1 2015-12-03T00:00:16  *** erasmospunk has quit IRC
   2 2015-12-03T00:00:20  *** jtoomim_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
   3 2015-12-03T00:00:23  *** jtoomim has quit IRC
   4 2015-12-03T00:01:46  *** lnostdal has quit IRC
   5 2015-12-03T00:02:35  *** moa has joined #bitcoin-dev
   6 2015-12-03T00:02:41  *** lnostdal has joined #bitcoin-dev
   7 2015-12-03T00:06:38  *** Lightsword has quit IRC
   8 2015-12-03T00:08:31  *** Lightsword has joined #bitcoin-dev
   9 2015-12-03T00:11:40  *** roxtrongo has quit IRC
  10 2015-12-03T00:21:19  *** t7 has quit IRC
  11 2015-12-03T00:21:49  *** metalcamp has quit IRC
  12 2015-12-03T00:24:10  *** zookolaptop has quit IRC
  13 2015-12-03T00:24:57  *** CheckDavid has joined #bitcoin-dev
  14 2015-12-03T00:25:55  *** Lightsword has quit IRC
  15 2015-12-03T00:30:15  *** agricocb has quit IRC
  16 2015-12-03T00:34:59  *** Lightsword has joined #bitcoin-dev
  17 2015-12-03T00:35:00  *** rdymac has quit IRC
  18 2015-12-03T00:36:59  *** guest234234 has joined #bitcoin-dev
  19 2015-12-03T00:37:47  *** IAmNotDorian has joined #bitcoin-dev
  20 2015-12-03T00:37:47  *** IAmNotDorian has joined #bitcoin-dev
  21 2015-12-03T00:46:06  *** karelk has quit IRC
  22 2015-12-03T00:46:17  *** agricocb has joined #bitcoin-dev
  23 2015-12-03T00:46:29  *** karelk has joined #bitcoin-dev
  24 2015-12-03T00:52:39  *** btc_panhandler has quit IRC
  25 2015-12-03T00:52:40  *** DigiByteDev has joined #bitcoin-dev
  26 2015-12-03T00:56:13  *** Newyorkadam has joined #bitcoin-dev
  27 2015-12-03T00:59:58  *** IAmNotDorian has quit IRC
  28 2015-12-03T01:00:26  *** GGuyZ has joined #bitcoin-dev
  29 2015-12-03T01:03:18  *** won9 has joined #bitcoin-dev
  30 2015-12-03T01:03:43  *** alex__ has quit IRC
  31 2015-12-03T01:04:46  *** Lightsword has quit IRC
  32 2015-12-03T01:09:09  *** one_zero has joined #bitcoin-dev
  33 2015-12-03T01:11:42  *** mrkent has joined #bitcoin-dev
  34 2015-12-03T01:13:00  *** Lightsword has joined #bitcoin-dev
  35 2015-12-03T01:13:13  *** simba has quit IRC
  36 2015-12-03T01:13:30  *** gielbier has quit IRC
  37 2015-12-03T01:15:17  *** Lightsword has quit IRC
  38 2015-12-03T01:18:44  *** agricocb has quit IRC
  39 2015-12-03T01:21:35  *** GGuyZ_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
  40 2015-12-03T01:24:41  *** GGuyZ has quit IRC
  41 2015-12-03T01:24:42  *** GGuyZ_ is now known as GGuyZ
  42 2015-12-03T01:25:41  <mrkent> Okay I remember reading something about the attack on the OP_CHECKSIG limit or something (to artificially reduce the effective blocksize limit)
  43 2015-12-03T01:25:53  <mrkent> Anyone have link to that post?
  44 2015-12-03T01:27:40  *** h3xc0d3r has quit IRC
  45 2015-12-03T01:28:21  *** GGuyZ has quit IRC
  46 2015-12-03T01:29:10  *** bendavenport has quit IRC
  47 2015-12-03T01:30:16  *** Ylbam has quit IRC
  48 2015-12-03T01:30:55  *** justanotheruser has quit IRC
  49 2015-12-03T01:31:56  *** notj has joined #bitcoin-dev
  50 2015-12-03T01:33:41  *** c0rw1n is now known as c0rw|zZz
  51 2015-12-03T01:36:48  *** Lightsword has joined #bitcoin-dev
  52 2015-12-03T01:38:42  *** Lightsword has joined #bitcoin-dev
  53 2015-12-03T01:38:42  *** simba has joined #bitcoin-dev
  54 2015-12-03T01:39:27  *** mrkent_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
  55 2015-12-03T01:43:03  *** mrkent has quit IRC
  56 2015-12-03T01:45:32  *** Yoghur114 has quit IRC
  57 2015-12-03T01:48:20  *** notj has quit IRC
  58 2015-12-03T01:59:41  *** jtoomim_ has quit IRC
  59 2015-12-03T02:00:53  *** jtoomim has joined #bitcoin-dev
  60 2015-12-03T02:04:20  *** Lightsword has quit IRC
  61 2015-12-03T02:06:27  *** IAmNotDorian has joined #bitcoin-dev
  62 2015-12-03T02:06:28  *** IAmNotDorian has joined #bitcoin-dev
  63 2015-12-03T02:11:24  *** Lightsword has joined #bitcoin-dev
  64 2015-12-03T02:12:26  *** shesek has quit IRC
  65 2015-12-03T02:13:26  *** notj has joined #bitcoin-dev
  66 2015-12-03T02:13:29  *** justanotheruser has joined #bitcoin-dev
  67 2015-12-03T02:16:26  *** joeykrim has joined #bitcoin-dev
  68 2015-12-03T02:16:51  *** simba has quit IRC
  69 2015-12-03T02:17:20  *** simba has joined #bitcoin-dev
  70 2015-12-03T02:18:10  *** stapler117 is now known as DisplacedStapler
  71 2015-12-03T02:19:16  *** DisplacedStapler is now known as Displacer117
  72 2015-12-03T02:19:17  *** IAmNotDorian has quit IRC
  73 2015-12-03T02:20:14  *** h3xc0d3r has joined #bitcoin-dev
  74 2015-12-03T02:23:29  *** zookolaptop has joined #bitcoin-dev
  75 2015-12-03T02:23:49  *** alex__ has joined #bitcoin-dev
  76 2015-12-03T02:25:27  *** alex__ has quit IRC
  77 2015-12-03T02:25:31  *** Lightsword has quit IRC
  78 2015-12-03T02:28:13  *** splix has joined #bitcoin-dev
  79 2015-12-03T02:29:11  *** CheckDavid has quit IRC
  80 2015-12-03T02:32:47  *** roconnor has joined #bitcoin-dev
  81 2015-12-03T02:34:44  *** Guest78012 is now known as Graet
  82 2015-12-03T02:35:01  *** Lightsword has joined #bitcoin-dev
  83 2015-12-03T02:35:08  *** Graet has quit IRC
  84 2015-12-03T02:35:08  *** Graet has joined #bitcoin-dev
  85 2015-12-03T02:42:44  *** kgk has quit IRC
  86 2015-12-03T02:44:21  *** notj has quit IRC
  87 2015-12-03T02:46:03  *** moli has joined #bitcoin-dev
  88 2015-12-03T02:46:03  *** alex_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
  89 2015-12-03T02:49:46  *** molly has quit IRC
  90 2015-12-03T02:50:15  *** h3xc0d3r has quit IRC
  91 2015-12-03T02:50:42  *** alex_ has quit IRC
  92 2015-12-03T02:50:55  *** IrishGringo has quit IRC
  93 2015-12-03T02:52:35  *** hsmiths__ has quit IRC
  94 2015-12-03T02:55:20  *** IAmNotDorian has joined #bitcoin-dev
  95 2015-12-03T02:55:20  *** IAmNotDorian has joined #bitcoin-dev
  96 2015-12-03T02:55:36  *** notj has joined #bitcoin-dev
  97 2015-12-03T02:57:14  *** patcon has quit IRC
  98 2015-12-03T03:00:04  *** brson has quit IRC
  99 2015-12-03T03:02:01  *** notj has quit IRC
 100 2015-12-03T03:02:47  *** p15 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 101 2015-12-03T03:02:47  *** Lightsword_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 102 2015-12-03T03:03:55  *** Lightsword has quit IRC
 103 2015-12-03T03:04:43  *** jaclupi has quit IRC
 104 2015-12-03T03:04:46  *** bsm117532 has quit IRC
 105 2015-12-03T03:08:14  *** Lightsword_ has quit IRC
 106 2015-12-03T03:08:37  *** Lightsword has joined #bitcoin-dev
 107 2015-12-03T03:11:59  *** jaclupi has joined #bitcoin-dev
 108 2015-12-03T03:12:22  *** IrishGringo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 109 2015-12-03T03:14:44  *** Lightsword has quit IRC
 110 2015-12-03T03:19:05  *** jaclupi has quit IRC
 111 2015-12-03T03:20:55  *** Lightsword has joined #bitcoin-dev
 112 2015-12-03T03:22:26  *** jaclupi has joined #bitcoin-dev
 113 2015-12-03T03:24:25  *** Subo1977 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 114 2015-12-03T03:26:52  *** Delta_ has quit IRC
 115 2015-12-03T03:38:46  *** Skirmant has quit IRC
 116 2015-12-03T03:39:37  *** kgk has joined #bitcoin-dev
 117 2015-12-03T03:41:44  *** Newyorkadam has quit IRC
 118 2015-12-03T03:44:14  *** Newyorkadam has joined #bitcoin-dev
 119 2015-12-03T03:45:18  *** kgk has quit IRC
 120 2015-12-03T03:45:48  *** Newyorkadam has quit IRC
 121 2015-12-03T03:46:43  *** akstunt600 has quit IRC
 122 2015-12-03T03:53:26  *** calibre720 has quit IRC
 123 2015-12-03T03:53:36  *** ademoglu_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 124 2015-12-03T03:54:36  *** ademoglu has quit IRC
 125 2015-12-03T03:56:14  *** melvster has quit IRC
 126 2015-12-03T03:58:23  *** DigiByteDev has quit IRC
 127 2015-12-03T04:04:53  *** alex_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 128 2015-12-03T04:06:25  *** simba has quit IRC
 129 2015-12-03T04:08:18  *** alex__ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 130 2015-12-03T04:08:54  *** melvster has joined #bitcoin-dev
 131 2015-12-03T04:09:35  *** alex_ has quit IRC
 132 2015-12-03T04:12:50  *** alex__ has quit IRC
 133 2015-12-03T04:22:25  *** Newyorkadam has joined #bitcoin-dev
 134 2015-12-03T04:22:40  *** Newyorkadam has quit IRC
 135 2015-12-03T04:22:55  *** simba has joined #bitcoin-dev
 136 2015-12-03T04:26:36  *** hsmiths has quit IRC
 137 2015-12-03T04:26:38  *** alex_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 138 2015-12-03T04:31:54  *** hsmiths has joined #bitcoin-dev
 139 2015-12-03T04:31:59  *** IrishGringo has quit IRC
 140 2015-12-03T04:35:24  *** simba has quit IRC
 141 2015-12-03T04:36:05  *** nessence has joined #bitcoin-dev
 142 2015-12-03T04:43:09  *** IAmNotDorian has quit IRC
 143 2015-12-03T04:44:44  *** alex_ has quit IRC
 144 2015-12-03T04:45:00  *** alex_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 145 2015-12-03T04:45:01  *** DigiByteDev has joined #bitcoin-dev
 146 2015-12-03T04:45:11  *** splix has quit IRC
 147 2015-12-03T04:45:19  *** alex_ has quit IRC
 148 2015-12-03T04:48:51  *** akstunt600 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 149 2015-12-03T04:59:02  *** guest234234 has quit IRC
 150 2015-12-03T05:04:44  *** alex_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 151 2015-12-03T05:05:23  *** alex_ has quit IRC
 152 2015-12-03T05:12:11  *** zookolaptop has quit IRC
 153 2015-12-03T05:13:14  *** alex_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 154 2015-12-03T05:17:42  *** alex_ has quit IRC
 155 2015-12-03T05:19:21  *** sparetire_ has quit IRC
 156 2015-12-03T05:22:05  *** mrkent_ has quit IRC
 157 2015-12-03T05:24:08  *** simba has joined #bitcoin-dev
 158 2015-12-03T05:26:59  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
 159 2015-12-03T05:27:47  *** ademoglu_ has quit IRC
 160 2015-12-03T05:30:16  *** won9 has quit IRC
 161 2015-12-03T05:38:58  *** kgk has joined #bitcoin-dev
 162 2015-12-03T05:39:11  *** ribasushi has quit IRC
 163 2015-12-03T05:44:18  *** kgk has quit IRC
 164 2015-12-03T05:48:04  *** ThomasV has joined #bitcoin-dev
 165 2015-12-03T05:49:25  *** ribasushi has joined #bitcoin-dev
 166 2015-12-03T05:59:47  *** Subo1977 has quit IRC
 167 2015-12-03T06:03:28  *** Delta_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 168 2015-12-03T06:24:03  *** mrkent has joined #bitcoin-dev
 169 2015-12-03T06:26:54  *** sekrit has quit IRC
 170 2015-12-03T06:27:35  *** dave4925 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 171 2015-12-03T06:28:27  *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
 172 2015-12-03T06:29:33  *** splix has joined #bitcoin-dev
 173 2015-12-03T06:31:54  *** instagibbs has quit IRC
 174 2015-12-03T06:32:38  *** matsjj has joined #bitcoin-dev
 175 2015-12-03T06:33:13  *** propumpkin has joined #bitcoin-dev
 176 2015-12-03T06:33:30  *** sporkman_ has quit IRC
 177 2015-12-03T06:34:14  *** copumpkin has quit IRC
 178 2015-12-03T06:36:25  *** sekrit has joined #bitcoin-dev
 179 2015-12-03T06:37:03  *** DigiByteDev has quit IRC
 180 2015-12-03T06:42:44  *** instagibbs has joined #bitcoin-dev
 181 2015-12-03T06:42:48  *** alex_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 182 2015-12-03T06:43:35  *** p15 has quit IRC
 183 2015-12-03T06:47:04  *** alex_ has quit IRC
 184 2015-12-03T06:50:06  *** neozaru has joined #bitcoin-dev
 185 2015-12-03T06:54:49  *** nivah has joined #bitcoin-dev
 186 2015-12-03T06:56:49  *** ThomasV has quit IRC
 187 2015-12-03T07:10:38  *** lnostdal has quit IRC
 188 2015-12-03T07:13:08  *** lnostdal has joined #bitcoin-dev
 189 2015-12-03T07:16:10  *** melvster has quit IRC
 190 2015-12-03T07:17:14  *** melvster has joined #bitcoin-dev
 191 2015-12-03T07:22:48  *** noamh has joined #bitcoin-dev
 192 2015-12-03T07:25:15  *** p15 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 193 2015-12-03T07:26:59  *** nivah has quit IRC
 194 2015-12-03T07:27:55  *** nivah has joined #bitcoin-dev
 195 2015-12-03T07:41:16  *** DougieBot5000 has quit IRC
 196 2015-12-03T07:41:18  *** nessence has quit IRC
 197 2015-12-03T07:41:40  *** kgk has joined #bitcoin-dev
 198 2015-12-03T07:43:36  *** Ylbam has joined #bitcoin-dev
 199 2015-12-03T07:46:07  *** kgk has quit IRC
 200 2015-12-03T07:46:58  *** neozaru has quit IRC
 201 2015-12-03T07:56:27  *** won9 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 202 2015-12-03T07:56:48  *** metalcamp has joined #bitcoin-dev
 203 2015-12-03T07:57:52  *** Grouver has joined #bitcoin-dev
 204 2015-12-03T08:06:35  *** molly has joined #bitcoin-dev
 205 2015-12-03T08:09:52  *** damethos has joined #bitcoin-dev
 206 2015-12-03T08:09:54  *** moli has quit IRC
 207 2015-12-03T08:12:14  *** lnostdal has quit IRC
 208 2015-12-03T08:21:34  *** kadoban has quit IRC
 209 2015-12-03T08:21:49  *** ThomasV has joined #bitcoin-dev
 210 2015-12-03T08:22:59  *** grassass has quit IRC
 211 2015-12-03T08:25:22  *** mdemont has joined #bitcoin-dev
 212 2015-12-03T08:25:28  *** guest234234 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 213 2015-12-03T08:28:59  *** lnostdal has joined #bitcoin-dev
 214 2015-12-03T08:32:05  *** xegoo has quit IRC
 215 2015-12-03T08:33:02  *** erasmospunk has joined #bitcoin-dev
 216 2015-12-03T08:33:02  *** ThomasV has quit IRC
 217 2015-12-03T08:33:14  *** cysm has quit IRC
 218 2015-12-03T08:33:42  *** blackjid has quit IRC
 219 2015-12-03T08:34:00  *** cysm has joined #bitcoin-dev
 220 2015-12-03T08:35:15  *** xegoo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 221 2015-12-03T08:36:02  *** blackjid has joined #bitcoin-dev
 222 2015-12-03T08:36:16  *** p15 has quit IRC
 223 2015-12-03T08:40:00  *** Lightsword has quit IRC
 224 2015-12-03T08:40:05  *** Lightsword_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 225 2015-12-03T08:42:18  *** phoenix52 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 226 2015-12-03T08:45:36  *** ThomasV has joined #bitcoin-dev
 227 2015-12-03T08:45:44  *** moa has quit IRC
 228 2015-12-03T08:46:29  *** btcdrak has quit IRC
 229 2015-12-03T08:48:08  *** [1]evoskuil has joined #bitcoin-dev
 230 2015-12-03T08:49:19  *** evoskuil has quit IRC
 231 2015-12-03T08:49:19  *** [1]evoskuil is now known as evoskuil
 232 2015-12-03T08:50:30  *** lnostdal has quit IRC
 233 2015-12-03T08:51:41  *** lnostdal has joined #bitcoin-dev
 234 2015-12-03T08:52:07  *** p15 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 235 2015-12-03T08:56:38  *** wallet42 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 236 2015-12-03T09:00:21  *** tarantillo_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 237 2015-12-03T09:02:07  *** btcdrak has joined #bitcoin-dev
 238 2015-12-03T09:03:35  *** bsm1175322 has quit IRC
 239 2015-12-03T09:05:31  *** jzk has quit IRC
 240 2015-12-03T09:07:06  *** CoinMuncher has joined #bitcoin-dev
 241 2015-12-03T09:08:05  *** _yoy_ has quit IRC
 242 2015-12-03T09:08:14  *** p15 has quit IRC
 243 2015-12-03T09:09:31  *** _yoy_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 244 2015-12-03T09:10:06  *** lnostdal has quit IRC
 245 2015-12-03T09:10:20  *** p15 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 246 2015-12-03T09:11:27  *** phoenix52 has quit IRC
 247 2015-12-03T09:12:19  *** bsm117532 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 248 2015-12-03T09:12:47  *** lnostdal has joined #bitcoin-dev
 249 2015-12-03T09:14:40  *** jzk has joined #bitcoin-dev
 250 2015-12-03T09:16:03  *** lnostdal has quit IRC
 251 2015-12-03T09:17:03  *** lnostdal has joined #bitcoin-dev
 252 2015-12-03T09:20:22  *** bsm117532 has quit IRC
 253 2015-12-03T09:20:54  *** erasmospunk has quit IRC
 254 2015-12-03T09:22:44  *** bsm117532 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 255 2015-12-03T09:26:10  *** erasmospunk has joined #bitcoin-dev
 256 2015-12-03T09:26:27  *** mdemont has quit IRC
 257 2015-12-03T09:27:11  *** GAit1 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 258 2015-12-03T09:28:56  *** chmod755 has quit IRC
 259 2015-12-03T09:29:53  *** phoenix53 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 260 2015-12-03T09:35:13  *** bsm117532 has quit IRC
 261 2015-12-03T09:36:33  *** wallet42 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 262 2015-12-03T09:38:39  *** graingert has joined #bitcoin-dev
 263 2015-12-03T09:38:51  *** justanotheruser has quit IRC
 264 2015-12-03T09:39:06  *** evoskuil has quit IRC
 265 2015-12-03T09:39:43  *** bsm117532 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 266 2015-12-03T09:41:22  *** justanotheruser has joined #bitcoin-dev
 267 2015-12-03T09:43:00  *** phoenix53 has quit IRC
 268 2015-12-03T09:44:15  *** kgk has joined #bitcoin-dev
 269 2015-12-03T09:44:55  *** evoskuil has joined #bitcoin-dev
 270 2015-12-03T09:45:21  *** mdemont has joined #bitcoin-dev
 271 2015-12-03T09:48:30  *** kgk has quit IRC
 272 2015-12-03T09:49:44  *** jtoomim_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 273 2015-12-03T09:50:45  *** justanotheruser has quit IRC
 274 2015-12-03T09:50:56  *** justanotheruser has joined #bitcoin-dev
 275 2015-12-03T09:51:39  *** jtoomim has quit IRC
 276 2015-12-03T09:58:43  *** GAit1 has quit IRC
 277 2015-12-03T09:59:06  *** wallet421 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 278 2015-12-03T09:59:07  *** wallet42 is now known as Guest58817
 279 2015-12-03T09:59:07  *** wallet421 has quit IRC
 280 2015-12-03T09:59:07  *** wallet421 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 281 2015-12-03T09:59:07  *** Guest58817 has quit IRC
 282 2015-12-03T09:59:07  *** wallet421 is now known as wallet42
 283 2015-12-03T10:01:15  *** wallet421 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 284 2015-12-03T10:01:16  *** wallet421 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 285 2015-12-03T10:01:16  *** wallet42 has quit IRC
 286 2015-12-03T10:01:16  *** wallet421 is now known as wallet42
 287 2015-12-03T10:04:42  *** roconnor has quit IRC
 288 2015-12-03T10:07:15  *** mrkent has quit IRC
 289 2015-12-03T10:16:05  *** alex_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 290 2015-12-03T10:20:16  *** alex_ has quit IRC
 291 2015-12-03T10:22:38  *** ThomasV has quit IRC
 292 2015-12-03T10:23:49  *** won9 has quit IRC
 293 2015-12-03T10:30:46  *** rubensayshi has joined #bitcoin-dev
 294 2015-12-03T10:34:45  *** mdemont has quit IRC
 295 2015-12-03T10:40:14  *** won9 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 296 2015-12-03T10:51:19  *** GAit has joined #bitcoin-dev
 297 2015-12-03T10:54:14  *** ThomasV has joined #bitcoin-dev
 298 2015-12-03T10:57:58  *** simba has quit IRC
 299 2015-12-03T10:58:14  *** OneMiner1 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 300 2015-12-03T11:01:27  *** OneMiner has quit IRC
 301 2015-12-03T11:03:46  *** blueness has quit IRC
 302 2015-12-03T11:03:46  *** zxzzt has quit IRC
 303 2015-12-03T11:03:50  *** blueness__ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 304 2015-12-03T11:11:06  *** evoskuil has quit IRC
 305 2015-12-03T11:12:26  *** jtoomim_ has quit IRC
 306 2015-12-03T11:12:58  *** jtoomim has joined #bitcoin-dev
 307 2015-12-03T11:15:27  *** chmod755 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 308 2015-12-03T11:17:29  *** jtoomim has quit IRC
 309 2015-12-03T11:17:42  *** zxzzt has joined #bitcoin-dev
 310 2015-12-03T11:20:04  *** OneMiner1 has quit IRC
 311 2015-12-03T11:20:04  *** TrippySalmon has joined #bitcoin-dev
 312 2015-12-03T11:20:13  *** OneMiner1 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 313 2015-12-03T11:20:36  *** guest234234 has quit IRC
 314 2015-12-03T11:24:50  *** Tera2342 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 315 2015-12-03T11:24:56  *** melvster has quit IRC
 316 2015-12-03T11:25:38  *** tg has quit IRC
 317 2015-12-03T11:25:39  *** xeon-enouf has quit IRC
 318 2015-12-03T11:25:43  *** Tera2342 has quit IRC
 319 2015-12-03T11:26:16  *** Tera2342 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 320 2015-12-03T11:36:11  *** noamh has quit IRC
 321 2015-12-03T11:38:17  *** melvster has joined #bitcoin-dev
 322 2015-12-03T11:40:43  *** IrishGringo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 323 2015-12-03T11:40:43  *** Tera2342 has quit IRC
 324 2015-12-03T11:41:33  *** Tera2342 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 325 2015-12-03T11:42:58  *** Tera2342 has quit IRC
 326 2015-12-03T11:43:43  *** Tera2342 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 327 2015-12-03T11:43:51  *** tg has joined #bitcoin-dev
 328 2015-12-03T11:46:11  *** one_zero has quit IRC
 329 2015-12-03T11:47:22  *** won9 has quit IRC
 330 2015-12-03T11:49:04  *** won9 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 331 2015-12-03T11:49:29  *** noamh has joined #bitcoin-dev
 332 2015-12-03T11:52:03  *** ThomasV has quit IRC
 333 2015-12-03T11:59:34  *** petrkr has joined #bitcoin-dev
 334 2015-12-03T12:00:26  *** simba has joined #bitcoin-dev
 335 2015-12-03T12:02:06  *** tric3838383838 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 336 2015-12-03T12:03:48  *** GGuyZ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 337 2015-12-03T12:04:40  <tric3838383838> Hi guys. I am from Cubits, and we tried getting listed on bitcoin.org. So far, nobody helped out with reviewing the wallet, so I wanted to ask for help here. We are a Bitcoin platform, going steady for a year now, with web wallet. In addition, we recently added option to buy Bitcoin at 4500 ATMs in Poland, and Jon Matonis is in our board
 338 2015-12-03T12:05:08  <Diablo-D3> tric3838383838: most likely you got ignored because you're doing a web wallet
 339 2015-12-03T12:06:12  *** tj100 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 340 2015-12-03T12:06:18  <sipa> harding: ^
 341 2015-12-03T12:06:30  *** tj100 has quit IRC
 342 2015-12-03T12:07:05  <tric3838383838> Yeah, I am aware that it is not a popular choice. On the other hand, others offering similar services got listed in that section. We had no issues for a year now, and we keep user funds in cold storage. I can get CTO to comment if you guys are interested
 343 2015-12-03T12:11:39  *** GGuyZ has quit IRC
 344 2015-12-03T12:11:53  *** GGuyZ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 345 2015-12-03T12:18:55  *** GAit has quit IRC
 346 2015-12-03T12:21:54  *** won9 has quit IRC
 347 2015-12-03T12:26:47  *** GAit has joined #bitcoin-dev
 348 2015-12-03T12:26:49  *** xeon-enouf has joined #bitcoin-dev
 349 2015-12-03T12:32:09  *** mdemont has joined #bitcoin-dev
 350 2015-12-03T12:33:19  *** mdemont has joined #bitcoin-dev
 351 2015-12-03T12:34:24  *** mdemont has joined #bitcoin-dev
 352 2015-12-03T12:35:00  *** mdemont has quit IRC
 353 2015-12-03T12:35:31  *** mdemont has joined #bitcoin-dev
 354 2015-12-03T12:36:57  *** mdemont has joined #bitcoin-dev
 355 2015-12-03T12:42:05  *** ThomasV has joined #bitcoin-dev
 356 2015-12-03T12:44:25  *** justice has quit IRC
 357 2015-12-03T12:46:39  *** simba has quit IRC
 358 2015-12-03T12:47:54  *** kgk has joined #bitcoin-dev
 359 2015-12-03T12:47:57  *** Lyth0s__ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 360 2015-12-03T12:52:23  *** kgk has quit IRC
 361 2015-12-03T12:53:26  *** mdemont has quit IRC
 362 2015-12-03T12:55:30  *** nivah has quit IRC
 363 2015-12-03T12:57:12  <instagibbs> tric3838383838, you may have to ping the thread again. The review process is pretty thourough, but if it's a web wallet the barriers to getting listed will be even higher most likely.
 364 2015-12-03T12:58:07  <instagibbs> the only web wallets listed thus far are cross-platform(and probably deprecating) GreenAddress, and other huge VC-backed names.
 365 2015-12-03T12:58:20  <instagibbs> also, this is probably #bitcoin
 366 2015-12-03T12:58:53  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 367 2015-12-03T13:05:05  *** Emcy has joined #bitcoin-dev
 368 2015-12-03T13:06:42  *** lnostdal has quit IRC
 369 2015-12-03T13:08:01  *** jtoomim has joined #bitcoin-dev
 370 2015-12-03T13:09:31  *** Lyth0s__ has quit IRC
 371 2015-12-03T13:10:44  *** erasmospunk has quit IRC
 372 2015-12-03T13:13:04  *** BashCo has quit IRC
 373 2015-12-03T13:14:09  *** erasmospunk has joined #bitcoin-dev
 374 2015-12-03T13:15:49  *** prof7bit has joined #bitcoin-dev
 375 2015-12-03T13:16:16  *** prof7bit has left #bitcoin-dev
 376 2015-12-03T13:18:22  *** tric3838383838 has quit IRC
 377 2015-12-03T13:23:47  *** lnostdal has joined #bitcoin-dev
 378 2015-12-03T13:25:15  *** erasmospunk has quit IRC
 379 2015-12-03T13:25:48  *** jtoomim has quit IRC
 380 2015-12-03T13:27:44  *** erasmospunk has joined #bitcoin-dev
 381 2015-12-03T13:34:15  *** rdymac has joined #bitcoin-dev
 382 2015-12-03T13:34:42  *** hashtag_ has quit IRC
 383 2015-12-03T13:40:39  *** tric900 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 384 2015-12-03T13:48:20  *** wallet42 has quit IRC
 385 2015-12-03T13:52:33  *** benrcole has joined #bitcoin-dev
 386 2015-12-03T13:57:23  *** agricocb has joined #bitcoin-dev
 387 2015-12-03T13:58:44  *** GAit has quit IRC
 388 2015-12-03T14:04:06  *** joystream_ has quit IRC
 389 2015-12-03T14:05:56  *** arichnad has quit IRC
 390 2015-12-03T14:06:28  *** hashtag_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 391 2015-12-03T14:15:15  *** ItSANgo has quit IRC
 392 2015-12-03T14:17:04  *** TrippySalmon has quit IRC
 393 2015-12-03T14:25:13  *** ItSANgo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 394 2015-12-03T14:25:14  *** ItSANgo_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 395 2015-12-03T14:26:32  *** ItSANgo has quit IRC
 396 2015-12-03T14:36:07  *** ademoglu_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 397 2015-12-03T14:36:58  *** sparetire_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 398 2015-12-03T14:37:43  *** Tera2342 has quit IRC
 399 2015-12-03T14:37:58  *** ademoglu__ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 400 2015-12-03T14:39:56  *** Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 401 2015-12-03T14:41:08  *** ademoglu_ has quit IRC
 402 2015-12-03T14:41:22  *** ademoglu has joined #bitcoin-dev
 403 2015-12-03T14:43:47  *** ademoglu__ has quit IRC
 404 2015-12-03T14:51:53  *** roxtrongo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 405 2015-12-03T14:52:09  *** chmod755 has quit IRC
 406 2015-12-03T14:55:14  *** afk11 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 407 2015-12-03T14:57:24  *** notj has joined #bitcoin-dev
 408 2015-12-03T14:57:45  *** notj has quit IRC
 409 2015-12-03T14:58:41  *** c-cex-finch has joined #bitcoin-dev
 410 2015-12-03T15:01:37  *** ademoglu_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 411 2015-12-03T15:04:41  *** cryptapus_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 412 2015-12-03T15:04:41  *** cryptapus_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 413 2015-12-03T15:04:59  *** ademoglu has quit IRC
 414 2015-12-03T15:05:11  *** ademoglu__ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 415 2015-12-03T15:07:30  *** damethos has quit IRC
 416 2015-12-03T15:07:57  *** roxtrong_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 417 2015-12-03T15:08:14  *** ademoglu_ has quit IRC
 418 2015-12-03T15:09:20  *** ademoglu__ has quit IRC
 419 2015-12-03T15:10:50  *** roxtrongo has quit IRC
 420 2015-12-03T15:13:55  *** jaclupi has quit IRC
 421 2015-12-03T15:14:03  *** GAit has joined #bitcoin-dev
 422 2015-12-03T15:14:28  *** jaclupi has joined #bitcoin-dev
 423 2015-12-03T15:14:45  *** SwedFTP has quit IRC
 424 2015-12-03T15:16:34  *** Skirmant has joined #bitcoin-dev
 425 2015-12-03T15:17:25  *** SwedFTP has joined #bitcoin-dev
 426 2015-12-03T15:24:47  *** DougieBot5000 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 427 2015-12-03T15:25:33  *** cyphase has joined #bitcoin-dev
 428 2015-12-03T15:25:34  *** cyphase has joined #bitcoin-dev
 429 2015-12-03T15:26:25  <jl2012> Why Antpool is not upgrading to BIP65? It is the last major pool to upgrade. Any representative of Antpool here?
 430 2015-12-03T15:27:37  *** ademoglu__ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 431 2015-12-03T15:29:03  *** alex____ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 432 2015-12-03T15:29:33  *** mdemont has joined #bitcoin-dev
 433 2015-12-03T15:31:03  *** IAmNotDorian has joined #bitcoin-dev
 434 2015-12-03T15:31:07  *** n0n0 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 435 2015-12-03T15:31:40  *** gielbier has joined #bitcoin-dev
 436 2015-12-03T15:31:59  *** giel__ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 437 2015-12-03T15:32:13  *** gielbier has quit IRC
 438 2015-12-03T15:32:23  *** giel__ has quit IRC
 439 2015-12-03T15:32:23  *** giel__ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 440 2015-12-03T15:32:31  *** giel__ is now known as gielbier
 441 2015-12-03T15:33:04  *** alex____ has quit IRC
 442 2015-12-03T15:33:10  *** ParadoxSpiral has joined #bitcoin-dev
 443 2015-12-03T15:35:22  *** graingert has quit IRC
 444 2015-12-03T15:35:33  *** graingert has joined #bitcoin-dev
 445 2015-12-03T15:36:25  *** porquilho has joined #bitcoin-dev
 446 2015-12-03T15:36:41  *** graingert has quit IRC
 447 2015-12-03T15:36:57  *** damethos has joined #bitcoin-dev
 448 2015-12-03T15:37:01  *** max__ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 449 2015-12-03T15:37:01  *** mdemont has quit IRC
 450 2015-12-03T15:37:01  *** graingert has joined #bitcoin-dev
 451 2015-12-03T15:37:25  *** max__ is now known as Guest22103
 452 2015-12-03T15:37:34  *** treehug88 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 453 2015-12-03T15:37:35  *** Guest22103 has quit IRC
 454 2015-12-03T15:38:49  *** mdemont has joined #bitcoin-dev
 455 2015-12-03T15:39:24  *** mdemont has quit IRC
 456 2015-12-03T15:40:09  *** mdemont has joined #bitcoin-dev
 457 2015-12-03T15:41:19  *** mdemont has joined #bitcoin-dev
 458 2015-12-03T15:45:20  *** Ahmed90 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 459 2015-12-03T15:46:18  *** agricocb has quit IRC
 460 2015-12-03T15:49:34  *** noamh has quit IRC
 461 2015-12-03T15:50:17  *** ademoglu_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 462 2015-12-03T15:52:05  *** kgk has joined #bitcoin-dev
 463 2015-12-03T15:53:23  *** ademoglu__ has quit IRC
 464 2015-12-03T15:56:21  *** btc_panhandler has joined #bitcoin-dev
 465 2015-12-03T15:56:25  *** kgk has quit IRC
 466 2015-12-03T15:57:56  *** atgreen_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 467 2015-12-03T15:59:50  *** molly has quit IRC
 468 2015-12-03T16:06:53  *** kadoban has joined #bitcoin-dev
 469 2015-12-03T16:07:02  *** IrishGringo has quit IRC
 470 2015-12-03T16:08:35  <gmaxwell> jl2012: I heard that they were; they just hadn't yet.
 471 2015-12-03T16:09:06  *** graingert_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 472 2015-12-03T16:09:22  *** noamh has joined #bitcoin-dev
 473 2015-12-03T16:12:23  *** agricocb has joined #bitcoin-dev
 474 2015-12-03T16:13:37  *** DatBeeDoe has joined #bitcoin-dev
 475 2015-12-03T16:14:10  <jl2012> The adoption of BIP65 is amazingly fast, except for Antpool. Hope it'll be the same for the BIP68 etc later. I guess BIP68 etc is one of the tasks in the after-workshop meetup?
 476 2015-12-03T16:14:21  *** rubensayshi has quit IRC
 477 2015-12-03T16:15:09  *** tantalum has joined #bitcoin-dev
 478 2015-12-03T16:15:26  *** jtoomim has joined #bitcoin-dev
 479 2015-12-03T16:18:35  *** IAmNotDorian has quit IRC
 480 2015-12-03T16:19:48  *** IrishGringo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 481 2015-12-03T16:21:31  *** tantalum has quit IRC
 482 2015-12-03T16:24:53  *** tantalum has joined #bitcoin-dev
 483 2015-12-03T16:29:55  *** DatBeeDoe has quit IRC
 484 2015-12-03T16:36:52  *** roxtrong_ has quit IRC
 485 2015-12-03T16:37:15  *** melvster has quit IRC
 486 2015-12-03T16:37:32  *** moli has joined #bitcoin-dev
 487 2015-12-03T16:38:23  *** lnostdal_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 488 2015-12-03T16:40:42  *** GAit has quit IRC
 489 2015-12-03T16:41:25  *** GAit has joined #bitcoin-dev
 490 2015-12-03T16:41:50  *** lnostdal has quit IRC
 491 2015-12-03T16:45:18  *** n0n0 has quit IRC
 492 2015-12-03T16:50:17  *** melvster has joined #bitcoin-dev
 493 2015-12-03T16:51:05  *** mrkent has joined #bitcoin-dev
 494 2015-12-03T16:51:16  *** Grouver has quit IRC
 495 2015-12-03T16:52:34  *** IrishGringo has quit IRC
 496 2015-12-03T16:53:00  *** petrkr has quit IRC
 497 2015-12-03T16:55:33  *** wraithm has joined #bitcoin-dev
 498 2015-12-03T16:55:52  *** JackH has joined #bitcoin-dev
 499 2015-12-03T16:57:08  *** ademoglu_ has quit IRC
 500 2015-12-03T16:59:18  *** GAit has quit IRC
 501 2015-12-03T17:01:05  *** propumpkin is now known as copumpkin
 502 2015-12-03T17:04:14  *** mrkent has quit IRC
 503 2015-12-03T17:09:05  *** GAit has joined #bitcoin-dev
 504 2015-12-03T17:11:46  *** splix_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 505 2015-12-03T17:12:13  *** GAit has quit IRC
 506 2015-12-03T17:12:29  *** splix has quit IRC
 507 2015-12-03T17:13:01  *** splix_ has quit IRC
 508 2015-12-03T17:14:31  *** akstunt600 has quit IRC
 509 2015-12-03T17:16:25  *** GAit has joined #bitcoin-dev
 510 2015-12-03T17:17:08  *** iv3c has joined #bitcoin-dev
 511 2015-12-03T17:19:48  *** bendavenport has joined #bitcoin-dev
 512 2015-12-03T17:21:02  *** tric900 has quit IRC
 513 2015-12-03T17:23:16  *** mdemont has quit IRC
 514 2015-12-03T17:24:42  *** mdemont has joined #bitcoin-dev
 515 2015-12-03T17:25:40  *** Icloud has joined #bitcoin-dev
 516 2015-12-03T17:27:15  *** ThomasV has quit IRC
 517 2015-12-03T17:28:27  *** GAit has quit IRC
 518 2015-12-03T17:28:51  *** GAit has joined #bitcoin-dev
 519 2015-12-03T17:30:00  *** Icloud has quit IRC
 520 2015-12-03T17:30:18  *** Lightsword_ has quit IRC
 521 2015-12-03T17:30:40  *** benrcole has quit IRC
 522 2015-12-03T17:30:44  *** Lightsword has joined #bitcoin-dev
 523 2015-12-03T17:32:39  *** zookolaptop has joined #bitcoin-dev
 524 2015-12-03T17:33:06  *** benrcole has joined #bitcoin-dev
 525 2015-12-03T17:38:03  *** alex_____ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 526 2015-12-03T17:38:42  *** brson has joined #bitcoin-dev
 527 2015-12-03T17:39:03  *** Amnez777- has joined #bitcoin-dev
 528 2015-12-03T17:39:45  *** Amnez777 has quit IRC
 529 2015-12-03T17:40:21  *** Amnez777 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 530 2015-12-03T17:40:22  *** Amnez777 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 531 2015-12-03T17:44:23  *** Amnez777- has quit IRC
 532 2015-12-03T17:46:25  *** a5m0 has quit IRC
 533 2015-12-03T17:46:37  *** ParadoxSpiral_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 534 2015-12-03T17:49:45  *** ParadoxSpiral has quit IRC
 535 2015-12-03T17:51:43  *** joystream_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 536 2015-12-03T17:52:10  *** noobfikt has joined #bitcoin-dev
 537 2015-12-03T17:54:13  *** kgk has joined #bitcoin-dev
 538 2015-12-03T17:55:28  *** a5m0 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 539 2015-12-03T17:57:10  *** GAit has quit IRC
 540 2015-12-03T17:58:36  *** graingert has quit IRC
 541 2015-12-03T17:58:36  *** graingert_ is now known as graingert
 542 2015-12-03T17:58:51  *** kgk has quit IRC
 543 2015-12-03T18:00:35  *** GAit has joined #bitcoin-dev
 544 2015-12-03T18:02:01  *** mrkent has joined #bitcoin-dev
 545 2015-12-03T18:02:27  *** GAit has quit IRC
 546 2015-12-03T18:02:59  *** GAit has joined #bitcoin-dev
 547 2015-12-03T18:05:00  *** notj has joined #bitcoin-dev
 548 2015-12-03T18:06:37  *** noamh has quit IRC
 549 2015-12-03T18:09:04  *** swappermall has quit IRC
 550 2015-12-03T18:10:56  *** swappermall has joined #bitcoin-dev
 551 2015-12-03T18:12:26  *** benrcole1 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 552 2015-12-03T18:13:18  *** benrcole has quit IRC
 553 2015-12-03T18:17:14  *** zookolaptop has quit IRC
 554 2015-12-03T18:18:05  *** goregrind has joined #bitcoin-dev
 555 2015-12-03T18:21:26  *** a5m0 has quit IRC
 556 2015-12-03T18:21:51  *** CheckDavid has joined #bitcoin-dev
 557 2015-12-03T18:24:25  *** neozaru has joined #bitcoin-dev
 558 2015-12-03T18:26:49  *** mdemont has quit IRC
 559 2015-12-03T18:28:40  *** mdemont has joined #bitcoin-dev
 560 2015-12-03T18:30:00  *** ItSANgo_ has quit IRC
 561 2015-12-03T18:30:43  *** a5m0 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 562 2015-12-03T18:31:39  *** damethos has quit IRC
 563 2015-12-03T18:32:43  *** Yoghur114 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 564 2015-12-03T18:32:50  *** patcon has joined #bitcoin-dev
 565 2015-12-03T18:33:51  *** mdemont has quit IRC
 566 2015-12-03T18:35:08  *** hey_joe has joined #bitcoin-dev
 567 2015-12-03T18:35:10  *** mdemont has joined #bitcoin-dev
 568 2015-12-03T18:37:15  *** ribasushi has quit IRC
 569 2015-12-03T18:39:55  *** mdemont has quit IRC
 570 2015-12-03T18:40:09  <gijensen> Is there any reason zapwallettxes and rescan can't be RPC calls? Like if I wrote them would it be as simple as it looks?
 571 2015-12-03T18:42:18  *** ribasushi has joined #bitcoin-dev
 572 2015-12-03T18:42:37  *** hey_joe has quit IRC
 573 2015-12-03T18:46:05  *** atgreen_ has quit IRC
 574 2015-12-03T18:48:42  *** alex_____ has quit IRC
 575 2015-12-03T18:48:57  *** alex_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 576 2015-12-03T18:48:58  *** iv3c has quit IRC
 577 2015-12-03T18:49:21  *** alex_ has quit IRC
 578 2015-12-03T18:50:13  *** iv3c has joined #bitcoin-dev
 579 2015-12-03T18:50:16  *** ebfull has joined #bitcoin-dev
 580 2015-12-03T18:50:16  *** wraithm has quit IRC
 581 2015-12-03T18:50:39  *** cocoBTC has joined #bitcoin-dev
 582 2015-12-03T18:52:10  <jonasschnelli> gijensen: for rescan there is a RPC proposal (pull request): https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7061
 583 2015-12-03T18:52:30  *** lnostdal_ has quit IRC
 584 2015-12-03T18:52:51  <gijensen> jonasschnelli: Thank you
 585 2015-12-03T18:53:06  *** jtoomim has quit IRC
 586 2015-12-03T18:53:37  *** notj has quit IRC
 587 2015-12-03T18:53:41  *** jtoomim has joined #bitcoin-dev
 588 2015-12-03T18:57:25  <jonasschnelli> meeting today or is everyone already in HK?
 589 2015-12-03T18:58:02  <wumpus> dunno, I suppose some people are not yet or not going like us
 590 2015-12-03T18:58:04  *** jtoomim has quit IRC
 591 2015-12-03T18:59:06  *** damethos has joined #bitcoin-dev
 592 2015-12-03T18:59:43  <wumpus> we can try
 593 2015-12-03T18:59:47  <wumpus> #meetingstart
 594 2015-12-03T18:59:51  <wumpus> #startmeeting
 595 2015-12-03T18:59:51  <lightningbot`> Meeting started Thu Dec  3 18:59:51 2015 UTC.  The chair is wumpus. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
 596 2015-12-03T18:59:51  <lightningbot`> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
 597 2015-12-03T19:00:10  <wumpus> anyone topics?
 598 2015-12-03T19:00:31  *** alex_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 599 2015-12-03T19:01:26  <jcorgan> bip68-related pull requests?
 600 2015-12-03T19:01:44  <jonasschnelli> bip68 is a evergreen here... :)
 601 2015-12-03T19:01:50  *** notj has joined #bitcoin-dev
 602 2015-12-03T19:02:06  <wumpus> yes from last week we have: CLTV activation, BIP68/112 implementation, RBF
 603 2015-12-03T19:02:25  <wumpus> action item for CLTV activation was: Post reminder about CLTV deployment next week on social media (btcdrak, 19:28:39)
 604 2015-12-03T19:02:52  <btcdrak> wumpus: I did it a couple days ago
 605 2015-12-03T19:03:02  <wumpus> awesome
 606 2015-12-03T19:03:18  <wumpus> ok, BIP68 it is then
 607 2015-12-03T19:03:30  <wumpus> #topic BIP68-related pull requests
 608 2015-12-03T19:03:33  <btcdrak> is morcos here?
 609 2015-12-03T19:03:36  <gmaxwell> I want to talk briefly about eviction and onion support.
 610 2015-12-03T19:03:39  <morcos> yep, justg showed up
 611 2015-12-03T19:03:49  <wumpus> action item from last week was  Merge BIPs PRs #245 and #248
 612 2015-12-03T19:03:57  <btcdrak> wumpus: that was done
 613 2015-12-03T19:04:01  <Diablo-D3> wait, wtf?
 614 2015-12-03T19:04:03  <wumpus> good
 615 2015-12-03T19:04:08  <Diablo-D3> how the hell did we get that many BIPs
 616 2015-12-03T19:04:25  <wumpus> we didn't, those refer to pull requests, not to pull numbers
 617 2015-12-03T19:04:38  *** afk11 has quit IRC
 618 2015-12-03T19:04:56  <btcdrak> wumpus: there is one small correction https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/252
 619 2015-12-03T19:05:07  *** alex_ has quit IRC
 620 2015-12-03T19:05:08  <btcdrak> if that could be merged it would be dandy.
 621 2015-12-03T19:05:12  <morcos> so we're not on the verge of merging 6312 immediately anyway correct?
 622 2015-12-03T19:05:25  <Diablo-D3> wumpus: ahh
 623 2015-12-03T19:05:30  <morcos> it needs more tested ACKS ?
 624 2015-12-03T19:05:31  <morcos> or any
 625 2015-12-03T19:05:36  <wumpus> yes
 626 2015-12-03T19:05:36  *** lnostdal_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 627 2015-12-03T19:05:39  <btcdrak> morcos: yes
 628 2015-12-03T19:05:42  <morcos> i don't want to be the cause of delaying it
 629 2015-12-03T19:05:44  <Diablo-D3> wumpus: I was going to say, did I sleep for 10 years or what
 630 2015-12-03T19:05:48  <morcos> but i want to throw something out there
 631 2015-12-03T19:05:56  <sipa> present, from airport
 632 2015-12-03T19:05:57  <wumpus> #action there is one small correction https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/252
 633 2015-12-03T19:06:21  <morcos> i'm trying to figure out how to cache and efficiently check BIP68 validity
 634 2015-12-03T19:06:22  <btcdrak> morcos: although to be fair, I think we're much closer now. Are we going to leave the CNB optimisations till post merge of #6312?
 635 2015-12-03T19:06:37  <wumpus> ok, next topic I guess
 636 2015-12-03T19:06:40  <morcos> we'd realized before this is necessary for reorgs, but more importantly its necessary to make CNB fast
 637 2015-12-03T19:06:58  <morcos> (sorry i guess i intepreted BIP68 related pulls differently :) )
 638 2015-12-03T19:07:10  <btcdrak> wumpus: wait a sec
 639 2015-12-03T19:07:14  <morcos> sdaftuar and i are looking at two approaches
 640 2015-12-03T19:07:34  <morcos> 1 will probably not change the existing code in 6312 at all (or barely)
 641 2015-12-03T19:07:42  *** notj has quit IRC
 642 2015-12-03T19:07:49  <morcos> the other will refactor LockTime(..)  signficiantly
 643 2015-12-03T19:07:52  *** notj has joined #bitcoin-dev
 644 2015-12-03T19:08:10  <sipa> i'd rather see the refactor done uofront
 645 2015-12-03T19:08:16  <morcos> I think if we decide the refactored version is better, exactly
 646 2015-12-03T19:08:21  <morcos> thats what i was going to say
 647 2015-12-03T19:08:33  <btcdrak> sipa: +1
 648 2015-12-03T19:08:50  <sipa> so not significantly different code goes into backports
 649 2015-12-03T19:08:50  <morcos> ok, so it may be the refactor is not better anyway, but give us a couple of days to try out the two approaches and let people see them
 650 2015-12-03T19:09:11  <morcos> sipa: yep, thats what we were discussing
 651 2015-12-03T19:09:55  <morcos> ok..  will make sure we ping people when we have something to show then
 652 2015-12-03T19:10:10  <btcdrak> morcos: so let's revisit the topic next meeting.
 653 2015-12-03T19:10:11  *** spinza has quit IRC
 654 2015-12-03T19:10:12  *** yrashk has joined #bitcoin-dev
 655 2015-12-03T19:10:18  <morcos> ack
 656 2015-12-03T19:10:41  <btcdrak> morcos: if you do make a patch ping me and I'll cherry-pick it into to the PR
 657 2015-12-03T19:11:17  <btcdrak> so I guess the action point is look into refactoring for CNB optimisation
 658 2015-12-03T19:11:44  <wumpus> #action  look into refactoring for CNB optimisation
 659 2015-12-03T19:12:01  <morcos> yeah, but since the code is also for backports that doesn't care about cnb optimisation i think we need to make sure the refactor is reasonable standing on its own as well  (and b/c its consensus code!)
 660 2015-12-03T19:12:13  <btcdrak> morcos: ack
 661 2015-12-03T19:12:27  <sipa> i believe that code that works on master/0.12 will be easier to trivially backport than the other way around
 662 2015-12-03T19:13:26  <morcos> sipa: sure but interesting to think about the data that we'll be getting out of the refactor, these heights and times and so forth, isn't useful in backports
 663 2015-12-03T19:13:56  <sipa> agree
 664 2015-12-03T19:14:16  <morcos> new topic PR 7062?
 665 2015-12-03T19:14:29  <morcos> i know ppl are going to conference now
 666 2015-12-03T19:14:31  <btcdrak> morcos: ack
 667 2015-12-03T19:14:39  <wumpus> gmaxwell proposed a next topic already
 668 2015-12-03T19:14:40  <gmaxwell> I believe we've seen ~no network visbile use or user comments on backports 0.10.x; so I believe we should backport no further than 0.11.x anymore. (and perhaps announce pending end of support on 0.10 on the list to bring anyone out of the woodwork)
 669 2015-12-03T19:14:47  <wumpus> #topic eviction and onions
 670 2015-12-03T19:14:51  <morcos> but sooner we merge that into 0.12, the more test coverage it gets.. (ok sorry, all iw anted to say)
 671 2015-12-03T19:14:53  *** wh092m has joined #bitcoin-dev
 672 2015-12-03T19:15:15  <btcdrak> gmaxwell: yes
 673 2015-12-03T19:15:32  <gmaxwell> Brief, w/ auto onion support we'll now have a lot of potentially hostile localhost peers, which our eviction code will currently not evict.  #7082 addresses this, but sipa caught me making a locking naughty move.
 674 2015-12-03T19:15:48  <wumpus> we usually keep to one version back, support for 0.10 stops as soon as 0.12 is released
 675 2015-12-03T19:16:11  <wumpus> (excluding super serious bugs and security issues I guess)
 676 2015-12-03T19:16:15  <gmaxwell> I updated to fix it with a kind of gross global lock. But looking around, I see that we frequently update data in node objects with no lock protection. (e.g. pingtimes)
 677 2015-12-03T19:16:52  <btcdrak> wumpus: let's post that to the mailing list so end users are clear about it.
 678 2015-12-03T19:16:59  <btcdrak> wumpus: I was thinking we need a clear EOL statement somewhere
 679 2015-12-03T19:17:10  <gmaxwell> I think its somewhat important to do something about the localhost connections w/ eviction, even in 0.12, to prevent the HS support from bein a liability.
 680 2015-12-03T19:17:15  *** neha has quit IRC
 681 2015-12-03T19:17:21  <sipa> gmaxwell: i know how to fix that
 682 2015-12-03T19:17:26  *** wh092m is now known as Drona
 683 2015-12-03T19:17:37  <wumpus> btcdrak: well it used to be the case that luke-jr was backporting things to older versions, in general other people may still bother
 684 2015-12-03T19:17:51  <gmaxwell> I don't really care what, if I'm getting no comments on that PR because people hate that; lemme know. If someone wants to suggest how to fix the locking mess without the gross global lock I just updated the PR to add, let me know.
 685 2015-12-03T19:17:56  *** Drona is now known as Guest43702
 686 2015-12-03T19:17:59  *** t7 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 687 2015-12-03T19:18:02  <gmaxwell> sipa: great.
 688 2015-12-03T19:18:06  <btcdrak> What PR are we talking about now?
 689 2015-12-03T19:18:12  <gmaxwell> 7082
 690 2015-12-03T19:18:14  <gmaxwell> Thats all I had for that.
 691 2015-12-03T19:18:38  <wumpus> we can still disable the auto HS stuff by default if it's risky
 692 2015-12-03T19:19:02  <gmaxwell> I think a very minimal change derisks it, even less than 7082. (7082 without the last commit, basically)
 693 2015-12-03T19:19:04  <wumpus> the only reason it's enabled by default is because I never got any pushback on that
 694 2015-12-03T19:19:04  <cfields> gmaxwell: could you describe the issue with nasty localhost peers? I'm not following
 695 2015-12-03T19:19:33  *** neha has joined #bitcoin-dev
 696 2015-12-03T19:19:59  <gmaxwell> cfields: localhost peers are never evicted; so as soon as you show up on HS someone can prevent anyone else from connecting to you trivially. (just open 125 connections and respond to pings)
 697 2015-12-03T19:20:06  <wumpus> #action take a look at #7082
 698 2015-12-03T19:20:24  <gmaxwell> thanks.
 699 2015-12-03T19:20:48  <jonasschnelli> and there is no other way to distinct between real localhost connections and tor hs localhost connections?
 700 2015-12-03T19:20:51  <wumpus> there's already plenty of people that run HS nodes so that is an issue independent of whether auto HS support will be disabled
 701 2015-12-03T19:20:59  <wumpus> jonasschnelli: yes, use whitebind
 702 2015-12-03T19:21:03  *** agricocb has quit IRC
 703 2015-12-03T19:21:09  <sipa> jonasschnelli: we could restrict the no-evict behaviour to whitelisted nodes
 704 2015-12-03T19:21:11  *** agricocb has joined #bitcoin-dev
 705 2015-12-03T19:21:18  <sipa> but that may break existing software
 706 2015-12-03T19:21:21  <gmaxwell> jonasschnelli: you can whitebind, but that has other effects like force relaying all transactions even redundantly.
 707 2015-12-03T19:21:44  <jonasschnelli> why to we special threat localhost in the first place?
 708 2015-12-03T19:21:51  <wumpus> jonasschnelli: because of old
 709 2015-12-03T19:22:05  <wumpus> if it was decided now, we'd only do it for specially whitelisted nodes
 710 2015-12-03T19:22:06  <cfields> gmaxwell: got it now, thanks
 711 2015-12-03T19:22:08  <sipa> jonasschnelli: because local software was historically trusted
 712 2015-12-03T19:22:17  <sipa> but tor connections aren't really
 713 2015-12-03T19:22:22  <gmaxwell> 7082 does not evict whitelisted peers. It removes the special treatment in eviction; and trusts that the fact that eviction does not evict the peers with the 8 lowest ping times, to protect local peers.
 714 2015-12-03T19:22:28  <sipa> HS support was only added in 0.6 iirc
 715 2015-12-03T19:22:43  *** alex_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 716 2015-12-03T19:22:58  <gmaxwell> We still have several other bits of excessive trust of local peers, I think; but this was the most obvious.
 717 2015-12-03T19:23:09  <wumpus> in general, P2P connecting software will be able to cope with being disconnected/evicted
 718 2015-12-03T19:23:35  <wumpus> gmaxwell: sounds good to me
 719 2015-12-03T19:23:44  *** JackH has quit IRC
 720 2015-12-03T19:23:52  <gmaxwell> So long has you have less than 8 local peers, and they respond to pings fast just once, they'll still get protected from eviction in 7082.
 721 2015-12-03T19:23:56  *** noamh has joined #bitcoin-dev
 722 2015-12-03T19:24:06  <wumpus> in the long term we should encourage using whitelisted for special peers
 723 2015-12-03T19:24:08  <wumpus> local or not
 724 2015-12-03T19:24:14  <sipa> agree
 725 2015-12-03T19:24:15  <jonasschnelli> +1!
 726 2015-12-03T19:24:24  <jonasschnelli> I think we should take https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7082/files#diff-9a82240fe7dfe86564178691cc57f2f1L886 in
 727 2015-12-03T19:24:48  *** afk11 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 728 2015-12-03T19:25:14  <wumpus> #action look at  https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7082/files#diff-9a82240fe7dfe86564178691cc57f2f1L886
 729 2015-12-03T19:25:15  <jonasschnelli> i mean remove the if (node->addr.IsLocal()) protection at all
 730 2015-12-03T19:25:20  <wumpus> any other topics?
 731 2015-12-03T19:25:37  <sipa> topic: 0.12 party
 732 2015-12-03T19:25:39  <sipa> :p
 733 2015-12-03T19:25:54  <btcdrak> +1
 734 2015-12-03T19:25:54  <cfields> i'd like to quickly discuss the HK dev meetup
 735 2015-12-03T19:25:54  <wumpus> lol :)
 736 2015-12-03T19:25:54  <jonasschnelli> hah!
 737 2015-12-03T19:25:59  <wumpus> #topic HK dev meetup
 738 2015-12-03T19:26:04  * sipa will be in HK in 14 hours
 739 2015-12-03T19:26:11  <cfields> everyone who's in hk, come to the dev meetup :)
 740 2015-12-03T19:26:13  <cfields> </topic>
 741 2015-12-03T19:26:24  <jonasschnelli> ;-)
 742 2015-12-03T19:26:28  <cfields> sec, i'll like the mail thread
 743 2015-12-03T19:26:37  <wumpus> useful information may be: where, when etc
 744 2015-12-03T19:26:57  <sipa> cfields: you'll "like" it, is it on facebook?
 745 2015-12-03T19:27:01  <morcos> sorry to be missing it!
 746 2015-12-03T19:27:07  <cfields> wumpus: getting there, discussion went faster than i expected. 1 sec :)
 747 2015-12-03T19:27:16  <wumpus> twitter has 'likes' now too :')
 748 2015-12-03T19:27:22  <cfields> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-November/011712.html
 749 2015-12-03T19:27:25  <morcos> we shoudl add on github
 750 2015-12-03T19:27:30  *** afk11 has quit IRC
 751 2015-12-03T19:27:41  <cfields> Dec 8/9, 8am-?
 752 2015-12-03T19:27:54  <wumpus> #action all go to HK dev meeting if you're around https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-November/011712.html Dec 8/9, 8am-?
 753 2015-12-03T19:27:56  <cfields> same place as the conference. More info at the link above
 754 2015-12-03T19:28:17  *** noamh has quit IRC
 755 2015-12-03T19:28:22  <cfields> hope everyone can make it. Plan it just to have unstructured dev time.
 756 2015-12-03T19:28:55  * jonasschnelli can't go to HK
 757 2015-12-03T19:28:56  <btcdrak> with lots of beer
 758 2015-12-03T19:29:06  <cfields> If anyone wants to suggest some topics ahead of time, I'm happy to start a list. Otherwise, whatever comes up on its own
 759 2015-12-03T19:29:08  <cfields> :(
 760 2015-12-03T19:29:09  <wumpus> any other topics?
 761 2015-12-03T19:29:09  <sipa> :(
 762 2015-12-03T19:29:23  *** neha has quit IRC
 763 2015-12-03T19:29:35  <sdaftuar> topic suggestion: opt-in RBF shoudl have a BIP?
 764 2015-12-03T19:29:54  <wumpus> #topic BIP for opt-in RBF
 765 2015-12-03T19:29:56  <btcdrak> not really, it is just policy code
 766 2015-12-03T19:29:56  <jonasschnelli> definitively!
 767 2015-12-03T19:30:12  <sdaftuar> i think it's unfortunate that the only documentation for what wallet writers should do is in a single mailnig list post...
 768 2015-12-03T19:30:28  <gmaxwell> Sounds reasonable.
 769 2015-12-03T19:30:28  <wumpus> depends on whether someone is volunteering I suppose
 770 2015-12-03T19:30:28  <sipa> standardness has been covered before in BIPs
 771 2015-12-03T19:30:41  <harding> +1 for a BIP.  I'll write something and coordinate with petertodd
 772 2015-12-03T19:30:42  <btcdrak> sdaftaur: I think we should add this FAQ to the release notes https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3urm8o/optin_rbf_is_misunderstood_ask_questions_about_it/
 773 2015-12-03T19:30:45  *** JackH has joined #bitcoin-dev
 774 2015-12-03T19:30:49  <sipa> well better communication with wallet authors definitely makes sense
 775 2015-12-03T19:30:49  <morcos> its also very intricate policy that is likely to be handled in the exact same way by a high proportion of the network
 776 2015-12-03T19:30:51  <wumpus> awesome harding
 777 2015-12-03T19:30:52  <sdaftuar> awesome, thansk harding
 778 2015-12-03T19:31:27  <wumpus> #action harding will coordinate with petertodd about opt-in RBF BIP
 779 2015-12-03T19:31:59  <wumpus> next topic?
 780 2015-12-03T19:32:20  <sipa> Segmentation faul
 781 2015-12-03T19:32:37  <cfields> red flag
 782 2015-12-03T19:32:38  <wumpus> #action FAQ useful for BIP: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3urm8o/optin_rbf_is_misunderstood_ask_questions_about_it/
 783 2015-12-03T19:32:47  <gmaxwell> lol
 784 2015-12-03T19:33:26  <btcdrak> #link https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3urm8o/optin_rbf_is_misunderstood_ask_questions_about_it/
 785 2015-12-03T19:34:33  <wumpus> ok, short meeting this time :) have fun in HK everyone that is going
 786 2015-12-03T19:35:06  <jonasschnelli> Yes. Have fun. And enjoy the warm weather...
 787 2015-12-03T19:35:10  <wumpus> #endmeeting
 788 2015-12-03T19:35:10  <lightningbot`> Meeting ended Thu Dec  3 19:35:10 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
 789 2015-12-03T19:35:10  <lightningbot`> Minutes:        http://www.erisian.com.au/meetbot/bitcoin-dev/2015/bitcoin-dev.2015-12-03-18.59.html
 790 2015-12-03T19:35:10  <lightningbot`> Minutes (text): http://www.erisian.com.au/meetbot/bitcoin-dev/2015/bitcoin-dev.2015-12-03-18.59.txt
 791 2015-12-03T19:35:10  <lightningbot`> Log:            http://www.erisian.com.au/meetbot/bitcoin-dev/2015/bitcoin-dev.2015-12-03-18.59.log.html
 792 2015-12-03T19:35:53  *** neha has joined #bitcoin-dev
 793 2015-12-03T19:36:47  <gmaxwell> I didn't want to dive to into it in the meeting; but if people are around;  so I've been observing abusive behavior with the mempool p2p message. There are some nodes connecting to everyone and constantly polling it at high speed.
 794 2015-12-03T19:37:26  <gijensen> How can one detect / avoid this?
 795 2015-12-03T19:37:30  <wumpus> yes I noticed too...
 796 2015-12-03T19:37:47  <gmaxwell> I don't know if their motivation is a upstream bandwdith exhaustion DOS attack, or if they are trying to bypass the batch transmission to determine tx origins, or what. But it sends several megabytes in response right now, on nodes with a big mempool.
 797 2015-12-03T19:38:17  <gmaxwell> There are SPV clients that query multiple times, unfortunately (breadwallet for example).
 798 2015-12-03T19:38:17  <jonasschnelli> gmaxwell: is the mempool p2p message "in use"? Should we configure that p2p message type and disable it by default?
 799 2015-12-03T19:38:39  <gmaxwell> so right now most SPV clients call it on connect to find unconfirmed transactions they were sent before they got online.
 800 2015-12-03T19:38:43  <wumpus> jonasschnelli's pull is useful to track bandwidth usage per message
 801 2015-12-03T19:39:25  <gmaxwell> The reason some query it multiple times is because they update their bloom filters as they add more keys to their wallets (and for some reason need to deal with time travling people sending them funds...)
 802 2015-12-03T19:39:26  <wumpus> gijensen: most straightforward is to disable the message
 803 2015-12-03T19:39:32  <jonasschnelli> (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6589)
 804 2015-12-03T19:39:36  <wumpus> gijensen: you can do that locally, but it's no solution to merge :)
 805 2015-12-03T19:39:38  <gmaxwell> jgarzik (who created the message suggested disabling it.
 806 2015-12-03T19:39:51  <gmaxwell>                                  )
 807 2015-12-03T19:40:03  <gmaxwell> But since it's used I don't think thats a cheap option.
 808 2015-12-03T19:40:06  <jonasschnelli> disable with a arg to enable?
 809 2015-12-03T19:40:07  <gijensen> wumpus, jonasschnelli thanks!
 810 2015-12-03T19:40:24  <gmaxwell> I proposed something complex; but it inspired a nasty rant by hearn.
 811 2015-12-03T19:40:55  <instagibbs> was that the PR you posted a few days ago?
 812 2015-12-03T19:40:57  <wumpus> gmaxwell: that means you're on the right way *ducks*
 813 2015-12-03T19:41:22  <jonasschnelli> or we could add the p2p mempool outbound traffic to the maxuploadtarget rules
 814 2015-12-03T19:41:23  <gmaxwell> My proposal is: have it only work with the top 8k feerate sorted transactions; have it use the inv filter to remove dupes; and to only return entries that have been in the mempool for more than a certian amount of time.
 815 2015-12-03T19:41:46  <gmaxwell> jonasschnelli: I have a patch that does that, I could PR.
 816 2015-12-03T19:42:00  <wumpus> jonasschnelli: that is sensible in any case
 817 2015-12-03T19:42:18  <gmaxwell> but it's not really a fix; and if we did the thing I suggested in the PR; I don't think it's needed.
 818 2015-12-03T19:42:19  <jonasschnelli> gmaxwell: this would allow to keep the original behavior while reducing it's traffic consumption.
 819 2015-12-03T19:42:31  <jonasschnelli> the 8k feerate proposal would slightly change the protocol.
 820 2015-12-03T19:42:34  <gmaxwell> (since returning at most 8k entries doesn't use much bandwidth... and the known filtering .. filters.
 821 2015-12-03T19:42:49  <wumpus> jonasschnelli: well the other proposed 'fix' is to disable the command completely, gmaxwell's is already a compromise
 822 2015-12-03T19:42:56  *** cj_cj has joined #bitcoin-dev
 823 2015-12-03T19:43:22  <gmaxwell> I don't think we should have a p2p message that results in multiple megabytes of transmission with a single request.
 824 2015-12-03T19:43:25  <wumpus> I think it's unreasonable to expect nodes to cough up their *entire* mempool
 825 2015-12-03T19:43:29  <wumpus> it is privacy sensitive as well
 826 2015-12-03T19:43:40  <jonasschnelli> Agree with wumpus
 827 2015-12-03T19:43:43  <cfields> agreed
 828 2015-12-03T19:43:48  <wumpus> I don't think I was aware of it when the mempool message was introduced, otherwsie I'd probably have pushed back
 829 2015-12-03T19:43:51  <jonasschnelli> The SPV wallets will find other ways *duck*
 830 2015-12-03T19:44:14  <gmaxwell> There was pushback on the message in fact but it was pretty mild. I think it wouldn't have happened if people realized the privacy problem with it.
 831 2015-12-03T19:44:15  <wumpus> gmaxwell: indeed
 832 2015-12-03T19:44:52  <jonasschnelli> limit the amount of mempool MB responses by time and node?
 833 2015-12-03T19:45:00  <gmaxwell> So in my patch, I picked 8k pretty randomly as "a couple blocks worth", for lack of a better idea.
 834 2015-12-03T19:45:10  <cfields> jonasschnelli: that was my thought as well
 835 2015-12-03T19:45:11  <wumpus> so if we can somehow neuter the mempool message to be less harmful from a bandwidth and privacy perspective, that sounds good, and is probably more acceptable then deprecating it completely
 836 2015-12-03T19:45:29  <wumpus> (as gmaxwell's patch does)
 837 2015-12-03T19:45:35  <jonasschnelli> maybe both would be usefull.
 838 2015-12-03T19:45:55  <jonasschnelli> If the current abusive behavior is critical, we need a fix without disabling something over an arg or so
 839 2015-12-03T19:46:04  <gmaxwell> Yea, I _think_ I achieved that.  I went and talked to breadwallet about their multiple requests (to figure out why they were making them)
 840 2015-12-03T19:46:08  *** alex_ has quit IRC
 841 2015-12-03T19:46:22  *** alex_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 842 2015-12-03T19:46:43  *** alex_ has quit IRC
 843 2015-12-03T19:47:15  <gmaxwell> jonasschnelli: so far, it is only critcial to people running nodes with only a few megabits up... the traffic was pretty much totally knocking out my internet at home.
 844 2015-12-03T19:47:24  *** btc_panhandler has quit IRC
 845 2015-12-03T19:47:26  <jonasschnelli> I read breadwallets source code and just checked it. It seems like they checking if a broadcasted tx was recieved by sending the mempool p2p msg
 846 2015-12-03T19:48:05  <jonasschnelli> no.. wait
 847 2015-12-03T19:48:08  <gmaxwell> oh interesting; they didn't tell me that when I asked. So much for asking.
 848 2015-12-03T19:48:15  <gijensen> Is there not a better way to accomplish that?
 849 2015-12-03T19:48:20  <wumpus> is that necessary? we send a reject of a transaction is not accepted right?
 850 2015-12-03T19:48:40  <jonasschnelli> no.. i was wrong.
 851 2015-12-03T19:48:56  <jonasschnelli> the update the filter, then dispatch the mempool p2p msg
 852 2015-12-03T19:48:59  <gmaxwell> in any case they do send more than one.
 853 2015-12-03T19:49:02  *** alex_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 854 2015-12-03T19:49:24  *** waxwing is now known as waxwing2
 855 2015-12-03T19:49:35  <gijensen> What did they tell you when you asked?
 856 2015-12-03T19:49:38  <gmaxwell> and effectively other SPV clients do-- because they don't stay connected forever, they have short liftimes and always pull.
 857 2015-12-03T19:49:41  <wumpus> this again shows that any messages not strictly required for node P2P traffic are DoS liabilities
 858 2015-12-03T19:49:51  <gmaxwell> gijensen: what it does; as jonasschnelli corrected; they do it when they update the filter.
 859 2015-12-03T19:50:01  <gijensen> Oh okay, thanks
 860 2015-12-03T19:50:49  <gmaxwell> in any case, delivery of an unconfirmed transaction isn't guarenteed in the first place.
 861 2015-12-03T19:51:59  <jonasschnelli> would it be to harsh to disabled the mempool p2p msg when the maxuploadtraget has been reached?
 862 2015-12-03T19:52:08  <wumpus> jonasschnelli: no
 863 2015-12-03T19:52:20  <gmaxwell> jonasschnelli: I have a commit to do that.
 864 2015-12-03T19:52:29  <jonasschnelli> no response, empty response or a disconnect?
 865 2015-12-03T19:52:30  <gmaxwell> I think it's not needed if the amount returned is limited though.
 866 2015-12-03T19:52:44  <gmaxwell> I disconnect in mine. but maybe just ignoring would be best.
 867 2015-12-03T19:52:44  <wumpus> just don't respond to it
 868 2015-12-03T19:53:05  <gmaxwell> okay changing.
 869 2015-12-03T19:53:34  <wumpus> disconnecting makes sense if you don't expect anything useful from nodes sending the message after it
 870 2015-12-03T19:53:58  <wumpus> full nodes never send it right now so at this point I suppose it makes snese
 871 2015-12-03T19:54:22  *** jtoomim has joined #bitcoin-dev
 872 2015-12-03T19:54:23  <jonasschnelli> But how would the SPV wallet react?
 873 2015-12-03T19:54:24  <gmaxwell> I wonder if spv clients poll the mempool from all peers, I think they do, I've never seen one _not_ send a mempool request while I was watching.
 874 2015-12-03T19:54:30  *** wraithm has joined #bitcoin-dev
 875 2015-12-03T19:54:36  <jonasschnelli> Would a disconnect not be better,.. so the SPV wallet can go to another node and try?
 876 2015-12-03T19:55:05  <wumpus> but what if it's not a SPV wallet? what if you have a (theoretical) full node that sends the message, to collect transactions?
 877 2015-12-03T19:55:21  <wumpus> right now the assumption is valid
 878 2015-12-03T19:55:40  <wumpus> but there have been ideas to pre-fill the mempool using other nodes mempools
 879 2015-12-03T19:55:48  <gmaxwell> I think the only think to ask is it better for the peer to disconnect them.
 880 2015-12-03T19:55:51  <wumpus> so the message is not necessarily only for SPVs
 881 2015-12-03T19:56:56  <gmaxwell> wumpus: sipa and phantomcircuit both do this during testing. though it takes like ... forever to get the whole thing now. like an hour.
 882 2015-12-03T19:57:02  <gmaxwell> (from a node with a big mempool)
 883 2015-12-03T19:57:27  <gmaxwell> mempool request sends invs, so you can't even tell which invs were the response to the request.
 884 2015-12-03T19:57:27  <wumpus> right, it gets quite confusing to behavior based on assumptions on by whom a message is used
 885 2015-12-03T19:57:58  <gmaxwell> I don't think we should ever use this p2p message for mempool syncing. We should have functionality for mempool syncing, but we can add a new message.
 886 2015-12-03T19:58:18  *** jtoomim has quit IRC
 887 2015-12-03T19:58:19  *** Guest43702 has quit IRC
 888 2015-12-03T19:58:29  <jonasschnelli> But should the SPV response be tiny because of the BF?
 889 2015-12-03T19:58:44  *** karelk has quit IRC
 890 2015-12-03T19:58:45  <jonasschnelli> shouldn't
 891 2015-12-03T19:58:55  *** jtoomim has joined #bitcoin-dev
 892 2015-12-03T19:58:58  <wumpus> yes, but from a DoS perspective that's even worse
 893 2015-12-03T19:59:17  <jonasschnelli> fully agreed.
 894 2015-12-03T19:59:34  <wumpus> (not from a bandwidth one, agreed)
 895 2015-12-03T19:59:47  *** notj has quit IRC
 896 2015-12-03T19:59:48  <jonasschnelli> I see the problem, breadwallet (and probably other), update the filter whenever someone create a new address,.. then get queriy the mempool of n nodes.
 897 2015-12-03T20:00:43  *** jtoomim_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 898 2015-12-03T20:00:47  *** alex_ has quit IRC
 899 2015-12-03T20:01:00  *** jtoomim_ has quit IRC
 900 2015-12-03T20:01:01  *** jtoomim has quit IRC
 901 2015-12-03T20:01:13  *** jtoomim has joined #bitcoin-dev
 902 2015-12-03T20:01:28  <wumpus> gmaxwell: but a new message for mempool syncing will likely have the same issues
 903 2015-12-03T20:02:38  *** notj has joined #bitcoin-dev
 904 2015-12-03T20:02:45  <wumpus> (unless it has the same adapted behavior to only return the most important part)
 905 2015-12-03T20:02:54  <gmaxwell> wumpus: nah, it would be defined to only work with at most a certian size, defined to give feerate order, defined to respond in a message and not random invs, defined to give data on delay. etc.
 906 2015-12-03T20:03:32  <gmaxwell> and potentially use IBLT sync, but I haven't yet been able to measure the performance of set reconcillation on this problem; by rusty's calculations it should work pretty well.
 907 2015-12-03T20:03:51  <wumpus> even returning a random selection would be useful I suppose, it can ask multiple nodes to get a more complete picture
 908 2015-12-03T20:03:57  *** dcousens has joined #bitcoin-dev
 909 2015-12-03T20:04:03  *** notj has quit IRC
 910 2015-12-03T20:04:32  <morcos>  my 2 cents are i don't find it that useful for testing mempool related pulls.  i'd be happy to see it go.  not sure what about the SPV issues
 911 2015-12-03T20:04:42  <jgarzik> damned time zones.
 912 2015-12-03T20:04:50  <jgarzik> who invented them and why?
 913 2015-12-03T20:04:58  <jonasschnelli> haha
 914 2015-12-03T20:05:07  <gmaxwell> jgarzik: set your clocks to utc and avoid that problem... thats what I do.
 915 2015-12-03T20:05:08  <wumpus> right, for testing it's better to use RPC commands morcos
 916 2015-12-03T20:05:21  *** Dizzle has joined #bitcoin-dev
 917 2015-12-03T20:05:30  <jgarzik> gmaxwell, I do that for all my VPS's... should do for local too :)
 918 2015-12-03T20:05:37  *** notj has joined #bitcoin-dev
 919 2015-12-03T20:05:48  <wumpus> good idea gmaxwell
 920 2015-12-03T20:07:05  <jonasschnelli> morcos: I guess the SPV issue is: how to get wallet releated tx when you update the filter (after creating a new key).
 921 2015-12-03T20:07:28  <wumpus> though I think there is some sense in timezones, DST on the other hand can't wait for it to be consigned to the dustbin of history
 922 2015-12-03T20:07:56  <gmaxwell> jonasschnelli: thing is, unless the sender has a time machine or there are multiple copies of the same wallet running; theyre couldn't exist any matching transactions yet.
 923 2015-12-03T20:08:06  *** cybrNaut has quit IRC
 924 2015-12-03T20:08:17  *** cybrNaut- has joined #bitcoin-dev
 925 2015-12-03T20:08:34  <jonasschnelli> gmaxwell: heh. Good point. :)
 926 2015-12-03T20:08:41  <jonasschnelli> Unless its a bip32 re-creation?
 927 2015-12-03T20:08:46  <sipa> jonasschnelli: when you create a new keuly, there cannot be any transaction to it
 928 2015-12-03T20:08:47  <wumpus> gmaxwell: I guess when importing a key or so
 929 2015-12-03T20:09:03  <gmaxwell> in any case, my PR is fine for that use.
 930 2015-12-03T20:09:09  <wumpus> yes
 931 2015-12-03T20:09:12  <sipa> yeah, it is useful for importing a key, but that inevitably needs a rescan, not just mempool resync
 932 2015-12-03T20:09:42  <gmaxwell> because the response is filtered you can call it often too, to make up for the delay.
 933 2015-12-03T20:09:45  <jonasschnelli> right... Breadwallet probably needs to disable the mempool check after updating the filter because of a new generated address
 934 2015-12-03T20:09:55  <jonasschnelli> but better threat the node side
 935 2015-12-03T20:10:37  <wumpus> yes no matter what they do... the node side still has to mitigate the DoS potential of the message
 936 2015-12-03T20:10:57  <cfields> oh, speaking of tor, i noticed something yesterday. wumpus: did you ever notice tor preferring !streamisolation via socks5? On my local machine, given the options for auth/no auth, tor selects no auth (and !streamisolation as a result)
 937 2015-12-03T20:11:30  <cfields> docs hint at an option for that behavior, but it's supposed to be disabled by default
 938 2015-12-03T20:11:52  <wumpus> cfields: you mean at the tor side or the bitcoin side?
 939 2015-12-03T20:12:08  <cfields> wumpus: bitcoin's connection to the proxy
 940 2015-12-03T20:12:49  *** c0rw|zZz is now known as c0rw1n
 941 2015-12-03T20:13:34  <cfields> wumpus: when connecting to the proxy, you give it a list of acceptable forms of auth. we give it "none or user/pass". It then replies with its preference and you use that mode. My testing shows that it always replies with "none" if you list "none" as an option
 942 2015-12-03T20:13:35  <wumpus> cfields: I'm quite sure our stream isolation works? TOR offers two authentication options: NONE and PASSWORD, we pick PASSWORD if we can and send a random user/pass
 943 2015-12-03T20:14:15  <wumpus> cfields: huh! I tested it extensively when I worked on that pull
 944 2015-12-03T20:14:18  <cfields> wumpus: not doubting that it works, only wondering why i see that behavior.
 945 2015-12-03T20:14:18  <Luke-Jr> wumpus: I may continue on 0.10 once you're done with it, since that is still my main wallet
 946 2015-12-03T20:14:48  <cfields> (and, if we should reject "none" if -streamisolation is on, and disconnect instead)
 947 2015-12-03T20:15:03  <cfields> wumpus: maybe it's my old tor version?
 948 2015-12-03T20:15:42  *** jtoomim has quit IRC
 949 2015-12-03T20:16:12  *** spinza has joined #bitcoin-dev
 950 2015-12-03T20:16:16  *** jtoomim has joined #bitcoin-dev
 951 2015-12-03T20:17:04  <wumpus> cfields: does your tor version support stream isolation?
 952 2015-12-03T20:17:23  <cfields> wumpus: yes. if i remove the "none" option and give it only "auth", it requests auth.
 953 2015-12-03T20:17:25  *** dcousens has quit IRC
 954 2015-12-03T20:18:05  *** jtoomim has quit IRC
 955 2015-12-03T20:18:10  <wumpus> let me try with -debug=proxy ...
 956 2015-12-03T20:18:16  *** jtoomim has joined #bitcoin-dev
 957 2015-12-03T20:19:12  *** CheckDavid has quit IRC
 958 2015-12-03T20:19:23  <wumpus> 2015-12-03 20:19:15 SOCKS5 sending proxy authentication 2952828871:1412341242  works for me
 959 2015-12-03T20:19:54  <wumpus> probably your tor version, or an configuration issue at the tor side
 960 2015-12-03T20:21:02  <cfields> yes, -debug=proxy doesn't show that here. must be local indeed.
 961 2015-12-03T20:21:03  *** Starduster has quit IRC
 962 2015-12-03T20:21:44  *** IrishGringo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 963 2015-12-03T20:22:02  *** jtoomim has quit IRC
 964 2015-12-03T20:22:16  <cfields> wumpus: that behavior's deceiving, though. if isolation is requested but not used, i think disconnecting would be the more reasonable expectation?
 965 2015-12-03T20:22:19  *** jtoomim has joined #bitcoin-dev
 966 2015-12-03T20:22:42  <wumpus> what you could do is try to switch the methods? put 0x02 first then 0x00
 967 2015-12-03T20:22:50  <wumpus> cfields: that'll mess with "auto detection" badly
 968 2015-12-03T20:22:52  <cfields> same result, had the same thought :)
 969 2015-12-03T20:23:17  *** jtoomim has quit IRC
 970 2015-12-03T20:23:31  <cfields> i'll see if i can track down when the behavior changed
 971 2015-12-03T20:23:33  <wumpus> the reason for implementing it this way is that this still works with non-tor proxies
 972 2015-12-03T20:23:45  <wumpus> which is the only reason why it could be enabled by default
 973 2015-12-03T20:23:53  *** jtoomim has joined #bitcoin-dev
 974 2015-12-03T20:24:12  <wumpus> I guess you could add an explicit proxyrandomize=force option that disconnects if it can't do it
 975 2015-12-03T20:24:18  <cfields> wumpus: what if the non-tor proxy accepts auth as well as none? surely a random user/pass would fail in that case
 976 2015-12-03T20:24:25  <wumpus> but I'm not so sure that's so useful, right now it's pretty much 'best effort'
 977 2015-12-03T20:24:42  <wumpus> cfields: sure, *except* in that case, but remember we don't support auth at all
 978 2015-12-03T20:24:51  <wumpus> cfields: there's always -proxyrandomize=0
 979 2015-12-03T20:25:17  <wumpus> I'd really prefer to leave it as it
 980 2015-12-03T20:25:22  <cfields> ok. just trying to weigh expectations vs results.
 981 2015-12-03T20:27:32  <wumpus> if you value your privacy don't use a very old tor version, they have more bugs
 982 2015-12-03T20:28:38  *** jtoomim has quit IRC
 983 2015-12-03T20:28:59  <wumpus> and as said I'm not against adding a -proxyrandomize=force option, just can't make it default
 984 2015-12-03T20:29:58  <cfields> ok
 985 2015-12-03T20:30:23  <gmaxwell> Is anyone around that knows, cares, anything about the versionbits BIP?  I want to steal a bit.
 986 2015-12-03T20:30:23  *** btc_panhandler has joined #bitcoin-dev
 987 2015-12-03T20:30:42  <morcos> wumpus: Just for the record.  There is a comparison of unsigned ints in GetMinRelayFee that is comparing an underflow now that DEFAULT_BLOCK_PRIORITY_SIZE = 0.  This has the same effect has removing GetMinRelayFee which is what we're going to do anyway.  So nothing to be done.
 988 2015-12-03T20:30:47  *** belcher has joined #bitcoin-dev
 989 2015-12-03T20:31:07  <morcos> But just wanted to point out that the code was structured in such a way that a change to a DEFAULT caused a buggy comparison
 990 2015-12-03T20:31:17  *** metalcamp has quit IRC
 991 2015-12-03T20:31:43  *** metalcamp has joined #bitcoin-dev
 992 2015-12-03T20:32:10  <wumpus> morcos: what is the bug?
 993 2015-12-03T20:32:36  <gmaxwell> main.cpp~:        if (nBytes < (DEFAULT_BLOCK_PRIORITY_SIZE - 1000))
 994 2015-12-03T20:32:37  <morcos>  if (nBytes < (DEFAULT_BLOCK_PRIORITY_SIZE - 1000))
 995 2015-12-03T20:33:12  *** neozaru has quit IRC
 996 2015-12-03T20:33:29  <wumpus> ouch
 997 2015-12-03T20:33:32  * wumpus curses C again for not trapping on integer overflows
 998 2015-12-03T20:33:53  <gmaxwell> policy/policy.h:static const unsigned int DEFAULT_BLOCK_PRIORITY_SIZE = 0;
 999 2015-12-03T20:33:55  <sdaftuar> yeah we were wondering why the rpc tests didn't all break after the value was set (it looks like that code should stop all free transactions from the mempool)
1000 2015-12-03T20:33:55  <gmaxwell> thats unsigned.
1001 2015-12-03T20:34:00  <gmaxwell> so it's not undefined.
1002 2015-12-03T20:34:24  <morcos> did i misuese the term underflow?
1003 2015-12-03T20:34:28  <morcos> misuse
1004 2015-12-03T20:34:30  <wumpus> morcos: no
1005 2015-12-03T20:34:47  <wumpus> it's an underflow, whether it is defined is just language lawyerism :)
1006 2015-12-03T20:34:48  <gmaxwell> Your use is fine, but I was expecting undefined behavior.
1007 2015-12-03T20:35:11  *** neozaru has joined #bitcoin-dev
1008 2015-12-03T20:35:20  <wumpus> if it was undefined the compiler could give a warning
1009 2015-12-03T20:36:05  <sipa> indeed, seems unsigned integers are just defined as doing arithmetic modulo 2^32 (apart from division?)
1010 2015-12-03T20:36:26  <sdaftuar> funny thing about division that i learned recently...
1011 2015-12-03T20:36:48  <sdaftuar> have you looked at what CFeeRate does if you pass in a negative fee?
1012 2015-12-03T20:36:53  <morcos> anyway, like i said, no reason to do anything now, the last commit from 7062 removes the function anyway, and that is the same as the current state
1013 2015-12-03T20:37:21  *** graingert has quit IRC
1014 2015-12-03T20:37:37  <wumpus> what I find strangest about "  if (nBytes < (DEFAULT_BLOCK_PRIORITY_SIZE - 1000))" is that is abuses a default
1015 2015-12-03T20:37:55  <wumpus> it's supposed to be default for a parameter, not used to compare against
1016 2015-12-03T20:38:11  <morcos> yeah, thats why we just now noticed, this, when sdaftuar said,hmm the change we made to RPC tests wouldn't have actually affected that
1017 2015-12-03T20:38:12  <sdaftuar> yes!
1018 2015-12-03T20:38:39  <sdaftuar> CFeeRate::CFeeRate(const CAmount& nFeePaid, size_t nSize)
1019 2015-12-03T20:38:39  <sdaftuar> {
1020 2015-12-03T20:38:39  <sdaftuar>     if (nSize > 0)
1021 2015-12-03T20:38:39  <sdaftuar>         nSatoshisPerK = nFeePaid*1000/nSize;
1022 2015-12-03T20:38:50  <wumpus> sipa: division modulo 2^32 would be interesting but probably not what people want :)
1023 2015-12-03T20:39:06  <sdaftuar> so on a platform where size_t is 8 bytes, this doesn't work with negative numbers
1024 2015-12-03T20:39:22  <sipa> oh wow
1025 2015-12-03T20:39:31  <sdaftuar> yeah it's troubling
1026 2015-12-03T20:40:00  <wumpus> why would you use it with negative numbers?
1027 2015-12-03T20:40:10  <sdaftuar> prioritisetransaction
1028 2015-12-03T20:40:10  <morcos> feeDeltas
1029 2015-12-03T20:40:15  <wumpus> what is the meaning of a negative fee?
1030 2015-12-03T20:40:17  <wumpus> oh
1031 2015-12-03T20:40:26  <wumpus> probably should regard that as a zero fee though?
1032 2015-12-03T20:40:27  <sdaftuar> i was just surprised to learn it didn't work
1033 2015-12-03T20:40:43  <sdaftuar> (when i wrote the prioritise_transaction.py test recently, i couldn't figure out why my test was breaking)
1034 2015-12-03T20:41:06  *** shaman_ua has joined #bitcoin-dev
1035 2015-12-03T20:41:10  <sdaftuar> i think we could just fix this?
1036 2015-12-03T20:41:28  <sdaftuar> i was nervous at first, but it seems like fixing it to be properly negative should be safe (?)
1037 2015-12-03T20:41:47  *** neozaru has quit IRC
1038 2015-12-03T20:41:47  <wumpus> what is the expectation if you feed it a negative number?
1039 2015-12-03T20:42:24  <morcos> wumpus: Without understanding more about how feeDeltas are used, I think capping it at 0 could have unintended consequences.  People might expect to apply a cost Delta and benefit Delta and them net propertly or something
1040 2015-12-03T20:42:25  <sdaftuar> well, i would think that it would be worse (ie to mine) than any 0-fee rate transaction
1041 2015-12-03T20:42:39  <sdaftuar> and yes what morcos said...
1042 2015-12-03T20:43:07  <wumpus> just be careful that nothing in the code that handles fees probably takes into account that they can be negative
1043 2015-12-03T20:43:15  *** shaman_ua has quit IRC
1044 2015-12-03T20:43:34  <wumpus> this could be just one exampel
1045 2015-12-03T20:43:44  <sdaftuar> the scary thing about this example is that it's platform dependent, i think
1046 2015-12-03T20:43:46  <morcos> we actually think it works now, except with the possible exception of some printing issues, since FeeRates aren't actually used for much
1047 2015-12-03T20:44:01  <sdaftuar> i haven't tested on 32-bit platforms, but i tried doing the same calculation with an unsigned int rather than a size_t
1048 2015-12-03T20:44:03  *** neozaru has joined #bitcoin-dev
1049 2015-12-03T20:44:10  <sdaftuar> and the calculation results in a negative value
1050 2015-12-03T20:44:28  <wumpus> yes it is platform dependent
1051 2015-12-03T20:44:45  <Lightsword> btw I tested CNB with TestBlockValidity patched out and it get’s it down to ~10ms, otherwise it is over 100ms, if that can be put in a background thread and made not to block it looks like the speed increase should be fairly significant
1052 2015-12-03T20:45:25  <sdaftuar> so if we think the code is safe on 32-bit platforms, it should be fine to fix on 64-bit platforms.  that is perhaps a big assumption :)
1053 2015-12-03T20:45:48  <wumpus> nFeePaid is a signed 64 bit integer, if nSize is a 32 bit unsigned integer then this works fine (it's casted up to 64 bit signed), but if 64 bit unsigned then everything will be done as 64 bit unsigned arithmethic
1054 2015-12-03T20:46:00  *** IrishGringo has quit IRC
1055 2015-12-03T20:46:03  <morcos> Lightsword: yay!  I think the background thread can be a future improvement.  The reason I didn't try to do that now is it wasn't clear to me what to do if it fails in the background thread.  although to be fair, its not really clear what to do if it fails when its synchronous
1056 2015-12-03T20:46:29  *** matsjj has quit IRC
1057 2015-12-03T20:46:32  <Lightsword> morcos, it’s a fatal error anyways so it should just terminate I think
1058 2015-12-03T20:46:45  <wumpus> sdaftuar: agreed
1059 2015-12-03T20:47:02  *** Starduster has joined #bitcoin-dev
1060 2015-12-03T20:47:27  *** waxwing2 is now known as waxwing
1061 2015-12-03T20:47:39  <Lightsword> morcos, if TestBlockValidity fails and GBT has already returned worst case is a miner is only invalid work for 30 seconds before bitcoind terminates
1062 2015-12-03T20:48:31  <wumpus> sdaftuar: ((int64_t)nSize) would already work to fix the arithmetic, of course given that nSize itself fits into that...
1063 2015-12-03T20:48:48  <sdaftuar> wumpus: agreed
1064 2015-12-03T20:49:19  <morcos> Lightsword: yeah so its not a hard fix, but i think we'll have to live with the 100ms for 0.12
1065 2015-12-03T20:49:25  <morcos> better than it was!
1066 2015-12-03T20:50:07  <Lightsword> morcos, hmm, can we just move TestBlockValidity right to right after GBT returns?
1067 2015-12-03T20:50:23  <Lightsword> TestBlockValidity to right after*
1068 2015-12-03T20:50:57  <Lightsword> that may be simpler than a background thread
1069 2015-12-03T20:52:38  *** notj has quit IRC
1070 2015-12-03T20:56:33  *** chjj has joined #bitcoin-dev
1071 2015-12-03T20:58:35  *** CoinMuncher has quit IRC
1072 2015-12-03T21:06:43  *** t7 has quit IRC
1073 2015-12-03T21:07:25  *** erasmospunk has quit IRC
1074 2015-12-03T21:07:52  *** arhuaco has joined #bitcoin-dev
1075 2015-12-03T21:08:55  *** rolandnsharp has quit IRC
1076 2015-12-03T21:09:52  *** t7 has joined #bitcoin-dev
1077 2015-12-03T21:11:19  *** ItSANgo has joined #bitcoin-dev
1078 2015-12-03T21:12:03  *** aulait has quit IRC
1079 2015-12-03T21:13:25  *** aulait has joined #bitcoin-dev
1080 2015-12-03T21:15:38  *** cryptapus_ has quit IRC
1081 2015-12-03T21:17:23  *** gielbier has quit IRC
1082 2015-12-03T21:21:11  *** Guyver2 has quit IRC
1083 2015-12-03T21:23:47  *** h3xc0d3r has joined #bitcoin-dev
1084 2015-12-03T21:27:40  *** mrkent_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
1085 2015-12-03T21:28:34  *** agricocb1 has joined #bitcoin-dev
1086 2015-12-03T21:28:35  *** GAit has quit IRC
1087 2015-12-03T21:29:21  *** GAit has joined #bitcoin-dev
1088 2015-12-03T21:29:44  *** mrkent has quit IRC
1089 2015-12-03T21:30:20  *** ThomasV has joined #bitcoin-dev
1090 2015-12-03T21:30:47  *** agricocb has quit IRC
1091 2015-12-03T21:31:39  *** zookolaptop has joined #bitcoin-dev
1092 2015-12-03T21:35:22  *** a5m0 has quit IRC
1093 2015-12-03T21:36:46  *** lnostdal_ has quit IRC
1094 2015-12-03T21:37:02  *** lnostdal_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
1095 2015-12-03T21:37:04  *** h3xc0d3r has quit IRC
1096 2015-12-03T21:37:34  *** zookolap` has joined #bitcoin-dev
1097 2015-12-03T21:38:28  *** porquilho has quit IRC
1098 2015-12-03T21:38:54  *** zookolaptop has quit IRC
1099 2015-12-03T21:39:28  *** yrashk has quit IRC
1100 2015-12-03T21:42:05  *** damethos has quit IRC
1101 2015-12-03T21:45:09  *** a5m0 has joined #bitcoin-dev
1102 2015-12-03T21:46:50  *** AndyOfiesh has quit IRC
1103 2015-12-03T21:48:26  *** joystream_ has quit IRC
1104 2015-12-03T21:48:27  *** AndyOfiesh has joined #bitcoin-dev
1105 2015-12-03T21:53:28  *** mrkent has joined #bitcoin-dev
1106 2015-12-03T21:53:57  *** roxtrongo has joined #bitcoin-dev
1107 2015-12-03T21:54:19  *** arichnad has joined #bitcoin-dev
1108 2015-12-03T21:54:26  *** zookolap` is now known as zooko
1109 2015-12-03T21:55:10  *** mrkent_ has quit IRC
1110 2015-12-03T21:58:28  *** kgk has joined #bitcoin-dev
1111 2015-12-03T21:59:53  *** alex_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
1112 2015-12-03T22:00:37  *** moley has joined #bitcoin-dev
1113 2015-12-03T22:01:09  *** scosant_ has quit IRC
1114 2015-12-03T22:02:54  *** kgk has quit IRC
1115 2015-12-03T22:03:05  *** moli has quit IRC
1116 2015-12-03T22:04:26  *** hashtag_ has quit IRC
1117 2015-12-03T22:05:24  *** drfoo has joined #bitcoin-dev
1118 2015-12-03T22:17:13  *** neozaru has quit IRC
1119 2015-12-03T22:18:18  *** lnostdal_ has quit IRC
1120 2015-12-03T22:22:02  *** zooko has quit IRC
1121 2015-12-03T22:22:33  *** treehug88 has quit IRC
1122 2015-12-03T22:23:06  *** wraithm has quit IRC
1123 2015-12-03T22:24:12  *** c-cex-finch has quit IRC
1124 2015-12-03T22:25:01  *** rdymac has quit IRC
1125 2015-12-03T22:30:08  *** cryptapus has joined #bitcoin-dev
1126 2015-12-03T22:30:08  *** cryptapus has joined #bitcoin-dev
1127 2015-12-03T22:30:24  *** roxtrongo has quit IRC
1128 2015-12-03T22:34:58  *** lnostdal_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
1129 2015-12-03T22:34:59  *** noamh has joined #bitcoin-dev
1130 2015-12-03T22:37:27  *** cryptapus has quit IRC
1131 2015-12-03T22:37:28  *** mrkent_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
1132 2015-12-03T22:38:15  *** cryptapus has joined #bitcoin-dev
1133 2015-12-03T22:38:15  *** cryptapus has joined #bitcoin-dev
1134 2015-12-03T22:39:23  *** noamh has quit IRC
1135 2015-12-03T22:39:47  *** mrkent has quit IRC
1136 2015-12-03T22:45:10  *** p15 has quit IRC
1137 2015-12-03T22:46:04  *** drfoo has quit IRC
1138 2015-12-03T22:46:46  *** agricocb1 has quit IRC
1139 2015-12-03T22:48:54  *** iv3c has quit IRC
1140 2015-12-03T22:51:40  *** notj has joined #bitcoin-dev
1141 2015-12-03T22:54:25  *** iv3c has joined #bitcoin-dev
1142 2015-12-03T22:55:10  *** iv3c has joined #bitcoin-dev
1143 2015-12-03T22:56:00  *** ParadoxSpiral_ has quit IRC
1144 2015-12-03T22:56:00  *** iv3c has joined #bitcoin-dev
1145 2015-12-03T22:56:02  *** notj has quit IRC
1146 2015-12-03T22:56:09  *** iv3c has quit IRC
1147 2015-12-03T22:57:39  *** Dizzle has quit IRC
1148 2015-12-03T22:58:37  *** Dizzle has joined #bitcoin-dev
1149 2015-12-03T23:01:15  *** Amnez777 has quit IRC
1150 2015-12-03T23:02:02  *** akstunt600 has joined #bitcoin-dev
1151 2015-12-03T23:03:34  *** Dizzle has quit IRC
1152 2015-12-03T23:05:31  *** Guest82545 is now known as ahmed_
1153 2015-12-03T23:08:05  *** Amnez777 has joined #bitcoin-dev
1154 2015-12-03T23:10:04  *** moley is now known as moli
1155 2015-12-03T23:11:13  *** wraithm has joined #bitcoin-dev
1156 2015-12-03T23:14:33  *** notj has joined #bitcoin-dev
1157 2015-12-03T23:14:47  *** t7 has quit IRC
1158 2015-12-03T23:19:54  *** wraithm has quit IRC
1159 2015-12-03T23:20:11  *** wraithm has joined #bitcoin-dev
1160 2015-12-03T23:22:15  *** wraithm has quit IRC
1161 2015-12-03T23:22:28  *** wraithm has joined #bitcoin-dev
1162 2015-12-03T23:26:26  *** lnovy has quit IRC
1163 2015-12-03T23:28:02  *** lnovy has joined #bitcoin-dev
1164 2015-12-03T23:30:12  *** tantalum has quit IRC
1165 2015-12-03T23:31:29  *** won9 has joined #bitcoin-dev
1166 2015-12-03T23:32:30  *** lnovy has quit IRC
1167 2015-12-03T23:33:12  *** jgarzik has quit IRC
1168 2015-12-03T23:33:50  *** zookolaptop has joined #bitcoin-dev
1169 2015-12-03T23:33:55  *** belcher has quit IRC
1170 2015-12-03T23:36:29  *** belcher has joined #bitcoin-dev
1171 2015-12-03T23:37:42  *** hashtag_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
1172 2015-12-03T23:39:06  *** cocoBTC has quit IRC
1173 2015-12-03T23:40:04  *** Tera2342 has joined #bitcoin-dev
1174 2015-12-03T23:45:46  *** tulip has joined #bitcoin-dev
1175 2015-12-03T23:46:31  *** lnovy has joined #bitcoin-dev
1176 2015-12-03T23:47:46  *** erasmospunk has joined #bitcoin-dev
1177 2015-12-03T23:48:50  *** cyphase has quit IRC
1178 2015-12-03T23:51:51  *** wraithm has quit IRC
1179 2015-12-03T23:53:17  *** erasmosp_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
1180 2015-12-03T23:55:22  *** erasmospunk has quit IRC
1181 2015-12-03T23:56:21  *** DougieBot5000 has quit IRC