09:23:26 <GitHub16> bitcoin/0.9 460ccfb Wladimir J. van der Laan: Disable upnp by default...
872015-10-15T09:23:27 <btcdrak> yeah I suppose it's good to encourage people to upgrade
882015-10-15T09:24:40 <btcdrak> Luke-Jr: can you speare some time to review the locktime implementation pull-requests?
892015-10-15T09:25:12 <Luke-Jr> specifically which one? otherwise I'll get to it in order of reviewing PRs :p
902015-10-15T09:25:42 <btcdrak> all three really: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6312 BIP68 for sequence numbers
912015-10-15T09:25:42 <btcdrak> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6564 BIP112 for OP_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY
922015-10-15T09:25:42 <btcdrak> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6566 BIP113 for median-past locktime
932015-10-15T09:30:50 <jonasschnelli> hmm... for the 0.10.3 gitian build, .. do i need to load the sigs manually?
942015-10-15T09:31:08 <jonasschnelli> ah. found it in the backlog: https://bitcoincore.org/cfields/bitcoin-0.10.3/signature.tar.gz
952015-10-15T09:32:04 *** wumpus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
962015-10-15T10:46:25 <GitHub149> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/a1d623da3ea4...34f200d1404d
972015-10-15T10:46:25 <GitHub149> bitcoin/master d57586f Micha: Add historical release notes for October 2015 bugfix releases...
982015-10-15T10:46:26 <GitHub149> bitcoin/master 34f200d Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge pull request #6830...
992015-10-15T10:46:35 <GitHub199> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #6830: Add historical release notes for October 2015 bugfix releases (master...add-release-notes) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6830
1002015-10-15T10:46:45 <GitHub78> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #6831: Bring historical release notes up to date (0.10...0.10-add-release-notes) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6831
1012015-10-15T10:49:50 <GitHub39> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 1 new commit to 0.11: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/09a00a1f7f27c95f794aa42bd01a049448ed056d
1022015-10-15T10:49:50 <GitHub39> bitcoin/0.11 09a00a1 Micha: Add historical release notes for October 2015 bugfix releases...
1032015-10-15T10:50:18 <GitHub23> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #6832: Bring historical release notes up to date (0.11...0.11-add-release-notes) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6832
1042015-10-15T10:52:54 <GitHub166> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/34f200d1404d...fa6b405f0594
1052015-10-15T10:52:54 <GitHub166> bitcoin/master f8f2ace Daniel Kraft: trivial: use constants for db keys...
1062015-10-15T10:52:55 <GitHub166> bitcoin/master fa6b405 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge pull request #6823...
1072015-10-15T10:52:59 <GitHub82> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #6823: [Trivial] Use constants for DB keys (master...txdb-constants) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6823
1082015-10-15T10:54:26 <GitHub113> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/fa6b405f0594...8ce992063510
1092015-10-15T10:54:26 <GitHub113> bitcoin/master a0d5e0d Michael: [doc] Cleanup release-process documentation
1102015-10-15T10:54:27 <GitHub113> bitcoin/master 8ce9920 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge pull request #6817...
1112015-10-15T10:54:36 <GitHub189> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #6817: [doc] Cleanup release-process documentation (master...patch-2) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6817
1122015-10-15T10:55:43 <GitHub136> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/8ce992063510...d78a880900c1
1132015-10-15T10:55:43 <GitHub136> bitcoin/master 60af755 Cory Fields: build: univalue subdir build fixups...
1142015-10-15T10:55:44 <GitHub136> bitcoin/master d78a880 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge pull request #6820...
1152015-10-15T10:55:48 <GitHub157> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #6820: build: univalue subdir build fixups (master...univalue-build-fixes) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6820
1162015-10-15T11:12:09 *** PRab_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1172015-10-15T11:15:19 *** PRab has quit IRC
1182015-10-15T11:15:26 *** PRab_ is now known as PRab
1192015-10-15T12:37:42 *** jonasschnelli has quit IRC
1202015-10-15T12:38:04 *** jonasschnelli has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1212015-10-15T13:13:14 *** goregrind has quit IRC
1222015-10-15T13:23:00 *** goregrind has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1232015-10-15T13:41:45 *** treehug88 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1242015-10-15T13:48:57 <morcos> btcdrak: just sent an email to ML, i'm a bit confused as to why we're still getting people to review those pulls if we expect them to change?
1252015-10-15T13:51:38 <morcos> Request for acks on 6618, its a very simple change (other than modifying the unit test) its really an improvement that would have been nice to have backported to 0.11 and included in the last release. We can still do it for the next realease.
1262015-10-15T14:20:39 *** Ylbam has quit IRC
1272015-10-15T14:24:15 *** Ylbam has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1282015-10-15T14:25:04 *** Thireus has quit IRC
1292015-10-15T14:29:29 <morcos> wumpus or jonasschnelli: i'm also going to refresh 6134 to do the same thing (return the next best answer if the result is -1) for priority. Could you tell me if the way I'm updating the slider in updateSmartFeeLabel is right?
1302015-10-15T14:30:18 <jonasschnelli> morcos: hmm..
1312015-10-15T14:30:19 <morcos> I don't know anything about QT, and the way I made it if you try to move the slider over it keeps snapping back, which is kind of what I want, except it results in a stream of calls to estimateFee
1322015-10-15T14:30:56 <jonasschnelli> does ui->sliderSmartFee->setValue() not work?
1332015-10-15T14:31:37 * jonasschnelli is reading
1342015-10-15T14:32:07 <morcos> it works, but if you try it out, you try to move the slider over to 1, and it won't let you (because answer is -1 or whatever) and so it kind of encourages you to keep trying to move it over, until you sort of give up and say hmm, i guess it wont' let me select anything higher than 2
1352015-10-15T14:33:24 <morcos> but if you look at whats happening, as you're trying to move it over, its causing a repeated stream of function calls as you move it over and it triggers updates, it snaps back and triggers updates, all very quickly in succession
1362015-10-15T14:33:30 <jonasschnelli> morcos: i think you have a strange loop there. from updateSmartFeeLabel() you call ui->sliderSmartFee->setValue() which has a signal to updateSmartFeeLabel().
1372015-10-15T14:33:40 <morcos> yes
1382015-10-15T14:33:43 <jonasschnelli> Somehow a circular loop.
1392015-10-15T14:35:00 <morcos> this is why i wanted someone else to look at it! i think the loop ends because after it gets triggered once the else if clause should no longer be hit, EXCEPT if the user is still trying to move the slider over, which in practice happens for a little while
1402015-10-15T14:35:29 <jonasschnelli> morcos: i can take a look at it.
1412015-10-15T14:35:40 <jonasschnelli> Do you have other changes planed. Or can i work on top of 6134?
1422015-10-15T14:35:47 <morcos> so i'd love a better way to do this, what i want to accomplish is if there are no valid fee estimates for say a confirmation target of 1, then it won't let you move the slider there
1432015-10-15T14:36:22 <jonasschnelli> we could set the slider to readonly during that time..
1442015-10-15T14:36:46 <morcos> i'm going to change more of 6134, but i don't think the changes should conflict.
1452015-10-15T14:37:09 <jonasschnelli> But first i need to read myself into your PR... i miss the context because i'm working on some c script implementation and my head is full of OP_s
1462015-10-15T14:37:13 <morcos> thanks for taking a look, no real hurry, but this pull has been open for a long time and i think its a nice improvement
1472015-10-15T14:37:17 <jonasschnelli> morcos: okay. Will work on it
1482015-10-15T14:37:23 <morcos> great!
1492015-10-15T14:37:45 * jonasschnelli puts 6134 on the stack to work on. :)
1502015-10-15T14:38:23 *** d_t has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1512015-10-15T14:48:27 <morcos> Regarding my request for reviewing 6618, let me withdraw that, I think I'll fold it into 6134
1522015-10-15T14:59:08 <GitHub176> [bitcoin] morcos closed pull request #6618: Fee estimate patch (master...fee_estimate_patch) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6618
1532015-10-15T15:01:46 *** d_t has quit IRC
1542015-10-15T15:02:02 *** d_t has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1552015-10-15T15:09:29 <michagogo> What's github.com/Bitcoin-dot-org?
1562015-10-15T15:10:00 <michagogo> Also, an unfortunate typo got into release-process at some point... (gbuild -> bguild)
1572015-10-15T15:12:01 <michagogo> wumpus: hm, I can understand not having release notes for chronologically earlier releases that are in a later branch
1582015-10-15T15:12:47 <michagogo> But I feel like we should at least have e.g. All the 0.10.x notes in the 0.10 branch
1592015-10-15T16:07:24 <btcdrak> morcos: because the PRs were already changed as per your request.
1602015-10-15T16:07:39 <btcdrak> morcos: it's now masking the bits
1612015-10-15T16:08:44 <morcos> btcdrak: yes, sorry missed that. i checked the BIP, but not the PR. you should maybe announce it instead of letting people discover it in the code? back in a few
1622015-10-15T16:10:05 <btcdrak> morcos: yeah I agree. I guess the addition was also made invisible by squashing the commit.
1632015-10-15T16:18:29 *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1642015-10-15T16:33:55 *** Thireus1 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1652015-10-15T16:34:27 <morcos> btcdrak: thanks for sending the email!
1662015-10-15T16:34:52 *** Thireus has quit IRC
1672015-10-15T16:35:25 *** sdaftuar has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1682015-10-15T16:47:39 *** jl2012 has quit IRC
1692015-10-15T16:47:53 *** jl2012 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1702015-10-15T16:54:47 *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1712015-10-15T16:54:47 *** Thireus1 has quit IRC
1722015-10-15T17:16:39 <gmaxwell> https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3ou1im/bitcoin_core_version_0111_released/cw0g8d0 someone should respond to "A cool example of how an attack can prompt developers to make Bitcoin better." with "This improvement was written years ago, but not activated because at the time it blocked most transactions. We've been waiting for wallets to upgrade; with the attacks going on, it didn't mak
1732015-10-15T17:16:45 <gmaxwell> e sense to keep waiting just to avoid disrupting the [last 5%](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6769#issuecomment-146100684) of transactions."
1742015-10-15T17:29:52 <michagogo> gmaxwell: "someone"?
1752015-10-15T17:30:49 <gmaxwell> or something similar to that, of course. Anytime I post on reddit I get hit with nasty attacks/threats/etc. so I'm not doing so anymore.
1762015-10-15T17:32:56 <helo> (make a new accoutn)
1772015-10-15T17:33:57 <helo> although it's a time waster, it's probably more productive to do almost anything else
1782015-10-15T17:36:10 <helo> ooh, someone replied with that ;)
1792015-10-15T17:36:28 <michagogo> :-(
1802015-10-15T17:42:18 <btcdrak> gmaxwell: commented
1812015-10-15T17:42:37 <btcdrak> morcos: you are welcome.
1822015-10-15T17:46:30 <michagogo> btcdrak: sounds like someone beat you to it, if helo wasn't referring to you
1832015-10-15T17:46:54 <michagogo> helo: time waster? I thought Reddit account creation is trivial
1842015-10-15T17:47:41 <helo> i meant battling reddit misconceptions is a time waster (tilting at windmills)
1852015-10-15T17:48:41 <gmaxwell> I'm mostly not reading it now, but I'm on the lookout for any problems with the new point releases.
1862015-10-15T17:50:23 <btcdrak> michagogo: deleted
1872015-10-15T17:51:45 <btcdrak> gmaxwell: I'm pleased to hear this, I think it was a big waste of your time
1882015-10-15T17:53:20 <gmaxwell> Luke-Jr: your edit here is weird; https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3ou1im/bitcoin_core_version_0111_released/cw0h368?context=1 git master does the first half of what he's asking. (#6148)
1892015-10-15T17:57:44 <michagogo> btcdrak: er, I don't know if that was yours or the other one, but they seem to both be deleted
1902015-10-15T17:58:03 <btcdrak> Oh ffs
1912015-10-15T17:58:18 <michagogo> (One of them has a comment, so it's appearing... Looks like someone made a throwaway to support gmaxwell)
1922015-10-15T18:04:53 *** molly has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1932015-10-15T18:07:39 *** moli has quit IRC
1942015-10-15T18:11:57 <morcos> wumpus: sorry for not doing this myself, but we really should make sure somoene runs the extended rpc tests before a release. actually i think i ran them on rc1, but then never got around to it for rc2.
1952015-10-15T18:17:12 *** Palaver has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1962015-10-15T18:17:17 <GitHub52> [bitcoin] rnicoll opened pull request #6835: Add address-based index (master...search-raw-transactions) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6835
1972015-10-15T18:18:28 *** Thireus has quit IRC
1982015-10-15T18:18:40 *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1992015-10-15T18:20:07 <wumpus> morcos: agreed, need to make sure some tests and checks are run before a release
2002015-10-15T18:20:35 *** Palaver has quit IRC
2012015-10-15T18:21:27 *** Thireus has quit IRC
2022015-10-15T18:21:37 <gmaxwell> whomever gmaxwellfan is, thanks; but realize that any mention of me on reddit is going to likely result in me getting the same crap.
2032015-10-15T18:21:44 *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2042015-10-15T18:21:50 <wumpus> michagogo: I guess that makes sense
2052015-10-15T18:22:16 <morcos> wumpus: rpcbind_test.py doesn't work for anyone right? i'll comment it out of the extended tests
2062015-10-15T18:22:40 <wumpus> morcos: it works if you use libevent beta/master
2072015-10-15T18:22:54 *** Thireus has quit IRC
2082015-10-15T18:23:03 *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2092015-10-15T18:23:05 <wumpus> morcos: I've also got the libevent people to backport that fix to next stable release
2102015-10-15T18:23:29 <wumpus> morcos: but sure, you could comment it out for now, or better, the ipv6 part that fails
2112015-10-15T18:23:58 <morcos> wumpus: ah thought about that, seems like we'll forget if thats what i do, but up to you
2122015-10-15T18:24:07 *** Thireus has quit IRC
2132015-10-15T18:25:09 *** CodeShark has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2142015-10-15T18:26:09 <wumpus> another option would be to log the libevent version to debug.log, then parse that from the test, and determine based on that whether to do that subtest.. but nah...
2152015-10-15T18:26:20 <wumpus> just comment it out is fine
2162015-10-15T18:26:25 *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2172015-10-15T18:26:50 *** Thireus has quit IRC
2182015-10-15T18:26:56 *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2192015-10-15T18:28:28 *** Thireus1 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2202015-10-15T18:28:29 *** Thireus has quit IRC
2212015-10-15T18:29:17 <GitHub199> [bitcoin] Michagogo opened pull request #6836: Bring historical release notes up to date (0.10...0.10-add-release-notes) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6836
2222015-10-15T18:30:40 *** Thireus1 has quit IRC
2232015-10-15T18:30:56 *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2242015-10-15T18:32:11 *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2252015-10-15T18:35:57 *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2262015-10-15T18:38:54 *** Thireus has quit IRC
2272015-10-15T18:39:40 *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2282015-10-15T18:40:15 *** sipa has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2292015-10-15T18:42:22 <GitHub106> [bitcoin] morcos opened pull request #6837: Cleanup rpc-tests.py (master...fixupRPCtests) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6837
2302015-10-15T18:43:42 *** Thireus has quit IRC
2312015-10-15T18:48:14 <gmaxwell> Can anyone help me understand why the PR to avoid re-requesting rejected transactions used a bloom filter instead of a limitedmap?
2322015-10-15T18:51:50 *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2332015-10-15T18:53:11 *** Thireus has quit IRC
2342015-10-15T18:53:26 *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2352015-10-15T18:56:41 *** sipa has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2362015-10-15T18:57:27 <sipa> gmaxwell: much smaller
2372015-10-15T18:59:42 *** Thireus has quit IRC
2382015-10-15T18:59:59 *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2392015-10-15T19:02:08 *** CodeShark_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2402015-10-15T19:02:10 *** CodeShark has quit IRC
2412015-10-15T19:02:36 *** CodeShark_ has quit IRC
2422015-10-15T19:02:40 *** Thireus has quit IRC
2432015-10-15T19:02:48 *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2442015-10-15T19:02:59 *** CodeShark has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2452015-10-15T19:04:24 *** Thireus has quit IRC
2462015-10-15T19:04:35 *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2472015-10-15T19:05:39 *** Thireus has quit IRC
2482015-10-15T19:05:53 *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2492015-10-15T19:08:19 *** harding has quit IRC
2502015-10-15T19:08:35 *** Thireus has quit IRC
2512015-10-15T19:08:47 *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2522015-10-15T19:19:51 *** Thireus has quit IRC
2532015-10-15T19:20:06 *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2542015-10-15T19:21:07 *** harding has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2552015-10-15T19:35:03 *** paveljanik has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2562015-10-15T19:55:45 <Luke-Jr> gmaxwell: not the bittorrent part though
2572015-10-15T19:55:56 <gmaxwell> Luke-Jr: agreed.
2582015-10-15T19:57:16 <Luke-Jr> added a second edit clarifying that
2592015-10-15T19:59:46 <gmaxwell> oh gosh, see this is what I meant about mentioning me on reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/bitcoinxt/comments/3ow4o7/bitcoin_core_clowns_unullc_release_a_botched/
2602015-10-15T20:07:05 *** belcher has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2612015-10-15T20:07:15 <jcorgan> gmaxwell: stop slumming, fuck 'em if they have a problem with what other people give them for free
2622015-10-15T20:07:51 <gmaxwell> only noticed because someone else pointed me to it.
2632015-10-15T20:08:31 <sipa> in /etc/hosts: 0.0.0.0 www.reddit.com
2642015-10-15T20:09:08 <CodeShark> good move ;)
2652015-10-15T20:10:27 <devrandom> any known chef scripts for bitcoind that leverage gitian-downloader for auto-updates?
2662015-10-15T20:10:31 <Luke-Jr> gmaxwell: lol, the linked comment seems to be very confused
2672015-10-15T20:10:38 <Luke-Jr> gmaxwell: is there an actual problem?
2682015-10-15T20:10:44 <devrandom> if not, I might write some
2692015-10-15T20:16:17 <btcdrak> yeah gmaxwell: dont pay it any mind. They just want to stop us being productive (and they succeeded to some degree over the last several months)
2702015-10-15T20:18:05 <CodeShark> the PR play is at a higher level than reddit - reddit is just a good way to measure response
2712015-10-15T20:18:17 <CodeShark> but offtopic here
2722015-10-15T20:20:03 <CodeShark> I guess only point being I think gmaxwell should focus his efforts on persuading more important people and fuck the trolls
2732015-10-15T20:20:10 <gmaxwell> Luke-Jr: no. as noted in the actual PR, it was measured by multiple people. The guy at bitgo is likely seeing a mix of the malleability attack and the effect of the relay fee bump.
2742015-10-15T20:21:05 <Luke-Jr> +1 on ignoring them then - it's not even on a reputable subreddit
2752015-10-15T20:21:27 <gmaxwell> sure I was ignoring it, it's clearly trolling.
2762015-10-15T20:26:53 <michagogo> BTW, anyone want a free shirt? https://hacktoberfest.digitalocean.com/
2772015-10-15T20:28:17 <btcdrak> would it be wiser to merge 6312+6564 (sequence numbers and op_csv) into one PR?
2782015-10-15T20:28:26 <michagogo> gmaxwell: uh. Wtf?
2792015-10-15T20:29:37 <michagogo> sipa: that won't block np.reddit.com, pay.reddit.com (the domain they use for payments, but at one point you could use it anywhere on the site, and it was the only way to get https), etc
2802015-10-15T20:30:07 <michagogo> Better to put it into a ublock origin filter if you want to block it
2812015-10-15T20:31:04 <michagogo> devrandom: I've not been keeping track so closely lately. Has there been any improvement on the topic of LXC?
2822015-10-15T20:31:31 <michagogo> It's annoying to have to keep manually upgrading the container
2832015-10-15T20:31:53 <devrandom> I have to admit I don't recall the status there
2842015-10-15T20:32:04 <devrandom> I've been distracted
2852015-10-15T20:32:34 <devrandom> any progress would be on the relevant github issue(s)
2862015-10-15T20:32:53 * michagogo wonders if one was ever created
2872015-10-15T20:33:36 <michagogo> I'm not sure I understand why debootstrap is incapable of using packages from -updates/-security
2882015-10-15T21:07:55 *** equil__ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2892015-10-15T21:08:19 *** equil_ has quit IRC
2902015-10-15T21:24:06 *** equil__ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2912015-10-15T21:44:35 *** equil__ has quit IRC
2922015-10-15T21:47:21 <gmaxwell> holy crap. I want a device that lets me shock people with lightning bolts over the internet when they don't disclose their software versions
2932015-10-15T21:47:22 *** dcousens has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2942015-10-15T21:47:28 <gmaxwell> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/5668#issuecomment-148511855
2952015-10-15T21:47:41 <dcousens> gmaxwell: figured I'd pop in
2962015-10-15T21:47:47 <gmaxwell> dcousens: the line before you joined was partly directed at you! :)
2972015-10-15T21:47:51 <gmaxwell> "holy crap. I want a device that lets me shock people with lightning bolts over the internet when they don't disclose their software versions"
2982015-10-15T21:47:54 <gmaxwell> :)
2992015-10-15T21:48:31 <gmaxwell> dcousens: what version were you running that crashed?
3002015-10-15T21:48:36 <dcousens> So, yeah, had a box up for 2.5 months no issues suddenly it went down after a get version
3012015-10-15T21:48:54 <dcousens> gmaxwell: quickest way to check that on CLI?
3022015-10-15T21:49:04 <dcousens> nvm
3032015-10-15T21:49:04 <dcousens> "version" : 110000,
3042015-10-15T21:49:06 <sipa> dcousens: or in the first line it prints to debug.log
3052015-10-15T21:49:14 <gmaxwell> dcousens: look in debug.log? first line logged. or... yea
3062015-10-15T21:49:14 <sipa> which will also report the git commit
3072015-10-15T21:49:16 <gmaxwell> well shit.
3082015-10-15T21:49:42 <dcousens> there was no other information, at all, anywhere :/
3092015-10-15T21:49:53 <sipa> any chance it OOMed?
3102015-10-15T21:50:08 <dcousens> sipa: no way to tell, I had it running using nohup but nothing showed at all
3112015-10-15T21:50:12 <gmaxwell> sipa: it's crashing with ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk: Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize(): size too large at CBlockDiskPos(nFile=356, nPos=43062353)
3122015-10-15T21:50:18 <dcousens> Running it now in tmux so I shouldn't miss anything if it happens again
3132015-10-15T21:50:39 <sipa> dcousens: did it crash with that error message?
3142015-10-15T21:50:39 <gmaxwell> (that was from someone else, but it sounded like dcousens got the same thing)
3152015-10-15T21:50:58 <dcousens> gmaxwell: I feel like my comment in that thread might be misplaced, I hadn't read the thread, only that my situation directly correlated
3162015-10-15T21:51:07 <gmaxwell> dcousens: how did it correlate?
3172015-10-15T21:51:22 <dcousens> gmaxwell: node went down after a get version, however I had no error message show
3182015-10-15T21:51:26 <gmaxwell> just timing and you were on aws?
3192015-10-15T21:51:30 <dcousens> correct
3202015-10-15T21:51:34 <gmaxwell> okay, if you didn't get that error its almost certantly a different issue.
3212015-10-15T21:51:45 <dcousens> will amend comment
3222015-10-15T21:51:54 <gmaxwell> at least make it clear you didn't get that error.
3232015-10-15T21:52:55 <dcousens> gmaxwell: I wonder if rromanchuk received that error
3242015-10-15T21:53:03 <dcousens> His comment seemed to indicate he didn't IMHO
3252015-10-15T21:54:18 <dcousens> sipa: is OOM handled gracefully or would we expect the process to just end with no message?
3262015-10-15T21:55:16 <sipa> dcousens: you'd expect to die with a std::bad_alloc exception
3272015-10-15T21:55:35 <dcousens> sipa: right, nothing of that sort. Will keep closer tabs on it
3282015-10-15T21:57:00 <gmaxwell> well the exception wouldn't go into the logs, so you might not have seen it depending on how it was running.
3292015-10-15T21:57:15 <dcousens> gmaxwell: indeed
3302015-10-15T21:57:47 <jcorgan> Luke-Jr: your travis-ci emailed me about your #192
3312015-10-15T21:58:19 <Luke-Jr> jcorgan: ?
3322015-10-15T21:59:11 <jcorgan> yep, just got an email
3332015-10-15T21:59:45 <jcorgan> i guess about your branch zeromq-0.11.x
3342015-10-15T21:59:56 <jcorgan> so thoughtful of them
3352015-10-15T22:00:08 <Luke-Jr> eh?
3362015-10-15T22:00:16 <Luke-Jr> I'm lost
3372015-10-15T22:04:29 <Luke-Jr> jcorgan: no idea why it emailed you
3382015-10-15T22:05:01 <jcorgan> no worries
3392015-10-15T22:06:12 <Luke-Jr> note the error is just Travis's bug
3402015-10-15T22:09:39 *** equil__ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3412015-10-15T22:10:04 *** treehug88 has quit IRC
3422015-10-15T22:23:26 <dcousens> gmaxwell: them pesky rpi nodes and their SD cards :P
3432015-10-15T22:24:20 <gmaxwell> gah he still didn't answer my question!
3442015-10-15T22:24:30 <gmaxwell> Lightningbolt Lightningbolt Lightningbolt
3452015-10-15T22:24:44 <michagogo> very very frightning, ME!
3462015-10-15T22:24:56 <michagogo> frightening*
3472015-10-15T22:26:47 *** Luke-Jr has quit IRC
3482015-10-15T22:32:44 *** Luke-Jr has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3492015-10-15T23:15:41 *** equil__ has quit IRC
3502015-10-15T23:15:57 *** equil__ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3512015-10-15T23:16:07 *** equil__ is now known as equil_
3522015-10-15T23:16:27 *** equil_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3532015-10-15T23:31:27 *** lightningbot has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3542015-10-15T23:32:19 *** molly has quit IRC
3552015-10-15T23:32:19 *** d_t has quit IRC
3562015-10-15T23:32:20 *** btcdrak has quit IRC
3572015-10-15T23:32:26 *** btcdrak_ is now known as btcdrak
3582015-10-15T23:34:20 *** fkhan has quit IRC
3592015-10-15T23:34:50 *** maaku has quit IRC
3602015-10-15T23:34:50 *** Guest4879 has quit IRC
3612015-10-15T23:55:55 *** Guest52664 has quit IRC
3622015-10-15T23:55:57 *** Jaamg has quit IRC
3632015-10-15T23:56:00 *** instagibbs has quit IRC
3642015-10-15T23:56:02 *** crescendo has quit IRC
3652015-10-15T23:56:03 *** PaulCapestany has quit IRC
3662015-10-15T23:56:06 *** kanzure has quit IRC
3672015-10-15T23:56:07 *** harding has quit IRC
3682015-10-15T23:56:08 *** go1111111 has quit IRC
3692015-10-15T23:56:09 *** Apocalyptic has quit IRC
3702015-10-15T23:56:12 *** warren has quit IRC
3712015-10-15T23:56:12 *** btcdrak has quit IRC
3722015-10-15T23:56:14 *** Naphex has quit IRC
3732015-10-15T23:56:15 *** BananaLotus has quit IRC
3742015-10-15T23:56:15 *** guruvan has quit IRC
3752015-10-15T23:56:15 *** nanotube has quit IRC
3762015-10-15T23:56:16 *** teward has quit IRC
3772015-10-15T23:56:16 *** Anduck has quit IRC
3782015-10-15T23:56:17 *** neha has quit IRC
3792015-10-15T23:56:18 *** [b__b] has quit IRC
3802015-10-15T23:56:19 *** Arnavion has quit IRC
3812015-10-15T23:56:19 *** d_t_ has quit IRC
3822015-10-15T23:56:20 *** malte has quit IRC
3832015-10-15T23:56:26 *** moli has quit IRC
3842015-10-15T23:56:26 *** Luke-Jr has quit IRC
3852015-10-15T23:56:26 *** dcousens has quit IRC
3862015-10-15T23:56:27 *** jonasschnelli has quit IRC
3872015-10-15T23:56:27 *** PRab has quit IRC
3882015-10-15T23:56:27 *** AtashiCon has quit IRC
3892015-10-15T23:56:27 *** baldur has quit IRC
3902015-10-15T23:56:28 *** phantomcircuit has quit IRC
3912015-10-15T23:56:28 *** GAit has quit IRC
3922015-10-15T23:56:29 *** dhill has quit IRC
3932015-10-15T23:56:30 *** BlueMatt has quit IRC
3942015-10-15T23:56:31 *** helo has quit IRC
3952015-10-15T23:56:31 *** aj has quit IRC
3962015-10-15T23:56:31 *** berndj has quit IRC
3972015-10-15T23:56:31 *** ProfMac has quit IRC
3982015-10-15T23:56:32 *** gmaxwell has quit IRC
3992015-10-15T23:56:33 *** cfields has quit IRC
4002015-10-15T23:56:33 *** gavinandresen has quit IRC
4012015-10-15T23:56:34 *** sipa_ has quit IRC
4022015-10-15T23:56:34 *** equil_ has quit IRC
4032015-10-15T23:56:35 *** ParadoxSpiral has quit IRC
4042015-10-15T23:56:35 *** alpalp has quit IRC
4052015-10-15T23:56:35 *** jcorgan has quit IRC
4062015-10-15T23:56:36 *** sdaftuar has quit IRC
4072015-10-15T23:56:36 *** isis has quit IRC
4082015-10-15T23:56:37 *** michagogo has quit IRC
4092015-10-15T23:56:41 *** mm_1 has quit IRC
4102015-10-15T23:56:43 *** devrando1 has quit IRC
4112015-10-15T23:56:45 *** pigeons has quit IRC
4122015-10-15T23:56:46 *** ghtdak has quit IRC
4132015-10-15T23:56:46 *** gribble has quit IRC
4142015-10-15T23:56:47 *** zxzzt_ has quit IRC
4152015-10-15T23:56:47 *** paveljanik has quit IRC
4162015-10-15T23:56:47 *** CodeShark has quit IRC
4172015-10-15T23:56:48 *** dgenr8 has quit IRC
4182015-10-15T23:56:50 *** Guest1235 has quit IRC
4192015-10-15T23:56:50 *** andytoshi has quit IRC
4202015-10-15T23:56:52 *** jl2012 has quit IRC
4212015-10-15T23:56:52 *** da2ce7 has quit IRC
4222015-10-15T23:56:53 *** morcos has quit IRC
4232015-10-15T23:56:56 *** amiller has quit IRC
4242015-10-15T23:56:57 *** tripleslash has quit IRC
4252015-10-15T23:56:59 *** belcher has quit IRC
4262015-10-15T23:56:59 *** Ylbam has quit IRC
4272015-10-15T23:56:59 *** goregrind has quit IRC
4282015-10-15T23:56:59 *** wumpus has quit IRC