12018-07-06T00:01:39 *** shesek has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
22018-07-06T00:01:39 *** shesek has quit IRC
32018-07-06T00:01:39 *** shesek has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
42018-07-06T00:07:22 *** drexl has quit IRC
52018-07-06T00:08:45 *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
62018-07-06T00:08:49 *** Dyaheon has quit IRC
72018-07-06T00:09:25 *** rex4539 has quit IRC
82018-07-06T00:09:46 *** Dyaheon has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
92018-07-06T00:11:31 *** ctrlbreak_MAD has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
102018-07-06T00:14:21 *** ctrlbreak has quit IRC
112018-07-06T00:15:51 *** Emcy has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
122018-07-06T00:17:17 *** YANKEE_games is now known as games_
132018-07-06T00:28:37 *** grafcaps has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
142018-07-06T00:40:28 *** grafcaps has quit IRC
152018-07-06T00:52:47 *** grafcaps has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
162018-07-06T01:24:58 *** grafcaps has quit IRC
172018-07-06T01:31:28 *** grafcaps has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
182018-07-06T01:35:28 *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
192018-07-06T01:38:17 <gmaxwell> sdaftuar: any idea why on #13298 naumenkogs claims that changing the bucket count does not change propagation time? this seems improbable to me in the extreme.
202018-07-06T01:38:19 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/13298 | Net: Random delays *per network group* to obfuscate transaction time by naumenkogs · Pull Request #13298 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
212018-07-06T01:38:45 <gmaxwell> Since e.g. 2 buckets should be effectively half the delay to relay to someone.
222018-07-06T01:38:49 <gmaxwell> vs 1
232018-07-06T01:39:06 <sipa> gmaxwell: because in practice propagation is much faster through outgoing connections
242018-07-06T01:39:16 <sipa> (where there is no bucket limit)
252018-07-06T01:39:17 <gmaxwell> if it's true, what it means is basically all the propagation is done via outbounds...
262018-07-06T01:39:39 <sipa> right
272018-07-06T01:39:39 <gmaxwell> which is fine, but then thats an argument for using 1 bucket
282018-07-06T01:39:59 <sipa> the argument against 1 bucket is bandwidth spikes
292018-07-06T01:41:56 <gmaxwell> right now the code is n=8, r=2, which gleb didn't post images. And his figures give 63% success for first spy.
302018-07-06T01:42:29 <gmaxwell> I was expecting 2,4 based on the comment "From these numbers, 2 buckets and R=4 seems optimal."
312018-07-06T01:42:37 *** nmnkgl has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
322018-07-06T01:43:24 <gmaxwell> nmnkgl: https://0bin.net/paste/JglfiwFb85oBwU6K#wNRzTWRa7TIbbKJibWAGRxMBZ7jh54JsUwc7xisTkoc
332018-07-06T01:45:37 <nmnkgl> Well, I might have been confusing in my messages. Propagation time is slower 25-40% for r=4 comparing to r=2.
342018-07-06T01:46:16 <nmnkgl> Oh, that's about buckets, right.
352018-07-06T01:47:15 <gmaxwell> nmnkgl: well we can always decrease the base speed to get the propagation time back.
362018-07-06T01:47:39 <gmaxwell> though also I don't have any particular reason to think making propagation slower would be a problem.
372018-07-06T01:48:09 <gmaxwell> with the current behavior we still get very close to 100% hitrates on compact blocks.
382018-07-06T01:48:55 <gmaxwell> I think past analysis of mining stuff suggested that mining infra had average delays on the order of 30 seconds. (e.g. only giving new work to miners somewhat infrequently)
392018-07-06T01:50:27 <nmnkgl> The only thing I'm worried about here is correctness of my results :)
402018-07-06T01:50:32 *** schmidty_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
412018-07-06T01:50:58 <gmaxwell> nmnkgl: your result isn't surprising if we assume that almost all propagation is done by the outbound side, which is plausable.
422018-07-06T01:51:01 *** schmidty_ has quit IRC
432018-07-06T01:51:02 *** schmidty_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
442018-07-06T01:51:40 <gmaxwell> esp if, as I assume, your topology has all nodes with similar order and all accepting inbound.
452018-07-06T01:52:36 <sipa> so the propagation speed across the network should be to some extent influenced by the time until the _first_ broadcast of a given transaction
462018-07-06T01:52:42 <nmnkgl> I can measure what fraction is relayed through outgoing if we won't come up with a good explanation.
472018-07-06T01:53:07 <sipa> if you have more independent buckets, that time will be lower, because there are more independent broadcast events
482018-07-06T01:53:09 <gmaxwell> (luke's figures suggest about 10% of nodes are listening)
492018-07-06T01:53:23 <sipa> turns out there is a simple formula for the minimum of multiple exponential distributions
502018-07-06T01:53:34 <gmaxwell> sipa: but in terms of estimating e.g. impact on CB performance, the first delay is irrelevant.
512018-07-06T01:54:02 <sipa> gmaxwell: no it isn't- as soon as the transaction is out, the rest of the network has a chance to relay it - even to your own peers
522018-07-06T01:54:28 <sipa> i didn't mean to claim this is the dominant factor in propagation, but it matters
532018-07-06T01:55:12 <gmaxwell> sipa: I just mean that we don't care about the time until the second node gets it, we care about the time between the second node and almost all nodes.
542018-07-06T01:55:33 <sipa> something in between, i think
552018-07-06T01:55:42 <gmaxwell> why in between?
562018-07-06T01:55:59 <gmaxwell> I think we're probably talking past each other.
572018-07-06T01:56:02 <sipa> perhaps
582018-07-06T01:56:28 <nmnkgl> To be clear, I observed delay of less that 10% if increasing n buckets. In most of the cases up to 5%.
592018-07-06T01:56:35 <nmnkgl> To be clear, I observed delay of less than 10% if increasing n buckets. In most of the cases up to 5%.
602018-07-06T01:56:37 <gmaxwell> I think all these times are fast enough they're more or less background noise compared to ten minute confirmations and whatnot. But they can potentially impact CB effectiveness.
612018-07-06T01:57:34 <sipa> i'm just trying to argue that having more buckets should be espected to reduce overall propagation delay across the network
622018-07-06T01:57:45 <sipa> even if the average time for sending to any given peer is the same
632018-07-06T01:58:26 <gmaxwell> OH
642018-07-06T01:58:27 <gmaxwell> OKAY
652018-07-06T01:58:46 <gmaxwell> sorry, you and nmnkgl are focused on debugging his simulation and I keep going off topic and trying to optimize the network.
662018-07-06T01:58:54 <sipa> haha ok
672018-07-06T01:59:26 <gmaxwell> yes, indeed, I expect the outbound count would change the propagation time, at least for the first hop, even if almost all the propagation happens via outbound links.
682018-07-06T02:00:53 <gmaxwell> nmnkgl: simulate with r=1, you should see a very dramatic effect from the number of buckets.
692018-07-06T02:01:12 <nmnkgl> will do.
702018-07-06T02:01:41 <gmaxwell> would it be hard for you to simulate only 10% of nodes accepting inbounds?
712018-07-06T02:02:42 <nmnkgl> Not at all, I already did that for spikes measurement.
722018-07-06T02:04:25 *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
732018-07-06T02:05:19 <nmnkgl> I will share results tomorrow morning.
742018-07-06T02:07:06 *** tryphe has quit IRC
752018-07-06T02:07:34 *** tryphe has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
762018-07-06T02:12:48 *** schmidty_ has quit IRC
772018-07-06T02:13:09 *** schmidty_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
782018-07-06T02:29:04 *** schmidty_ has quit IRC
792018-07-06T02:31:57 *** grafcaps has quit IRC
802018-07-06T02:40:53 *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
812018-07-06T02:42:02 *** Tralfaz has quit IRC
822018-07-06T02:43:04 *** grafcaps has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
832018-07-06T02:53:56 *** grafcaps has quit IRC
842018-07-06T03:01:45 *** grafcaps has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
852018-07-06T03:19:52 *** GoldenBear_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
862018-07-06T03:20:22 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] mruddy closed pull request #13596: zmq: update to avoid deprecated zeromq api functions and log zmq version used (master...zmq-deprecation-update) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13596
872018-07-06T03:21:58 *** GoldenBear has quit IRC
882018-07-06T03:33:58 *** grafcaps has quit IRC
892018-07-06T03:57:57 *** bitconner has quit IRC
902018-07-06T04:08:55 *** bitconner has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
912018-07-06T04:17:26 <sipa> jonasschnelli: i realize i'm very late with my review on your scanutxoset RPC... but i'm very surprised by the sweep transaction creation integration
922018-07-06T04:18:01 <sipa> a separate createrawsweeptransaction RPC seems much more useful and sane
932018-07-06T04:21:50 <sipa> the size estimation looks broken too; it assumes everything is P2SH-P2WSH with a dummy script inside?
942018-07-06T04:22:17 <sipa> this is not something you can usefully implement without knowing the scripts involved
952018-07-06T04:25:58 *** Guest20586 has quit IRC
962018-07-06T04:26:24 <sipa> as is, it seems the feature is identical to createrawtransaction with the unspents listed + a simple vbytes per input constant to estimate size
972018-07-06T04:26:35 *** fear has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
982018-07-06T04:26:59 *** fear is now known as Guest48034
992018-07-06T04:31:26 <sipa> Does it even work? It looks to me that for anything P2SH or P2WSH it won't even include the size of transactions in the estimate.
1002018-07-06T04:31:40 <sipa> Eh, size of the signatures.
1012018-07-06T04:32:02 *** unholymachine has quit IRC
1022018-07-06T04:32:13 *** Guest48034 has quit IRC
1032018-07-06T04:32:39 *** fear1 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1042018-07-06T04:36:52 *** jwhoisthat has quit IRC
1052018-07-06T04:37:15 *** fear1 has quit IRC
1062018-07-06T04:38:45 *** fear1 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1072018-07-06T04:40:56 *** jwhoisthat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1082018-07-06T04:41:07 *** fear1 has quit IRC
1092018-07-06T04:42:09 *** fear1 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1102018-07-06T04:43:02 *** sakalli_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1112018-07-06T04:46:15 *** sakalli_ has quit IRC
1122018-07-06T04:46:36 *** fear1 has quit IRC
1132018-07-06T04:48:18 *** fear1 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1142018-07-06T04:54:05 *** fear1 has quit IRC
1152018-07-06T04:57:53 *** fear1 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1162018-07-06T04:59:22 *** jwhoisthat has quit IRC
1172018-07-06T04:59:36 *** fear1 has quit IRC
1182018-07-06T04:59:48 *** jwhoisthat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1192018-07-06T04:59:51 *** fear1 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1202018-07-06T05:00:55 *** fear1 has quit IRC
1212018-07-06T05:12:24 *** fear1 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1222018-07-06T05:15:12 *** nmnkgl has quit IRC
1232018-07-06T05:18:02 *** fear1 has quit IRC
1242018-07-06T05:18:13 *** fear1 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1252018-07-06T05:19:26 *** tryphe has quit IRC
1262018-07-06T05:19:52 *** tryphe has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1272018-07-06T05:20:01 *** shesek has quit IRC
1282018-07-06T05:20:29 *** fear1 has quit IRC
1292018-07-06T05:23:37 *** fear has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1302018-07-06T05:24:01 *** fear is now known as Guest26645
1312018-07-06T05:32:16 *** davec has quit IRC
1322018-07-06T05:52:05 *** nmnkgl has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1332018-07-06T05:54:08 *** Guest26645 has quit IRC
1342018-07-06T05:54:37 *** fear1 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1352018-07-06T05:59:15 *** tryphe_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1362018-07-06T06:01:30 *** tryphe has quit IRC
1372018-07-06T06:14:20 *** bitconner has quit IRC
1382018-07-06T06:15:13 *** Randolf has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1392018-07-06T06:25:08 *** davec has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1402018-07-06T06:29:56 *** grafcaps has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1412018-07-06T06:31:06 *** bitconner has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1422018-07-06T06:31:22 *** Jmabsd has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1432018-07-06T06:34:00 *** grafcaps has quit IRC
1442018-07-06T06:40:35 *** achow101 has quit IRC
1452018-07-06T06:48:15 *** achow101 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1462018-07-06T06:49:29 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] YutakaNakasone opened pull request #13602: Trivial: delete "to" in comment (master...topic) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13602
1472018-07-06T06:54:50 *** marcoagner has quit IRC
1482018-07-06T07:01:23 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/287e4edc2fd2...0212187fc624
1492018-07-06T07:01:23 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 1fc605a Akio Nakamura: fix bench/prevector.cpp...
1502018-07-06T07:01:24 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 0212187 MarcoFalke: Merge #13598: bench: fix incorrect behaviour in prevector.cpp...
1512018-07-06T07:02:23 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #13598: bench: fix incorrect behaviour in prevector.cpp (master...fix_bench_prevector) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13598
1522018-07-06T07:02:44 *** Soligor has quit IRC
1532018-07-06T07:12:02 *** d9b4bef9 has quit IRC
1542018-07-06T07:13:08 *** d9b4bef9 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1552018-07-06T07:16:30 *** Jmabsd has quit IRC
1562018-07-06T07:54:40 *** rex4539 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1572018-07-06T07:59:11 *** lnostdal has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1582018-07-06T08:11:48 *** nmnkgl has quit IRC
1592018-07-06T08:23:59 *** timothy has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1602018-07-06T08:32:35 *** lnostdal has quit IRC
1612018-07-06T08:33:50 *** SopaXorzTaker has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1622018-07-06T08:42:09 *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1632018-07-06T08:57:26 *** belcher has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1642018-07-06T09:16:14 *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1652018-07-06T09:16:54 *** Aaronvan_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1662018-07-06T09:20:51 *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
1672018-07-06T09:25:42 *** lnostdal has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1682018-07-06T09:37:34 *** Victorsueca has quit IRC
1692018-07-06T09:38:55 *** Victorsueca has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1702018-07-06T09:47:57 *** |EHG| has quit IRC
1712018-07-06T10:02:20 *** Aaronvan_ has quit IRC
1722018-07-06T10:03:30 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] Sjors closed pull request #13029: Interpret absense of prune= as prune=1 if there are pruned blocks (master...2018/04/implicit_prune) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13029
1732018-07-06T10:04:11 *** schmidty has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1742018-07-06T10:04:40 *** rubensayshi_ has quit IRC
1752018-07-06T10:04:53 <provoostenator> #12818 could use some (easy!) review love
1762018-07-06T10:04:54 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/12818 | [qt] TransactionView: highlight replacement tx after fee bump by Sjors · Pull Request #12818 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
1772018-07-06T10:05:01 *** rubensayshi_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1782018-07-06T10:06:14 *** grafcaps has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1792018-07-06T10:07:45 *** lnostdal has quit IRC
1802018-07-06T10:08:43 *** griswaalt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1812018-07-06T10:10:35 *** grafcaps has quit IRC
1822018-07-06T10:11:37 *** schmidty has quit IRC
1832018-07-06T10:14:18 *** laurentmt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1842018-07-06T10:18:32 *** vicenteH has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1852018-07-06T10:25:05 *** gribble has quit IRC
1862018-07-06T10:28:50 *** gribble has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1872018-07-06T10:32:42 *** exit70 has quit IRC
1882018-07-06T10:33:08 *** exit70 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1892018-07-06T10:36:35 *** robby938_ has quit IRC
1902018-07-06T10:36:48 *** robby938_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1912018-07-06T10:42:57 *** Randolf has quit IRC
1922018-07-06T10:43:11 *** griswaalt has quit IRC
1932018-07-06T10:43:27 *** Randolf has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1942018-07-06T10:47:47 *** anome has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1952018-07-06T10:49:23 *** savantgarde has quit IRC
1962018-07-06T10:49:28 *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1972018-07-06T10:49:40 *** savantgarde has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1982018-07-06T11:00:29 *** shesek has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1992018-07-06T11:00:30 *** shesek has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2002018-07-06T11:04:31 *** anome has quit IRC
2012018-07-06T11:08:20 *** bitconner has quit IRC
2022018-07-06T11:20:47 *** bitconner has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2032018-07-06T11:30:54 *** vxe has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2042018-07-06T11:32:21 *** promag has quit IRC
2052018-07-06T11:45:57 *** |EHG| has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2062018-07-06T11:50:27 *** bitconner has quit IRC
2072018-07-06T11:54:37 <provoostenator> Unhappy Travis linter (I tried a restart), any idea why? https://travis-ci.org/bitcoin/bitcoin/builds/400849545
2082018-07-06T11:54:48 *** anome has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2092018-07-06T11:57:16 <provoostenator> It's also not whitespace, which I tested locally.
2102018-07-06T12:12:27 *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
2112018-07-06T12:15:08 *** anome has quit IRC
2122018-07-06T12:23:04 *** griswaalt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2132018-07-06T12:23:50 <Varunram> provoostenator: Travis says the error is from `test/lint/lint-shell-locale.sh`
2142018-07-06T12:24:24 *** vicenteH has quit IRC
2152018-07-06T12:24:45 *** vicenteH has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2162018-07-06T12:35:09 <provoostenator> Ok, I'm guessing it wants me to add "export LC_ALL=C" at the top...
2172018-07-06T12:47:18 *** griswaalt has quit IRC
2182018-07-06T12:57:09 *** Victorsueca has quit IRC
2192018-07-06T12:57:32 *** laurentmt has quit IRC
2202018-07-06T12:58:25 *** Victorsueca has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2212018-07-06T12:58:42 *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2222018-07-06T13:03:47 *** anome has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2232018-07-06T13:04:04 *** Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2242018-07-06T13:30:58 *** Urgo has quit IRC
2252018-07-06T13:32:00 *** Urgo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2262018-07-06T13:35:55 *** belcher has quit IRC
2272018-07-06T13:42:15 *** belcher has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2282018-07-06T13:42:29 *** grafcaps has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2292018-07-06T13:46:58 *** grafcaps has quit IRC
2302018-07-06T13:48:28 *** vicenteH has quit IRC
2312018-07-06T13:48:49 *** belcher has quit IRC
2322018-07-06T13:48:49 *** vicenteH has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2332018-07-06T14:01:32 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] domob1812 opened pull request #13603: bitcoin-tx: Stricter check for valid integers (master...bitcointx) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13603
2342018-07-06T14:14:21 *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
2352018-07-06T14:31:01 *** d9b4bef9 has quit IRC
2362018-07-06T14:32:08 *** d9b4bef9 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2372018-07-06T14:38:35 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] TheCharlatan opened pull request #13604: Add depends 32-bit arm support for bitcoin-qt (master...Qt59arm) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13604
2382018-07-06T14:53:27 *** eenoch has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2392018-07-06T14:58:41 *** grafcaps has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2402018-07-06T15:01:05 *** instagibbs has quit IRC
2412018-07-06T15:03:15 *** instagibbs has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2422018-07-06T15:18:43 *** nmnkgl has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2432018-07-06T15:42:07 *** vicenteH has quit IRC
2442018-07-06T15:46:54 *** bitconner has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2452018-07-06T15:51:22 *** bitconner has quit IRC
2462018-07-06T15:56:26 <provoostenator> Another Travis mystery: https://travis-ci.org/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/400935074 "Done. Your build exited with 1." but nothing red
2472018-07-06T16:03:59 <arubi> provoostenator, https://travis-ci.org/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/400935074#L1493 , probably needs to be mkdir -p
2482018-07-06T16:04:11 <arubi> it didn't end up cd'ing into ./build because it's &&'ed
2492018-07-06T16:05:20 <provoostenator> Ah yes, because I'm now caching the build dir...
2502018-07-06T16:06:45 *** schmidty has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2512018-07-06T16:34:47 *** Randolf has quit IRC
2522018-07-06T16:35:18 *** Randolf has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2532018-07-06T16:47:35 *** Emcy has quit IRC
2542018-07-06T16:49:58 *** schmidty has quit IRC
2552018-07-06T16:51:57 *** Emcy has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2562018-07-06T16:54:44 *** Tralfaz has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2572018-07-06T17:01:05 *** Randolf has quit IRC
2582018-07-06T17:02:02 *** anome has quit IRC
2592018-07-06T17:04:31 *** amdsfmoa244 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2602018-07-06T17:05:36 *** marcoagner has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2612018-07-06T17:07:45 *** Szadek has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2622018-07-06T17:10:13 *** anome has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2632018-07-06T17:12:43 *** Szadek has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2642018-07-06T17:33:34 *** vicenteH has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2652018-07-06T17:36:33 *** sakalli_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2662018-07-06T17:38:51 *** sakalli_ has quit IRC
2672018-07-06T17:41:07 *** sakalli_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2682018-07-06T17:43:05 *** rex4539 has quit IRC
2692018-07-06T17:47:22 *** sakalli_ has quit IRC
2702018-07-06T17:47:42 *** sakalli_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2712018-07-06T17:50:30 *** drexl has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2722018-07-06T17:51:52 *** sakalli_ has quit IRC
2732018-07-06T17:52:11 *** sakalli_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2742018-07-06T17:56:33 *** sakalli_ has quit IRC
2752018-07-06T18:08:20 *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2762018-07-06T18:14:33 *** timothy has quit IRC
2772018-07-06T18:24:13 *** promag has quit IRC
2782018-07-06T18:33:34 *** drexl_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2792018-07-06T18:36:32 *** drexl has quit IRC
2802018-07-06T18:36:34 *** drexl_ is now known as drexl
2812018-07-06T19:00:21 *** anome has quit IRC
2822018-07-06T19:05:04 *** SopaXorzTaker has quit IRC
2832018-07-06T19:05:41 *** rex4539 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2842018-07-06T19:21:06 *** bitconner has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2852018-07-06T19:26:13 *** rex4539 has quit IRC
2862018-07-06T19:36:05 *** belcher has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2872018-07-06T19:59:32 *** schmidty has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2882018-07-06T19:59:59 <CubicEarths> Exciting to the Schnorr bip submitted!! Is there a size savings on the signature for a standard, non-multisig tx?
2892018-07-06T20:01:14 <sipa> CubicEarths: read the email :)
2902018-07-06T20:01:29 <sipa> this is just a signature scheme, not an integration in bitcoin
2912018-07-06T20:03:38 <CubicEarths> ok ok. I'll re-ask in few months when a similar question becomes answerable :)
2922018-07-06T20:06:04 <sipa> thanks!
2932018-07-06T20:10:36 <CubicEarths> looks like a future implementation based on your work might save 8 bytes for a non-multisig tx
2942018-07-06T20:24:04 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jhfrontz opened pull request #13605: Corrected text to reflect new[er] process of specifying fingerprints (master...update-gitian-keys-README) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13605
2952018-07-06T20:24:04 *** schmidty has quit IRC
2962018-07-06T20:24:38 *** Emcy has quit IRC
2972018-07-06T20:29:56 *** rex4539 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2982018-07-06T20:31:53 *** Emcy has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2992018-07-06T20:33:43 *** bitconner has quit IRC
3002018-07-06T20:39:01 *** d9b4bef9 has quit IRC
3012018-07-06T20:40:08 *** d9b4bef9 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3022018-07-06T20:44:17 *** bitconner has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3032018-07-06T20:52:50 *** belcher has quit IRC
3042018-07-06T20:59:00 *** Guyver2 has quit IRC
3052018-07-06T21:11:39 *** rex4539 has quit IRC
3062018-07-06T21:18:30 *** bitconner has quit IRC
3072018-07-06T21:35:01 *** contrapumpkin has quit IRC
3082018-07-06T21:59:02 *** bitconner has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3092018-07-06T22:00:31 *** BashCo has quit IRC
3102018-07-06T22:01:19 *** BashCo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3112018-07-06T22:03:03 *** spinza has quit IRC
3122018-07-06T22:21:59 *** spinza has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3132018-07-06T22:34:29 *** BashCo has quit IRC
3142018-07-06T22:36:41 *** BashCo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3152018-07-06T22:54:58 *** marcoagner has left #bitcoin-core-dev
3162018-07-06T22:55:01 *** marcoagner has quit IRC
3172018-07-06T23:26:10 *** Tralfaz has quit IRC
3182018-07-06T23:51:29 *** grafcaps has quit IRC
3192018-07-06T23:55:14 *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev