12015-12-09T00:18:49 *** MarcoFalke has quit IRC
22015-12-09T00:21:42 *** luke-jr_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
32015-12-09T00:22:39 *** Luke-Jr has quit IRC
42015-12-09T00:22:39 *** sdaftuar has quit IRC
52015-12-09T00:23:11 *** sdaftuar has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
62015-12-09T00:23:53 *** kanzure has quit IRC
72015-12-09T00:24:04 *** kanzure has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
82015-12-09T00:29:14 *** zookolaptop has quit IRC
92015-12-09T00:30:26 *** Tera2342 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
102015-12-09T00:45:22 *** jtimon has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
112015-12-09T01:06:08 *** Ylbam has quit IRC
122015-12-09T01:52:26 *** jtimon has quit IRC
132015-12-09T01:55:46 *** evoskuil has quit IRC
142015-12-09T02:26:15 *** PRab has quit IRC
152015-12-09T02:27:33 *** xiangfu has quit IRC
162015-12-09T02:30:03 *** PRab has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
172015-12-09T02:37:36 *** jtimon has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
182015-12-09T02:42:40 *** evoskuil has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
192015-12-09T02:43:45 *** dcousens has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
202015-12-09T03:14:17 *** tripleslash_s is now known as tripleslash
212015-12-09T03:24:49 *** belcher has quit IRC
222015-12-09T03:33:46 *** evoskuil has quit IRC
232015-12-09T03:46:59 *** NLNico has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
242015-12-09T03:52:58 *** phantomcircuit is now known as phantiomcircuit
252015-12-09T03:53:09 *** phantiomcircuit is now known as phantomcircuit
262015-12-09T04:09:45 *** luke-jr_ is now known as Luke-Jr
272015-12-09T04:10:58 *** Squidicuz has quit IRC
282015-12-09T04:14:33 *** evoskuil has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
292015-12-09T04:16:35 *** jtimon has quit IRC
302015-12-09T04:17:54 *** evoskuil has quit IRC
312015-12-09T04:25:13 *** Thireus has quit IRC
322015-12-09T04:25:27 *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
332015-12-09T04:25:58 *** Thireus has quit IRC
342015-12-09T04:31:26 *** randy-waterhouse has quit IRC
352015-12-09T04:32:20 *** randy-waterhouse has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
362015-12-09T04:46:30 *** btcdrak has quit IRC
372015-12-09T04:55:52 *** Tera2342 has quit IRC
382015-12-09T04:58:40 *** Tera2342 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
392015-12-09T05:00:08 *** dermoth has quit IRC
402015-12-09T05:00:47 *** dermoth has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
412015-12-09T05:03:34 *** randy-waterhouse has quit IRC
422015-12-09T05:09:56 *** Tera2342 has quit IRC
432015-12-09T05:15:27 *** berndj has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
442015-12-09T05:23:05 *** jtimon has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
452015-12-09T05:38:10 *** Tera2342 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
462015-12-09T05:39:21 *** zookolaptop has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
472015-12-09T05:45:16 *** zookolaptop has quit IRC
482015-12-09T06:00:54 *** dermoth has quit IRC
492015-12-09T06:01:15 *** dermoth has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
502015-12-09T06:15:42 *** zookolaptop has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
512015-12-09T06:20:44 *** JackH has quit IRC
522015-12-09T06:30:58 *** JackH has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
532015-12-09T06:31:03 <jonasschnelli_> phantomcircuit: thanks for reporting. Will have a look.
542015-12-09T06:32:02 *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
552015-12-09T06:50:32 *** davec has quit IRC
562015-12-09T06:51:34 *** davec has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
572015-12-09T07:02:55 *** btcdrak has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
582015-12-09T07:13:33 *** Ylbam has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
592015-12-09T07:18:52 <GitHub114> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli closed pull request #7188: Update sha512.cpp (master...patch-1) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7188
602015-12-09T07:30:42 <cfields> wumpus: ping. around? we're hanging out around a conference table in hk. anything that may be helpful to discuss?
612015-12-09T07:39:19 *** Thireus has quit IRC
622015-12-09T07:42:47 <wumpus> dunno
632015-12-09T07:44:36 <cfields> ok, no worries
642015-12-09T07:53:19 <wumpus> for 0.13 I think we should look into deprecating the external comparison tool, as we have a similar framework in-tree now (thanks to sdaftuar), which is easier to update along with code changes. But it's not clear to me what tests still have to be transferred to the new framework.
652015-12-09T07:53:22 <GitHub154> [bitcoin] NicolasDorier opened pull request #7190: Performance fix for #6312 (master...sequencenumbers) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7190
662015-12-09T07:54:30 *** larrysalibra has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
672015-12-09T07:57:37 *** berndj-blackout has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
682015-12-09T07:58:33 <wumpus> gmaxwell: the ping-interferes-with-transaction-relay issue should definitely be solved, we want #7125 for 0.12 then
692015-12-09T08:04:51 <gmaxwell> wumpus: I think so.
702015-12-09T08:05:37 <gmaxwell> when we were in the merge flurry for 0.12 pieter asked me privately if that attack was widely going on and I said I didn't know; but since this was logically a bugfix we didn't need to rush at that moment.
712015-12-09T08:09:49 *** zookolaptop has quit IRC
722015-12-09T08:10:05 *** zookolap` has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
732015-12-09T08:10:44 *** larrysalibra has quit IRC
742015-12-09T08:14:35 *** zookolap` is now known as zooko
752015-12-09T08:21:41 <dcousens> out of interest, why do we have compat/endian ?
762015-12-09T08:21:44 <dcousens> Isn't that in most stdlibs?
772015-12-09T08:22:58 <dcousens> ah, its Linux only aye
782015-12-09T08:23:26 <dcousens> nvm
792015-12-09T08:25:54 *** paveljanik has quit IRC
802015-12-09T08:26:45 <wumpus> dcousens: the reason we have most compat stuff is for non-POSIX OSes
812015-12-09T08:27:07 <wumpus> (which in practice amounts to "just windows" these days, all others at least put up a veneer of POSIXism)
822015-12-09T08:27:29 <dcousens> those bastards, lol, yeah no worries, jsut wanted to quickly compile something and realised I had to put include "config/bitcoin-config.h" in a bunch of files just to stop it exploding
832015-12-09T08:29:43 <wumpus> gmaxwell: yes actually seeing the attack changes things, makes me wonder what other sneaky things are going on, adding these kind of traffic statistics to the P2P layer has turned out very useful
842015-12-09T08:30:14 <gmaxwell> I've observed it before; just from logging all network traffic. "I see the matrix" ... but the stats are helpful.
852015-12-09T08:33:09 <wumpus> yes that can certainly be useful, I had a set of hacks to just log traffic from certain suspicious nodes for a while, though it's also easy to miss the forest for the trees when looking at detailed logging output
862015-12-09T08:47:35 *** NLNico has quit IRC
872015-12-09T09:04:36 *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
882015-12-09T09:07:25 *** Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
892015-12-09T09:07:48 *** Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
902015-12-09T09:07:56 *** Tera2342 has quit IRC
912015-12-09T09:09:19 *** Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
922015-12-09T09:09:45 *** Guyver2 has quit IRC
932015-12-09T09:09:56 *** Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
942015-12-09T09:19:47 *** larrysalibra has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
952015-12-09T09:22:34 <Luke-Jr> wumpus: speaking of the external comparison tool, I can't get it to pass on 0.11 :/
962015-12-09T09:38:18 <jonasschnelli_> Heh: lol: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/7191
972015-12-09T09:43:38 <gmaxwell> jonasschnelli_: whats going on there?
982015-12-09T09:44:59 <phantomcircuit> gmaxwell, there's something weird, the guys reporting paying 1 satoshi/byte
992015-12-09T09:45:05 <phantomcircuit> which afaik is basically impossible with core
1002015-12-09T09:46:37 <Luke-Jr> phantomcircuit: Core will send fee-less in some cases
1012015-12-09T09:46:49 <Luke-Jr> the dust should be impossible though
1022015-12-09T09:47:36 <Luke-Jr> Nucleul Bitcoin is our name in Romanian?
1032015-12-09T09:48:30 <phantomcircuit> Luke-Jr, yes no fee i understand, tiny fees though?
1042015-12-09T09:48:31 <gmaxwell> dust limit is slaved to relay fee, turn relay fee down and ...
1052015-12-09T09:48:47 <Luke-Jr> oooh that might be it
1062015-12-09T09:48:48 <gmaxwell> tiny can happen just for change avoidance too.
1072015-12-09T09:48:58 <Luke-Jr> bet someone told him to add a bitcoin.conf option or something
1082015-12-09T09:49:00 <GitHub113> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/0800092fc252...00b4b8d1c47a
1092015-12-09T09:49:01 <GitHub113> bitcoin/master a3c3ddb Jonas Schnelli: [Qt] add InMempool() info to transaction details
1102015-12-09T09:49:01 <GitHub113> bitcoin/master 00b4b8d Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge pull request #7154...
1112015-12-09T09:49:05 <GitHub51> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #7154: [Qt] add InMempool() info to transaction details (master...2015/12/qt_conflicts) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7154
1122015-12-09T09:49:20 <gmaxwell> Luke-Jr: there have been webpages that do that... :(
1132015-12-09T09:49:39 <gmaxwell> we should probably log the relevant settings in the wallet.
1142015-12-09T09:58:11 *** zooko is now known as zooko_on_phoner
1152015-12-09T10:14:03 *** zooko_on` has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1162015-12-09T10:14:04 *** zooko_on_phoner has quit IRC
1172015-12-09T10:15:08 *** zooko_on` is now known as zooko
1182015-12-09T10:20:10 *** MazrimTaim has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1192015-12-09T10:21:06 *** jtimon has quit IRC
1202015-12-09T10:21:25 *** zooko is now known as zookolaptop
1212015-12-09T10:24:02 *** larrysalibra has quit IRC
1222015-12-09T10:25:18 <jonasschnelli_> Maybe my lol was inappropriate (I thought he is using a different wallet (Nucleul Bitcoin versiunea v0.11.0 (32-bit)), but looks like core. Could be that the user really face an issue/bug.
1232015-12-09T10:37:53 <phantomcircuit> jonasschnelli_, it seems likely that he adjusted the relay fee
1242015-12-09T10:37:56 *** MarcoFalke has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1252015-12-09T10:38:12 <phantomcircuit> and he's basically screwed without RBF
1262015-12-09T10:41:08 <wumpus> jonasschnelli_: hehe in Dutch it's called "Bitcoin Kern"
1272015-12-09T10:41:20 <MarcoFalke> Should I encourage to double spen?
1282015-12-09T10:41:25 <jonasschnelli_> phantomcircuit: zapwallettxes is probably his best friend now
1292015-12-09T10:41:33 <wumpus> which has the same meaning as 'Nucleul'
1302015-12-09T10:41:46 <jonasschnelli_> Why do we translate "core"... Hah
1312015-12-09T10:42:08 <wumpus> zapwallettxes would be the first step
1322015-12-09T10:42:19 <jonasschnelli_> nucleul sounded after a reasonable Bitcoin wallet name...:-)
1332015-12-09T10:42:23 <wumpus> then if possible spend one of the inputs to yourself
1342015-12-09T10:42:32 <MarcoFalke> An update to 0.11.2 should be sufficient
1352015-12-09T10:42:38 <wumpus> (to make sure it doesn't go through at some point in the future)
1362015-12-09T10:43:30 * jonasschnelli_ needs to check the GUI state when smartfees are not available because of not enough blocks
1372015-12-09T10:43:45 <MarcoFalke> command line is a pain in windows, not sure if the user wants to go through this
1382015-12-09T10:43:53 <MarcoFalke> an update can hurt anyway
1392015-12-09T10:44:03 <phantomcircuit> wumpus, it's probably not safe to tell him to do that...
1402015-12-09T10:44:05 <wumpus> would be great to have a RPC to nuke a single transaction from the wallet
1412015-12-09T10:44:15 <jonasschnelli_> wumpus: agree
1422015-12-09T10:44:27 <wumpus> instead of this zapwallettx which, admittedly, is kind of scary
1432015-12-09T10:44:30 <phantomcircuit> it's what the software should do but is unlikely something he can do manually
1442015-12-09T10:44:35 <jonasschnelli_> archivetransaction
1452015-12-09T10:44:38 <wumpus> MarcoFalke: upgrade can't hurt.
1462015-12-09T10:44:41 <MarcoFalke> *can't
1472015-12-09T10:44:43 <MarcoFalke> right
1482015-12-09T10:46:26 *** zookolaptop has quit IRC
1492015-12-09T10:47:52 <wumpus> jonasschnelli_: yeah, possibly, translating the name of the software is not a good idea. Then again, it's what has already happened, suddenly reverting it would be even more confusing to foreign users
1502015-12-09T10:56:41 <Luke-Jr> let's rename to Nucleul Bitcoin in all languages. it sounds nicer.
1512015-12-09T11:15:33 *** Tera2342 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1522015-12-09T11:38:40 <wumpus> it does :)
1532015-12-09T11:50:47 <GitHub35> [bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #7192: Unify product name to as few places as possible without major changes (master...single_prodname) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7192
1542015-12-09T12:20:26 *** tripleslash has quit IRC
1552015-12-09T12:20:43 *** tripleslash has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1562015-12-09T12:24:17 *** larrysalibra has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1572015-12-09T12:36:46 *** larrysalibra has quit IRC
1582015-12-09T13:03:56 <GitHub177> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #7193: [wallet] Cleanup tests (master...MarcoFalke-2015-WalletTests) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7193
1592015-12-09T13:15:37 <jonasschnelli_> <Luke-Jr> [11:56:41] let's rename to Nucleul Bitcoin in all languages. it sounds nicer.: <-- haha
1602015-12-09T13:16:00 <MarcoFalke> +1 ;)
1612015-12-09T14:24:04 *** berndj has quit IRC
1622015-12-09T14:28:38 *** berndj-blackout is now known as berndj
1632015-12-09T14:46:17 *** jonasschnelli_ has quit IRC
1642015-12-09T14:46:25 *** jonasschnelli has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1652015-12-09T14:46:26 *** jonasschnelli has quit IRC
1662015-12-09T14:47:01 *** jonasschnelli has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1672015-12-09T15:03:52 *** Tera2342 has quit IRC
1682015-12-09T15:04:43 *** Tera2342 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1692015-12-09T15:18:56 <phantomcircuit> wumpus, it's potentially more confusing in the short term, but long term it's got to be more confusing to have different names
1702015-12-09T15:20:41 *** ParadoxSpiral has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1712015-12-09T15:20:45 *** zookolaptop has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1722015-12-09T15:24:30 *** jamesob has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1732015-12-09T15:26:11 *** gijensen has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1742015-12-09T15:31:38 *** Tera2342 has quit IRC
1752015-12-09T15:33:06 *** PaulCapestany has quit IRC
1762015-12-09T15:33:21 *** Squidicuz has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1772015-12-09T15:41:15 *** PaulCapestany has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1782015-12-09T15:56:10 *** zookolaptop has quit IRC
1792015-12-09T16:10:11 *** tripleslash_i has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1802015-12-09T16:10:23 *** Thireus has quit IRC
1812015-12-09T16:10:59 *** tripleslash has quit IRC
1822015-12-09T16:15:38 *** CodeShark_ is now known as CodeShark
1832015-12-09T16:19:58 <morcos> wumpus: close your ears
1842015-12-09T16:20:14 <morcos> so i think there was a slight regression in 6898 that i hadn't quite thought about
1852015-12-09T16:20:44 <morcos> i was under the assumption that there had to be a bug in the code for an invalid block to be assembled (but still fail TBV)
1862015-12-09T16:21:13 <morcos> however, if someone runs with policy that is looser than a soft fork that is about to activate, and then that soft fork activates
1872015-12-09T16:21:50 <morcos> we're not checking those txs against what is now the new consensus rules in assembly
1882015-12-09T16:25:31 <morcos> ok, so i take that back, its not a regression, but its still a problem
1892015-12-09T16:26:11 <morcos> the old code is also unaware of soft forks that have activated when assembling a block
1902015-12-09T16:26:15 <morcos> maybe this is a known problem
1912015-12-09T16:27:18 <morcos> but means if you're running with policy looser than activated or soon to be activated soft forks, you will assemble blocks which would fail those soft forks. this would be caught in TestBlockValidity
1922015-12-09T16:27:52 <morcos> maybe i need to go look at the versionbits implementation
1932015-12-09T16:28:04 <morcos> seems like there has to be a better way to do this
1942015-12-09T16:35:31 *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1952015-12-09T16:35:56 <morcos> CodeShark: ping?
1962015-12-09T16:36:16 <CodeShark> Hey, morcos
1972015-12-09T16:36:21 <CodeShark> What's up?
1982015-12-09T16:36:25 <morcos> I want to versionbits do I look at just 6816 or all 3 pulls?
1992015-12-09T16:36:32 <morcos> to review that is
2002015-12-09T16:39:20 <CodeShark> are you referring to 6774 and 6747?
2012015-12-09T16:39:29 <morcos> ha, thats what i'm asking
2022015-12-09T16:39:49 <morcos> i saw you have 3 PR's open, i see now 6747 builds on 6774
2032015-12-09T16:40:06 <morcos> how does 6816 fit in with 6747?
2042015-12-09T16:40:14 <morcos> where is review wanted?
2052015-12-09T16:40:31 <CodeShark> 6816
2062015-12-09T16:40:33 <morcos> also i want to understand the implementation to think about the changes i'm making to BIP 68 implementation
2072015-12-09T16:43:00 <CodeShark> what are you changing?
2082015-12-09T16:43:56 <morcos> In BIP 68 I'm proposing to change the implementation to break out sequence checks from locktime checks (see 7184). Also changing the semantics to use MTP always for sequence checks.
2092015-12-09T16:44:43 <morcos> Just up in the history, I'm worried about maintaining mempool consistency after a soft fork activates. Motivated by the way I'm implementing BIP 68, but a concern for any soft fork
2102015-12-09T16:46:25 <CodeShark> I'll take a look at 7184
2112015-12-09T16:47:38 <morcos> sure, thx, mostly i just wanted to know what to look at to review versionbits to think about the problem i discuss in the scrollback. mostly independent from 7184, just motivated by it.
2122015-12-09T16:53:07 *** MazrimTaim has quit IRC
2132015-12-09T17:06:42 <GitHub111> [bitcoin] jamesob opened pull request #7194: [tests] Add RPC tests for getblockheader (master...test_getblockheader) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7194
2142015-12-09T17:07:22 <jamesob> 'sup, sdaftuar? :)
2152015-12-09T17:25:38 *** larrysalibra has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2162015-12-09T17:38:52 *** larrysalibra has quit IRC
2172015-12-09T17:48:48 *** MarcoFalke has quit IRC
2182015-12-09T17:57:51 *** Guyver2 has quit IRC
2192015-12-09T17:59:20 <sdaftuar> hi!
2202015-12-09T18:26:42 *** Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2212015-12-09T18:33:16 *** teddy_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2222015-12-09T18:58:06 *** dcousens has quit IRC
2232015-12-09T19:51:17 *** teddy_ has quit IRC
2242015-12-09T19:59:33 *** raedah has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2252015-12-09T19:59:38 *** jamesob has quit IRC
2262015-12-09T20:14:45 *** raedah has quit IRC
2272015-12-09T20:15:15 *** raedah has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2282015-12-09T20:24:08 *** jamesob has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2292015-12-09T20:27:34 <morcos> CodeShark: It looks to me from reading the code that a bit can't be used again until the expire time even if the soft fork activated. But I thought from BIP and discussion that it could be used after the activation delay.
2302015-12-09T20:29:25 *** jamesob has quit IRC
2312015-12-09T20:45:05 *** raedah has quit IRC
2322015-12-09T20:46:06 *** raedah has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2332015-12-09T21:02:32 *** tripleslash_i is now known as tripleslash
2342015-12-09T21:12:46 *** JackH has quit IRC
2352015-12-09T21:14:04 *** raedah has quit IRC
2362015-12-09T21:21:34 *** raedah has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2372015-12-09T21:23:49 *** d_t has quit IRC
2382015-12-09T21:44:18 *** challisto has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2392015-12-09T21:44:18 *** challisto has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2402015-12-09T21:47:46 *** go1111111 has quit IRC
2412015-12-09T21:53:15 *** randy-waterhouse has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2422015-12-09T21:59:12 *** go1111111 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2432015-12-09T22:13:23 *** JackH has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2442015-12-09T22:35:25 *** Guyver2 has quit IRC
2452015-12-09T22:36:38 *** job_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2462015-12-09T22:41:08 *** Ylbam has quit IRC
2472015-12-09T22:41:09 *** instagibbs2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2482015-12-09T22:43:00 *** instagibbs2 has quit IRC
2492015-12-09T22:52:32 *** ParadoxSpiral has quit IRC
2502015-12-09T23:10:18 *** tripleslash_a has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2512015-12-09T23:10:26 *** tripleslash has quit IRC
2522015-12-09T23:31:28 <GitHub53> [bitcoin] awelch83 opened pull request #7196: Doxygen (master...doxygen-a) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7196
2532015-12-09T23:32:11 *** Arnavion has quit IRC
2542015-12-09T23:33:32 *** Arnavion has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2552015-12-09T23:36:24 *** BashCo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2562015-12-09T23:41:36 *** Ylbam has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2572015-12-09T23:46:33 *** jcorgan is now known as jcorgan|away