12017-01-31T00:21:51 *** justanotheruser has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
22017-01-31T00:31:40 *** NicolasDorier has quit IRC
32017-01-31T00:32:01 *** NicolasDorier has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
42017-01-31T00:40:24 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jtimon opened pull request #9654: Add jtimon pgp keys for commit sigs and future gitian builds (master...jtimon-key-gpg) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9654
52017-01-31T00:47:40 *** dstadulis has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
62017-01-31T00:57:47 *** abpa has quit IRC
72017-01-31T01:37:31 *** Ylbam has quit IRC
82017-01-31T02:05:27 *** justan0theruser has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
92017-01-31T02:08:10 *** justanotheruser has quit IRC
102017-01-31T02:54:40 *** dermoth_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
112017-01-31T02:55:08 *** dermoth has quit IRC
122017-01-31T02:55:10 *** dermoth_ is now known as dermoth
132017-01-31T03:17:08 *** dstadulis has quit IRC
142017-01-31T03:42:36 *** MarcoFalke has quit IRC
152017-01-31T04:46:51 *** CubicEarth has quit IRC
162017-01-31T04:50:54 *** waxwing has quit IRC
172017-01-31T04:55:19 *** chris2000 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
182017-01-31T04:58:08 *** chris200_ has quit IRC
192017-01-31T05:35:01 *** CubicEarth has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
202017-01-31T05:45:04 *** CubicEarth has quit IRC
212017-01-31T05:48:12 *** CubicEarth has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
222017-01-31T05:55:09 *** CubicEarth has quit IRC
232017-01-31T06:03:48 *** guest23190302109 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
242017-01-31T06:04:26 *** guest23190302109 has left #bitcoin-core-dev
252017-01-31T06:15:25 *** Ylbam has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
262017-01-31T06:33:17 <luke-jr> what would others think of a feature where you can sign a message using the UTXO set to show you probably run a full node?
272017-01-31T06:46:24 *** jtimon has quit IRC
282017-01-31T06:56:35 <jl2012> you could outsource this, I suppose
292017-01-31T06:57:07 *** jouke has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
302017-01-31T07:00:29 *** CubicEarth has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
312017-01-31T07:12:38 *** lclc has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
322017-01-31T07:13:20 <sipa> if you do it as a challenge-response, and require a response within not-much-more-than-ping-time, you'd at least prove you're close to a full node
332017-01-31T07:15:58 <luke-jr> jl2012: yes, it won't be 100% reliable, but it might be handy
342017-01-31T07:16:23 <luke-jr> sipa: that sounds much more complicated (can't really integrate with a browser) :/
352017-01-31T07:16:51 <luke-jr> it would also exclude those who have remote full nodes under their own control
362017-01-31T07:17:05 <luke-jr> depending on implementation I guess
372017-01-31T07:17:37 <luke-jr> I suppose the node can contact the webpage directly, but that seems like not the best idea for security
382017-01-31T07:21:57 <sipa> webpage?
392017-01-31T07:22:34 <sipa> maybe you have a very different use case in mind than me
402017-01-31T07:31:05 *** cjamthagen has quit IRC
412017-01-31T07:45:47 *** cjamthagen has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
422017-01-31T08:01:18 <luke-jr> sipa: I was thinking for polling users
432017-01-31T08:07:23 <TD-Linux> that makes no sense if you're trying to make 1 vote per user
442017-01-31T08:37:50 *** Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
452017-01-31T08:40:45 <CubicEarth> luke-jr: you are interested in poll results, 1 vote per-full node?
462017-01-31T08:41:05 <luke-jr> CubicEarth: that's up to the polling website to figure out weights
472017-01-31T08:41:40 <luke-jr> eg, one might use a combination of full-node-signature plus coin-control-signature to weigh by coins controlled
482017-01-31T08:42:40 <CubicEarth> luke-jr: Nice! Anything with coin-weights is near and dear to my heart
492017-01-31T08:44:58 <CubicEarth> luke-jr: any what are you trying to limit by wanting the full-node signature in addition to coin control proof?
502017-01-31T08:46:06 <luke-jr> gauging interest and possible consent in protocol change ideas
512017-01-31T08:47:12 <CubicEarth> I guessed that part.... but my question stands
522017-01-31T08:50:20 *** echonaut3 has quit IRC
532017-01-31T08:50:37 *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
542017-01-31T08:53:55 <CubicEarth> I could see the benefit in giving coins more weight if someone can prove a node as well, but I can't see a point to giving the same amount of coins more weight if two nodes were proved
552017-01-31T08:57:37 <luke-jr> I'm not even sure what you're asking about there
562017-01-31T08:59:05 <CubicEarth> If you are interested in proof-of-full-node as a voting concept, and if so, curious as to why sybil wouldn't be an issue
572017-01-31T09:00:01 <CubicEarth> So, that's why I said I could see it being binary: do the coins that are voting also have a node.... that wouldn't have sybil issues
582017-01-31T09:00:40 <CubicEarth> maybe I missed something about the discussion
592017-01-31T09:02:58 *** aguycalled has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
602017-01-31T09:03:13 *** aguycalled has quit IRC
612017-01-31T09:17:11 *** jannes has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
622017-01-31T09:20:08 *** Guyver2 has quit IRC
632017-01-31T09:23:56 *** paveljanik has quit IRC
642017-01-31T09:26:42 *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
652017-01-31T09:26:43 *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
662017-01-31T10:43:23 *** lclc has quit IRC
672017-01-31T11:01:41 *** aguycalled has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
682017-01-31T11:05:01 *** aguycalled has quit IRC
692017-01-31T11:35:54 *** MarcoFalke has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
702017-01-31T11:51:41 *** MarcoFalke has quit IRC
712017-01-31T12:27:35 *** lclc has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
722017-01-31T12:47:06 <jl2012> luke-jr: wouldn't it be very cheap to run one full node, and pretend to be 100 using 100 ip addresses?
732017-01-31T13:18:55 <jl2012> if proof of full node is remotely possible, we don't need pow
742017-01-31T13:20:13 <jl2012> finally, people will just invest on resources (e.g. ip addresses), that do not have anything to do with the security of bitcoin
752017-01-31T13:24:37 <CubicEarth> I could see a small use case: If someone has a bunch of coins they want to vote with, they could also need to prove they have a full node. There would be no limit to the coins that one node could enable to vote.
762017-01-31T13:24:47 <CubicEarth> What would that show?
772017-01-31T13:25:05 <CubicEarth> That someone who wanted to vote was able to create a full node
782017-01-31T13:25:28 <CubicEarth> I don't know if that would be important to anyone....
792017-01-31T13:30:28 *** chjj has quit IRC
802017-01-31T14:00:02 *** BCBot has quit IRC
812017-01-31T14:00:26 *** BCBot has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
822017-01-31T14:04:55 <gmaxwell> sipa: no you don't, I can artifically increase my ping time.
832017-01-31T14:15:13 *** groot has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
842017-01-31T14:25:25 <Eliel_> jl2012: isn't it reasonably easy to construct a challenge you can use to verify a full node? There have been ideas for mining algorithms that'd make mining impossible if you don't have the full blockchain available.
852017-01-31T14:26:21 <Eliel_> although, the only way to verify that two different looking nodes aren't the same one would be to challenge them both at the same time.
862017-01-31T14:26:23 <jl2012> yes, but luke-jr is suggesting a voting system based on that
872017-01-31T14:26:51 <jl2012> and that's outsourceable
882017-01-31T14:26:55 <Eliel_> I guess I'd better read the backlog
892017-01-31T14:27:18 <jl2012> even for the purpose of mining, that's outsourceable
902017-01-31T14:30:25 <jonasschnelli> If I create a bloom filter (block filter) of all the COutPoints and inputs scriptSigs of a recent block, it will get pretty big,... It often hits around 15'000 elememts, so, roughly 15kb per block = 2.1MB of filters per day... Any idea how to improve that?
912017-01-31T14:46:16 *** rafalcpp has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
922017-01-31T15:15:07 *** Sosumi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
932017-01-31T15:16:02 *** jtimon has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
942017-01-31T15:25:38 <sipa> gmaxwell: sure, but then you have a higher ping time
952017-01-31T15:32:47 *** lclc has quit IRC
962017-01-31T15:38:06 *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
972017-01-31T15:53:52 *** dstadulis has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
982017-01-31T15:54:58 *** groot has quit IRC
992017-01-31T15:55:07 *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1002017-01-31T16:09:50 *** dstadulis has quit IRC
1012017-01-31T16:22:30 *** lclc has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1022017-01-31T16:45:00 *** dstadulis has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1032017-01-31T16:45:46 *** ratoder has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1042017-01-31T16:51:29 *** abpa has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1052017-01-31T16:54:22 *** lclc has quit IRC
1062017-01-31T17:04:33 *** dstadulis has quit IRC
1072017-01-31T17:15:22 *** aguycalled has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1082017-01-31T17:24:17 *** dstadulis has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1092017-01-31T17:38:49 *** aguycalled has quit IRC
1102017-01-31T17:39:26 *** aguycalled has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1112017-01-31T17:44:59 *** paveljanik has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1122017-01-31T17:44:59 *** paveljanik has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1132017-01-31T17:47:30 *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1142017-01-31T17:50:24 *** Giszmo1 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1152017-01-31T17:50:25 *** Giszmo has quit IRC
1162017-01-31T17:51:39 *** Giszmo1 has quit IRC
1172017-01-31T17:51:52 *** aguycalled has quit IRC
1182017-01-31T17:52:27 *** aguycalled has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1192017-01-31T17:57:08 *** aguycalled has quit IRC
1202017-01-31T18:16:24 *** lclc has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1212017-01-31T18:17:49 *** dstadulis has quit IRC
1222017-01-31T18:18:46 *** echonaut has quit IRC
1232017-01-31T18:19:00 *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1242017-01-31T18:31:53 *** reginaldo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1252017-01-31T18:52:33 *** reginaldo has quit IRC
1262017-01-31T18:55:26 *** reginaldo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1272017-01-31T19:06:07 *** reginaldo_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1282017-01-31T19:06:13 *** reginaldo_ has quit IRC
1292017-01-31T19:06:13 *** reginaldo has quit IRC
1302017-01-31T19:06:35 *** reginaldo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1312017-01-31T19:23:46 *** lclc has quit IRC
1322017-01-31T19:32:07 *** jannes has quit IRC
1332017-01-31T19:43:46 *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1342017-01-31T20:10:36 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] practicalswift closed pull request #9581: [pep-8] Prefer "foo is None" to "foo == None". Prefer "foo not in bar" to "not foo in bar". (master...test-for-membership) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9581
1352017-01-31T20:21:26 *** Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1362017-01-31T20:55:59 <BlueMatt> wtf travis
1372017-01-31T20:56:00 <BlueMatt> https://travis-ci.org/TheBlueMatt/bitcoin/jobs/197083388#L5456
1382017-01-31T20:56:06 <BlueMatt> "The command "if [ "$RUN_TESTS" = "true" -a "$TRAVIS_REPO_SLUG" = "TheBlueMatt/bitcoin" -a "$TRAVIS_PULL_REQUEST" = "false" ]; then contrib/verify-commits/verify-commits.sh; fi" exited with 127."
1392017-01-31T20:56:10 <BlueMatt> but it keps turnning......
1402017-01-31T20:56:28 <BlueMatt> oh, it did mark failure, ok
1412017-01-31T20:59:50 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] TheBlueMatt opened pull request #9656: Add Marko's Key to verify-commits and check verify-commits on pushes to master (master...2017-01-fix-verify-commits) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9656
1422017-01-31T21:00:23 *** Sosumi has quit IRC
1432017-01-31T21:00:30 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jnewbery opened pull request #9657: Improve rpc-tests.py (master...improvepytests2) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9657
1442017-01-31T21:07:00 *** aguycalled has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1452017-01-31T21:11:32 *** windsok has quit IRC
1462017-01-31T21:21:36 *** windsok has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1472017-01-31T21:26:30 *** aguycalled has quit IRC
1482017-01-31T21:26:36 *** aguycalled has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1492017-01-31T21:45:40 *** reginaldo has quit IRC
1502017-01-31T22:01:52 *** dermoth_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1512017-01-31T22:02:20 *** dermoth has quit IRC
1522017-01-31T22:02:22 *** dermoth_ is now known as dermoth
1532017-01-31T22:04:31 *** cryptapus_afk has quit IRC
1542017-01-31T22:05:19 *** chjj has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1552017-01-31T22:05:37 *** reginaldo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1562017-01-31T22:10:11 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] isle2983 opened pull request #9658: Add clang_format.py to help automate code style analysis (master...PR-clang-format) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9658
1572017-01-31T22:11:46 *** cryptapus_afk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1582017-01-31T22:11:47 *** cryptapus_afk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1592017-01-31T22:50:09 *** luke-jr has quit IRC
1602017-01-31T22:51:14 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jtimon opened pull request #9659: Net: Turn some methods and params/variables const (master...0.14-net-more-const) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9659
1612017-01-31T22:54:22 *** aguycalled has quit IRC
1622017-01-31T22:59:58 *** cryptapus_afk has quit IRC
1632017-01-31T23:00:20 *** cryptapus_afk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1642017-01-31T23:00:24 *** cryptapus_afk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1652017-01-31T23:11:32 *** reginaldo has quit IRC
1662017-01-31T23:22:42 *** CubicEarth has quit IRC
1672017-01-31T23:27:04 *** aguycalled has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1682017-01-31T23:27:15 <dgenr8> to conduct a poll by coins you can make a hard-forking client with limited ways to "spend" coins to vote (none of which create txes valid on mainnet). has similar drawbacks as bitcoinocracy
1692017-01-31T23:39:49 *** Guyver2 has quit IRC
1702017-01-31T23:51:15 *** CubicEarth has joined #bitcoin-core-dev