12017-11-08T00:02:35 *** dcousens has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
22017-11-08T00:06:40 *** LumberCartel has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
32017-11-08T00:06:51 *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
42017-11-08T00:07:33 *** Aaronvan_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
52017-11-08T00:11:13 *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
62017-11-08T00:22:36 *** Aaronvan_ has quit IRC
72017-11-08T00:41:54 *** Cheeseo has quit IRC
82017-11-08T00:51:11 *** shesek has quit IRC
92017-11-08T01:01:21 *** dgenr8 has quit IRC
102017-11-08T01:02:07 *** dgenr8 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
112017-11-08T01:03:37 *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
122017-11-08T01:09:51 *** jb55 has quit IRC
132017-11-08T01:11:00 *** EEXIST64 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
142017-11-08T01:14:43 *** EEXIST64 has quit IRC
152017-11-08T01:15:23 *** shesek has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
162017-11-08T01:27:40 *** arubi has quit IRC
172017-11-08T01:28:25 *** arubi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
182017-11-08T01:30:06 *** dgenr8 has quit IRC
192017-11-08T01:30:27 *** dgenr8 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
202017-11-08T01:36:33 *** RubenSomsen has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
212017-11-08T01:47:13 *** Ylbam has quit IRC
222017-11-08T02:06:08 *** btcdrak has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
232017-11-08T02:12:46 *** ula has quit IRC
242017-11-08T02:49:27 *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
252017-11-08T03:13:16 *** wxss has quit IRC
262017-11-08T03:37:06 *** d9b4bef9 has quit IRC
272017-11-08T03:38:59 *** PaulCapestany has quit IRC
282017-11-08T03:42:02 <wumpus> BlueMatt: I'm all for adding different formats but please keep csv output support
292017-11-08T03:42:15 <wumpus> it's easy to parse for my own tooling, I don't eally like web tools
302017-11-08T03:42:30 <BlueMatt> wumpus: csv is still there and still default
312017-11-08T03:42:47 <BlueMatt> (and not my pr)
322017-11-08T03:44:09 <wumpus> relating the bench framework, #11562 seems ready for merge at least
332017-11-08T03:44:11 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11562 | bench: use std::chrono rather than gettimeofday by theuni · Pull Request #11562 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
342017-11-08T03:45:13 *** PaulCape_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
352017-11-08T03:48:35 *** chjj has quit IRC
362017-11-08T03:50:09 *** bule2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
372017-11-08T03:52:23 *** bule2 has quit IRC
382017-11-08T03:53:17 *** bule has quit IRC
392017-11-08T04:33:03 <achow101> For some reason, all of my builds locally continuously fail p2p-fullblocktest.py (it's been happening for a while now, I've just been ignoring it). any ideas why?
402017-11-08T04:33:18 <achow101> it just times out
412017-11-08T04:33:50 <achow101> and it's unrelated to anything that I am working on, happens on master and checked out PRs that are passing Travis
422017-11-08T04:35:19 <wumpus> well it used to be that such issues were related to the cache, but I think that's properly cleared now
432017-11-08T04:35:35 <wumpus> (e.g. sticky issues that seem to happen only in one environment)
442017-11-08T04:36:49 <gmaxwell> how do timeouts even work if not running in travis?
452017-11-08T04:38:30 <wumpus> there are some timeouts during the test as well, say if it's waiting for two nodes to be synced and it takes too long, or when an RPC command takes too long
462017-11-08T04:39:00 <gmaxwell> makes sense.
472017-11-08T04:39:02 *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
482017-11-08T04:39:08 *** RubenSomsen has quit IRC
492017-11-08T04:39:11 <gmaxwell> achow101: sounds concerning.
502017-11-08T04:39:28 <wumpus> these should be really high but just make sure it finishes some day even if there's some bug preventing forward progress
512017-11-08T04:39:31 *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
522017-11-08T04:39:53 <wumpus> in some cases they're set too tight though and they can trigger if a system is just at high load
532017-11-08T04:40:04 <wumpus> (then again that tends to happen on travis not locally)
542017-11-08T04:40:23 *** uneeb has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
552017-11-08T04:40:38 <achow101> It's a consistent test failure, happens on test 98 of p2p-fullblocktest.py and it is a timeout
562017-11-08T04:40:53 <achow101> I think it's literally the same line every single time, but I haven't actually bothered to investigate
572017-11-08T04:41:27 <wumpus> they're among the most annoying failures to debug, at least with wrong output there's something clear to investigate
582017-11-08T04:41:48 <gmaxwell> Which test is "98"?
592017-11-08T04:42:37 *** uneeb has quit IRC
602017-11-08T04:42:38 <gmaxwell> I don't see a number 98 in the file, so... (sorry, I'm still kind of embarassingly ignorant about a lot of the test framework)
612017-11-08T04:42:50 <achow101> gmaxwell: I dunno. It just says "Test 98: PASS" and then "(ERROR): Assertion failed"
622017-11-08T04:42:58 <achow101> ehh, I guess it's failing on test 99 then..
632017-11-08T04:44:02 *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
642017-11-08T04:44:51 <wumpus> any specifics on the assertion that fails?
652017-11-08T04:46:22 <achow101> https://0bin.net/paste/tsfO8D4nhJB+dN6i#PoyRukFXKiHKLFR-t8dxloT74Ys0SdaK6bhhBm9lVUR <-- traceback
662017-11-08T04:50:32 <achow101> gmaxwell: Test 99 is the thing that the 99th yield of get_tests() in p2p-fullblocktest.py "returns"
672017-11-08T04:50:58 <gmaxwell> If I understand this correctly, it's waiting for a ping response.
682017-11-08T04:51:23 <wumpus> oh the assertion is that a timeout is exceeded, yes that seems to be it gmaxwell
692017-11-08T04:53:03 <gmaxwell> it's really hard for me to tell from this traceback what the test conditions were where it croaked out.
702017-11-08T04:54:41 <achow101> gmaxwell: it should be whatever accepted() at this line is: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/p2p-fullblocktest.py#L1282
712017-11-08T04:54:48 <wumpus> there's a command line argument jump into the python debugger on a failure, so the conditions can be investigated
722017-11-08T04:54:56 <achow101> which is something that this loop https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/test_framework/comptool.py#L299 does something with
732017-11-08T05:00:07 *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
742017-11-08T05:01:47 *** Aaronvan_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
752017-11-08T05:05:27 *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
762017-11-08T05:09:58 *** fanquake has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
772017-11-08T05:10:17 <fanquake> achow101 I have occasionally seen the same. Only that test.
782017-11-08T05:22:42 *** MrPaz has quit IRC
792017-11-08T05:35:31 *** luke-jr has quit IRC
802017-11-08T05:37:16 *** luke-jr has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
812017-11-08T05:58:28 *** fanquake has quit IRC
822017-11-08T06:09:09 *** jtimon has quit IRC
832017-11-08T06:36:24 *** bule2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
842017-11-08T06:51:13 *** d9b4bef9 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
852017-11-08T07:09:32 *** bule2 has quit IRC
862017-11-08T07:15:40 <wumpus> is this one of the extended tests?
872017-11-08T07:29:33 <wumpus> no it's not - strange, so I'm running it all the time and not triggering that FWIW
882017-11-08T07:33:57 *** Aaronvan_ has quit IRC
892017-11-08T07:47:17 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/5776582b7f3e...5ef3b6967b5c
902017-11-08T07:47:18 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 5ce7cb9 Thomas Snider: [net] De-duplicate connection eviction logic
912017-11-08T07:47:18 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 5ef3b69 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #11524: [net] De-duplicate connection eviction logic...
922017-11-08T07:51:15 *** BashCo has quit IRC
932017-11-08T08:07:32 *** rafalcpp has quit IRC
942017-11-08T08:15:00 *** BashCo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
952017-11-08T08:17:05 *** shesek has quit IRC
962017-11-08T08:20:27 *** Cory has quit IRC
972017-11-08T08:24:47 *** shesek has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
982017-11-08T08:26:07 *** Pasha has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
992017-11-08T08:27:25 *** adetate has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1002017-11-08T08:29:18 *** Pasha is now known as Cory
1012017-11-08T08:33:16 *** Cogito_Ergo_Sum has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1022017-11-08T08:50:39 *** DvdKhl has quit IRC
1032017-11-08T09:01:37 *** JackH has quit IRC
1042017-11-08T09:02:39 *** timothy has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1052017-11-08T09:04:31 *** kexkey has quit IRC
1062017-11-08T09:05:47 *** shesek has quit IRC
1072017-11-08T09:08:51 *** laurentmt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1082017-11-08T09:20:10 *** puff has quit IRC
1092017-11-08T09:22:27 *** puff has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1102017-11-08T09:24:48 *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1112017-11-08T09:27:49 *** puff has quit IRC
1122017-11-08T09:27:50 *** adetate has quit IRC
1132017-11-08T09:28:22 *** puff has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1142017-11-08T09:34:10 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #11634: wallet: Add missing cs_wallet/cs_KeyStore locks to wallet (master...missing-wallet-locks) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11634
1152017-11-08T09:43:23 *** btcdrak has quit IRC
1162017-11-08T09:43:23 *** felco has quit IRC
1172017-11-08T09:43:23 *** rubensayshi has quit IRC
1182017-11-08T09:43:23 *** pindarhk_ has quit IRC
1192017-11-08T09:43:24 *** griswaalt[m] has quit IRC
1202017-11-08T09:43:24 *** herzmeister[m] has quit IRC
1212017-11-08T09:43:24 *** unholymachine has quit IRC
1222017-11-08T09:43:24 *** eragmus has quit IRC
1232017-11-08T09:43:24 *** derbumi has quit IRC
1242017-11-08T09:43:24 *** jimpo has quit IRC
1252017-11-08T09:43:24 *** NielsvG has quit IRC
1262017-11-08T09:43:25 *** bitbee has quit IRC
1272017-11-08T09:43:25 *** newbold has quit IRC
1282017-11-08T09:43:25 *** gwillen has quit IRC
1292017-11-08T09:43:25 *** adam3us has quit IRC
1302017-11-08T09:43:25 *** jonasschnelli has quit IRC
1312017-11-08T09:43:25 *** bordeaux_facile has quit IRC
1322017-11-08T09:43:25 *** robby938 has quit IRC
1332017-11-08T09:43:25 *** wbnns has quit IRC
1342017-11-08T09:43:25 *** CodeShark has quit IRC
1352017-11-08T09:47:00 *** Masaomi[m] has quit IRC
1362017-11-08T09:47:01 *** kewde[m] has quit IRC
1372017-11-08T09:48:39 *** shesek has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1382017-11-08T09:49:04 *** btcdrak has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1392017-11-08T09:49:05 *** felco has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1402017-11-08T09:49:05 *** rubensayshi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1412017-11-08T09:49:05 *** pindarhk_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1422017-11-08T09:49:05 *** unholymachine has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1432017-11-08T09:49:05 *** eragmus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1442017-11-08T09:49:05 *** derbumi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1452017-11-08T09:49:05 *** jimpo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1462017-11-08T09:49:05 *** NielsvG has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1472017-11-08T09:49:05 *** bitbee has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1482017-11-08T09:49:05 *** newbold has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1492017-11-08T09:49:05 *** gwillen has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1502017-11-08T09:49:05 *** adam3us has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1512017-11-08T09:49:05 *** jonasschnelli has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1522017-11-08T09:49:05 *** bordeaux_facile has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1532017-11-08T09:49:05 *** wbnns has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1542017-11-08T09:49:05 *** robby938 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1552017-11-08T09:49:05 *** CodeShark has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1562017-11-08T09:49:09 *** shesek has quit IRC
1572017-11-08T09:49:09 *** shesek has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1582017-11-08T09:49:19 *** mlz has quit IRC
1592017-11-08T09:51:25 *** mlz has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1602017-11-08T09:56:56 *** herzmeister[m] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1612017-11-08T10:05:44 *** griswaalt[m] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1622017-11-08T10:05:44 *** kewde[m] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1632017-11-08T10:05:56 *** Masaomi[m] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1642017-11-08T10:10:21 *** wxss has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1652017-11-08T10:14:41 *** adetate has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1662017-11-08T10:24:03 *** rafalcpp has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1672017-11-08T10:33:52 *** Ylbam has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1682017-11-08T10:41:44 *** timothy has quit IRC
1692017-11-08T10:44:54 *** btcdrak has quit IRC
1702017-11-08T10:49:11 *** timothy has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1712017-11-08T10:53:01 *** shesek has quit IRC
1722017-11-08T10:53:46 *** promag has quit IRC
1732017-11-08T10:54:03 *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1742017-11-08T10:55:35 *** StopAndDecrypt_ has quit IRC
1752017-11-08T10:56:18 *** StopAndDecrypt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1762017-11-08T11:07:01 *** shesek has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1772017-11-08T11:07:02 *** shesek has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1782017-11-08T11:16:15 *** shesek has quit IRC
1792017-11-08T11:16:50 *** shesek has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1802017-11-08T11:16:51 *** shesek has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1812017-11-08T11:35:38 *** laurentmt has quit IRC
1822017-11-08T11:41:30 *** lukedashjr has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1832017-11-08T11:42:23 *** luke-jr has quit IRC
1842017-11-08T11:43:32 *** promag has quit IRC
1852017-11-08T11:44:42 *** laurentmt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1862017-11-08T11:45:54 *** lukedashjr is now known as luke-jr
1872017-11-08T11:50:03 *** manamex has left #bitcoin-core-dev
1882017-11-08T11:51:55 *** shesek has quit IRC
1892017-11-08T11:56:25 *** shesek has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1902017-11-08T11:56:26 *** shesek has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1912017-11-08T11:58:38 *** ula has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1922017-11-08T12:06:58 *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1932017-11-08T12:12:43 *** shesek has quit IRC
1942017-11-08T12:15:02 *** SopaXorzTaker has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1952017-11-08T12:15:04 *** Khunbish has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1962017-11-08T12:17:28 *** adetate has quit IRC
1972017-11-08T12:18:23 *** shesek has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1982017-11-08T12:18:23 *** shesek has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1992017-11-08T12:18:40 *** Khunbish has quit IRC
2002017-11-08T12:23:05 *** shesek has quit IRC
2012017-11-08T12:26:17 *** shesek has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2022017-11-08T13:03:30 *** promag has quit IRC
2032017-11-08T13:14:41 <instagibbs> achow101, same issue for months locally
2042017-11-08T13:15:11 <instagibbs> "glad" im not the only one
2052017-11-08T13:20:42 *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2062017-11-08T13:21:36 <morcos> can you guys open an issue or something for these test failures. they should not be failing. they can be annoying to debug, but i feel like we are slowly improving them so lets not become immune to failures
2072017-11-08T13:35:16 <jnewbery> #11468 should make comp test framework tests more debuggable (and we should remove them entirely at some point)
2082017-11-08T13:35:17 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11468 | [tests] Make comp test framework more debuggable by jnewbery · Pull Request #11468 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
2092017-11-08T13:37:28 <luke-jr> I noticed timeouts give a useless assertion error with regard to times.. I wonder what it would take to have the message describe the actual condition
2102017-11-08T13:38:48 <luke-jr> (otoh, the traceback typically includes that, so not a huge deal)
2112017-11-08T13:39:46 *** promag has quit IRC
2122017-11-08T13:41:50 *** btcdrak has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2132017-11-08T13:44:01 <jnewbery> luke-jr: yeah, it's buried in there, but assert message could def be improved
2142017-11-08T13:45:17 <luke-jr> just not sure how to do that kind of thing with Python. I guess catch it and analyze the traceback object to get info to re-throw with?
2152017-11-08T13:50:24 *** meshcollider has quit IRC
2162017-11-08T13:51:19 *** Gnof has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2172017-11-08T13:52:52 *** Giszmo1 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2182017-11-08T14:00:19 *** Giszmo has quit IRC
2192017-11-08T14:00:19 *** Giszmo1 has quit IRC
2202017-11-08T14:02:55 *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2212017-11-08T14:03:01 <jnewbery> correct. That's possible with traceback: https://docs.python.org/3/library/traceback.html
2222017-11-08T14:12:36 *** Ylbam has quit IRC
2232017-11-08T14:19:09 *** Manoj_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2242017-11-08T14:23:40 *** Manoj_ has quit IRC
2252017-11-08T14:25:18 *** xinxi has quit IRC
2262017-11-08T14:25:51 *** xinxi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2272017-11-08T14:31:04 *** Khunbish has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2282017-11-08T14:31:18 *** jb55 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2292017-11-08T14:39:37 *** jb55 has quit IRC
2302017-11-08T14:39:42 *** Khunbish has quit IRC
2312017-11-08T14:40:08 *** jb55 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2322017-11-08T14:40:51 *** Khunbish has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2332017-11-08T14:44:39 *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2342017-11-08T14:46:48 *** laurentmt has quit IRC
2352017-11-08T14:48:42 *** laurentmt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2362017-11-08T14:57:15 *** MrPaz has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2372017-11-08T15:13:17 *** jb55 has quit IRC
2382017-11-08T15:15:22 *** adetate has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2392017-11-08T15:17:34 <MarcoFalke> re: test failure. Agree that an issue should be opened in case the fix is not trivial.
2402017-11-08T15:18:19 <MarcoFalke> Also, the command line switch to jump into pdb only works on shutdown/teardown of nodes
2412017-11-08T15:18:34 *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2422017-11-08T15:18:36 <MarcoFalke> Currently not possible where the assertion hits, iirc
2432017-11-08T15:27:18 *** arubi has quit IRC
2442017-11-08T15:27:18 *** zshlyk has quit IRC
2452017-11-08T15:27:18 *** dermoth has quit IRC
2462017-11-08T15:27:18 *** ghost43 has quit IRC
2472017-11-08T15:31:37 *** shesek has quit IRC
2482017-11-08T15:32:13 *** jtimon has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2492017-11-08T15:33:23 *** zshlyk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2502017-11-08T15:34:08 *** ghost43 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2512017-11-08T15:34:16 *** arubi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2522017-11-08T15:37:14 *** promag has quit IRC
2532017-11-08T15:39:09 *** Aaronvan_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2542017-11-08T15:42:53 *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
2552017-11-08T15:43:01 *** Khunbish has quit IRC
2562017-11-08T15:44:52 *** shesek has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2572017-11-08T15:44:52 *** shesek has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2582017-11-08T15:47:58 *** Guest3097 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2592017-11-08T15:54:13 *** Guest3097 has quit IRC
2602017-11-08T15:56:43 *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2612017-11-08T15:59:10 *** arubi has quit IRC
2622017-11-08T15:59:27 *** Aaronvan_ has quit IRC
2632017-11-08T15:59:31 *** arubi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2642017-11-08T16:01:37 *** btcdrak has quit IRC
2652017-11-08T16:20:42 *** promag has quit IRC
2662017-11-08T16:24:22 *** quantbot has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2672017-11-08T16:24:32 *** quantbot_ has quit IRC
2682017-11-08T16:24:49 <BlueMatt> luke-jr: care to close #10593 or at least provide some justification? there were objections about it in principal and you didn't materially address them or explain what the pr was even trying to do.....
2692017-11-08T16:24:52 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10593 | Relax punishment for peers relaying invalid blocks and headers by luke-jr · Pull Request #10593 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
2702017-11-08T16:26:54 *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2712017-11-08T16:31:28 *** goatpig has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2722017-11-08T16:33:02 *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
2732017-11-08T16:53:31 *** LumberCartel has quit IRC
2742017-11-08T17:00:21 *** shesek has quit IRC
2752017-11-08T17:03:13 *** shesek has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2762017-11-08T17:03:14 *** shesek has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2772017-11-08T17:05:26 <luke-jr> BlueMatt: the ONLY objection I see there is Suhas assuming it reverts 8305, which isn't "in principle" and isn't even true..
2782017-11-08T17:07:01 <luke-jr> elaborated a bit on the OP description
2792017-11-08T17:08:47 *** adetate has quit IRC
2802017-11-08T17:10:36 *** kkode has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2812017-11-08T17:10:37 *** bule2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2822017-11-08T17:14:38 *** Khunbish has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2832017-11-08T17:14:45 *** MrPaz has quit IRC
2842017-11-08T17:15:57 *** shesek has quit IRC
2852017-11-08T17:25:58 *** MrPaz has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2862017-11-08T17:36:56 *** tux3do has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2872017-11-08T17:39:19 *** MrPaz has quit IRC
2882017-11-08T17:40:29 *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2892017-11-08T17:40:57 *** BashCo has quit IRC
2902017-11-08T17:41:33 *** BashCo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2912017-11-08T17:46:17 *** BashCo has quit IRC
2922017-11-08T17:46:52 *** kkode has quit IRC
2932017-11-08T17:48:33 *** Gnof has quit IRC
2942017-11-08T17:53:14 *** quantbot_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2952017-11-08T17:53:14 *** quantbot has quit IRC
2962017-11-08T17:56:19 *** quantbot has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2972017-11-08T17:57:21 *** quantbot_ has quit IRC
2982017-11-08T18:00:15 *** BashCo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2992017-11-08T18:01:47 *** jb55 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3002017-11-08T18:04:16 *** Aaronvan_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3012017-11-08T18:04:56 *** pbase has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3022017-11-08T18:06:01 *** ExtraCrispy has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3032017-11-08T18:06:49 *** meshcollider has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3042017-11-08T18:07:04 <karelb> Is 0.15.1 "canceled" now? :)
3052017-11-08T18:07:21 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/77546a3182e5...0a2f46b0158b
3062017-11-08T18:07:22 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 7536b08 practicalswift: trivial: Fix typo â alreardy â already
3072017-11-08T18:07:22 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 0a2f46b MarcoFalke: Merge #11635: trivial: Fix typo â alreardy â already...
3082017-11-08T18:07:52 *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
3092017-11-08T18:08:13 *** Arokh has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3102017-11-08T18:08:50 *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3112017-11-08T18:09:48 <meshcollider> karelb: cancelled? Why?
3122017-11-08T18:09:51 <luke-jr> karelb: meh, might as well get bugfixes out
3132017-11-08T18:09:55 <luke-jr> meshcollider: 2X aborted
3142017-11-08T18:10:09 <meshcollider> What really :O yay!
3152017-11-08T18:10:16 <Chris_Stewart_5> ... so is segwit support wallet support back on the menu for 0.15.1?? :P
3162017-11-08T18:10:31 <luke-jr> meshcollider: https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-segwit2x/2017-November/000685.html
3172017-11-08T18:10:55 <meshcollider> Only just woke up, excellent start to the day \o/
3182017-11-08T18:11:07 <gmaxwell> lol
3192017-11-08T18:11:15 <gmaxwell> there are other fixes in 0.15.1
3202017-11-08T18:11:24 *** MrPaz has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3212017-11-08T18:11:37 <karelb> yeah I saw the backports list :)
3222017-11-08T18:12:04 <gmaxwell> also, there is no guarentee that B2X won't fork anyways, it might not be completely centeralized.
3232017-11-08T18:12:46 <Chris_Stewart_5> it will be interesting to see how fast the node count drops
3242017-11-08T18:12:50 <luke-jr> gmaxwell: lol
3252017-11-08T18:14:19 <gmaxwell> last three blocks still "NYA" signaling.
3262017-11-08T18:14:43 <sipa> asia is asleep
3272017-11-08T18:14:51 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 4 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/0a2f46b0158b...f7388e93d3dd
3282017-11-08T18:14:52 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master b86c1cd John Newbery: [tests] fix TestNode.__getattr__() method
3292017-11-08T18:14:53 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 5e5725c John Newbery: [tests] Add p2p connection to TestNode...
3302017-11-08T18:14:53 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 32ae82f John Newbery: [tests] use TestNode p2p connection in tests
3312017-11-08T18:14:59 <sipa> also, no reason to cancel the 0.15.1 release which is already in RC
3322017-11-08T18:15:11 <sipa> though decision is up to wumpus i'd say
3332017-11-08T18:15:16 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #11182: [tests] Add P2P interface to TestNode (master...test_node_p2p) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11182
3342017-11-08T18:15:18 <MarcoFalke> Is there be going to be a 15.2?
3352017-11-08T18:15:54 <gmaxwell> I'm still in favor of 0.15.1 though I do think the urgency is reduced a little.
3362017-11-08T18:16:04 <Chris_Stewart_5> MarcoFalke: It was my understanding that is the release for segwit wallet support because of s2x stuff
3372017-11-08T18:16:48 <jnewbery> I reckon the improvements in v0.15.1 are helpful to fortify against any hostile hard fork. Si vis pacem, para bellum.
3382017-11-08T18:16:58 <luke-jr> I thought we moved it to an early 0.16 *shrug*
3392017-11-08T18:17:16 <MarcoFalke> Yeah. 15.1 has other bugfixes in as well. Though, not all that I liked to put in
3402017-11-08T18:17:23 <MarcoFalke> We should get it out ntl
3412017-11-08T18:17:39 <sipa> luke-jr: undecided in last meeting, but i think that's a reasonable thing to do - push 0.16 forward a bit rather than a 0.15.2 in between
3422017-11-08T18:18:40 <gmaxwell> I hope a lot rather than a bit. :)
3432017-11-08T18:18:47 <gmaxwell> that would be pretty awesome.
3442017-11-08T18:20:26 <MarcoFalke> Can move it at most 1 or 2 months ahead. Moving it to december would be way too rushed, imo
3452017-11-08T18:22:14 <aj> is it bringing 0.16 features forward or renaming 0.15.2 as 0.16 and 0.16 as 0.17?
3462017-11-08T18:23:01 <luke-jr> meh, when it's ready it's ready..?
3472017-11-08T18:23:04 <luke-jr> aj: IMO the latter
3482017-11-08T18:26:30 <aj> MarcoFalke: 0.16 timeline has two months for translations, that seems like it puts an absolute minimum? ie, make the decision on friday, open translations this month some time, then no release prior to mid january?
3492017-11-08T18:26:53 <MarcoFalke> aj: Segwit wallet review/testing is still needed
3502017-11-08T18:28:29 <aj> MarcoFalke: yeah. and needed prior to merging and hence prior to translations?
3512017-11-08T18:29:26 <MarcoFalke> ideally
3522017-11-08T18:32:55 *** ula has quit IRC
3532017-11-08T18:39:27 *** daljeet has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3542017-11-08T18:40:44 *** ula has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3552017-11-08T18:41:36 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #11637: Remove dead service bits code (master...Mf1711-p2pDead) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11637
3562017-11-08T18:41:55 *** daljeet has quit IRC
3572017-11-08T18:47:21 *** laurentmt has quit IRC
3582017-11-08T18:47:48 *** chjj has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3592017-11-08T18:50:31 *** kambinghitam has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3602017-11-08T18:52:09 *** Aaronvan_ has quit IRC
3612017-11-08T18:52:40 *** bule2 has quit IRC
3622017-11-08T18:55:37 *** SopaXorzTaker has quit IRC
3632017-11-08T18:58:32 *** SopaXorzTaker has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3642017-11-08T18:59:58 *** kambinghitam has quit IRC
3652017-11-08T19:00:35 *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
3662017-11-08T19:02:22 *** timothy has quit IRC
3672017-11-08T19:02:39 <gmaxwell> MarcoFalke: there are thousands of b2x nodes that will go off in space still, and also still make bcash nodes that are off in space.
3682017-11-08T19:02:54 <gmaxwell> MarcoFalke: so I don't think removing the service flag thing makes sense.
3692017-11-08T19:02:58 <gmaxwell> unless I'm missing something.
3702017-11-08T19:03:20 <achow101> gmaxwell: for 0.16, not 0.15.x I think
3712017-11-08T19:03:28 <achow101> hopefully they'll be gone by then
3722017-11-08T19:03:33 *** kambinghitam has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3732017-11-08T19:03:51 <gmaxwell> they're not gone yet, and if they're not by then we need to add it back. Plus people run master.
3742017-11-08T19:03:55 <gmaxwell> (some people)
3752017-11-08T19:04:01 <MarcoFalke> Jup, this is meant for 0.16. We can merge it in a couple of weeks. That should be fine, no?
3762017-11-08T19:04:26 *** ula has quit IRC
3772017-11-08T19:04:29 *** kambinghitam has quit IRC
3782017-11-08T19:04:32 <gmaxwell> I don't expect it'll make it for 0.16. There are still hundreds of bcash nodes that use the old magic.
3792017-11-08T19:04:41 <gmaxwell> no harm in having a pull req, I suppose.
3802017-11-08T19:05:31 <achow101> maybe we should hold off on that until shortly before 0.16 and re-evaluate then
3812017-11-08T19:05:35 *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3822017-11-08T19:06:36 *** ula has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3832017-11-08T19:07:05 <cfields> oh, commented on the PR before i saw the discussion here. Agree it's too early for that.
3842017-11-08T19:08:28 *** ExtraCrispy has quit IRC
3852017-11-08T19:09:56 *** adetate has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3862017-11-08T19:10:52 *** chjj has quit IRC
3872017-11-08T19:14:46 *** SopaXorzTaker has quit IRC
3882017-11-08T19:28:39 *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3892017-11-08T19:30:15 *** bule has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3902017-11-08T19:31:45 *** bule2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3912017-11-08T19:31:54 *** bule has quit IRC
3922017-11-08T19:31:57 *** bule2 is now known as bule
3932017-11-08T19:32:36 *** promag has quit IRC
3942017-11-08T19:36:35 <achow101> can we remove the "good first issue" tag from the release schedule issue? It apparently confuses the people that I talk to about how they can start contributing to core
3952017-11-08T19:38:46 <sdaftuar> luke-jr: regarding #10593 -- as i read the code, a peer serving a header that doesn't connect will be assigned 20 dos points. is that correct?
3962017-11-08T19:38:48 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10593 | Relax punishment for peers relaying invalid blocks and headers by luke-jr · Pull Request #10593 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
3972017-11-08T19:40:38 <sdaftuar> luke-jr: actually, scratch that (i just looked at it again)
3982017-11-08T19:40:53 <sdaftuar> luke-jr: an outbound peer that serves a header that doesn't connect will be disconnected?
3992017-11-08T19:41:04 <luke-jr> sdaftuar: right
4002017-11-08T19:41:38 <luke-jr> we want our outbound peers to always be on the same chain ideally
4012017-11-08T19:41:45 <sdaftuar> so in particular someone mining a block 2 hours ahead can split the network
4022017-11-08T19:42:34 <luke-jr> disconnecting outbound peers only should never split the network, am I wrong?
4032017-11-08T19:44:11 <sdaftuar> i think, at the least, that being so aggressive is risky
4042017-11-08T19:45:54 <luke-jr> it might make sense to be softer on the time rule I guessw
4052017-11-08T19:46:41 <luke-jr> not sure that's related to this PR though
4062017-11-08T19:47:02 <sdaftuar> the point of that unconnecting headers PR was to avoid (eventual) disconnection in the situation where peers weren't on an incompatible chain
4072017-11-08T19:47:09 <sdaftuar> that's why i called your PR a reversion of that logic
4082017-11-08T19:47:40 <luke-jr> it only disconnects when the peer *is* on an incompatible chain, though?
4092017-11-08T19:47:51 <sdaftuar> i don't think so? it disconnects if they serve a header that doesn't connect
4102017-11-08T19:47:56 <sdaftuar> which could be for a number of reasons
4112017-11-08T19:48:04 <sdaftuar> including the intermediate block being just over 2 hrs in the future
4122017-11-08T19:48:16 <sdaftuar> or because they sent a header when they shoudl have sent an inv or something
4132017-11-08T19:48:32 <sdaftuar> which is a p2p error, not a consensus error
4142017-11-08T19:49:12 *** neep3r has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4152017-11-08T19:49:28 <luke-jr> not sure disconnecting for p2p errors is a bad thing; are there any cases where it's neither a p2p issue nor a consensus error (which the 2h limit kindof is)?
4162017-11-08T19:49:35 <sdaftuar> but the original way i saw this was on testnet, where a peer using headers announcements for blocks (eg via the sendheaders p2p protocol) would announce a block, via header, that didn't connect, because the prior block was on the wrong side of the 2hr rule
4172017-11-08T19:49:37 <luke-jr> and don't we disconnect after N such headers anyway already?
4182017-11-08T19:50:19 <sdaftuar> we do, but we set N to be big-ish to account for this occasionally happening iirc
4192017-11-08T19:50:59 <sdaftuar> the thing that scares me is if an attacker can get us to disconnect an outbound peer
4202017-11-08T19:51:11 <sdaftuar> i mean, disconnect an outbound peer for spurious reasons
4212017-11-08T19:51:20 <sdaftuar> because that makes us more vulnerable to sybil attack
4222017-11-08T19:51:28 <luke-jr> hmm
4232017-11-08T19:53:58 *** tux3do has quit IRC
4242017-11-08T19:54:07 *** jb55 has quit IRC
4252017-11-08T19:54:08 <luke-jr> sdaftuar: can you think of any cases besides the time one this might be an issue for?
4262017-11-08T19:54:09 *** neep3r is now known as tux3do
4272017-11-08T19:57:57 *** AndBobsYourUncle has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4282017-11-08T19:57:58 <sdaftuar> well i think matt hated the idea that peers couldn't just switch to announcing everything via header, rather than having to send an inv if they weren't sure the header would connect
4292017-11-08T19:58:10 <sdaftuar> the idea that we might disconnect a peer for an unconnecting header is an undocumented p2p behavior
4302017-11-08T19:58:27 *** pbase has quit IRC
4312017-11-08T19:58:56 <sdaftuar> so i think it's sort of a question of how the p2p layer ought to work, and what we should tolerate
4322017-11-08T20:03:22 *** bule has quit IRC
4332017-11-08T20:03:49 *** bule has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4342017-11-08T20:12:24 *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
4352017-11-08T20:13:51 *** roasbeef has quit IRC
4362017-11-08T20:14:02 *** hg_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4372017-11-08T20:15:27 *** jtimon has quit IRC
4382017-11-08T20:17:22 <luke-jr> sdaftuar: so long as you know your peers have header X, sending X+1, X+2, etc should be safe so long as they're on the same chain?
4392017-11-08T20:17:30 <luke-jr> (and if they're not, you don't want them as a primary peer)
4402017-11-08T20:18:34 <sdaftuar> i'm not sure i understand your question, but i think the answer is yes. can you remind me what case you're concerned about addressing?
4412017-11-08T20:18:48 *** hg_ is now known as hnfgns
4422017-11-08T20:19:21 <sdaftuar> i think the recently merged PRs for 0.15.1 address all the cases of bad outbound peer that i was able to come up with, with the goal of ensuring that not all of the outbound peers are on bogus chains
4432017-11-08T20:19:46 <sdaftuar> (i'm actually working on a document now that explains all the cases and our logic, which i can share when i'm done)
4442017-11-08T20:20:12 *** bule has quit IRC
4452017-11-08T20:20:37 *** bule has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4462017-11-08T20:20:53 *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4472017-11-08T20:22:40 *** AndBobsYourUncle has quit IRC
4482017-11-08T20:24:07 *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4492017-11-08T20:24:58 *** jtimon has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4502017-11-08T20:25:23 *** Ylbam has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4512017-11-08T20:25:59 *** clarkmoody has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4522017-11-08T20:26:51 *** AndBobsYourUncle has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4532017-11-08T20:31:08 *** bule has quit IRC
4542017-11-08T20:31:43 *** bule has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4552017-11-08T20:32:27 *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4562017-11-08T20:32:38 *** hnfgns has quit IRC
4572017-11-08T20:33:17 *** hnfgns has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4582017-11-08T20:33:35 <luke-jr> sdaftuar: "This is necessary to avoid banning peers that merely run old formerly-full nodes, after a softfork. We disconnect primary peers because we want compatible full nodes for that role, but allow non-full nodes to remain connected to inbound slots so they can sync the correct chain from us."
4592017-11-08T20:34:03 *** LumberCartel has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4602017-11-08T20:34:25 *** JackH has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4612017-11-08T20:34:33 <luke-jr> I suppose there's no reason we couldn't leave the counter in too.
4622017-11-08T20:34:40 *** tux3do has quit IRC
4632017-11-08T20:36:02 *** bule has quit IRC
4642017-11-08T20:36:25 *** bule has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4652017-11-08T20:38:21 *** LumberCartel has quit IRC
4662017-11-08T20:41:37 *** promag has quit IRC
4672017-11-08T20:47:22 *** cheese_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4682017-11-08T20:48:21 *** ekrion has quit IRC
4692017-11-08T20:50:27 *** ekrion has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4702017-11-08T20:51:05 *** jtimon has quit IRC
4712017-11-08T20:57:54 *** wunpunch has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4722017-11-08T20:59:02 <sdaftuar> luke-jr: ok yes, i agree with that objective (sorry i haven't paged in your PR in a while). i will try to take a look with fresh eyes, i've lost track a little of where we are (i seem to recall some other PRs that try to address this as well)
4732017-11-08T21:00:23 <sdaftuar> to rephrase -- i think we have enough protection in place for outbound peers now (to ensure that we're not solely connected to bogus outbound peers). but we can do more to protect inbound peers from disconnection, eg in the event that they are unaware of a softfork
4742017-11-08T21:03:49 *** hnfgns has quit IRC
4752017-11-08T21:04:03 *** hnfgns has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4762017-11-08T21:04:04 *** adetate has quit IRC
4772017-11-08T21:07:02 *** RoyceX has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4782017-11-08T21:07:28 *** jb55 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4792017-11-08T21:09:52 *** cheese_ has quit IRC
4802017-11-08T21:15:30 *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
4812017-11-08T21:19:39 <BlueMatt> luke-jr: you might consider rebasing on #11639
4822017-11-08T21:19:40 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11639 | Rewrite the interface between validation and net_processing wrt DoS by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #11639 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
4832017-11-08T21:20:03 <BlueMatt> then you get nice things like invalid reasons (including SOFT_FORK and BAD_TIME) so you can avoid splitting the network
4842017-11-08T21:20:16 <BlueMatt> plus the resulting pr will be much clearer
4852017-11-08T21:26:24 *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
4862017-11-08T21:34:50 *** p3scobar has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4872017-11-08T21:34:58 <p3scobar> Roger, you in here?
4882017-11-08T21:35:32 *** p3scobar has quit IRC
4892017-11-08T21:35:55 *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4902017-11-08T21:43:27 *** hnfgns has quit IRC
4912017-11-08T21:45:35 *** lxer has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4922017-11-08T21:45:44 *** hnfgns has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4932017-11-08T21:48:29 *** MrPaz has quit IRC
4942017-11-08T21:50:12 *** AndBobsYourUncle has quit IRC
4952017-11-08T21:53:21 *** LumberCartel has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4962017-11-08T21:56:50 *** wunpunch has quit IRC
4972017-11-08T21:59:33 *** StopAndDecrypt has quit IRC
4982017-11-08T22:04:10 *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4992017-11-08T22:04:13 *** StopAndDecrypt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5002017-11-08T22:06:53 *** chjj has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5012017-11-08T22:11:52 *** RoyceX has quit IRC
5022017-11-08T22:12:25 *** RoyceX has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5032017-11-08T22:16:31 *** meshcollider has quit IRC
5042017-11-08T22:16:37 *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5052017-11-08T22:20:52 *** RoyceX has quit IRC
5062017-11-08T22:24:50 <luke-jr> BlueMatt: from the description, I wonder if 11639 makes 10593 unnecessary
5072017-11-08T22:25:04 <BlueMatt> it might, i still dont fully understand 10593
5082017-11-08T22:25:12 <BlueMatt> but 11639 (mostly) doesnt change behavior
5092017-11-08T22:25:26 <luke-jr> BlueMatt: the goal of 10593 is essentially to not ban pre-softfork nodes
5102017-11-08T22:25:55 <BlueMatt> I doubt its fully fixed by 11639, but I dont know exactly which case you're handling differently there
5112017-11-08T22:30:39 *** Cogito_Ergo_Sum has quit IRC
5122017-11-08T22:30:51 <promag> ryanofsky: ping
5132017-11-08T22:31:50 <ryanofsky> i'm here
5142017-11-08T22:32:12 <promag> does the qt test timeout?
5152017-11-08T22:32:48 <promag> if one callback stays pending
5162017-11-08T22:34:03 <ryanofsky> it will hang if an expected signal never arrives
5172017-11-08T22:34:37 <ryanofsky> existing wallettests also does this, probably there should be a global test timeout
5182017-11-08T22:35:05 <promag> ok, something to improve later if relevant
5192017-11-08T22:36:32 *** boreddanman has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5202017-11-08T22:37:55 *** spinza has quit IRC
5212017-11-08T22:38:34 <boreddanman> Hey all, my name is Dan, and I'm a software engineer & crypto analyst. Figured i'd stop by the dev chat to see what's cookin'
5222017-11-08T22:39:02 <BlueMatt> not much, usually, usually pretty quiet unless people are talking about specific things - keeps the backlog short so folks can stay caught up easily
5232017-11-08T22:40:03 <boreddanman> gotchya. any other channels i should check out?
5242017-11-08T22:41:43 <BlueMatt> #bitcoin is more active, #bitcoin-wizards is occasionally interesting
5252017-11-08T22:43:47 *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
5262017-11-08T22:44:06 *** hnfgns has quit IRC
5272017-11-08T22:48:07 *** AndBobsYourUncle has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5282017-11-08T22:48:19 *** xinxi has quit IRC
5292017-11-08T22:48:52 *** xinxi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5302017-11-08T22:50:31 *** CubicEarth has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5312017-11-08T22:51:11 *** hnfgns has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5322017-11-08T22:54:29 *** promag has quit IRC
5332017-11-08T22:55:08 *** bule has quit IRC
5342017-11-08T22:56:50 *** MrPaz has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5352017-11-08T22:57:14 *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5362017-11-08T22:57:23 *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5372017-11-08T22:59:12 *** hnfgns has quit IRC
5382017-11-08T23:01:52 *** promag has quit IRC
5392017-11-08T23:03:07 *** Khunbish has quit IRC
5402017-11-08T23:11:21 *** spinza has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5412017-11-08T23:11:51 *** bule has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5422017-11-08T23:13:24 *** Cheeseo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5432017-11-08T23:15:45 *** Victor_sueca has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5442017-11-08T23:16:28 *** fanquake has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5452017-11-08T23:18:12 *** Cheeseo has quit IRC
5462017-11-08T23:18:25 *** Victorsueca has quit IRC
5472017-11-08T23:19:32 <fanquake> morcos see #11632
5482017-11-08T23:19:33 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11632 | p2p-fullblocktest.py fails occasionally · Issue #11632 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
5492017-11-08T23:19:44 *** fanquake has quit IRC
5502017-11-08T23:20:38 *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
5512017-11-08T23:21:05 *** hnfgns has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5522017-11-08T23:24:37 *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
5532017-11-08T23:26:28 *** CubicEarth has quit IRC
5542017-11-08T23:28:29 *** hellocoin has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5552017-11-08T23:30:21 *** hellocoin has quit IRC
5562017-11-08T23:46:07 *** quantbot_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5572017-11-08T23:46:07 *** quantbot has quit IRC
5582017-11-08T23:47:30 *** quantbot has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5592017-11-08T23:49:21 *** bule2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5602017-11-08T23:49:30 *** Victor_sueca is now known as Victorsueca
5612017-11-08T23:50:21 *** quantbot_ has quit IRC
5622017-11-08T23:52:31 *** bule2 has quit IRC
5632017-11-08T23:54:39 *** AndBobsYourUncle has quit IRC
5642017-11-08T23:57:00 *** mxg has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5652017-11-08T23:58:45 *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev