12017-05-03T00:03:22  *** owowo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  22017-05-03T00:29:40  *** Dyaheon has quit IRC
  32017-05-03T00:30:20  *** Dyaheon has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  42017-05-03T00:37:57  *** harrymm has quit IRC
  52017-05-03T00:39:20  *** harrymm has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  62017-05-03T00:43:42  *** dermoth has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  72017-05-03T00:44:53  *** Ylbam has quit IRC
  82017-05-03T00:48:01  <Chris_Stewart_5> Has anyone had to deal with using bitcoind as a dependency with travis ci? Is there a way to get them to whitelist it's use in -regtest mode?
  92017-05-03T00:50:32  <sipa> ?
 102017-05-03T00:50:52  <sipa> why would it need a whitelist?
 112017-05-03T00:52:21  <Chris_Stewart_5> It looks like travis-ci bans people that use bitcoin as a dependency in .travis.yml
 122017-05-03T00:52:29  <Chris_Stewart_5> https://travis-ci.org/bitcoin-s/bitcoin-s-rpc-client/requests
 132017-05-03T00:52:40  <Chris_Stewart_5> claiming I am mining
 142017-05-03T00:52:56  <sipa> ah, i see
 152017-05-03T00:53:10  <sipa> perhaps if you built bitcoind inside the VM?
 162017-05-03T00:53:13  <Chris_Stewart_5> and now I am a repeat offender :o. I emailed the travis ci people to hopefully get off of the list
 172017-05-03T00:53:22  <sipa> rather than using it as a dependency
 182017-05-03T00:53:27  <sipa> yeah, contact them to explain first
 192017-05-03T00:53:29  <Chris_Stewart_5> I asked if they could whitelist 'bitcoind -regtest'
 202017-05-03T00:53:43  <Chris_Stewart_5> We will see what the response is :/
 212017-05-03T00:55:01  <sipa> bitcoind doesn't even contain a miner anymore
 222017-05-03T00:55:12  <luke-jr> sipa: they banned us too
 232017-05-03T00:55:31  <luke-jr> had to get whitelisted :/
 242017-05-03T00:55:41  <Chris_Stewart_5> luke-jr: How long ago was that?
 252017-05-03T00:55:52  <luke-jr> not sure, a Looooooong time ago
 262017-05-03T00:57:19  <gmaxwell> great so even we're using a service that bans people for running our software. :(
 272017-05-03T00:58:52  <Chris_Stewart_5> yeah, I didn't even just get banned on that repo, it looks like I am banned on all repos :S
 282017-05-03T01:22:15  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] sipa opened pull request #10322: Use hardware timestamps in RNG seeding (master...rdtsc) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10322
 292017-05-03T01:43:58  <sipa> gmaxwell: std::random_device in libstdc++ from modern G++ uses rdrand when available, so we could just include that into the seeding
 302017-05-03T01:44:28  <sipa> and /dev/urandom otherwise
 312017-05-03T01:44:57  <sipa> ... however, the mingw-64 version just uses a mersenne twister with a constant(!) seed
 322017-05-03T01:49:56  *** molz_ has quit IRC
 332017-05-03T01:57:26  *** NewLiberty has quit IRC
 342017-05-03T01:59:46  *** moli_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 352017-05-03T02:00:07  *** dermoth has quit IRC
 362017-05-03T02:00:09  *** moli_ has quit IRC
 372017-05-03T02:00:37  *** moli_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 382017-05-03T02:01:01  *** dermoth has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 392017-05-03T02:18:00  *** fao2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 402017-05-03T02:21:04  *** fao1 has quit IRC
 412017-05-03T02:21:26  *** arowser has quit IRC
 422017-05-03T02:27:02  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] sipa opened pull request #10323: Update to latest libsecp256k1 master (master...secp_up) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10323
 432017-05-03T02:27:17  *** arowser has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 442017-05-03T02:57:02  *** arowser_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 452017-05-03T02:57:21  *** fao3 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 462017-05-03T02:59:24  *** arowser has quit IRC
 472017-05-03T03:00:05  *** fao2 has quit IRC
 482017-05-03T03:00:22  *** wasi has quit IRC
 492017-05-03T03:00:53  *** wasi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 502017-05-03T03:09:38  *** logsys has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 512017-05-03T03:10:13  *** _anthony_ has quit IRC
 522017-05-03T03:29:55  <sipa> TIL: C++ template parameters can be (uninstantiated) templates themselves
 532017-05-03T03:42:43  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] sipa pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/75171f099e82...431a548faaf5
 542017-05-03T03:42:43  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master db994b2 Pieter Wuille: Simplify DisconnectBlock arguments/return value...
 552017-05-03T03:42:44  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 431a548 Pieter Wuille: Merge #10297: Simplify DisconnectBlock arguments/return value...
 562017-05-03T03:43:02  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] sipa closed pull request #10297: Simplify DisconnectBlock arguments/return value (master...disconnect_enum) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10297
 572017-05-03T03:53:25  *** NewLiberty has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 582017-05-03T04:12:20  *** moli_ has quit IRC
 592017-05-03T04:13:36  *** moli_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 602017-05-03T04:34:34  *** arowser_ has quit IRC
 612017-05-03T04:34:56  *** arowser has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 622017-05-03T05:07:02  *** NewLiberty has quit IRC
 632017-05-03T05:12:13  *** NewLiberty has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 642017-05-03T05:55:40  *** paveljanik has quit IRC
 652017-05-03T06:00:03  *** dermoth has quit IRC
 662017-05-03T06:00:54  *** dermoth has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 672017-05-03T06:11:20  *** logsys has quit IRC
 682017-05-03T06:11:32  *** Ylbam has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 692017-05-03T06:15:54  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/431a548faaf5...d4732f3232c3
 702017-05-03T06:15:54  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master bd1f138 Pieter Wuille: Add getchaintxstats RPC
 712017-05-03T06:15:55  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master d4732f3 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #9733: Add getchaintxstats RPC...
 722017-05-03T06:17:42  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #9733: Add getchaintxstats RPC (master...chaintxstats) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9733
 732017-05-03T06:26:19  *** mryandao has quit IRC
 742017-05-03T06:47:58  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/d4732f3232c3...83073de4bdd8
 752017-05-03T06:47:59  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master b8251f6 John Newbery: [tests] allow zmq test to be run in out-of-tree builds
 762017-05-03T06:47:59  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 83073de Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10307: [tests] allow zmq test to be run in out-of-tree builds...
 772017-05-03T06:48:25  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #10307: [tests] allow zmq test to be run in out-of-tree builds (master...fix_zmq_test_out_of_tree) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10307
 782017-05-03T06:52:14  *** BashCo has quit IRC
 792017-05-03T07:11:53  *** BashCo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 802017-05-03T07:12:05  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/83073de4bdd8...d3dce0eb67e8
 812017-05-03T07:12:05  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 185c7f0 Matt Corallo: Avoid reading the old hd master key during wallet encryption...
 822017-05-03T07:12:06  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master d3dce0e Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10115: Avoid reading the old hd master key during wallet encryption...
 832017-05-03T07:12:25  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #10115: Avoid reading the old hd master key during wallet encryption (master...2017-03-cleanup-sethdmasterkey) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10115
 842017-05-03T07:23:00  *** arowser has quit IRC
 852017-05-03T07:24:09  *** arowser has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 862017-05-03T08:04:58  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] spencerlievens opened pull request #10324: Add OSX keystroke to clear RPCConsole (master...patch-3) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10324
 872017-05-03T08:22:24  *** timothy has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 882017-05-03T08:25:14  *** movrcx has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 892017-05-03T08:37:43  *** RubenSomsen has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 902017-05-03T08:38:32  *** BashCo has quit IRC
 912017-05-03T08:40:23  *** BashCo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 922017-05-03T08:44:17  *** vicenteH has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 932017-05-03T09:04:14  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 3 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/d3dce0eb67e8...2a183de0ecb5
 942017-05-03T09:04:15  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 91c91e1 John Newbery: Control mempool persistence using a command line parameter....
 952017-05-03T09:04:15  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master a750d77 John Newbery: Add tests for mempool persistence...
 962017-05-03T09:04:16  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 2a183de Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #9966: Control mempool persistence using a command line parameter...
 972017-05-03T09:04:35  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #9966: Control mempool persistence using a command line parameter (master...mempoolpersistenceoption) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9966
 982017-05-03T09:05:21  *** elkalamar has quit IRC
 992017-05-03T09:14:30  *** Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1002017-05-03T09:26:39  *** jannes has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1012017-05-03T09:40:54  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/2a183de0ecb5...0912620888e8
1022017-05-03T09:40:55  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 56f09df Spencer Lievens: [Makefile] Alphabetically Reorder addrdb.cpp...
1032017-05-03T09:40:55  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 0912620 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10302: [Makefile] Alphabetically Reorder addrdb.cpp...
1042017-05-03T09:41:19  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #10302: [Makefile] Alphabetically Reorder addrdb.cpp (master...patch-2) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10302
1052017-05-03T09:42:28  *** RubenSomsen has quit IRC
1062017-05-03T09:48:04  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/0912620888e8...22d870016eb6
1072017-05-03T09:48:05  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 1ff2bb4 BtcDrak: Remove unused args from GetFetchhFlags()
1082017-05-03T09:48:05  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 22d8700 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10311: Remove unused args from GetFetchFlags()...
1092017-05-03T09:48:29  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #10311: Remove unused args from GetFetchFlags() (master...getflags) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10311
1102017-05-03T10:02:35  *** laurentmt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1112017-05-03T10:04:17  *** laurentmt has quit IRC
1122017-05-03T10:38:18  *** shesek has quit IRC
1132017-05-03T10:40:43  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #10325: 0.15.0 Depends Updates (master...depends-0-15-0) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10325
1142017-05-03T10:52:01  *** shesek has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1152017-05-03T10:52:01  *** shesek has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1162017-05-03T11:00:32  *** cryptapus_afk has quit IRC
1172017-05-03T11:04:02  *** tw2006 has quit IRC
1182017-05-03T11:04:52  *** swoup has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1192017-05-03T11:31:36  *** swoup has left #bitcoin-core-dev
1202017-05-03T11:31:45  *** tw2006 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1212017-05-03T11:45:14  *** Guyver2_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1222017-05-03T11:48:08  *** Guyver2 has quit IRC
1232017-05-03T11:48:16  *** Guyver2_ is now known as Guyver2
1242017-05-03T11:51:04  *** RubenSomsen has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1252017-05-03T11:51:14  *** harrymm has quit IRC
1262017-05-03T12:15:50  *** Guyver2_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1272017-05-03T12:18:28  *** Guyver2 has quit IRC
1282017-05-03T12:18:29  *** Guyver2_ is now known as Guyver2
1292017-05-03T12:21:36  *** RubenSomsen has quit IRC
1302017-05-03T12:43:14  *** NewLiberty has quit IRC
1312017-05-03T12:57:38  *** cryptapus_afk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1322017-05-03T12:57:38  *** cryptapus_afk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1332017-05-03T12:57:39  *** goksinen has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1342017-05-03T13:01:51  *** jtimon has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1352017-05-03T13:03:08  <jtimon> more begging for review on https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9494
1362017-05-03T13:06:25  <jnewbery> wumpus did you see my comment on #10225? It's causing test runs to fail intermittently for me. Can we revert it until it's had some review?
1372017-05-03T13:06:27  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10225 | [test] Add aborttrescan tests by kallewoof · Pull Request #10225 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
1382017-05-03T13:07:10  <wumpus> jnewbery: sure
1392017-05-03T13:08:09  <wumpus> just commenting out the test so it doesn't run automatically would be enough I guess
1402017-05-03T13:10:16  <jnewbery> yes, that would solve the immediate problem, but I'd also like to make sure that the test gets some review. I had a bunch of review comments for the PR which I didn't add because it wasn't even running reliably for me
1412017-05-03T13:11:03  <wumpus> no matter waht, comments must be addressed in a new PR
1422017-05-03T13:11:09  <wumpus> it's not possible to unmerge and reopen a PR
1432017-05-03T13:12:13  <jnewbery> can we do something like: new PR or commit to remove the test entirely, and then PR it again
1442017-05-03T13:12:22  <wumpus> I guess if no one fixes it, we can remove the test again at some point
1452017-05-03T13:13:18  <wumpus> I don't really see how that is better than just disabling the test (so it can still be run manually) then fixing its problems while it's not blocking travis, but okay...
1462017-05-03T13:14:11  <jnewbery> because the test is unreviewed and untested. I think we *should* have the test, I'd just like it to go through a review process before it gets merged :)
1472017-05-03T13:18:28  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jnewbery opened pull request #10327: [tests] remove import-abort-rescan.py (master...remove_abort_rescan) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10327
1482017-05-03T13:40:05  *** questioner2 has quit IRC
1492017-05-03T13:44:52  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/22d870016eb6...35da2aeed7d4
1502017-05-03T13:44:53  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 981e586 John Newbery: [tests] remove import-abort-rescan.py...
1512017-05-03T13:44:53  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 35da2ae Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10327: [tests] remove import-abort-rescan.py...
1522017-05-03T13:45:19  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #10327: [tests] remove import-abort-rescan.py (master...remove_abort_rescan) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10327
1532017-05-03T13:50:36  *** d_t has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1542017-05-03T13:55:24  *** d_t has quit IRC
1552017-05-03T14:01:55  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] TheBlueMatt opened pull request #10328: Update contrib/debian to latest Ubuntu PPA upload. (master...2017-05-update-debian) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10328
1562017-05-03T14:14:41  <BlueMatt> jonasschnelli: re: qt4: I think we need to just remove our tray icon anyway, at this point?
1572017-05-03T14:14:53  <BlueMatt> then the issues with qt4 should be resolved, I believe?
1582017-05-03T14:14:54  <jonasschnelli> BlueMatt: I think there is an option
1592017-05-03T14:15:05  <jonasschnelli> let me check
1602017-05-03T14:15:34  <jonasschnelli> setTrayIconVisible(optionsModel->getHideTrayIcon());
1612017-05-03T14:16:11  <BlueMatt> can someone close #10326 as "follow up with antpool, we are not antpool support there is nothing we can do"
1622017-05-03T14:16:15  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10326 | block accepted in solo mining in Antpool and never rewards in the dashboard · Issue #10326 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
1632017-05-03T14:17:05  <BlueMatt> jonasschnelli: i believe there was previously discussion of just always not having tray icons
1642017-05-03T14:17:50  <jonasschnelli> Yes. Removing the tray makes sense... though, to prevent distraction, we shouldn't hurry. The option was a good start IMO
1652017-05-03T14:19:18  <jonasschnelli> I mean "removing the tray icon".
1662017-05-03T14:19:55  <jonasschnelli> OSX has already deprecated those "global menu icons" since years. Because it looks like that every new application wants to place a icon there and mostly the space is limited to just a handfull.
1672017-05-03T14:20:02  <jonasschnelli> I guess it's similar on Ubuntu/Windows.
1682017-05-03T14:20:17  <jonasschnelli> But all new application ignore these deprecations. :)
1692017-05-03T14:20:27  <jonasschnelli> Dropbox / Adobe / VMWare, etc.
1702017-05-03T14:20:42  <wumpus> ubuntu is going to drop unity anyhow
1712017-05-03T14:20:46  <wumpus> so the problem will go way
1722017-05-03T14:21:25  <jonasschnelli> wumpus: There are no such thing like Tray icons in GNOME?
1732017-05-03T14:21:26  <wumpus> but yes completely removing tray icon functionality would be a possible future thing too
1742017-05-03T14:21:35  <wumpus> jonasschnelli: there are, but that problem shouldn't exist there
1752017-05-03T14:21:55  <wumpus> it's a problem specific to how unity intercepts the tray menu
1762017-05-03T14:22:01  <wumpus> as I understand, at least
1772017-05-03T14:22:10  <jonasschnelli> Okay. Yes. I think as long as users like apps that inject tray icons, we should not hurry with removing the option.
1782017-05-03T14:22:17  <jonasschnelli> We could first set the option to false by default
1792017-05-03T14:22:31  <wumpus> right
1802017-05-03T14:23:43  <wumpus> but as I understand it this problem is specific to unity: it doesn't exist on GNOME, nor KDE
1812017-05-03T14:24:03  <wumpus> haven't tested, though.
1822017-05-03T14:24:16  <jonasschnelli> Yes. I think so.
1832017-05-03T14:24:29  <jonasschnelli> BlueMatt: the current PPA is built with Qt4? Right?
1842017-05-03T14:24:36  <BlueMatt> yes
1852017-05-03T14:24:47  <jonasschnelli> Hmm... what speaks against Qt5?
1862017-05-03T14:25:11  <BlueMatt> wumpus: luke-jr was also complaining about qt5 not working with kde4 folks (do people still use kde4...or kde?)
1872017-05-03T14:26:04  <jonasschnelli> Yes. But that orthogonal to the PPA.
1882017-05-03T14:26:36  <BlueMatt> true, but it is further reason why we need to support Qt4
1892017-05-03T14:26:52  <BlueMatt> (is there even a reason to migrate to qt5)
1902017-05-03T14:26:56  <BlueMatt> or, quickly migrate, that is
1912017-05-03T14:28:11  <wumpus> well, most software moved away from qt4 by now, so requiring qt4 for the ppa pulls that in, and makes the software look different from other things
1922017-05-03T14:28:35  <wumpus> this is a different decision than stopping qt4 support anyhow
1932017-05-03T14:28:44  <BlueMatt> how do other projects support qt5 on ubuntu? just no tray icons?
1942017-05-03T14:29:02  *** RubenSomsen has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1952017-05-03T14:29:19  <wumpus> I think so, yes
1962017-05-03T14:29:31  <jonasschnelli> I expect much less maintenance on the qt4 branch. Things like HiDPI, etc. which nowadays is also common on Ubuntu is only possible with Qt5.
1972017-05-03T14:29:38  <wumpus> software on linux that adds tray icons is kind of rare
1982017-05-03T14:29:43  <BlueMatt> lol, why is all software terrible
1992017-05-03T14:31:04  <wumpus> the "correct way" to do tray functionality on ubuntu is to register beneath one of the existing (vendor-provided) tray icons in the tray menu. They have an API for this. Of course, given that it's going to disappear it's not worth spending time on that.
2002017-05-03T14:31:08  <wumpus> (if it ever was)
2012017-05-03T14:31:34  <wumpus> but e.g. some instant messenger and email clients etc do that
2022017-05-03T14:31:46  <BlueMatt> ah
2032017-05-03T14:32:00  <wumpus> (probably, ubuntu maintains their own patches for that)
2042017-05-03T14:32:43  <BlueMatt> <BlueMatt> lol, why is all software terrible
2052017-05-03T14:33:46  <wumpus> why is all terrible
2062017-05-03T14:34:03  <BlueMatt> fair point
2072017-05-03T14:37:10  *** kexkey has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2082017-05-03T14:49:30  <luke-jr> BlueMatt: Qt5 doesn't adapt to Qt4, *and vice versa*. KDE 4 is rapidly becoming Windows XP. I think we're okay to drop Qt4 entirely as soon as it becomes a burden, but changing builds to use Qt5 ASAP is a good idea.
2092017-05-03T14:50:32  <wumpus> the bitcoin.org builds have been using qt5 for considerable time, it's just the PPA using qt4
2102017-05-03T14:52:01  <luke-jr> Ubuntu is no longer Unity; I'm guessing we still support an older Unity-based version though?
2112017-05-03T14:52:29  *** RubenSomsen has quit IRC
2122017-05-03T14:52:59  <wumpus> there's no Ubuntu no-Unity release yet afaik? I just meant that starting from there we can switch it to qt5
2132017-05-03T14:53:21  <luke-jr> is there a way to make debs use a different version based on their target?
2142017-05-03T14:53:40  <luke-jr> (parazyd - the guy who opened that PR - 's target is Knots on Devuan FWIW)
2152017-05-03T14:53:47  <wumpus> "On 5 April 2017 Mark Shuttleworth announced that Canonical's work on Unity will end and that Ubuntu 18.04 LTS, a year away from release at the time, will abandon the Unity desktop and employ the GNOME 3 desktop instead"
2162017-05-03T14:55:16  <wumpus> yes he's using KDE5, which doesn't work with qt4 all too well, so I understand his concern
2172017-05-03T15:04:33  <BlueMatt> luke-jr: all debian builds have the release hardcoded
2182017-05-03T15:04:45  <BlueMatt> well, for uploads to ppa/debian builds/ubuntu builds
2192017-05-03T15:04:50  <BlueMatt> manual builds ignore that
2202017-05-03T15:07:15  <luke-jr> I thought for PPAs you upload once and it built for everything? :o
2212017-05-03T15:07:32  *** tw2006 has quit IRC
2222017-05-03T15:07:43  <BlueMatt> nope, it gets uploaded like 5 times
2232017-05-03T15:08:15  <luke-jr> ew
2242017-05-03T15:08:41  <luke-jr> BlueMatt: it would be nice if there was a gitian descriptor that produced the files to upload btw ;)
2252017-05-03T15:10:39  <BlueMatt> the files to upload is pretty much just the debian/ folder from contrib/debian and a copy of the git archive, all signed by my pgp key
2262017-05-03T15:10:45  <BlueMatt> not sure how useful it would be, then, unsigned :p
2272017-05-03T15:12:13  *** tw2006 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2282017-05-03T15:12:51  <luke-jr> there isn't something that requires a Debian-based OS to generate?
2292017-05-03T15:13:14  <BlueMatt> I dunno, I use the debian tools to upload, but used to use the debain tools on arch, even
2302017-05-03T15:13:18  <BlueMatt> now its in a vm
2312017-05-03T15:14:06  <sipa> i thought PPA was ubuntu-spdcific
2322017-05-03T15:14:28  <luke-jr> it is
2332017-05-03T15:14:33  <BlueMatt> PPAs are, but the tools to upload to them are debian-generic
2342017-05-03T15:15:56  <luke-jr> BlueMatt: well, it'd be nice to have that VM turned into a gitian descriptor simply for convenience IMO; gitian as an automating tool rather that determinism tool ;)O
2352017-05-03T15:16:22  <BlueMatt> luke-jr: yes, but there'd be no point in anyone but me using it?
2362017-05-03T15:16:24  <BlueMatt> so why bother?
2372017-05-03T15:16:30  <BlueMatt> its already dead-simple to do
2382017-05-03T15:16:35  <luke-jr> BlueMatt: well, you don't want to maintain a PPA for Knots I assume?
2392017-05-03T15:16:39  <BlueMatt> just copy contrib/debian into debian and run dpkg-buildpackage
2402017-05-03T15:17:21  *** paveljanik has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2412017-05-03T15:17:22  <BlueMatt> iirc dpkg-buildpackage -S -sa -d && dput ppaname *.changes
2422017-05-03T15:17:47  <luke-jr> k, will try that
2432017-05-03T15:18:06  <BlueMatt> you need to add ppaname to some config file
2442017-05-03T15:18:25  <BlueMatt> but ofc thats the part that is me-specific
2452017-05-03T15:18:29  <BlueMatt> not gitian-able
2462017-05-03T15:19:04  <BlueMatt> also your pgp key name has to match the top entry in debian/changelog for dpkg-buildpackage to sign it right
2472017-05-03T15:20:12  <luke-jr> your daily and RC PPAs seem dead since 2011 btw
2482017-05-03T15:20:18  <BlueMatt> im aware
2492017-05-03T15:20:30  <BlueMatt> they need to be deleted, probably
2502017-05-03T15:25:08  *** laurentmt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2512017-05-03T15:25:23  *** laurentmt has quit IRC
2522017-05-03T15:25:35  <Lauda> Is 'walletpassphrase' supposed to return 'null' now on correct entry of pass?
2532017-05-03T15:27:47  <wumpus> it always did AFAIK
2542017-05-03T15:28:42  <wumpus> on failure it throws an error, on success it returns NullUniValue
2552017-05-03T15:33:19  <Lauda> It may just be me, but I haven't noticed 'null' up until today on 0.14.1
2562017-05-03T15:33:27  <Lauda> Thanks for clarifying though!
2572017-05-03T15:33:32  <BlueMatt> luke-jr: i cant add people to the "bitcoin" team on launchpad because adding people means they get instant upload rights....so adding people needs to be a public process of "this person is gonna get PPA upload rights"
2582017-05-03T15:33:48  <wumpus> Lauda: might be that the GUI now displays it differently?
2592017-05-03T15:35:07  <Lauda> wumpus IIRC the GUI never returned 'null', that's why it surprised me (it had an empty line or something). Again, might be me :l
2602017-05-03T15:37:23  <luke-jr> BlueMatt: hmm, no way to add me with just a second PPA for knots?
2612017-05-03T15:37:35  <BlueMatt> luke-jr: I dont believe so, but may be wrong
2622017-05-03T15:38:12  <luke-jr> weird
2632017-05-03T15:40:22  *** EagleTM has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2642017-05-03T15:40:23  <wumpus> Lauda: ah I think I remember now, IIRC that was changed because an empty line was confusing people
2652017-05-03T15:41:04  <Lauda> maybe in 0.14.0 (just tested that one, as it also has null). Thanks :D
2662017-05-03T15:44:41  <luke-jr> BlueMatt: dpkg-source: error: can't build with source format '3.0 (quilt)': no upstream tarball found at ../bitcoin_0.11.0.orig.tar.{bz2,gz,lzma,xz}
2672017-05-03T15:45:39  <BlueMatt> luke-jr: you need to create a git archive with the listed name :p
2682017-05-03T15:47:15  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
2692017-05-03T15:48:32  <luke-jr> dpkg-source: info: local changes detected, the modified files are: bitcoin/source/clientversion.cpp
2702017-05-03T15:49:03  <BlueMatt> yes, and the source has to match the git archive exactly, so the git archive magic in clientversion.cpp needs to be updated accordingly
2712017-05-03T15:49:22  <BlueMatt> really you're supposed to just untar the release source (which for us is git archive)
2722017-05-03T15:49:36  <luke-jr> not the gitian-generated tarball?
2732017-05-03T15:50:09  <BlueMatt> i suppose it doesnt matter?
2742017-05-03T15:50:27  <BlueMatt> i mean you can upload any source you want, i use git archives
2752017-05-03T15:50:30  <luke-jr> the latter has clientversion correct and configure generated :D
2762017-05-03T15:51:11  <BlueMatt> ehh, I'll stick with autogen on launchpad, doesnt matter
2772017-05-03T15:53:50  *** abpa has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2782017-05-03T16:03:42  <jtimon> mhmm, travis wasn't launched for #9494 on last rebase... wumpus can you or someone else make it happen or should I just push with a different commit id or something?
2792017-05-03T16:03:45  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9494 | Introduce an ArgsManager class encapsulating cs_args, mapArgs and mapMultiArgs by jtimon · Pull Request #9494 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
2802017-05-03T16:05:40  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] RHavar closed pull request #10100: Make ApproximateBestSubset optimize for amount of inputs (master...coinselection) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10100
2812017-05-03T16:18:04  *** BashCo has quit IRC
2822017-05-03T16:18:54  *** laurentmt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2832017-05-03T16:23:28  *** xiangfu has quit IRC
2842017-05-03T16:24:05  *** xiangfu has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2852017-05-03T16:30:38  *** timothy has quit IRC
2862017-05-03T16:38:07  <sipa> anyone know what could be happening here? https://travis-ci.org/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/228201960
2872017-05-03T16:38:24  <sipa> no output for 10 minutes while/after running bitcoin-util-test.py
2882017-05-03T16:38:48  <sipa> this is the second PR where I see this problem
2892017-05-03T16:40:00  <wumpus> no, no idea. This was after the revert of #10225?
2902017-05-03T16:40:01  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10225 | [test] Add aborttrescan tests by kallewoof · Pull Request #10225 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
2912017-05-03T16:43:23  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2922017-05-03T16:43:37  <sipa> let me rebase on top of that revert
2932017-05-03T16:45:11  *** EagleTM has left #bitcoin-core-dev
2942017-05-03T16:45:43  <sipa> reindex-chainstate on my laptop with pertxoutcache: 1h27m to block 453354 (default assumevalid)
2952017-05-03T16:46:17  <sipa> (and infinite dbcache, which is larger now)
2962017-05-03T16:46:56  <sipa> i'll benchmark master as well
2972017-05-03T16:58:06  *** heath_ is now known as heath
2982017-05-03T16:59:43  *** BashCo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2992017-05-03T17:01:46  <luke-jr> BlueMatt: how to get db4.8 built? :p
3002017-05-03T17:03:38  <luke-jr> (maybe it should be a separate PPA that can just be used as a dep?)
3012017-05-03T17:04:51  <TD-Linux> which reminds me, a recent beautiful locking bug with latest glibc and libdb breaks rpm on Fedora: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394862
3022017-05-03T17:05:09  <TD-Linux> I don't think this affects db4.8 or wallet btw
3032017-05-03T17:07:28  *** sambhu has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3042017-05-03T17:13:10  <BlueMatt> sipa: context? what is non-per-utxo?
3052017-05-03T17:13:16  <BlueMatt> wait, what is pertxoutcache?
3062017-05-03T17:13:40  <sipa> BlueMatt: pertxoutcache = #10195
3072017-05-03T17:13:41  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10195 | Switch chainstate db and cache to per-txout model by sipa · Pull Request #10195 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
3082017-05-03T17:13:56  <sipa> sorry, i think in my own branch names rather than PRs
3092017-05-03T17:14:11  <BlueMatt> ah, k
3102017-05-03T17:14:53  <sipa> dbcache was 6.3G at that point though, and 2.7G on disk after flushing
3112017-05-03T17:22:20  <BlueMatt> sipa: still missing lots of context...how do those numbers compare to previously :p
3122017-05-03T17:22:47  <BlueMatt> (esp cache size)
3132017-05-03T17:23:13  *** sambhu has quit IRC
3142017-05-03T17:23:53  <sipa> BlueMatt: yeah, i haven't done a rigorous benchmark on this system recently, so i can't tell
3152017-05-03T17:24:01  <sipa> i was just surprised by a reindex of 1.5h
3162017-05-03T17:24:20  <sipa> maybe that's due to improvements in master i'm not aware of, or maybe my memory is faulty :)
3172017-05-03T17:29:20  <BlueMatt> or assumevalid
3182017-05-03T17:30:02  *** mol has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3192017-05-03T17:33:27  *** moli_ has quit IRC
3202017-05-03T17:41:33  *** harrymm has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3212017-05-03T17:45:28  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jnewbery opened pull request #10330: fix zapwallettxes interaction with persistent mempool (master...zapwallettxes) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10330
3222017-05-03T17:53:56  *** vicenteH has quit IRC
3232017-05-03T17:55:59  <jnewbery> sipa: I may be wrong, but I think that your travis issue is with the unit tests rather than bitcoin-util-test.py. Compare: https://travis-ci.org/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/228344728 . I think the final line in your output:
3242017-05-03T17:55:59  <jnewbery> make[4]: Entering directory `/home/travis/build/bitcoin/bitcoin/build/bitcoin-i686-w64-mingw32/src'
3252017-05-03T17:55:59  <jnewbery> indicates that bitcoin-util-test.py has returned and you're now running the unit tests
3262017-05-03T17:58:55  <sipa> jnewbery: sounds plausible
3272017-05-03T18:00:12  <sipa> any idea on how to find out which test is the cause?
3282017-05-03T18:01:34  <luke-jr> I'm not sure the UAWITNESS service bit in BIP 149 is sufficient. At the very least, relying on service bits is a bad idea.
3292017-05-03T18:03:22  <luke-jr> what happens if a malicious node sends 0.14.1 a segwit block when BIP9 didn't activate? will it permanently flag it as invalid and never reconsider a stripped version?
3302017-05-03T18:04:53  <abpa> Don't you have the same issue if SegWit 2 is proposed with BIP9 over again?
3312017-05-03T18:05:12  <luke-jr> abpa: possibly. changing the dummy byte may workaround this.
3322017-05-03T18:06:38  <jnewbery> how reproducible is this on travis? Perhaps you could update the travis/make config to run the unit tests with verbose output?
3332017-05-03T18:15:05  *** Dyaheon has quit IRC
3342017-05-03T18:16:44  <sipa> jnewbery: i have 2 PRs which reproducibly failed in 1 or 2 builds, both windows builds
3352017-05-03T18:16:55  <sipa> how do i run the tests verbose?
3362017-05-03T18:18:10  *** Dyaheon has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3372017-05-03T18:26:02  <jnewbery> sipa: test_bitcoin --log_level=all if you're running them manually, but that produces a lot of output. I haven't looked at how you'd update makefiles/travis config to do this
3382017-05-03T18:37:29  *** dgenr8 has quit IRC
3392017-05-03T18:37:55  *** dgenr8 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3402017-05-03T18:43:00  *** molz_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3412017-05-03T18:43:16  <sipa> jnewbery: i cannot reproduce it locally
3422017-05-03T18:43:19  <sipa> ok
3432017-05-03T18:46:35  *** mol has quit IRC
3442017-05-03T18:52:36  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jnewbery opened pull request #10331: Share config between util and functional tests (master...shared_util_function_test_config) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10331
3452017-05-03T18:59:01  <luke-jr> woo success https://launchpad.net/~luke-jr/+archive/ubuntu/db48
3462017-05-03T19:09:55  *** molz_ has quit IRC
3472017-05-03T19:11:26  *** moli_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3482017-05-03T19:29:56  <luke-jr> FYI: release tarballs are missing contrib/debian entirely
3492017-05-03T19:55:00  *** mol has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3502017-05-03T19:56:47  *** moli_ has quit IRC
3512017-05-03T20:05:28  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] parazyd closed pull request #10316: fix contrib/debian builds; prefer qt5 (master...debian-packaging) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10316
3522017-05-03T20:17:58  *** harrymm has quit IRC
3532017-05-03T20:36:07  *** harrymm has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3542017-05-03T20:37:50  *** protomar has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3552017-05-03T20:38:55  *** vicenteH has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3562017-05-03T20:53:46  *** cryptapus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3572017-05-03T20:54:22  *** cryptapus_afk has quit IRC
3582017-05-03T20:55:16  *** goksinen has quit IRC
3592017-05-03T20:58:13  *** cryptapus_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3602017-05-03T20:58:14  *** cryptapus_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3612017-05-03T20:58:14  *** cryptapus_ is now known as cryptapus_afk
3622017-05-03T20:58:48  *** cryptapus has quit IRC
3632017-05-03T20:59:19  *** goksinen has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3642017-05-03T20:59:21  *** emucode has quit IRC
3652017-05-03T21:01:43  *** tw2006 has quit IRC
3662017-05-03T21:01:56  *** vicenteH has quit IRC
3672017-05-03T21:02:51  *** cryptapus_afk has quit IRC
3682017-05-03T21:04:11  *** goksinen has quit IRC
3692017-05-03T21:05:27  *** emucode has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3702017-05-03T21:06:42  *** cryptapus_afk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3712017-05-03T21:06:42  *** cryptapus_afk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3722017-05-03T21:08:43  *** molz_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3732017-05-03T21:11:07  *** str4d has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3742017-05-03T21:11:30  *** afk11 has quit IRC
3752017-05-03T21:11:32  *** cryptapus_afk has quit IRC
3762017-05-03T21:11:46  *** mol has quit IRC
3772017-05-03T21:12:08  *** cryptapus_afk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3782017-05-03T21:12:20  *** afk11 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3792017-05-03T21:14:03  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] instagibbs opened pull request #10333: CreateTransction fee fixes: always create change, adjust value, and p… (master...fixfeefinal) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10333
3802017-05-03T21:24:54  <sipa> cfields: how do i go about having a #define available for the presence of clock_gettime?
3812017-05-03T21:25:08  *** goksinen has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3822017-05-03T21:25:12  <sipa> cfields: it seems configure.ac already tests for it, but there is no macro
3832017-05-03T21:27:27  <cfields> sipa: looks like we assume it's always there?
3842017-05-03T21:27:28  *** protomar has quit IRC
3852017-05-03T21:28:40  <sipa> cfields: the interwebs tell me that OSX doesn't have it
3862017-05-03T21:28:55  <cfields> sipa: ergh, I remember something about it changing in 10.12
3872017-05-03T21:29:10  *** kexkey has quit IRC
3882017-05-03T21:29:47  <cfields> sipa: ah right, maybe it was added and we'll have to deal with it like getentropy
3892017-05-03T21:29:48  <cfields> checking
3902017-05-03T21:30:10  <cfields> sipa: wait. What do you need it for?
3912017-05-03T21:30:46  <sipa> cfields: #10322
3922017-05-03T21:30:47  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10322 | Use hardware timestamps in RNG seeding by sipa · Pull Request #10322 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
3932017-05-03T21:31:15  <sipa> ARM does not have an rdtsc instruction, and clock_gettime has much higher precision than gettimeofday
3942017-05-03T21:32:05  <sipa> i guess it does not matter that much... because on OSX we'll always be on a platform that does have rdtsc
3952017-05-03T21:32:19  <cfields> sipa: opposed to using std::chrono::high_resolution_clock ?
3962017-05-03T21:33:03  <sipa> ah!
3972017-05-03T21:33:43  <cfields> (i assume it's just an abstraction around clock_gettime for *nix)
3982017-05-03T21:34:30  *** goksinen has quit IRC
3992017-05-03T21:34:35  <sipa> checking how it is implemented; thanks for the suggestion
4002017-05-03T21:34:48  <cfields> np
4012017-05-03T21:35:05  * sipa is slightly scared about these things, after seeing how useless the std::random_device implementations can be...
4022017-05-03T21:35:38  *** afk11 has quit IRC
4032017-05-03T21:36:19  *** afk11 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4042017-05-03T21:37:43  <cfields> to answer your question, in case this doesn't work out, in the "AC_SEARCH_LIBS([clock_gettime]", just add a third argument. Do the AC_DEFINE there.
4052017-05-03T21:38:49  *** goksinen has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4062017-05-03T21:44:17  <cfields> libc++ uses:  clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME, &tp)
4072017-05-03T21:44:26  *** elkalamar has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4082017-05-03T21:44:49  *** goksinen has quit IRC
4092017-05-03T21:45:38  <cfields> but seems to round it to msecs :(
4102017-05-03T21:45:57  <sipa> "uses" ?
4112017-05-03T21:46:00  <sipa> for what?
4122017-05-03T21:46:24  <sipa> oh, for high_resolution_clock?
4132017-05-03T21:46:27  <sipa> rly?
4142017-05-03T21:47:27  <cfields> ah wait, that's only if there's no monotick source
4152017-05-03T21:47:47  <cfields> https://github.com/llvm-mirror/libcxx/blob/master/src/chrono.cpp#L137
4162017-05-03T21:48:22  *** Squidicuz has quit IRC
4172017-05-03T21:48:41  *** Squidicuz has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4182017-05-03T21:48:54  <cfields> and https://github.com/llvm-mirror/libcxx/blob/master/src/chrono.cpp#L224
4192017-05-03T21:50:09  <sipa> cfields: can you try compiling and running https://zerobin.net/?f8af7a8040549857#9JGDEBZvv+MQzzGCfLGyvIC5C8plMb7L/Jxg34DuCYM= ?
4202017-05-03T21:50:11  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9 | Fix for GUI on Macs and latest wxWidgets by gavinandresen · Pull Request #9 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
4212017-05-03T21:50:35  <sipa> on linux it gives me nanosecond precision, in mingw-w64 + wine microsecond
4222017-05-03T21:50:39  <cfields> mmm, i'm about ready to take back that suggestion. probably not worth the risk.
4232017-05-03T21:50:52  <cfields> sec
4242017-05-03T21:52:19  <cfields> yea, I get nano
4252017-05-03T21:52:44  <sipa> cool
4262017-05-03T21:54:26  <sipa> i like c++:
4272017-05-03T21:54:27  <sipa>     return std::chrono::duration_cast<std::chrono::nanoseconds>(std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::now().time_since_epoch()).count();
4282017-05-03T21:54:30  <sipa> ...
4292017-05-03T21:57:34  <cfields> heh
4302017-05-03T21:57:41  <sipa> translates to a single instruction
4312017-05-03T21:57:58  <sipa> (a library call, to be clear... but no conversion anywhere)
4322017-05-03T21:58:01  <cfields> oh, nice :)
4332017-05-03T21:58:08  <cfields> sipa: static_assert(std::ratio_greater_equal<std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::period, std::nano>::value == true, "no nanosecond precision");
4342017-05-03T21:58:13  <cfields> zero instructions for that one :)
4352017-05-03T21:59:16  <sipa> cfields: that compiles fine on mingw, even though the result only has microsecond precision
4362017-05-03T22:00:08  <sipa> (it always returns numbers that are multiples of 1000)
4372017-05-03T22:00:13  <cfields> hmm
4382017-05-03T22:00:54  <sipa> what output do you get on osx from my snippet?
4392017-05-03T22:02:39  *** tw2006 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4402017-05-03T22:03:03  <cfields> nano
4412017-05-03T22:03:15  <cfields> 1033378907044228
4422017-05-03T22:03:15  <cfields> 1033378907124163
4432017-05-03T22:03:19  <cfields> ...
4442017-05-03T22:07:01  *** tw2006 has quit IRC
4452017-05-03T22:07:07  <cfields> oh sorry, got that static_assert backwards. That should be ratio_less_equal
4462017-05-03T22:07:15  <cfields> with that change, mingw fails to compile for me.
4472017-05-03T22:07:55  <sipa> still compiles fine here
4482017-05-03T22:08:00  *** goksinen has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4492017-05-03T22:12:16  *** goksinen has quit IRC
4502017-05-03T22:19:04  <cfields> sipa: to avoid multiples of 1000 with microsecond precision, you can use: "auto value = std::chrono::duration_cast<std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::duration>(epoch);"
4512017-05-03T22:19:52  <cfields> (though it sounds like your mingw is lying to you about precision at compile-time, so that may not help)
4522017-05-03T22:19:58  <cfields> works here
4532017-05-03T22:20:06  *** goksinen has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4542017-05-03T22:21:43  *** altoz_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4552017-05-03T22:23:25  *** pindarhk_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4562017-05-03T22:23:29  *** eragmus_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4572017-05-03T22:23:32  *** CodeShark_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4582017-05-03T22:25:56  *** comboy_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4592017-05-03T22:26:09  *** xhire_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4602017-05-03T22:27:20  *** comboy_ has quit IRC
4612017-05-03T22:27:30  *** Apocalyptic_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4622017-05-03T22:27:57  *** comboy_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4632017-05-03T22:28:41  *** CodeShark has quit IRC
4642017-05-03T22:28:41  *** pindarhk has quit IRC
4652017-05-03T22:28:41  *** Apocalyptic has quit IRC
4662017-05-03T22:28:42  *** btcdrak has quit IRC
4672017-05-03T22:28:42  *** eragmus has quit IRC
4682017-05-03T22:28:43  *** comboy has quit IRC
4692017-05-03T22:28:43  *** xHire has quit IRC
4702017-05-03T22:28:43  *** altoz has quit IRC
4712017-05-03T22:28:44  *** kadoban has quit IRC
4722017-05-03T22:28:45  *** CodeShark_ is now known as CodeShark
4732017-05-03T22:28:45  *** Apocalyptic_ is now known as Apocalyptic
4742017-05-03T22:29:14  *** pindarhk_ is now known as pindarhk
4752017-05-03T22:29:25  *** eragmus_ is now known as eragmus
4762017-05-03T22:29:42  *** goksinen has quit IRC
4772017-05-03T22:30:50  *** Guyver2 has quit IRC
4782017-05-03T22:36:03  *** altoz_ is now known as altoz
4792017-05-03T22:57:03  *** laurentmt has quit IRC
4802017-05-03T23:01:31  *** goksinen has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4812017-05-03T23:03:37  *** tw2006 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4822017-05-03T23:08:24  *** tw2006 has quit IRC
4832017-05-03T23:08:52  *** goksinen has quit IRC
4842017-05-03T23:20:41  *** comboy_ is now known as comboy
4852017-05-03T23:21:56  *** goksinen has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4862017-05-03T23:26:50  *** goksinen has quit IRC
4872017-05-03T23:47:33  *** jannes has quit IRC
4882017-05-03T23:50:26  *** vicenteH has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4892017-05-03T23:52:57  *** kadoban has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4902017-05-03T23:59:56  *** abpa has quit IRC