1 2016-01-07T00:02:36  *** benrcole has joined #bitcoin-dev
   2 2016-01-07T00:03:33  *** benrcole has joined #bitcoin-dev
   3 2016-01-07T00:04:35  *** tjader has quit IRC
   4 2016-01-07T00:05:07  *** cryptopeddler has quit IRC
   5 2016-01-07T00:06:28  *** patcon has joined #bitcoin-dev
   6 2016-01-07T00:08:50  *** tjader has joined #bitcoin-dev
   7 2016-01-07T00:09:17  <Luke-Jr> stevenrooseyes
   8 2016-01-07T00:09:28  *** cryptopeddler has joined #bitcoin-dev
   9 2016-01-07T00:10:44  *** akrmn has quit IRC
  10 2016-01-07T00:12:42  *** t7 has quit IRC
  11 2016-01-07T00:13:45  *** Squidicuz has joined #bitcoin-dev
  12 2016-01-07T00:17:17  *** chmod755 has quit IRC
  13 2016-01-07T00:18:24  *** trixisowned has quit IRC
  14 2016-01-07T00:19:26  *** cryptopeddler has quit IRC
  15 2016-01-07T00:20:56  *** trixisowned has joined #bitcoin-dev
  16 2016-01-07T00:22:46  *** cryptopeddler has joined #bitcoin-dev
  17 2016-01-07T00:23:00  *** kgk has joined #bitcoin-dev
  18 2016-01-07T00:23:30  *** trixisowned has quit IRC
  19 2016-01-07T00:26:11  *** lsrp has joined #bitcoin-dev
  20 2016-01-07T00:26:13  *** trixisowned has joined #bitcoin-dev
  21 2016-01-07T00:26:18  *** benrcole has quit IRC
  22 2016-01-07T00:29:14  *** AtnevRed has joined #bitcoin-dev
  23 2016-01-07T00:33:59  *** AtnevRed has quit IRC
  24 2016-01-07T00:34:17  *** mrkent_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
  25 2016-01-07T00:34:30  *** wallet42 has joined #bitcoin-dev
  26 2016-01-07T00:35:02  *** mrkent has quit IRC
  27 2016-01-07T00:37:06  *** brson has quit IRC
  28 2016-01-07T00:37:15  *** lsrp has quit IRC
  29 2016-01-07T00:39:26  *** lsrp has joined #bitcoin-dev
  30 2016-01-07T00:39:36  *** wallet42 has joined #bitcoin-dev
  31 2016-01-07T00:39:51  *** wallet42 has joined #bitcoin-dev
  32 2016-01-07T00:40:04  *** wallet42 has joined #bitcoin-dev
  33 2016-01-07T00:40:18  *** wallet42 has joined #bitcoin-dev
  34 2016-01-07T00:40:29  *** atgreen has joined #bitcoin-dev
  35 2016-01-07T00:40:44  *** kgk has quit IRC
  36 2016-01-07T00:41:25  *** Belxjander has quit IRC
  37 2016-01-07T00:44:10  *** Belxjander has joined #bitcoin-dev
  38 2016-01-07T00:45:37  *** GGuyZ has quit IRC
  39 2016-01-07T00:46:56  *** metalcamp has quit IRC
  40 2016-01-07T00:47:02  *** Yoghur114_2 has quit IRC
  41 2016-01-07T00:48:18  *** zookolaptop has quit IRC
  42 2016-01-07T00:48:18  *** ThomasV has quit IRC
  43 2016-01-07T00:49:42  *** Guest14655 has quit IRC
  44 2016-01-07T00:51:02  *** Guest14655 has joined #bitcoin-dev
  45 2016-01-07T00:52:18  *** kgk has joined #bitcoin-dev
  46 2016-01-07T00:52:29  *** Guest14655 has quit IRC
  47 2016-01-07T00:53:05  <harding> Hey I have a BIP68 question.  If I use an nSequence of 0xfeffffff with locktime like Bitcoin Core >0.11.0 does, will that trigger relative locktime?
  48 2016-01-07T00:53:52  *** bsm117532 is now known as Guest38423
  49 2016-01-07T00:54:43  *** bsm1175321 has joined #bitcoin-dev
  50 2016-01-07T00:57:12  *** Belxjander has quit IRC
  51 2016-01-07T00:59:07  *** Belxjander has joined #bitcoin-dev
  52 2016-01-07T00:59:07  <stevenroose> Luke-Jr: how? I use cgminer on testnet now and it says longpolling disabled
  53 2016-01-07T01:04:32  <Luke-Jr> stevenroose: cgminer's GBT "support" is a hack and probably broken. try BFGMiner.
  54 2016-01-07T01:05:36  *** roconnor has joined #bitcoin-dev
  55 2016-01-07T01:09:35  *** lsrp has quit IRC
  56 2016-01-07T01:10:51  *** Mcgravier has joined #bitcoin-dev
  57 2016-01-07T01:10:56  *** lsrp has joined #bitcoin-dev
  58 2016-01-07T01:14:31  *** brson has joined #bitcoin-dev
  59 2016-01-07T01:14:37  *** ThomasV has joined #bitcoin-dev
  60 2016-01-07T01:19:42  *** d_t has joined #bitcoin-dev
  61 2016-01-07T01:19:46  *** d_t has quit IRC
  62 2016-01-07T01:20:13  *** d_t has joined #bitcoin-dev
  63 2016-01-07T01:33:43  *** jaclupi has quit IRC
  64 2016-01-07T01:34:17  *** tjader has quit IRC
  65 2016-01-07T01:36:14  *** jaclupi has joined #bitcoin-dev
  66 2016-01-07T01:36:22  *** cryptopeddler has quit IRC
  67 2016-01-07T01:36:30  *** lsrp has quit IRC
  68 2016-01-07T01:38:24  *** lsrp has joined #bitcoin-dev
  69 2016-01-07T01:38:58  *** tjader has joined #bitcoin-dev
  70 2016-01-07T01:39:03  *** cryptopeddler has joined #bitcoin-dev
  71 2016-01-07T01:40:15  *** patcon has quit IRC
  72 2016-01-07T01:43:18  *** antizionist__ has quit IRC
  73 2016-01-07T01:44:34  *** Ylbam has quit IRC
  74 2016-01-07T01:45:26  *** Belxjander has quit IRC
  75 2016-01-07T01:47:58  <maaku> harding: no
  76 2016-01-07T01:48:21  <maaku> harding: bit 0x80000000 (1 << 31) disables relative locktime
  77 2016-01-07T01:48:29  *** cryptopeddler has quit IRC
  78 2016-01-07T01:50:16  <harding> maaku: thanks!  I wanted to make sure I was understanding it correctly.
  79 2016-01-07T01:50:17  *** cryptopeddler has joined #bitcoin-dev
  80 2016-01-07T01:50:53  <maaku> harding: note that Bitcoin Core >0.11.0 defaults to opt-in RBF ... I'm surprised no one has mae a fuss about this
  81 2016-01-07T01:51:48  <harding> maaku: no, opt-in RBF is less than MAX-1 and Bitcoin Core is at MAX-1
  82 2016-01-07T01:51:52  *** Belxjander has joined #bitcoin-dev
  83 2016-01-07T02:00:56  *** Mcgravier has quit IRC
  84 2016-01-07T02:01:52  *** GGuyZ has joined #bitcoin-dev
  85 2016-01-07T02:04:18  *** Ahmed90 has quit IRC
  86 2016-01-07T02:06:02  *** Kexkey has quit IRC
  87 2016-01-07T02:07:46  *** xss has quit IRC
  88 2016-01-07T02:08:30  *** lsrp has quit IRC
  89 2016-01-07T02:12:53  *** c0rw1n is now known as c0rw|zZz
  90 2016-01-07T02:13:32  *** CubicEarth has quit IRC
  91 2016-01-07T02:14:59  *** Palsson has joined #bitcoin-dev
  92 2016-01-07T02:19:28  *** xiangfu has joined #bitcoin-dev
  93 2016-01-07T02:23:15  *** mrkent has joined #bitcoin-dev
  94 2016-01-07T02:23:59  *** Emcy has joined #bitcoin-dev
  95 2016-01-07T02:25:16  *** mrkent_ has quit IRC
  96 2016-01-07T02:26:17  *** Emcy_ has quit IRC
  97 2016-01-07T02:27:14  *** ThomasV has quit IRC
  98 2016-01-07T02:29:44  *** Kexkey has joined #bitcoin-dev
  99 2016-01-07T02:29:57  *** AtnevRed has joined #bitcoin-dev
 100 2016-01-07T02:30:42  *** REiN has quit IRC
 101 2016-01-07T02:33:08  *** stevenroose has quit IRC
 102 2016-01-07T02:33:09  *** stevenroose|BNC is now known as stevenroose
 103 2016-01-07T02:34:44  *** iv3c has joined #bitcoin-dev
 104 2016-01-07T02:34:51  *** AtnevRed has quit IRC
 105 2016-01-07T02:39:22  *** rayn has quit IRC
 106 2016-01-07T02:42:09  *** xss has joined #bitcoin-dev
 107 2016-01-07T02:44:51  *** scosant has joined #bitcoin-dev
 108 2016-01-07T02:45:07  *** rolandnsharp has joined #bitcoin-dev
 109 2016-01-07T02:49:40  *** GGuyZ has quit IRC
 110 2016-01-07T02:49:43  *** DougieBot5000 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 111 2016-01-07T02:51:46  *** justanotheruser has quit IRC
 112 2016-01-07T02:53:42  *** wallet42 has quit IRC
 113 2016-01-07T02:53:52  *** justanotheruser has joined #bitcoin-dev
 114 2016-01-07T02:57:34  *** Dr-G has joined #bitcoin-dev
 115 2016-01-07T02:58:06  *** Burrito has quit IRC
 116 2016-01-07T03:00:26  *** Dr-G2 has quit IRC
 117 2016-01-07T03:01:05  *** cryptopeddler has quit IRC
 118 2016-01-07T03:02:51  *** kgk has quit IRC
 119 2016-01-07T03:02:53  *** p15 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 120 2016-01-07T03:04:38  *** tjader has quit IRC
 121 2016-01-07T03:04:58  *** lsrp has joined #bitcoin-dev
 122 2016-01-07T03:05:31  *** cryptopeddler has joined #bitcoin-dev
 123 2016-01-07T03:05:35  *** jarkinox has joined #bitcoin-dev
 124 2016-01-07T03:08:39  *** tjader has joined #bitcoin-dev
 125 2016-01-07T03:17:47  *** justanotheruser has quit IRC
 126 2016-01-07T03:22:25  *** GGuyZ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 127 2016-01-07T03:23:45  *** one_zero has joined #bitcoin-dev
 128 2016-01-07T03:24:38  *** cyphase has joined #bitcoin-dev
 129 2016-01-07T03:24:39  *** cyphase has joined #bitcoin-dev
 130 2016-01-07T03:25:37  *** GGuyZ has quit IRC
 131 2016-01-07T03:27:36  *** Belxjander has quit IRC
 132 2016-01-07T03:28:24  *** xiangfu has quit IRC
 133 2016-01-07T03:29:00  *** Kexkey has quit IRC
 134 2016-01-07T03:30:32  *** justanotheruser has joined #bitcoin-dev
 135 2016-01-07T03:33:33  *** d_t has quit IRC
 136 2016-01-07T03:34:54  *** lsrp has quit IRC
 137 2016-01-07T03:35:18  *** brson has quit IRC
 138 2016-01-07T03:36:32  *** lsrp has joined #bitcoin-dev
 139 2016-01-07T03:38:55  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
 140 2016-01-07T03:44:49  *** brg444 has quit IRC
 141 2016-01-07T03:53:09  *** Subo1977 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 142 2016-01-07T03:53:59  *** Delta_ has quit IRC
 143 2016-01-07T03:56:42  *** jarkinox has quit IRC
 144 2016-01-07T04:00:49  *** lsrp has quit IRC
 145 2016-01-07T04:04:59  *** Emcy has quit IRC
 146 2016-01-07T04:15:23  *** d_t has joined #bitcoin-dev
 147 2016-01-07T04:15:27  *** d_t has quit IRC
 148 2016-01-07T04:15:54  *** d_t has joined #bitcoin-dev
 149 2016-01-07T04:18:00  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
 150 2016-01-07T04:20:52  *** mrkent has quit IRC
 151 2016-01-07T04:22:45  *** won9 has quit IRC
 152 2016-01-07T04:25:56  *** TheSeven has quit IRC
 153 2016-01-07T04:27:33  *** TheSeven has joined #bitcoin-dev
 154 2016-01-07T04:29:55  *** AtashiCon has quit IRC
 155 2016-01-07T04:32:01  *** c-cex-yuriy has quit IRC
 156 2016-01-07T04:34:20  *** tjader has quit IRC
 157 2016-01-07T04:35:11  *** AtashiCon has joined #bitcoin-dev
 158 2016-01-07T04:36:54  *** one_zero has quit IRC
 159 2016-01-07T04:39:14  *** tjader has joined #bitcoin-dev
 160 2016-01-07T04:44:45  *** treaki__ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 161 2016-01-07T04:48:36  *** treaki_ has quit IRC
 162 2016-01-07T04:49:53  *** DigiByteDev has joined #bitcoin-dev
 163 2016-01-07T04:55:57  *** one_zero has joined #bitcoin-dev
 164 2016-01-07T05:00:03  *** kgk has joined #bitcoin-dev
 165 2016-01-07T05:00:04  *** dermoth has quit IRC
 166 2016-01-07T05:00:29  *** patcon has joined #bitcoin-dev
 167 2016-01-07T05:00:32  *** dermoth has joined #bitcoin-dev
 168 2016-01-07T05:01:00  *** jarkinox has joined #bitcoin-dev
 169 2016-01-07T05:04:29  *** kgk has quit IRC
 170 2016-01-07T05:08:50  *** cyphase has quit IRC
 171 2016-01-07T05:13:54  *** PitBull_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 172 2016-01-07T05:14:47  *** oneeman has quit IRC
 173 2016-01-07T05:15:27  *** lorenzoasr has quit IRC
 174 2016-01-07T05:19:17  *** cyphase has joined #bitcoin-dev
 175 2016-01-07T05:20:15  *** Dizzle has joined #bitcoin-dev
 176 2016-01-07T05:21:02  *** DigiByteDev has quit IRC
 177 2016-01-07T05:28:04  *** jarkinox has quit IRC
 178 2016-01-07T05:32:35  *** paracyst has quit IRC
 179 2016-01-07T05:40:20  *** DigiByteDev has joined #bitcoin-dev
 180 2016-01-07T05:44:15  *** DigiByteDev has quit IRC
 181 2016-01-07T05:48:31  *** wiretap has joined #bitcoin-dev
 182 2016-01-07T05:48:50  <wiretap> u know a channel to get started with bitcoin?
 183 2016-01-07T05:48:58  <wiretap> sorry hello lol
 184 2016-01-07T05:49:21  *** CheckDavid has quit IRC
 185 2016-01-07T05:50:11  *** davec has quit IRC
 186 2016-01-07T05:50:41  *** davec has joined #bitcoin-dev
 187 2016-01-07T05:51:38  <sipa> #bitcoin
 188 2016-01-07T05:52:11  <wiretap> ty!
 189 2016-01-07T05:52:26  <wiretap> nomaste
 190 2016-01-07T05:54:27  *** sanada has joined #bitcoin-dev
 191 2016-01-07T05:55:22  *** DigiByteDev has joined #bitcoin-dev
 192 2016-01-07T06:03:23  *** tjader has quit IRC
 193 2016-01-07T06:04:24  *** cybrNaut has quit IRC
 194 2016-01-07T06:05:20  *** patcon has quit IRC
 195 2016-01-07T06:06:16  *** cybrNaut has joined #bitcoin-dev
 196 2016-01-07T06:09:23  *** tjader has joined #bitcoin-dev
 197 2016-01-07T06:12:06  *** bit2017 has quit IRC
 198 2016-01-07T06:15:06  *** moa has quit IRC
 199 2016-01-07T06:15:54  *** moa has joined #bitcoin-dev
 200 2016-01-07T06:16:16  *** wiretap has left #bitcoin-dev
 201 2016-01-07T06:17:51  *** dada0809 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 202 2016-01-07T06:31:07  *** AtnevRed has joined #bitcoin-dev
 203 2016-01-07T06:31:24  *** paleh0rse has quit IRC
 204 2016-01-07T06:35:12  *** hashtag_ has quit IRC
 205 2016-01-07T06:35:33  *** Ylbam has joined #bitcoin-dev
 206 2016-01-07T06:35:39  *** hashtag_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 207 2016-01-07T06:36:07  *** AtnevRed has quit IRC
 208 2016-01-07T06:36:38  *** cryptopeddler has quit IRC
 209 2016-01-07T06:38:04  *** cryptopeddler has joined #bitcoin-dev
 210 2016-01-07T06:39:51  *** sparetire has quit IRC
 211 2016-01-07T06:42:00  *** Yoghur114 has quit IRC
 212 2016-01-07T06:42:29  *** Yoghur114 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 213 2016-01-07T06:45:11  *** paveljanik has joined #bitcoin-dev
 214 2016-01-07T06:45:12  *** paveljanik has quit IRC
 215 2016-01-07T06:45:12  *** paveljanik has joined #bitcoin-dev
 216 2016-01-07T06:53:03  *** hashtag_ has quit IRC
 217 2016-01-07T06:53:03  *** DougieBot5000 has quit IRC
 218 2016-01-07T06:53:03  *** Squidicuz has quit IRC
 219 2016-01-07T06:53:03  *** DougieBot5000 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 220 2016-01-07T06:53:03  *** sparetire has joined #bitcoin-dev
 221 2016-01-07T06:53:12  *** rodarmor has quit IRC
 222 2016-01-07T06:53:22  *** AtashiCon has quit IRC
 223 2016-01-07T06:53:24  *** hashtag_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 224 2016-01-07T06:53:41  *** lightningbot` has joined #bitcoin-dev
 225 2016-01-07T06:53:53  *** rodarmor has joined #bitcoin-dev
 226 2016-01-07T06:54:34  *** Diablo-D3 has quit IRC
 227 2016-01-07T06:55:09  *** risho has quit IRC
 228 2016-01-07T06:55:13  *** CubicEarth has joined #bitcoin-dev
 229 2016-01-07T06:55:40  *** Diablo-D3 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 230 2016-01-07T06:56:24  *** risho has joined #bitcoin-dev
 231 2016-01-07T06:59:03  *** Belxjander has joined #bitcoin-dev
 232 2016-01-07T06:59:08  *** bit2017 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 233 2016-01-07T06:59:58  *** kgk has joined #bitcoin-dev
 234 2016-01-07T07:01:46  *** rusty has quit IRC
 235 2016-01-07T07:02:33  *** justanot1eruser has joined #bitcoin-dev
 236 2016-01-07T07:02:42  *** justanotheruser has quit IRC
 237 2016-01-07T07:06:21  *** kgk has quit IRC
 238 2016-01-07T07:07:49  *** d_t has quit IRC
 239 2016-01-07T07:07:49  *** markus-k has joined #bitcoin-dev
 240 2016-01-07T07:08:38  *** d_t has joined #bitcoin-dev
 241 2016-01-07T07:09:07  *** NicolasDorier has joined #bitcoin-dev
 242 2016-01-07T07:11:56  *** trippysalmon has joined #bitcoin-dev
 243 2016-01-07T07:12:44  *** d_t has quit IRC
 244 2016-01-07T07:16:27  *** justanot1eruser has quit IRC
 245 2016-01-07T07:16:53  *** justanotheruser has joined #bitcoin-dev
 246 2016-01-07T07:16:56  *** justanotheruser has joined #bitcoin-dev
 247 2016-01-07T07:24:21  *** d_t has joined #bitcoin-dev
 248 2016-01-07T07:32:25  *** ThomasV has joined #bitcoin-dev
 249 2016-01-07T07:35:02  *** tjader has quit IRC
 250 2016-01-07T07:39:28  *** tjader has joined #bitcoin-dev
 251 2016-01-07T07:40:06  *** tucenaber has quit IRC
 252 2016-01-07T07:48:19  *** wallet42 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 253 2016-01-07T07:48:43  *** quetzalcotalus has quit IRC
 254 2016-01-07T07:55:00  *** xss has quit IRC
 255 2016-01-07T07:57:05  *** REiN has joined #bitcoin-dev
 256 2016-01-07T08:03:23  *** castlelore has joined #bitcoin-dev
 257 2016-01-07T08:05:32  *** wiretapp has joined #bitcoin-dev
 258 2016-01-07T08:06:50  *** Belxjander has quit IRC
 259 2016-01-07T08:08:02  *** IAmNotDorian has joined #bitcoin-dev
 260 2016-01-07T08:08:03  *** IAmNotDorian has joined #bitcoin-dev
 261 2016-01-07T08:08:43  *** Belxjander has joined #bitcoin-dev
 262 2016-01-07T08:08:50  *** d_t has quit IRC
 263 2016-01-07T08:09:00  *** Raziel has quit IRC
 264 2016-01-07T08:11:22  *** wiretapp has quit IRC
 265 2016-01-07T08:12:03  *** DougieBot5000 has quit IRC
 266 2016-01-07T08:12:45  *** tucenaber has joined #bitcoin-dev
 267 2016-01-07T08:12:46  *** tucenaber has joined #bitcoin-dev
 268 2016-01-07T08:17:04  *** NicolasDorier has quit IRC
 269 2016-01-07T08:21:02  *** ebfull has joined #bitcoin-dev
 270 2016-01-07T08:24:51  *** ThomasV has quit IRC
 271 2016-01-07T08:25:34  *** sparetire_ has quit IRC
 272 2016-01-07T08:32:28  *** AtnevRed has joined #bitcoin-dev
 273 2016-01-07T08:34:44  *** Grouver has joined #bitcoin-dev
 274 2016-01-07T08:34:59  *** castlelore has quit IRC
 275 2016-01-07T08:36:59  *** AtnevRed has quit IRC
 276 2016-01-07T08:39:09  *** Dizzle has quit IRC
 277 2016-01-07T08:41:39  *** Belxjander has quit IRC
 278 2016-01-07T08:41:39  *** p15 has quit IRC
 279 2016-01-07T08:43:15  *** LeMiner has quit IRC
 280 2016-01-07T08:44:54  *** pcx has joined #bitcoin-dev
 281 2016-01-07T08:44:59  <pcx> join
 282 2016-01-07T08:45:05  *** pcx has left #bitcoin-dev
 283 2016-01-07T08:45:46  *** mnk has quit IRC
 284 2016-01-07T08:46:32  *** supasonic has quit IRC
 285 2016-01-07T08:46:37  *** Belxjander has joined #bitcoin-dev
 286 2016-01-07T08:47:16  *** adam3us1 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 287 2016-01-07T08:47:34  *** adam3us has quit IRC
 288 2016-01-07T08:48:08  *** adam3us1 has quit IRC
 289 2016-01-07T08:48:56  *** adam3us has joined #bitcoin-dev
 290 2016-01-07T08:50:10  *** p15 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 291 2016-01-07T08:54:41  *** YoY_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 292 2016-01-07T08:56:00  *** _yoy_ has quit IRC
 293 2016-01-07T09:01:51  *** castlelore has joined #bitcoin-dev
 294 2016-01-07T09:01:56  *** castlelore has joined #bitcoin-dev
 295 2016-01-07T09:02:17  *** antizionist__ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 296 2016-01-07T09:02:46  *** Amnez777 has quit IRC
 297 2016-01-07T09:02:47  *** Amnez777 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 298 2016-01-07T09:02:59  *** kgk has joined #bitcoin-dev
 299 2016-01-07T09:04:44  *** tjader has quit IRC
 300 2016-01-07T09:07:07  *** ThomasV has joined #bitcoin-dev
 301 2016-01-07T09:07:37  *** Emcy has joined #bitcoin-dev
 302 2016-01-07T09:07:37  *** Emcy has joined #bitcoin-dev
 303 2016-01-07T09:08:00  *** kgk has quit IRC
 304 2016-01-07T09:09:32  *** tjader has joined #bitcoin-dev
 305 2016-01-07T09:11:49  *** moa has quit IRC
 306 2016-01-07T09:18:52  *** rusty has joined #bitcoin-dev
 307 2016-01-07T09:23:42  *** won9 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 308 2016-01-07T09:27:02  *** arowser has quit IRC
 309 2016-01-07T09:27:28  *** arowser has joined #bitcoin-dev
 310 2016-01-07T09:27:58  *** ThomasV has quit IRC
 311 2016-01-07T09:30:12  *** Belxjander has quit IRC
 312 2016-01-07T09:30:26  *** wrabbit has quit IRC
 313 2016-01-07T09:30:48  *** wrabbit has joined #bitcoin-dev
 314 2016-01-07T09:31:55  *** Belxjander has joined #bitcoin-dev
 315 2016-01-07T09:31:56  *** Belxjander has joined #bitcoin-dev
 316 2016-01-07T09:32:27  *** betaccd has joined #bitcoin-dev
 317 2016-01-07T09:34:51  *** jtimon has joined #bitcoin-dev
 318 2016-01-07T09:37:40  *** AwchinBruh has quit IRC
 319 2016-01-07T09:39:05  *** kadoban has quit IRC
 320 2016-01-07T09:39:46  *** metalcamp has joined #bitcoin-dev
 321 2016-01-07T09:42:25  *** BashCo has quit IRC
 322 2016-01-07T09:47:20  *** lsrp has joined #bitcoin-dev
 323 2016-01-07T09:58:29  *** ThomasV has joined #bitcoin-dev
 324 2016-01-07T10:02:37  *** BashCo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 325 2016-01-07T10:02:48  *** p15_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 326 2016-01-07T10:03:55  *** roconnor has quit IRC
 327 2016-01-07T10:04:25  *** erasmospunk has joined #bitcoin-dev
 328 2016-01-07T10:05:39  *** p15 has quit IRC
 329 2016-01-07T10:08:46  *** erasmospunk has quit IRC
 330 2016-01-07T10:11:17  *** AwchinBruh has joined #bitcoin-dev
 331 2016-01-07T10:12:14  <rusty> So, if I want to generate a tx using bitcoind's wallet facility, but not broadcast it yet, I need to do:  estimatefee (to decide what fee to use), getaddress (for change), getunspent, figure out what inputs from that give me sufficient funds, figure out how much to go to change, createrawtransaction then signrawtransaction?
 332 2016-01-07T10:21:25  *** lsrp has quit IRC
 333 2016-01-07T10:22:54  *** lsrp has joined #bitcoin-dev
 334 2016-01-07T10:22:59  *** Belxjander has quit IRC
 335 2016-01-07T10:25:13  *** betaccd has quit IRC
 336 2016-01-07T10:29:40  *** Belxjander has joined #bitcoin-dev
 337 2016-01-07T10:31:00  <gijensen> rusty: that or set walletbroadcast=0 and use sendtoaddress to generate a tx
 338 2016-01-07T10:31:28  <gijensen> But I don't know how to get rid of that TX without zapwallettxes atm
 339 2016-01-07T10:31:56  *** AwchinBruh has quit IRC
 340 2016-01-07T10:33:04  <rusty> gijensen: hmm, maybe that's OK for the first cut.  It's certainly simpler!
 341 2016-01-07T10:33:06  *** AtnevRed has joined #bitcoin-dev
 342 2016-01-07T10:33:40  *** lsrp has quit IRC
 343 2016-01-07T10:35:05  *** tjader has quit IRC
 344 2016-01-07T10:35:24  <rusty> gijensen: hmm, there's no api to figure out if they've set walletbroadcast=0, either.
 345 2016-01-07T10:36:07  *** blur3d has joined #bitcoin-dev
 346 2016-01-07T10:36:58  *** GAit1 has quit IRC
 347 2016-01-07T10:37:06  <gijensen> Oh I never thought about that. Yeah :/
 348 2016-01-07T10:37:36  *** GAit has joined #bitcoin-dev
 349 2016-01-07T10:37:51  *** AtnevRed has quit IRC
 350 2016-01-07T10:38:00  <rusty> gijensen: yeah, I think I'll grep the default config location and warn if it's not set for now.
 351 2016-01-07T10:38:06  <rusty> gijensen: thanks!
 352 2016-01-07T10:38:12  <gijensen> No problem!
 353 2016-01-07T10:38:26  *** rusty has left #bitcoin-dev
 354 2016-01-07T10:39:09  *** tjader has joined #bitcoin-dev
 355 2016-01-07T10:43:41  *** AwchinBruh has joined #bitcoin-dev
 356 2016-01-07T10:56:25  *** berndj has quit IRC
 357 2016-01-07T10:58:20  *** berndj has joined #bitcoin-dev
 358 2016-01-07T10:58:57  *** berndj has quit IRC
 359 2016-01-07T11:00:02  *** berndj has joined #bitcoin-dev
 360 2016-01-07T11:00:03  *** berndj has quit IRC
 361 2016-01-07T11:00:24  *** berndj has joined #bitcoin-dev
 362 2016-01-07T11:06:18  *** stiell has quit IRC
 363 2016-01-07T11:18:14  *** aschildbach has joined #bitcoin-dev
 364 2016-01-07T11:18:35  *** aschildbach has quit IRC
 365 2016-01-07T11:21:36  *** berndj has quit IRC
 366 2016-01-07T11:21:59  *** berndj has joined #bitcoin-dev
 367 2016-01-07T11:23:28  *** berndj has quit IRC
 368 2016-01-07T11:23:57  *** berndj has joined #bitcoin-dev
 369 2016-01-07T11:25:02  *** berndj has quit IRC
 370 2016-01-07T11:25:10  *** lsrp has joined #bitcoin-dev
 371 2016-01-07T11:25:27  *** berndj has joined #bitcoin-dev
 372 2016-01-07T11:25:33  *** BashCo_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 373 2016-01-07T11:27:04  *** adam3us has quit IRC
 374 2016-01-07T11:29:41  *** BashCo has quit IRC
 375 2016-01-07T11:30:12  *** berndj has quit IRC
 376 2016-01-07T11:30:27  *** berndj has joined #bitcoin-dev
 377 2016-01-07T11:30:35  *** adam3us has joined #bitcoin-dev
 378 2016-01-07T11:32:26  *** markus-k has quit IRC
 379 2016-01-07T11:46:41  *** fabianfabian has joined #bitcoin-dev
 380 2016-01-07T11:47:31  *** damethos has joined #bitcoin-dev
 381 2016-01-07T11:48:36  *** CubicEarth has quit IRC
 382 2016-01-07T11:49:30  *** Belxjander has quit IRC
 383 2016-01-07T11:51:02  *** Belxjander has joined #bitcoin-dev
 384 2016-01-07T11:52:40  *** lsrp has quit IRC
 385 2016-01-07T11:54:17  *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-dev
 386 2016-01-07T11:56:14  *** damethos has quit IRC
 387 2016-01-07T11:57:58  *** damethos has joined #bitcoin-dev
 388 2016-01-07T12:01:48  *** damethos has quit IRC
 389 2016-01-07T12:02:56  *** markus-k has joined #bitcoin-dev
 390 2016-01-07T12:04:47  *** tjader has quit IRC
 391 2016-01-07T12:09:46  *** tjader has joined #bitcoin-dev
 392 2016-01-07T12:11:06  *** ThomasV has quit IRC
 393 2016-01-07T12:13:12  *** markus-k has quit IRC
 394 2016-01-07T12:15:15  *** DELTA9 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 395 2016-01-07T12:19:21  *** cryptapus_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 396 2016-01-07T12:19:22  *** cryptapus_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 397 2016-01-07T12:20:23  *** p15_ has quit IRC
 398 2016-01-07T12:20:36  *** damethos has joined #bitcoin-dev
 399 2016-01-07T12:21:35  *** adam3us has quit IRC
 400 2016-01-07T12:21:40  *** GGuyZ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 401 2016-01-07T12:23:34  <JackH> would it be possible to get soft-fork introduction that does not apply to all miners and nodes? for example, if I want a soft-fork introduced between myself and my 10 buddies, and I can find 1 miner to mine it, but the rest of the network will refuse this "soft fork" feature
 402 2016-01-07T12:23:50  <JackH> is that a feature that could be added, or wont this type of sharding of features work?
 403 2016-01-07T12:25:42  *** DELTA9 is now known as thevjm
 404 2016-01-07T12:27:31  *** YoY_ has quit IRC
 405 2016-01-07T12:28:30  *** markus-k has joined #bitcoin-dev
 406 2016-01-07T12:28:54  <wumpus> JackH: if it's a softfork then it is allowed by current consensus by definition; softforks only narrow down allowed blocks/transactions by adding additional constraints. So sure, you and your 10 buddies can decide on some 'secret rules' that no one else will enforce, and miners will still mine blocks that don't adhere to them, so if you regirously enforce the new rules thus refuse those blocks you will get forked off the chain
 407 2016-01-07T12:29:15  *** murch has joined #bitcoin-dev
 408 2016-01-07T12:29:20  *** _yoy_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 409 2016-01-07T12:29:53  <wumpus> this is why the thresholds exist, e.g. 75% to start enforcing the rules for new version blocks, 95% to only accept new version blocks
 410 2016-01-07T12:30:20  <wallet42> a soft-fork usually puts bitcoin into a "anyone-can-spend" output script. in the soft-fork the rules are stricter (eg. P2SH not only verified to hash to the output but is also executed) and after the miners voted to enable it, a block not using the strict rules becomes invalid. so anyone can steal those bitcoin you are sending between you and your 10 buddies.
 411 2016-01-07T12:30:30  <wumpus> if only one miner would go along without caring about thresholds, he'd be forked off from the rest
 412 2016-01-07T12:30:43  <JackH> yep, I follow you on this wumpus
 413 2016-01-07T12:30:46  <JackH> but, what I mean is
 414 2016-01-07T12:31:15  <JackH> say I propose a softfork, and this never gets accepted by the miners, thus it never reaches consensus
 415 2016-01-07T12:32:00  <wumpus> then it failed and you should probably abandon it, as wallet42 says, others are free to ignore your new rules
 416 2016-01-07T12:32:13  <wallet42> in that case your bitcoins aren't safe because the majority of the network does not agree to the new rules
 417 2016-01-07T12:32:29  *** stevenroose_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 418 2016-01-07T12:32:46  <JackH> hmm I have to think a bit more about how I wanted to explain this
 419 2016-01-07T12:33:19  *** stevenroose has quit IRC
 420 2016-01-07T12:33:22  *** stevenroose_ is now known as stevenroose
 421 2016-01-07T12:33:33  *** stevenroose|BNC has joined #bitcoin-dev
 422 2016-01-07T12:33:53  *** AtnevRed has joined #bitcoin-dev
 423 2016-01-07T12:38:17  *** c0rw|zZz is now known as c0rw1n
 424 2016-01-07T12:38:43  *** AtnevRed has quit IRC
 425 2016-01-07T12:41:48  *** c0rw1n has quit IRC
 426 2016-01-07T12:42:17  *** c0rw1n has joined #bitcoin-dev
 427 2016-01-07T12:49:40  *** lsrp has joined #bitcoin-dev
 428 2016-01-07T12:53:36  *** blur3d has quit IRC
 429 2016-01-07T12:55:06  *** matsjj has joined #bitcoin-dev
 430 2016-01-07T13:00:35  *** fabianfa_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 431 2016-01-07T13:03:06  *** fabianfabian has quit IRC
 432 2016-01-07T13:05:18  *** kgk has joined #bitcoin-dev
 433 2016-01-07T13:07:28  *** won9 has quit IRC
 434 2016-01-07T13:09:53  *** kgk has quit IRC
 435 2016-01-07T13:10:45  *** teward has quit IRC
 436 2016-01-07T13:11:44  *** lsrp has quit IRC
 437 2016-01-07T13:13:03  *** lsrp has joined #bitcoin-dev
 438 2016-01-07T13:14:31  *** teward has joined #bitcoin-dev
 439 2016-01-07T13:16:27  *** Starduster has quit IRC
 440 2016-01-07T13:16:38  *** matsjj has quit IRC
 441 2016-01-07T13:17:11  *** markus-k has quit IRC
 442 2016-01-07T13:17:28  *** Starduster has joined #bitcoin-dev
 443 2016-01-07T13:17:32  *** bengt__ has quit IRC
 444 2016-01-07T13:17:46  *** roybadam1 has quit IRC
 445 2016-01-07T13:17:47  *** bengt_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 446 2016-01-07T13:17:54  *** roybadami has joined #bitcoin-dev
 447 2016-01-07T13:18:06  *** lsrp has quit IRC
 448 2016-01-07T13:18:16  *** brg444 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 449 2016-01-07T13:18:43  *** markus-k has joined #bitcoin-dev
 450 2016-01-07T13:19:16  *** livegnik has quit IRC
 451 2016-01-07T13:19:39  *** wumpus has quit IRC
 452 2016-01-07T13:19:40  *** livegnik has joined #bitcoin-dev
 453 2016-01-07T13:20:04  *** lsrp has joined #bitcoin-dev
 454 2016-01-07T13:20:56  *** damethos has quit IRC
 455 2016-01-07T13:21:54  *** wumpus has joined #bitcoin-dev
 456 2016-01-07T13:29:32  *** GGuyZ has quit IRC
 457 2016-01-07T13:33:55  *** Belxjander has quit IRC
 458 2016-01-07T13:34:29  *** adam3us1 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 459 2016-01-07T13:34:36  <btcdrak> http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2016-January/012195.html
 460 2016-01-07T13:35:08  *** tjader has quit IRC
 461 2016-01-07T13:35:33  *** hashtag_ has quit IRC
 462 2016-01-07T13:37:06  <jonasschnelli> Nice work sipa, CodeShark, morcos, jl2012!
 463 2016-01-07T13:39:54  *** tjader has joined #bitcoin-dev
 464 2016-01-07T13:39:57  *** Belxjander has joined #bitcoin-dev
 465 2016-01-07T13:41:50  *** bit2017 has quit IRC
 466 2016-01-07T13:45:28  *** GamerSg has joined #bitcoin-dev
 467 2016-01-07T13:50:50  *** lsrp has quit IRC
 468 2016-01-07T13:52:49  *** lsrp has joined #bitcoin-dev
 469 2016-01-07T13:54:01  *** one_zero has quit IRC
 470 2016-01-07T13:58:01  *** dada0809 has left #bitcoin-dev
 471 2016-01-07T13:58:03  *** _yoy_ has quit IRC
 472 2016-01-07T13:58:07  *** hashtag_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 473 2016-01-07T13:59:41  *** YoY has joined #bitcoin-dev
 474 2016-01-07T14:06:18  *** scosant has quit IRC
 475 2016-01-07T14:07:44  <wumpus> woohoo!
 476 2016-01-07T14:08:30  <wumpus> doesn't it need steps on how to connect to the segwit testnet?
 477 2016-01-07T14:09:21  <wumpus> (e.g. at least until it has a DNS seed it needs manual connect=, right?)
 478 2016-01-07T14:10:40  *** Belxjander has quit IRC
 479 2016-01-07T14:11:05  *** _yoy_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 480 2016-01-07T14:12:39  *** YoY has quit IRC
 481 2016-01-07T14:12:53  *** GGuyZ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 482 2016-01-07T14:13:31  *** Belxjander has joined #bitcoin-dev
 483 2016-01-07T14:15:34  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 484 2016-01-07T14:15:55  <wumpus> my node still only has 3 connections
 485 2016-01-07T14:16:18  *** YoY has joined #bitcoin-dev
 486 2016-01-07T14:18:27  *** _yoy_ has quit IRC
 487 2016-01-07T14:26:26  *** lsrp has quit IRC
 488 2016-01-07T14:27:09  <btcdrak> bitcoind -segnet -daemon -addnode=46.101.235.82:28333;
 489 2016-01-07T14:28:13  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 490 2016-01-07T14:30:57  *** fabianfa_ has quit IRC
 491 2016-01-07T14:31:07  *** Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 492 2016-01-07T14:32:32  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
 493 2016-01-07T14:34:03  *** fabianfabian has joined #bitcoin-dev
 494 2016-01-07T14:35:01  *** AtnevRed has joined #bitcoin-dev
 495 2016-01-07T14:35:10  *** Belxjander has quit IRC
 496 2016-01-07T14:36:28  *** markus-k has quit IRC
 497 2016-01-07T14:37:29  *** tantalum has joined #bitcoin-dev
 498 2016-01-07T14:37:29  *** GAit has quit IRC
 499 2016-01-07T14:37:42  *** GAit has joined #bitcoin-dev
 500 2016-01-07T14:39:35  *** AtnevRed has quit IRC
 501 2016-01-07T14:41:43  *** Belxjander has joined #bitcoin-dev
 502 2016-01-07T14:42:05  *** derbumi has quit IRC
 503 2016-01-07T14:42:41  *** derbumi has joined #bitcoin-dev
 504 2016-01-07T14:44:59  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 505 2016-01-07T14:45:09  *** paracyst has joined #bitcoin-dev
 506 2016-01-07T14:45:12  *** akrmn has joined #bitcoin-dev
 507 2016-01-07T14:48:58  *** markus-k has joined #bitcoin-dev
 508 2016-01-07T14:49:27  *** rubensayshi has joined #bitcoin-dev
 509 2016-01-07T14:50:00  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
 510 2016-01-07T14:50:55  *** Belxjander has quit IRC
 511 2016-01-07T14:51:44  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 512 2016-01-07T14:55:59  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
 513 2016-01-07T14:57:13  *** Belxjander has joined #bitcoin-dev
 514 2016-01-07T14:57:23  *** xiangfu has joined #bitcoin-dev
 515 2016-01-07T14:58:25  *** lsrp has joined #bitcoin-dev
 516 2016-01-07T14:59:02  *** laurentmt has joined #bitcoin-dev
 517 2016-01-07T14:59:27  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 518 2016-01-07T15:00:20  *** paracyst has joined #bitcoin-dev
 519 2016-01-07T15:01:35  <wumpus> yea I know :) but I mean for people on the mailing list
 520 2016-01-07T15:03:48  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
 521 2016-01-07T15:05:29  *** tjader has quit IRC
 522 2016-01-07T15:06:23  *** CheckDavid has joined #bitcoin-dev
 523 2016-01-07T15:06:44  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 524 2016-01-07T15:08:08  *** IAmNotDorian has quit IRC
 525 2016-01-07T15:08:30  *** IAmNotDorian has joined #bitcoin-dev
 526 2016-01-07T15:08:31  *** IAmNotDorian has joined #bitcoin-dev
 527 2016-01-07T15:09:07  *** treehug88 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 528 2016-01-07T15:09:15  *** fabianfabian has quit IRC
 529 2016-01-07T15:10:01  *** tjader has joined #bitcoin-dev
 530 2016-01-07T15:11:20  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
 531 2016-01-07T15:13:53  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 532 2016-01-07T15:15:12  *** G1lius has joined #bitcoin-dev
 533 2016-01-07T15:18:19  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
 534 2016-01-07T15:21:23  *** B0g4r7_ has quit IRC
 535 2016-01-07T15:21:30  *** bsm1175321 is now known as bsm117532
 536 2016-01-07T15:21:49  *** B0g4r7_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 537 2016-01-07T15:21:57  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 538 2016-01-07T15:26:28  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
 539 2016-01-07T15:26:35  *** oneeman has joined #bitcoin-dev
 540 2016-01-07T15:26:46  *** YoY has quit IRC
 541 2016-01-07T15:27:55  *** lsrp has quit IRC
 542 2016-01-07T15:27:59  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 543 2016-01-07T15:29:21  *** _yoy_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 544 2016-01-07T15:30:27  *** elichai2 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 545 2016-01-07T15:30:27  *** elichai2 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 546 2016-01-07T15:31:25  *** elichai2 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 547 2016-01-07T15:32:24  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
 548 2016-01-07T15:38:02  *** IAmNotDorian has quit IRC
 549 2016-01-07T15:38:38  *** IAmNotDorian has joined #bitcoin-dev
 550 2016-01-07T15:38:39  *** IAmNotDorian has joined #bitcoin-dev
 551 2016-01-07T15:38:47  *** DougieBot5000 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 552 2016-01-07T15:38:51  *** markus-k has quit IRC
 553 2016-01-07T15:45:55  *** benjyz1 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 554 2016-01-07T15:46:11  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 555 2016-01-07T15:49:15  *** DougieBot5000_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 556 2016-01-07T15:49:47  *** DougieBot5000 is now known as Guest92207
 557 2016-01-07T15:49:48  *** DougieBot5000_ is now known as DougieBot5000
 558 2016-01-07T15:50:36  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
 559 2016-01-07T15:52:31  *** xabbix__ is now known as xabbix
 560 2016-01-07T15:52:35  *** xabbix has joined #bitcoin-dev
 561 2016-01-07T15:53:29  *** ThomasV has joined #bitcoin-dev
 562 2016-01-07T15:53:55  *** Raziel has joined #bitcoin-dev
 563 2016-01-07T16:00:28  *** jarkinox has joined #bitcoin-dev
 564 2016-01-07T16:02:16  *** benjyz1 has quit IRC
 565 2016-01-07T16:03:09  *** laurentmt has quit IRC
 566 2016-01-07T16:04:34  *** elichai2 has quit IRC
 567 2016-01-07T16:04:58  *** elichai2 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 568 2016-01-07T16:04:59  *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
 569 2016-01-07T16:05:59  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 570 2016-01-07T16:06:30  *** elichai2 has quit IRC
 571 2016-01-07T16:06:55  *** elichai2 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 572 2016-01-07T16:06:55  *** elichai2 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 573 2016-01-07T16:07:45  *** kgk has joined #bitcoin-dev
 574 2016-01-07T16:08:39  *** MarcoFalke has joined #bitcoin-dev
 575 2016-01-07T16:09:12  *** adam3us1 has quit IRC
 576 2016-01-07T16:09:22  *** adam3us has joined #bitcoin-dev
 577 2016-01-07T16:10:36  *** jarkinox has quit IRC
 578 2016-01-07T16:11:06  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
 579 2016-01-07T16:12:48  *** kgk has quit IRC
 580 2016-01-07T16:13:38  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 581 2016-01-07T16:15:03  *** kadoban has joined #bitcoin-dev
 582 2016-01-07T16:18:03  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
 583 2016-01-07T16:21:03  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 584 2016-01-07T16:24:56  *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-dev
 585 2016-01-07T16:24:56  *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-dev
 586 2016-01-07T16:25:14  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
 587 2016-01-07T16:27:59  *** IAmNotDorian has quit IRC
 588 2016-01-07T16:28:50  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 589 2016-01-07T16:31:33  *** YoY_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 590 2016-01-07T16:32:35  *** xiangfu has quit IRC
 591 2016-01-07T16:33:35  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
 592 2016-01-07T16:34:30  *** _yoy_ has quit IRC
 593 2016-01-07T16:35:50  *** tjader has quit IRC
 594 2016-01-07T16:36:11  *** trippysalmon has quit IRC
 595 2016-01-07T16:38:38  <jonasschnelli> ^^ connected to 4 segnet nodes.
 596 2016-01-07T16:40:08  *** tjader has joined #bitcoin-dev
 597 2016-01-07T16:45:12  *** NL5N has joined #bitcoin-dev
 598 2016-01-07T16:45:57  *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
 599 2016-01-07T16:46:15  *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-dev
 600 2016-01-07T16:46:15  *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-dev
 601 2016-01-07T16:46:35  *** brson has joined #bitcoin-dev
 602 2016-01-07T16:50:12  *** owlhooter_o has joined #bitcoin-dev
 603 2016-01-07T16:50:13  *** owlhooter has quit IRC
 604 2016-01-07T16:54:23  *** laurentmt has joined #bitcoin-dev
 605 2016-01-07T16:55:36  *** cybrNaut has quit IRC
 606 2016-01-07T16:56:50  *** Squidicuz has joined #bitcoin-dev
 607 2016-01-07T16:57:19  *** Grouver has quit IRC
 608 2016-01-07T16:57:43  *** owowo has quit IRC
 609 2016-01-07T16:57:50  *** cybrNaut has joined #bitcoin-dev
 610 2016-01-07T16:58:06  *** bit2017 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 611 2016-01-07T16:58:54  *** owlhooter_o is now known as owlhooter
 612 2016-01-07T16:58:57  *** supasonic has joined #bitcoin-dev
 613 2016-01-07T17:01:40  *** jaclupi has quit IRC
 614 2016-01-07T17:02:52  *** rnvk has joined #bitcoin-dev
 615 2016-01-07T17:03:26  *** trippysalmon has joined #bitcoin-dev
 616 2016-01-07T17:06:15  *** laurentmt has quit IRC
 617 2016-01-07T17:09:14  *** jaclupi has joined #bitcoin-dev
 618 2016-01-07T17:11:28  *** metalcamp_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 619 2016-01-07T17:12:11  *** laurentmt has joined #bitcoin-dev
 620 2016-01-07T17:12:12  *** ThomasV has quit IRC
 621 2016-01-07T17:12:52  *** Burrito has joined #bitcoin-dev
 622 2016-01-07T17:14:14  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 623 2016-01-07T17:14:52  *** metalcamp has quit IRC
 624 2016-01-07T17:17:26  *** laurentmt has quit IRC
 625 2016-01-07T17:17:47  <btcdrak> Luke-Jr: BIP100 was never submitted as a PR to bips afaik,
 626 2016-01-07T17:18:35  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
 627 2016-01-07T17:20:34  *** BlindSeer has joined #bitcoin-dev
 628 2016-01-07T17:20:51  <Luke-Jr> is Chris Priest here? his Uni's mail server is broken/bouncing..
 629 2016-01-07T17:20:51  <BlindSeer> do you guys do tech support here or no
 630 2016-01-07T17:20:57  <Luke-Jr> BlindSeer: no, that's in #Bitcoin
 631 2016-01-07T17:21:00  <BlindSeer> ok
 632 2016-01-07T17:21:05  *** BlindSeer has left #bitcoin-dev
 633 2016-01-07T17:22:50  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 634 2016-01-07T17:24:24  *** PitBull has joined #bitcoin-dev
 635 2016-01-07T17:25:31  *** xss has joined #bitcoin-dev
 636 2016-01-07T17:26:51  *** metalcamp_ is now known as metalcamp
 637 2016-01-07T17:27:11  *** PitBull_ has quit IRC
 638 2016-01-07T17:27:35  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
 639 2016-01-07T17:31:13  *** trippysalmon has quit IRC
 640 2016-01-07T17:31:22  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 641 2016-01-07T17:32:15  *** xss has quit IRC
 642 2016-01-07T17:35:54  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
 643 2016-01-07T17:36:25  *** owowo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 644 2016-01-07T17:38:11  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 645 2016-01-07T17:42:28  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
 646 2016-01-07T17:46:52  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 647 2016-01-07T17:49:28  *** oneeman has quit IRC
 648 2016-01-07T17:51:36  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
 649 2016-01-07T17:54:00  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 650 2016-01-07T17:56:42  *** GamerSg has quit IRC
 651 2016-01-07T17:57:11  *** elichai2 has quit IRC
 652 2016-01-07T17:58:18  *** Emcy_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 653 2016-01-07T17:58:19  *** Emcy_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 654 2016-01-07T17:58:46  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
 655 2016-01-07T18:01:00  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 656 2016-01-07T18:01:10  *** Emcy has quit IRC
 657 2016-01-07T18:01:37  *** brg444 has quit IRC
 658 2016-01-07T18:01:43  *** blackjid has quit IRC
 659 2016-01-07T18:04:49  *** blackjid has joined #bitcoin-dev
 660 2016-01-07T18:05:32  *** tjader has quit IRC
 661 2016-01-07T18:05:42  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
 662 2016-01-07T18:07:11  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 663 2016-01-07T18:07:51  *** afk11 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 664 2016-01-07T18:08:14  *** G1lius has quit IRC
 665 2016-01-07T18:09:45  *** tjader has joined #bitcoin-dev
 666 2016-01-07T18:10:00  *** BashCo_ has quit IRC
 667 2016-01-07T18:10:22  *** kgk has joined #bitcoin-dev
 668 2016-01-07T18:12:02  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
 669 2016-01-07T18:13:56  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 670 2016-01-07T18:14:56  *** GAit has quit IRC
 671 2016-01-07T18:15:05  *** kgk has quit IRC
 672 2016-01-07T18:15:11  *** Emcy has joined #bitcoin-dev
 673 2016-01-07T18:15:11  *** Emcy has joined #bitcoin-dev
 674 2016-01-07T18:16:52  *** GAit has joined #bitcoin-dev
 675 2016-01-07T18:17:42  *** Yoghur114_2 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 676 2016-01-07T18:18:22  *** Emcy_ has quit IRC
 677 2016-01-07T18:18:44  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
 678 2016-01-07T18:19:27  *** brson has quit IRC
 679 2016-01-07T18:21:33  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 680 2016-01-07T18:22:10  *** chmod755 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 681 2016-01-07T18:25:36  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
 682 2016-01-07T18:26:48  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 683 2016-01-07T18:27:20  <Chris_Stewart_5> Inside of script.cpp why are we using negative integers to find elements in the stack
 684 2016-01-07T18:27:22  <Chris_Stewart_5> i.e.
 685 2016-01-07T18:27:22  *** afk11 has quit IRC
 686 2016-01-07T18:27:30  <Chris_Stewart_5> stacktop(-1)
 687 2016-01-07T18:27:48  <sipa> Chris_Stewart_5: ask satoshi :)
 688 2016-01-07T18:28:05  <Chris_Stewart_5> sipa: brb
 689 2016-01-07T18:28:15  <Chris_Stewart_5> ok he said it was to confuse noobs like me :-)
 690 2016-01-07T18:28:54  <Chris_Stewart_5> is stacktop(-1) the same thing as stacktop.pop()?
 691 2016-01-07T18:29:05  <sipa> (that's an annoying answer, i'm aware, but it's correct: there is no reason to change perfectly functional consensus-critical code, so the reason why things are as they are is the same as the reason why they were done in the first place, which we don't know)
 692 2016-01-07T18:30:04  *** cryptopeddler has quit IRC
 693 2016-01-07T18:30:43  *** afk11 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 694 2016-01-07T18:31:11  <Chris_Stewart_5> sipa: the bullet is going to have to be bit as some point though, won't it? Obviously not today or within the next year but something like this needs to be done at some point. Test beds like sidechains seem to make this more likely as well
 695 2016-01-07T18:31:12  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
 696 2016-01-07T18:31:31  *** d_t has joined #bitcoin-dev
 697 2016-01-07T18:33:25  <sipa> what bullet?
 698 2016-01-07T18:33:34  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 699 2016-01-07T18:33:40  <sipa> it's perfectly functional code
 700 2016-01-07T18:35:08  <Chris_Stewart_5> Isn't that a dangerous thing to say though? Essentially, "the code works, why should it be improved?"
 701 2016-01-07T18:35:36  <wallet42> welcome to consensus critical code :-)
 702 2016-01-07T18:35:50  <MarcoFalke> Would adding a comment help?
 703 2016-01-07T18:36:01  <BlueMatt> -> #bitcoin-core-dev
 704 2016-01-07T18:36:16  <Chris_Stewart_5> wallet42: haha yes, I guess that is the arguement at hand.
 705 2016-01-07T18:36:25  *** AtnevRed has joined #bitcoin-dev
 706 2016-01-07T18:36:35  *** iv3c has joined #bitcoin-dev
 707 2016-01-07T18:37:36  *** murch has quit IRC
 708 2016-01-07T18:37:52  *** supasonic has quit IRC
 709 2016-01-07T18:37:53  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
 710 2016-01-07T18:38:00  *** murch has joined #bitcoin-dev
 711 2016-01-07T18:38:24  *** supasonic has joined #bitcoin-dev
 712 2016-01-07T18:41:19  *** AtnevRed has quit IRC
 713 2016-01-07T18:41:52  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 714 2016-01-07T18:45:54  *** CubicEarth has joined #bitcoin-dev
 715 2016-01-07T18:45:55  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
 716 2016-01-07T18:48:20  *** missmogg_ has quit IRC
 717 2016-01-07T18:48:21  *** missmogg has quit IRC
 718 2016-01-07T18:48:22  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 719 2016-01-07T18:53:00  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
 720 2016-01-07T18:54:16  *** missmogg has joined #bitcoin-dev
 721 2016-01-07T18:55:16  *** kinlo has quit IRC
 722 2016-01-07T18:55:19  *** sparetire_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 723 2016-01-07T18:55:50  *** kinlo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 724 2016-01-07T18:56:13  *** arubi is now known as fIatland
 725 2016-01-07T18:56:21  *** fIatland is now known as arubi
 726 2016-01-07T18:56:39  * jonasschnelli mined a segnet block... :P
 727 2016-01-07T18:57:34  <sipa> jonasschnelli: we are likely going to reset the chain soonish, though
 728 2016-01-07T18:58:16  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 729 2016-01-07T18:58:23  <jonasschnelli> sipa: okay,.. reset = new genesis?
 730 2016-01-07T18:58:43  <sipa> yeah
 731 2016-01-07T18:59:18  *** missmogg_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 732 2016-01-07T18:59:52  <wumpus> meeting start time?
 733 2016-01-07T19:00:10  <jonasschnelli> yes
 734 2016-01-07T19:00:19  <wumpus> #startmeeting
 735 2016-01-07T19:00:19  <lightningbot`> Meeting started Thu Jan  7 19:00:19 2016 UTC.  The chair is wumpus. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
 736 2016-01-07T19:00:19  <lightningbot`> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
 737 2016-01-07T19:00:21  <sipa> oh!
 738 2016-01-07T19:00:45  *** BashCo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 739 2016-01-07T19:00:57  *** _yoy_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 740 2016-01-07T19:00:57  <jonasschnelli> any topics?
 741 2016-01-07T19:01:01  <wumpus> topic: anything still needs to be merged before 0.12.0rc1?
 742 2016-01-07T19:01:07  <MarcoFalke> the wallet stuff
 743 2016-01-07T19:01:18  <wumpus> yeah besides what already has 0.12 milestone
 744 2016-01-07T19:01:26  * sipa at the real world crypto conference; right in thr middle of the bitcoin session
 745 2016-01-07T19:01:56  <wumpus> oh, probably not be a busy meeting then
 746 2016-01-07T19:01:56  <Luke-Jr> >_<
 747 2016-01-07T19:02:10  *** brg444 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 748 2016-01-07T19:02:27  <jonasschnelli> 0.12.0rc needs some more infos in the release notes
 749 2016-01-07T19:02:28  <Luke-Jr> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7151 for 0.12.0 <.<
 750 2016-01-07T19:02:29  <morcos> wumpus: you didn't add #7312 to 0.12 milestone.  i guess there is disagreement
 751 2016-01-07T19:02:43  <Luke-Jr> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7149 is a bugfix for 0.12.0 also
 752 2016-01-07T19:02:44  *** ninsei has quit IRC
 753 2016-01-07T19:02:47  <morcos> but i feel pretty strongly that releasing 0.12 as is, is pretty bad
 754 2016-01-07T19:02:55  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
 755 2016-01-07T19:02:56  *** YoY_ has quit IRC
 756 2016-01-07T19:03:01  <cfields> wumpus: if i work out a quick fix for #7098, ok for 0.12 ?
 757 2016-01-07T19:03:16  <MarcoFalke> jonas, I have a pull open for the release notes.
 758 2016-01-07T19:03:28  <MarcoFalke> Maybe someone can do the rbf part
 759 2016-01-07T19:03:31  <jonasschnelli> MarcoFalke: yes. But some things are missing.
 760 2016-01-07T19:03:49  <MarcoFalke> and morcos the txconfirmtarget part?
 761 2016-01-07T19:03:52  <wumpus> cfields: well I do intend to release rc1 tomorrow, so this was kind of a last minute call
 762 2016-01-07T19:03:58  <jonasschnelli> missed: wallet+prune, setban/banlist
 763 2016-01-07T19:04:02  <jonasschnelli> *misses
 764 2016-01-07T19:04:03  <cfields> ok
 765 2016-01-07T19:04:06  *** JackH has quit IRC
 766 2016-01-07T19:04:32  <jonasschnelli> 7312 is nice,.. but not urgent for 0.12 IMO.
 767 2016-01-07T19:04:32  <wumpus> #action look at #7151 #7149 #7312 for 0.12
 768 2016-01-07T19:05:08  <sdaftuar> i think 7312 is a bugfix?  not being able to spend coins after mempool eviction seems like a bad regression
 769 2016-01-07T19:05:10  <wumpus> 7312 is a feature, too late for 0.12.0 I'd think
 770 2016-01-07T19:05:28  <sdaftuar> (i still need to review it)
 771 2016-01-07T19:05:36  <Luke-Jr> sdaftuar: it has always been true that transactions with too little fee get stuck
 772 2016-01-07T19:05:50  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 773 2016-01-07T19:05:55  <wumpus> if it adds new strings or new RPC functionality that's really hard to put under the bugfix umbrella
 774 2016-01-07T19:05:56  <Luke-Jr> … until they gain sufficient priority, at least
 775 2016-01-07T19:05:57  <sdaftuar> previously those tx's could eventually get mined though
 776 2016-01-07T19:06:02  <Luke-Jr> which may not work anymore in 0.12
 777 2016-01-07T19:06:20  <Luke-Jr> sdaftuar: they can still eventually get mined
 778 2016-01-07T19:06:26  <wumpus> cfields: but this is only rc1, it's quite certain we'll have a rc2, so still worth working on
 779 2016-01-07T19:06:32  <Luke-Jr> sdaftuar: just your local node will fail to broadcast them, which I agree is a bug..
 780 2016-01-07T19:06:50  *** dstadulis has joined #bitcoin-dev
 781 2016-01-07T19:06:52  <morcos> wumpus: the situation for 0.12 will be significantly worse with respect to stuck txs than prior releases
 782 2016-01-07T19:06:53  <cfields> wumpus: ok, will do
 783 2016-01-07T19:07:15  <morcos> in prior releases, txs were eventually mined because the network didn't forget them
 784 2016-01-07T19:07:17  <Luke-Jr> morcos: abandontransaction is IMO not a solution to that though
 785 2016-01-07T19:07:28  <Luke-Jr> it does not guarantee the transaction won't get mined
 786 2016-01-07T19:07:36  <morcos> or if they were not in your mempool for some other reason, like you never broadcast them, then they didn't tie up inputs (this is a NEW change)
 787 2016-01-07T19:07:39  <sipa> do we currently rebroadcast a txn that is not accepted to our mempool?
 788 2016-01-07T19:07:42  <jonasschnelli> morcos: but due to the smartfee (+GUI) changes stuck tx should happen really rare? not?
 789 2016-01-07T19:07:44  <Luke-Jr> which means people will easily be tricked into double-sends
 790 2016-01-07T19:07:46  <wumpus> morcos: I agree it's worse, but I' not sure what to do about that on such short notice
 791 2016-01-07T19:07:47  <Luke-Jr> far worse than stuck
 792 2016-01-07T19:08:09  <Luke-Jr> sipa: I don't think so, but that would be a quick hack that would work I think
 793 2016-01-07T19:08:25  <morcos> also in 0.11, you could probably trick your node to start up with a high relay fee so the tx wouldn't be in yhour mempool any more if it was just taking a long time to mine, and then respend it
 794 2016-01-07T19:08:28  <sipa> i think that's a bad position to be in
 795 2016-01-07T19:08:45  <morcos> the only solution discussed for 0.12, is -zapwallettxes which sounds crazy to me
 796 2016-01-07T19:08:47  <sipa> as it relies on the rest of the world using a policy you're not following yourself
 797 2016-01-07T19:08:52  *** elichai2 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 798 2016-01-07T19:08:52  <sipa> agree with morcos
 799 2016-01-07T19:08:55  <Luke-Jr> how about adding local priority to wallet transactions so they never get pruned?
 800 2016-01-07T19:09:08  <wumpus> yes, -zapwallettxes is crazy
 801 2016-01-07T19:09:10  <sipa> Luke-Jr: privacy leak
 802 2016-01-07T19:09:19  <jonasschnelli> Luke-Jr: yes, open fingerprintig attacks
 803 2016-01-07T19:09:20  *** ninsei has joined #bitcoin-dev
 804 2016-01-07T19:09:21  <wumpus> so, you want to postpone rc1 then?
 805 2016-01-07T19:09:22  <Luke-Jr> sipa: any solution is a privacy leak?
 806 2016-01-07T19:09:36  <sipa> Luke-Jr: abandontransaction is not a privacy leak
 807 2016-01-07T19:09:39  <jonasschnelli> call mempool p2p message and compare
 808 2016-01-07T19:09:49  *** elichai2 has quit IRC
 809 2016-01-07T19:09:50  <Luke-Jr> abandontransaction is *worse* than a privacy leak..
 810 2016-01-07T19:09:50  <wumpus> mempool p2p message is a privacy leak :(
 811 2016-01-07T19:09:51  <sipa> a GUI way to do "respend with higher fee" is even better
 812 2016-01-07T19:09:56  <morcos> sipa: i think jonasschnelli is right that there will not be too many txs that are not accepted to the mempool in the first place, but more txs that are evicted.
 813 2016-01-07T19:10:01  <Luke-Jr> sipa: +1
 814 2016-01-07T19:10:18  *** YoY_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 815 2016-01-07T19:10:22  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
 816 2016-01-07T19:10:55  <Luke-Jr> IMO the rare stuck transactions are still rare enough to not be a blocker for 0.12.0
 817 2016-01-07T19:11:07  <jonasschnelli> I think a GUI fix that would re-broadcast the tx would be trivial... but respend with height fees might included some UX changes.
 818 2016-01-07T19:11:16  <morcos> yes there are a lot of options to improve this that will have to wait for 0.13
 819 2016-01-07T19:11:16  <wumpus> that's much nicer, but not realistic for 0.12, we need something that can be written ,tested and reviwed on short notice. abandontransaction could be such if everyone focuses on it I guess.
 820 2016-01-07T19:11:28  <Luke-Jr> we can add a respend option in 0.12.1 or something
 821 2016-01-07T19:11:35  <sipa> agree
 822 2016-01-07T19:11:37  <morcos> but #7312 as is should be reviewable and mergeable quickly
 823 2016-01-07T19:11:46  <Luke-Jr> morcos: but it creates worse problems
 824 2016-01-07T19:11:53  <morcos> its a manual operation
 825 2016-01-07T19:11:59  <morcos> if you don't use it, it doesn't create any problems
 826 2016-01-07T19:12:06  <Luke-Jr> …
 827 2016-01-07T19:12:14  <jonasschnelli> morcos: but won't help the people that have stuck tx... they are mostly GUI users i guess.
 828 2016-01-07T19:12:20  <wumpus> morcos: right
 829 2016-01-07T19:12:22  <morcos> if you want to put a big fat "WARNING: this may cause non opt-in double spends!" thats fine by me
 830 2016-01-07T19:12:32  <Luke-Jr> morcos: we intentionally make dumping private keys hard, and people STILL do it.
 831 2016-01-07T19:12:37  <Luke-Jr> morcos: that's not the problem
 832 2016-01-07T19:12:48  *** _biO_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 833 2016-01-07T19:12:50  <morcos> jonasschnelli: but when they are asking on #bitcoin, we can tell them to type something into their debug console to clear their tx
 834 2016-01-07T19:12:50  *** _yoy_ has quit IRC
 835 2016-01-07T19:12:52  <wumpus> well the GUI could also add a "abandon transaction" in the tx dropdown
 836 2016-01-07T19:13:05  <Luke-Jr> they will abandon a payment to Fred, then resend it to Fred with a higher fee and the wallet will use different inputs
 837 2016-01-07T19:13:07  <morcos> i just tried to rush out the bare bones functionality
 838 2016-01-07T19:13:09  <Luke-Jr> Fred will bribe a miner to mine both
 839 2016-01-07T19:13:11  <wumpus> not sure that's a good idea but heh...
 840 2016-01-07T19:13:14  <jonasschnelli> morcos: yes. almost as quick as tell them to use -zapwallettxes... but i agree, thats worse.
 841 2016-01-07T19:13:18  <wumpus> and that will add strings so definitely not for 0.12.0
 842 2016-01-07T19:13:19  <morcos> it is really annoyingly difficult to deal with stuck txs without this
 843 2016-01-07T19:13:21  <Luke-Jr> and Fred now has 2x the intended payment
 844 2016-01-07T19:13:25  <sdaftuar> Luke-Jr: it can only be used on not-in-mempool transactions i think
 845 2016-01-07T19:13:41  <Luke-Jr> sdaftuar: not-in-YOUR-mempool does not mean someone else does not have it
 846 2016-01-07T19:13:54  <Luke-Jr> sdaftuar: if it was NEVER broadcast, it wouldn't have been completed in the first place
 847 2016-01-07T19:14:38  <morcos> Luke-Jr: if could be never broadcast due to fee estimation error, or due to have broadcast off
 848 2016-01-07T19:14:40  <Luke-Jr> making it possible for Fred to receive 2x payment is far worse than stuck transactions; and I suspect will become far more common than the rare stuck txs would have been
 849 2016-01-07T19:14:46  *** Xaero91 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 850 2016-01-07T19:15:05  <Luke-Jr> morcos: the former case, will prevent the tx from ever being completed in the wallet
 851 2016-01-07T19:15:15  <morcos> Fred can just as easily tell people to send the tx twice and say that the old one is stuck now, what difference is there
 852 2016-01-07T19:15:24  <morcos> Luke-Jr: no it wont
 853 2016-01-07T19:15:39  <Luke-Jr> morcos: the difference is Fred has a much more convincing case if the user is told to abandon the old one
 854 2016-01-07T19:15:51  <Luke-Jr> morcos: it should!
 855 2016-01-07T19:15:54  <wumpus> ok... let's discuss this outside the meeting, I think it's clear what pulls still need to be looked at...  any other topics?
 856 2016-01-07T19:15:56  <Luke-Jr> pretty sure it has in the past
 857 2016-01-07T19:15:59  <Luke-Jr> k
 858 2016-01-07T19:16:01  <jonasschnelli> Should't time be involved in abandoning txes? A min delay?
 859 2016-01-07T19:16:13  <wumpus> sounds like overdesign to me
 860 2016-01-07T19:16:22  <jonasschnelli> hmm..
 861 2016-01-07T19:16:23  *** afk11 has quit IRC
 862 2016-01-07T19:16:27  <Luke-Jr> next topic: BIPs not in bitcoin/bips need to be told to me
 863 2016-01-07T19:16:36  <morcos> We can hide the rpc and/or make a more stern warning
 864 2016-01-07T19:16:37  <wumpus> this is meant to be a quick, advanced fix for people messing up transactions
 865 2016-01-07T19:16:47  <morcos> but not having the functionality is just risking a problem imo
 866 2016-01-07T19:16:53  <morcos> we agreed to put this in back in november
 867 2016-01-07T19:16:59  <wumpus> #topic Luke-jr new BIP editor
 868 2016-01-07T19:17:07  <wumpus> morcos: agree
 869 2016-01-07T19:17:21  <Luke-Jr> morcos: hidden RPC is maybe okay
 870 2016-01-07T19:17:31  <Luke-Jr> morcos: I thought we were talking about GUI exposed somehow
 871 2016-01-07T19:17:44  <wumpus> no, no, this is not GUI, just a RPC pull
 872 2016-01-07T19:18:06  <jonasschnelli> GUI's def. to late.. ok: #topic Luke-jr new BIP editor
 873 2016-01-07T19:18:15  <petertodd> ACK!
 874 2016-01-07T19:18:18  <jonasschnelli> what's the reason for gmaxwells step back?
 875 2016-01-07T19:18:34  <jonasschnelli> (but maybe this is not the topic)
 876 2016-01-07T19:18:39  <wumpus> jonasschnelli: I don't think we need to discuss that publically, you can ask him
 877 2016-01-07T19:18:51  <jonasschnelli> Right.
 878 2016-01-07T19:18:52  <morcos> i think there are no objections to Luke-Jr being bip editor, especially given gmaxwell asked him
 879 2016-01-07T19:19:02  <Luke-Jr> I don't know, and don't think we should pry into gmaxwell's private reasons in a meeting.
 880 2016-01-07T19:19:06  <wumpus> right
 881 2016-01-07T19:19:13  <petertodd> yeah, why gmaxwell doesn't want to do it isn't relevant to how good Luke-Jr will be
 882 2016-01-07T19:19:32  <petertodd> and Luke's email to the list earlier is good evidence he'll do a good job
 883 2016-01-07T19:19:48  <wumpus> he's been active with the repository at least
 884 2016-01-07T19:20:09  <Luke-Jr> so far I haven't had any emails on missing BIP assignments, although it's only been an hour or two
 885 2016-01-07T19:20:25  *** AusteritySucks has joined #bitcoin-dev
 886 2016-01-07T19:20:37  <wumpus> what do you mean with "BIPs not in bitcoin/bips"? are there BIPs somewhere else?
 887 2016-01-07T19:20:51  <Luke-Jr> wumpus: there are assignments with no draft in the repo, I suspect
 888 2016-01-07T19:20:54  <wumpus> yes, now the difficult task of allocating numbers falls to you
 889 2016-01-07T19:21:30  <MarcoFalke> BIP100 is not in bitcoin/bips
 890 2016-01-07T19:22:01  <wumpus> first priority regarding number assignment is probably the segwit BIP
 891 2016-01-07T19:22:05  <petertodd> MarcoFalke: do we know if BIP100 was ever officially assigned?
 892 2016-01-07T19:22:20  <sipa> it was not
 893 2016-01-07T19:22:32  <MarcoFalke> You can't "unassign" it now
 894 2016-01-07T19:22:47  <wumpus> well at least you can't allocate anything else to it anymore
 895 2016-01-07T19:22:47  <sipa> agree
 896 2016-01-07T19:23:22  <petertodd> pity leaving it off the index will be taken politically
 897 2016-01-07T19:23:32  <Luke-Jr> I'll give people 24 hours to notify me of missing assignments, then I'll get to some priority ones (like BIP 100 and segwit) and wait a little more to go through the rest of the pending ones
 898 2016-01-07T19:23:37  *** Xaero91 has quit IRC
 899 2016-01-07T19:23:42  <wumpus> there's no strong need to leave it off the index
 900 2016-01-07T19:23:52  <morcos> suggested topic: more detailed roadmap for next few major projects
 901 2016-01-07T19:24:11  <wumpus> though it should be clear that people should not self-assign numbers, gmaxwell by definition assigned a different number if people claimed their own
 902 2016-01-07T19:24:23  <Luke-Jr> does jgarzik's bips repo have a current BIP 100 draft I can PR?
 903 2016-01-07T19:24:31  <MarcoFalke> yes
 904 2016-01-07T19:24:37  <jgarzik> on a branch
 905 2016-01-07T19:24:39  <Luke-Jr> wumpus: I'll give "202" a different number for that..
 906 2016-01-07T19:24:43  <wumpus> but it's too late to do that for bip100
 907 2016-01-07T19:24:44  <Luke-Jr> jgarzik: can you PR it? ;)
 908 2016-01-07T19:24:48  <wumpus> right
 909 2016-01-07T19:24:50  <jgarzik> Luke-Jr, sure
 910 2016-01-07T19:24:51  <petertodd> Luke-Jr: ack on 202
 911 2016-01-07T19:25:35  <jgarzik> Luke-Jr, with "202", I tried to do a new method of (1) put in drafts/ dir with no number assigned, (2) have BIP editor move-and-assign-num-and-update-index
 912 2016-01-07T19:25:39  *** davec has quit IRC
 913 2016-01-07T19:25:47  <jgarzik> to respond to self-assignment complaints
 914 2016-01-07T19:25:49  <Luke-Jr> jgarzik: thanks; that sounds reasonable
 915 2016-01-07T19:26:07  *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
 916 2016-01-07T19:26:39  <petertodd> re: detailed plans, is everyone aware of my segwit previous block proof? I don't think there are any outstanding objections to it if it's structured as a tree for the sake of fraud proofs
 917 2016-01-07T19:26:51  <wumpus> #topic  more detailed roadmap for next few major projects
 918 2016-01-07T19:27:49  <morcos> thanks, i just wanted to make a request for a bit of direction (like your response to gmaxwell's email) on what sort of timelines are and order of implemntation of various work: segwit, versionbits (if its still happening), BIP 68,112,113
 919 2016-01-07T19:28:11  <morcos> And other major features we might want for 0.13, such as RBF functionality in the wallet?
 920 2016-01-07T19:28:35  <petertodd> morcos: anyone willing to work on RBF wallet functionality?
 921 2016-01-07T19:28:35  <wumpus> would be best to ask the people working on those
 922 2016-01-07T19:28:37  <morcos> Seems like we have a lot of things on our plate and having some concentration of effort on various things might be helpful
 923 2016-01-07T19:28:50  <Luke-Jr> morcos: for fee bumping at least
 924 2016-01-07T19:28:56  <jonasschnelli> petertodd: I will work on the RBF features for the wallet.
 925 2016-01-07T19:29:09  <wumpus> nice jonasschnelli!
 926 2016-01-07T19:29:11  <petertodd> jonasschnelli: great, thanks! feel free to ask me any questions
 927 2016-01-07T19:29:13  <sipa> good
 928 2016-01-07T19:29:31  *** Dr-G2 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 929 2016-01-07T19:29:32  *** Dr-G has quit IRC
 930 2016-01-07T19:29:33  <sipa> i apologize for pretty absent lately
 931 2016-01-07T19:29:38  <Luke-Jr> jonasschnelli: keep in mind some merchants explicitly plan to *reject* RBF-optin transactions
 932 2016-01-07T19:29:50  <morcos> wumpus: i was thinking that perhaps you, sipa, and gmaxwell might have a list of goals for 0.13 , we could obviously give feedback.  but i'm willing to work on many of those things but would appreciate knowing where the effort is requested.
 933 2016-01-07T19:29:57  <Luke-Jr> jonasschnelli: so you may need to implement a "disable RBF for this tx and retry" logic
 934 2016-01-07T19:30:08  <morcos> or not just for 0.13 as there will be SF's before then?
 935 2016-01-07T19:30:11  <wumpus> well you made great progress on segwit sipa
 936 2016-01-07T19:30:18  *** Madars has quit IRC
 937 2016-01-07T19:30:22  *** PRab_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 938 2016-01-07T19:30:28  <sipa> wumpus: thanks, but other things can't be put on hold either
 939 2016-01-07T19:30:31  * Luke-Jr notes segwit is necessarily decoupled from release versions
 940 2016-01-07T19:30:33  <jonasschnelli> Luke-Jr: Yes. We need to focus that. And wisely choose the default.
 941 2016-01-07T19:30:35  <petertodd> Luke-Jr: I'd be inclined to wait and see on that; solution may be to just turn the bit off, with logic otherwise unchanged
 942 2016-01-07T19:30:35  *** optimator_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 943 2016-01-07T19:30:49  <Luke-Jr> jonasschnelli: default IMO should be to attempt RBF, and if rejected, retry without it ;)
 944 2016-01-07T19:30:58  *** Arnavion has quit IRC
 945 2016-01-07T19:31:01  <cfields> i'm planning to post an rfc for a network stack overhaul in the next week or so as well, i realize it's getting a bit late for that
 946 2016-01-07T19:31:02  *** Arnavion3 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 947 2016-01-07T19:31:06  *** Arnavion3 is now known as Arnavion
 948 2016-01-07T19:31:14  <petertodd> sipa: you you planning on working on segwit relative to the v0.12 branch, or v0.13?
 949 2016-01-07T19:31:16  *** PsychoticBoy_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 950 2016-01-07T19:31:23  <sipa> petertodd: 0.12
 951 2016-01-07T19:31:31  <Luke-Jr> jonasschnelli: otoh, BIP70 txs already imply the merchant is responsible for getting it mined, so maybe RBF is less important there
 952 2016-01-07T19:31:31  <petertodd> sipa: ok good, that's probably faster
 953 2016-01-07T19:31:34  <sipa> i should stop rebasing on master
 954 2016-01-07T19:31:35  <morcos> cfields: perfect example.  it would be nice to know when we should all spend time looking at that, so we can get it in and merged
 955 2016-01-07T19:31:36  *** treehug8_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 956 2016-01-07T19:31:45  *** theorb has joined #bitcoin-dev
 957 2016-01-07T19:31:50  *** arowser_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 958 2016-01-07T19:31:50  *** treehug8_ has quit IRC
 959 2016-01-07T19:31:50  * Luke-Jr suggests the last common commit in 0.12 and master
 960 2016-01-07T19:31:56  <wumpus> sipa: may be better to rebase on 0.12 branch then :)
 961 2016-01-07T19:32:09  <sipa> wumpus: yes, will do soon
 962 2016-01-07T19:32:12  *** kadoban_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 963 2016-01-07T19:32:15  *** treehug8_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 964 2016-01-07T19:32:15  <cfields> morcos: yup. i've held off on requesting review so far. i'll begin that very soon.
 965 2016-01-07T19:32:27  <jonasschnelli> cfields: nice. And sorry,... I still own you some reviews of the current code.
 966 2016-01-07T19:32:37  <Luke-Jr> anything based on 3cd836c1d855b92e7c73ab31979f471c4f8dad68 should merge into 0.12 and master
 967 2016-01-07T19:32:40  <sipa> i think our choice of efforts for working towards consensus changes is independent from releases
 968 2016-01-07T19:32:55  <cfields> jonasschnelli: nah, i just poked you for an idea, wasn't looking for review yet
 969 2016-01-07T19:33:08  *** akrmn has quit IRC
 970 2016-01-07T19:33:19  <jonasschnelli> Okay. Poke me again if it's time...
 971 2016-01-07T19:33:31  *** Guest78135_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 972 2016-01-07T19:33:32  <cfields> will do, thanks
 973 2016-01-07T19:33:47  <morcos> sipa: sure.  i just mean an overall game plan.  for instance i reviewed versionbits, found a bug, got no feedback, and now am not sure we're even doing versionbits.  thats fine, things change.  but it would be nice if other people knew that maybe they shouldn't go review versionbits right now
 974 2016-01-07T19:33:48  *** wrabbit has quit IRC
 975 2016-01-07T19:33:50  *** warptangent_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 976 2016-01-07T19:33:51  <Luke-Jr> gotta run, bbiab
 977 2016-01-07T19:33:55  *** wrabbit has joined #bitcoin-dev
 978 2016-01-07T19:34:05  *** aj_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 979 2016-01-07T19:34:13  <wumpus> but yes it makes sense to make a list of goals for 0.13, although as the releases are time-based it's conditional on things being ready on time
 980 2016-01-07T19:34:19  <sipa> ok, i think bip9 is moved a bit back in priority
 981 2016-01-07T19:34:33  *** hsmiths2 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 982 2016-01-07T19:34:38  *** treehug88 has quit IRC
 983 2016-01-07T19:34:38  <morcos> sipa: yes thats all i'm saying a bit more communication on priorities
 984 2016-01-07T19:34:56  <sipa> agree with that choice?
 985 2016-01-07T19:34:57  <jonasschnelli> agree with morcos. A clear plan could result in investing resources into the right parts.
 986 2016-01-07T19:35:14  *** tjader has quit IRC
 987 2016-01-07T19:35:29  *** artifexd_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 988 2016-01-07T19:35:44  *** pindarhk_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 989 2016-01-07T19:35:49  <petertodd> morcos: whether or not we definitely need versionbits will depend on whether or not there is a competing fork on the network
 990 2016-01-07T19:36:00  <morcos> sipa: sure. more like no objection. there are many plans that are all good plans.  having one of them though is better than not.
 991 2016-01-07T19:36:10  <wumpus> well I suggest that everyone that is working on something that they plan to have finished for 0.13 sends me proposals, I can merge it into a plan
 992 2016-01-07T19:36:28  <morcos> +1
 993 2016-01-07T19:36:28  <petertodd> morcos: also, in that case, we can do my pseudo-versionbits with very little code
 994 2016-01-07T19:37:12  *** derbumi_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 995 2016-01-07T19:37:19  *** [Derek]_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 996 2016-01-07T19:37:20  *** nadio_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 997 2016-01-07T19:37:24  *** RBecker_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 998 2016-01-07T19:37:33  *** Kazzy has joined #bitcoin-dev
 999 2016-01-07T19:37:41  *** jaclupi_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
1000 2016-01-07T19:37:50  <btcdrak> petertodd: there are currently two implementations of version bits. one by codeshark and one by rusty
1001 2016-01-07T19:38:01  <sipa> and neither is maintaines at this point
1002 2016-01-07T19:38:11  <sipa> afaik
1003 2016-01-07T19:38:15  *** Omni- has joined #bitcoin-dev
1004 2016-01-07T19:38:17  <petertodd> btcdrak: I know, I just mean, if we're in a position where we need it ASAP and the actual versionbits isn't production quality
1005 2016-01-07T19:38:30  *** missmogg has quit IRC
1006 2016-01-07T19:38:34  *** jaclupi has quit IRC
1007 2016-01-07T19:38:34  *** kadoban has quit IRC
1008 2016-01-07T19:38:34  *** AusteritySucks has quit IRC
1009 2016-01-07T19:38:34  *** derbumi has quit IRC
1010 2016-01-07T19:38:34  *** MarcoFalke has quit IRC
1011 2016-01-07T19:38:34  *** arowser has quit IRC
1012 2016-01-07T19:38:34  *** melvster1 has quit IRC
1013 2016-01-07T19:38:34  *** nadio has quit IRC
1014 2016-01-07T19:38:34  *** aj has quit IRC
1015 2016-01-07T19:38:34  *** PsychoticBoy has quit IRC
1016 2016-01-07T19:38:34  *** dhill has quit IRC
1017 2016-01-07T19:38:34  *** donpillou has quit IRC
1018 2016-01-07T19:38:34  *** Internet13 has quit IRC
1019 2016-01-07T19:38:34  *** ceejep has quit IRC
1020 2016-01-07T19:38:34  *** theorbtwo has quit IRC
1021 2016-01-07T19:38:34  *** PRab has quit IRC
1022 2016-01-07T19:38:34  *** Guest78135 has quit IRC
1023 2016-01-07T19:38:34  *** CodeShark has quit IRC
1024 2016-01-07T19:38:34  *** Nothing4You has quit IRC
1025 2016-01-07T19:38:34  *** kalz has quit IRC
1026 2016-01-07T19:38:34  *** artifexd has quit IRC
1027 2016-01-07T19:38:34  *** pindarhk has quit IRC
1028 2016-01-07T19:38:34  *** hsmiths has quit IRC
1029 2016-01-07T19:38:34  *** RBecker has quit IRC
1030 2016-01-07T19:38:34  *** Omni_ has quit IRC
1031 2016-01-07T19:38:35  *** [Derek] has quit IRC
1032 2016-01-07T19:38:35  *** optimator has quit IRC
1033 2016-01-07T19:38:35  *** Kazz_ has quit IRC
1034 2016-01-07T19:38:35  *** tommygunner has quit IRC
1035 2016-01-07T19:38:35  *** Tykling has quit IRC
1036 2016-01-07T19:38:35  *** warptangent has quit IRC
1037 2016-01-07T19:38:35  *** derbumi_ is now known as derbumi
1038 2016-01-07T19:38:44  *** RBecker_ is now known as RBecker
1039 2016-01-07T19:38:48  <petertodd> btcdrak: my version is about two lines of code, at the cost of theoretically being a hardfork in cases where the fork fails
1040 2016-01-07T19:39:21  *** Internet13 has joined #bitcoin-dev
1041 2016-01-07T19:39:47  *** dhill has joined #bitcoin-dev
1042 2016-01-07T19:39:56  *** missmogg has joined #bitcoin-dev
1043 2016-01-07T19:40:07  *** tommygunner has joined #bitcoin-dev
1044 2016-01-07T19:40:15  *** pindarhk_ is now known as pindarhk
1045 2016-01-07T19:40:15  <Luke-Jr> pfft freenode
1046 2016-01-07T19:40:22  *** tjader has joined #bitcoin-dev
1047 2016-01-07T19:40:24  <wumpus> I think we've drifted off topic a bit. versionbits as new topic? or something else?
1048 2016-01-07T19:40:25  *** Dizzle has joined #bitcoin-dev
1049 2016-01-07T19:40:27  <sipa> there is a moral obligation to have VB or something with similar functionality available
1050 2016-01-07T19:40:42  *** PsychoticBoy_ is now known as PsychoticBoy
1051 2016-01-07T19:40:43  <wumpus> #topic versionbits (BIP9)
1052 2016-01-07T19:40:51  <morcos> sipa:  there is?  or is that a question?
1053 2016-01-07T19:40:52  *** kalz has joined #bitcoin-dev
1054 2016-01-07T19:40:56  *** davec has joined #bitcoin-dev
1055 2016-01-07T19:41:04  *** Guest78135_ is now known as Guest78135
1056 2016-01-07T19:41:13  <morcos> sorry, i read "objection"
1057 2016-01-07T19:41:19  <sdaftuar> sipa: agreed
1058 2016-01-07T19:41:24  <Luke-Jr> "Pieter Wuille proposes a moral requirement to rewrite Bitcoin in Visual Basic."
1059 2016-01-07T19:41:30  *** mrkent has joined #bitcoin-dev
1060 2016-01-07T19:41:33  *** donpillou has joined #bitcoin-dev
1061 2016-01-07T19:41:41  <wumpus> heh
1062 2016-01-07T19:41:42  *** melvster1 has joined #bitcoin-dev
1063 2016-01-07T19:41:43  <cfields> haha
1064 2016-01-07T19:41:45  *** AusteritySucks has joined #bitcoin-dev
1065 2016-01-07T19:41:46  <sipa> hahaha
1066 2016-01-07T19:41:54  *** artifexd_ is now known as artifexd
1067 2016-01-07T19:42:02  * petertodd is thinking of his Compaq 386 running Windows 3.1
1068 2016-01-07T19:42:14  <Luke-Jr> gotta go back to VB 4.0 for that I think
1069 2016-01-07T19:42:21  <sipa> back to topic?
1070 2016-01-07T19:42:23  <btcdrak> urgh, is there a freenode netsplit going on atm?
1071 2016-01-07T19:42:24  <Luke-Jr> sorry
1072 2016-01-07T19:42:28  *** Nothing4You has joined #bitcoin-dev
1073 2016-01-07T19:42:55  *** M-mistake has quit IRC
1074 2016-01-07T19:43:05  <sipa> i think there are a few long-lasting things that need a scheduled time to do: consensus refactoring (just moving things to one directory is already a great step)
1075 2016-01-07T19:43:10  <sipa> another is c++11
1076 2016-01-07T19:43:11  <wumpus> agree as well that something like versionbits is "a moral obligation", but indeed not the first priority
1077 2016-01-07T19:43:15  <sipa> another is clang-format
1078 2016-01-07T19:43:23  <wumpus> bleh clang-format
1079 2016-01-07T19:43:23  <petertodd> anyway, I agree that versionbits is a moral requirement, but we also have a moral requirement to release code that works and is well-tested
1080 2016-01-07T19:43:34  <jonasschnelli> +1 for c+11, -1 for clang format
1081 2016-01-07T19:43:39  *** jaclupi_ has quit IRC
1082 2016-01-07T19:43:41  <sipa> ok, good to hear
1083 2016-01-07T19:43:51  <jonasschnelli> it's just not worth it.
1084 2016-01-07T19:43:55  <wumpus> but yes, jtimon's libconsensus refactoring and c++11 would be nice to do for 0.13
1085 2016-01-07T19:44:01  <sipa> but people still have an epectation that clang-format wilk happen at some point
1086 2016-01-07T19:44:05  <jonasschnelli> MarcoFalkes git diff format script should be recommended.
1087 2016-01-07T19:44:11  <morcos> if there is a spell checker, i could use that so i stop getting so many comment fixups to my pulls.
1088 2016-01-07T19:44:19  <sipa> we need to communicate that it will not happen then
1089 2016-01-07T19:44:27  *** CodeShark has joined #bitcoin-dev
1090 2016-01-07T19:44:35  <wumpus> morcos: there's a way to run spellcheck on your source code and it will check only comments I think
1091 2016-01-07T19:44:40  <Luke-Jr> if we're going to begin using C++11 in 0.13, then I think we should have configure use C++11 to compile 0.12 by default (and fail loudly if unavailable)
1092 2016-01-07T19:44:58  <wumpus> don't know exctly how though :-)
1093 2016-01-07T19:45:04  <Luke-Jr> because once we start actually /using/ C++11, it will be difficult to go back
1094 2016-01-07T19:45:20  <cfields> Luke-Jr: that's not a bad idea.
1095 2016-01-07T19:45:24  <sipa> Luke-Jr: weak nak; i suggest compiling masting in both c++11 and c++03 in master now
1096 2016-01-07T19:45:33  <sipa> *compiling
1097 2016-01-07T19:45:43  <wumpus> I think we should just make the decision to use c++11
1098 2016-01-07T19:45:47  *** kadoban_ is now known as kadoban
1099 2016-01-07T19:45:52  <Luke-Jr> sipa: that's fine, as long as C++11 isn't required for 0.13
1100 2016-01-07T19:45:53  <wumpus> there's no way to go back, and that's ok
1101 2016-01-07T19:46:04  <jonasschnelli> how is c++11 related to a full remove of boost?
1102 2016-01-07T19:46:13  <cfields> wumpus: i believe Luke-Jr was talking about backporting
1103 2016-01-07T19:46:17  <sipa> cfields: after your PR, does c++11 compile?
1104 2016-01-07T19:46:18  <Luke-Jr> wumpus: that's okay, IF it actually is workable. which is far from clear.
1105 2016-01-07T19:46:24  <wumpus> jonasschnelli: c++11 takes over some parts that boost is now used for
1106 2016-01-07T19:46:25  *** chjj has quit IRC
1107 2016-01-07T19:46:32  <sipa> are we _ready_ with c++ for gitian/depends/...?
1108 2016-01-07T19:46:52  <wumpus> travis still needs a c++11 compiler
1109 2016-01-07T19:47:00  <cfields> sipa: yes. from my tests, all platforms compile bitcoin 100% now.
1110 2016-01-07T19:47:09  <cfields> sipa: still need to do depends, yes. i have that patch ready
1111 2016-01-07T19:47:23  <Luke-Jr> Users running the latest stable versions of major distros should not need to use depends/ to compile working dynamic binaries.
1112 2016-01-07T19:47:32  <cfields> yes, was working on getting travis in shape first. looking at options. looks like the easiest it just to install an updated gcc :\
1113 2016-01-07T19:47:42  <sipa> ugh
1114 2016-01-07T19:47:50  <droark> sipa: Armory used some C++11 code with Gitian and worked fine. I don't think the Core codebase needs to make Gitian-specific changes.
1115 2016-01-07T19:47:50  <wumpus> travis still can't do a newer distro?
1116 2016-01-07T19:47:52  <cfields> Luke-Jr: they don't. works with system libs
1117 2016-01-07T19:48:02  <morcos> cfields: that should be new Travis success message "all platforms compile bitcoin 100%"
1118 2016-01-07T19:48:03  <cfields> wumpus: yes, but not with caching
1119 2016-01-07T19:48:09  *** Tykling has joined #bitcoin-dev
1120 2016-01-07T19:48:10  <jonasschnelli> travis can use docker
1121 2016-01-07T19:48:15  *** wallet42 has quit IRC
1122 2016-01-07T19:48:16  <cfields> jonasschnelli: ^^
1123 2016-01-07T19:48:18  <wumpus> cfields: bleh :/
1124 2016-01-07T19:48:21  <sipa> well, the first point is we need travis to build *something* in c++11
1125 2016-01-07T19:48:37  <jonasschnelli> one of my bitcoin-core clone projects is now using c++11 with travis and gitian: https://github.com/digitalbitbox/dbb-app/blob/master/.travis.yml
1126 2016-01-07T19:48:40  <Luke-Jr> cfields: GCC 4.x at least has serious ABI problems that suggest that is unlikely.. and last I checked, I couldn't even compile Bitcoin Core with C++11
1127 2016-01-07T19:48:41  <wumpus> without caching it'd be useless, building depends every time
1128 2016-01-07T19:48:43  <cfields> i can have travis updated today using gcc 4.8, same as release builds
1129 2016-01-07T19:48:45  <sipa> once that is done and merged, i am fine with deciding whether to full switch or not
1130 2016-01-07T19:48:49  <wumpus> cfields: SGTM
1131 2016-01-07T19:49:07  <sipa> #action cfields enables c++11 build in travis
1132 2016-01-07T19:49:09  <cfields> Luke-Jr: see master as of ~12h ago
1133 2016-01-07T19:49:37  <Luke-Jr> cfields: cool, will try
1134 2016-01-07T19:50:09  <cfields> Luke-Jr: please report any build issues. i tried to ensure that any local setup will work
1135 2016-01-07T19:50:43  *** achow101 has joined #bitcoin-dev
1136 2016-01-07T19:50:44  <Luke-Jr> cfields: report on github, or IRC?
1137 2016-01-07T19:50:47  <cfields> morcos: you can add that to the success message :)
1138 2016-01-07T19:51:18  <Luke-Jr> httpserver.cpp:255:36: warning: ‘auto_ptr’ is deprecated (declared at /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.8.5/include/g++-v4/backward/auto_ptr.h:87) [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
1139 2016-01-07T19:51:24  <cfields> Luke-Jr: #7302 would be good, for posterity
1140 2016-01-07T19:51:47  *** JackH has joined #bitcoin-dev
1141 2016-01-07T19:51:51  <wumpus> Luke-Jr: ignore that just a warning, we can't replace that without breaking c++03 compat
1142 2016-01-07T19:52:00  <sipa> Luke-Jr: it is a harmless warning; unique_ptr is compatible with auto_ptr's interface, but suoerior
1143 2016-01-07T19:52:07  <cfields> Luke-Jr: deprecated in c++11, but not removed. auto_ptr -> unique_ptr will be one of the first changes after c++11 is enabled
1144 2016-01-07T19:52:08  <Luke-Jr> makes sense
1145 2016-01-07T19:52:15  <Luke-Jr> /usr/include/boost/thread/future_error_code.hpp:36:53: error: ‘enum_type’ is not a member of ‘boost::future_errc’
1146 2016-01-07T19:52:17  <wumpus> but that gets too detailed, any other topics for the meeting?
1147 2016-01-07T19:52:22  <Luke-Jr> maybe my system boost at fault though
1148 2016-01-07T19:52:35  <Luke-Jr> will move this to -core-dev
1149 2016-01-07T19:52:39  <wumpus> whow, future_error_code
1150 2016-01-07T19:53:04  * jonasschnelli is wondering how we solve the c++11 mutex stuff for mingw (one we move away from boost) 
1151 2016-01-07T19:53:08  <sipa> small status update: segnet will do a backwark incompatible change soon, to change the commitment structure; after that, first priority is getting mining code to work with it
1152 2016-01-07T19:53:16  <cfields> can we get a very quick/general segwit status update. i've seen a few things flying around
1153 2016-01-07T19:53:23  *** jaclupi has joined #bitcoin-dev
1154 2016-01-07T19:53:27  <cfields> heh, thanks :)
1155 2016-01-07T19:53:27  <sipa> cfields: ^
1156 2016-01-07T19:53:28  <wumpus> #topic segwit status update
1157 2016-01-07T19:53:42  <CodeShark> segnet has been up since dec 31
1158 2016-01-07T19:53:51  <Luke-Jr> sipa: still working on that
1159 2016-01-07T19:53:54  <sipa> i will also produce a separate branch with just consensus changes
1160 2016-01-07T19:54:25  <sipa> which could be perhaos backportable further back than 0.12
1161 2016-01-07T19:54:25  * jtimon agrees with Luke-Jr on working on top of last-0.12.99 3cd836c1 when possible
1162 2016-01-07T19:55:23  <sipa> jtimon: what is the advantage over using 0.12?
1163 2016-01-07T19:55:32  <sipa> ah, 0.12 is still moving
1164 2016-01-07T19:55:42  <sipa> ok, will rebase on that
1165 2016-01-07T19:55:44  <Luke-Jr> sipa: 0.12 won't merge into master nicely
1166 2016-01-07T19:55:48  <wumpus> yes, 0.12 is still moving
1167 2016-01-07T19:55:54  <sipa> jtimon: ack
1168 2016-01-07T19:56:41  <sipa> 4 min
1169 2016-01-07T19:56:56  *** zookolaptop has joined #bitcoin-dev
1170 2016-01-07T19:56:58  <btcdrak> sipa: nothing more on segwit?
1171 2016-01-07T19:57:19  <CodeShark> it works? :)
1172 2016-01-07T19:57:48  <jonasschnelli> hah
1173 2016-01-07T19:58:27  <Luke-Jr> meeting over then?
1174 2016-01-07T19:58:32  <wumpus> #endmeeting
1175 2016-01-07T19:58:32  <lightningbot`> Meeting ended Thu Jan  7 19:58:32 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
1176 2016-01-07T19:58:32  <lightningbot`> Minutes:        http://www.erisian.com.au/meetbot/bitcoin-dev/2016/bitcoin-dev.2016-01-07-19.00.html
1177 2016-01-07T19:58:32  <lightningbot`> Minutes (text): http://www.erisian.com.au/meetbot/bitcoin-dev/2016/bitcoin-dev.2016-01-07-19.00.txt
1178 2016-01-07T19:58:32  <lightningbot`> Log:            http://www.erisian.com.au/meetbot/bitcoin-dev/2016/bitcoin-dev.2016-01-07-19.00.log.html
1179 2016-01-07T19:58:51  <Luke-Jr> k, bbiab again
1180 2016-01-07T19:59:17  *** Palsson has quit IRC
1181 2016-01-07T20:00:32  *** Palsson has joined #bitcoin-dev
1182 2016-01-07T20:00:37  *** chjj has joined #bitcoin-dev
1183 2016-01-07T20:05:56  *** M-mistake has joined #bitcoin-dev
1184 2016-01-07T20:08:34  *** MarcoFalke has joined #bitcoin-dev
1185 2016-01-07T20:10:49  *** cryptapus_ has quit IRC
1186 2016-01-07T20:12:33  *** achow101 has quit IRC
1187 2016-01-07T20:12:38  *** anchow101 has joined #bitcoin-dev
1188 2016-01-07T20:14:26  *** anchow101 has quit IRC
1189 2016-01-07T20:14:26  *** zookolaptop has quit IRC
1190 2016-01-07T20:16:27  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-dev
1191 2016-01-07T20:20:46  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
1192 2016-01-07T20:23:42  *** cryptapus_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
1193 2016-01-07T20:23:43  *** cryptapus_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
1194 2016-01-07T20:23:55  *** laurentmt has joined #bitcoin-dev
1195 2016-01-07T20:24:25  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-dev
1196 2016-01-07T20:24:56  *** missmogg_ has quit IRC
1197 2016-01-07T20:25:04  *** missmogg_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
1198 2016-01-07T20:26:02  *** Dizzle_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
1199 2016-01-07T20:27:20  *** M-mistake has quit IRC
1200 2016-01-07T20:27:39  *** laurentmt has quit IRC
1201 2016-01-07T20:28:13  *** Quent has quit IRC
1202 2016-01-07T20:28:40  <jonasschnelli> CodeShark: re: https://github.com/CodeShark/BitcoinScriptExperiments, .. did you push segwit compat. CoinCore code somewhere?
1203 2016-01-07T20:28:42  *** Quent has joined #bitcoin-dev
1204 2016-01-07T20:28:45  <jonasschnelli> Stuff like .getSerializedWithWitness()?
1205 2016-01-07T20:28:48  *** Dizzle has quit IRC
1206 2016-01-07T20:28:59  <jonasschnelli> or TxInWitness
1207 2016-01-07T20:29:04  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
1208 2016-01-07T20:30:09  <CodeShark> Ah, yes - it's the segwit branch of https://github.com/ciphrex/mSIGNA
1209 2016-01-07T20:30:20  *** dstadulis has quit IRC
1210 2016-01-07T20:30:47  <CodeShark> Although I just made some more changes to it I have not pushed yet
1211 2016-01-07T20:31:20  <jonasschnelli> np... thanks
1212 2016-01-07T20:31:41  <jtimon> sipa to rebase from last-0.12.99 3cd836c1 to master you don't need to remove some commits like you would need if rebasing from 0.12 to master
1213 2016-01-07T20:32:32  *** patcon has joined #bitcoin-dev
1214 2016-01-07T20:33:31  <MarcoFalke> If a brach rebased on 3cd836c1 merges fine into master and 0.12, that should be preferred, always.
1215 2016-01-07T20:33:45  <sipa> jtimon: ok
1216 2016-01-07T20:34:10  *** elichai2 has joined #bitcoin-dev
1217 2016-01-07T20:34:11  *** elichai2 has joined #bitcoin-dev
1218 2016-01-07T20:35:43  *** M-mistake has joined #bitcoin-dev
1219 2016-01-07T20:35:53  * jtimon sighs when reading -segnet instead of -chain=segnet and remembers #5229 and hopes #6907 doesn't take much longer...
1220 2016-01-07T20:39:35  *** ribasushi has quit IRC
1221 2016-01-07T20:39:40  *** treehug8_ has quit IRC
1222 2016-01-07T20:39:53  *** treehug88 has joined #bitcoin-dev
1223 2016-01-07T20:42:50  *** dstadulis has joined #bitcoin-dev
1224 2016-01-07T20:43:10  *** dstadulis has quit IRC
1225 2016-01-07T20:44:52  *** elichai2 has quit IRC
1226 2016-01-07T20:45:18  *** elichai2 has joined #bitcoin-dev
1227 2016-01-07T20:45:19  *** elichai2 has joined #bitcoin-dev
1228 2016-01-07T20:46:08  *** elichai2 has joined #bitcoin-dev
1229 2016-01-07T20:46:09  *** elichai2 has joined #bitcoin-dev
1230 2016-01-07T20:49:16  *** Ahmed90 has joined #bitcoin-dev
1231 2016-01-07T20:56:16  *** JackH has quit IRC
1232 2016-01-07T20:58:03  *** alexpi__ has joined #bitcoin-dev
1233 2016-01-07T20:59:33  *** brson has joined #bitcoin-dev
1234 2016-01-07T21:00:27  *** ribasushi has joined #bitcoin-dev
1235 2016-01-07T21:01:20  *** alexpi__ has quit IRC
1236 2016-01-07T21:03:38  *** tjader has quit IRC
1237 2016-01-07T21:05:20  *** cryptapus_ has quit IRC
1238 2016-01-07T21:05:39  *** M-mistake has quit IRC
1239 2016-01-07T21:10:29  *** tjader has joined #bitcoin-dev
1240 2016-01-07T21:10:38  *** Newyorkadam has joined #bitcoin-dev
1241 2016-01-07T21:14:39  *** Arnavion has quit IRC
1242 2016-01-07T21:14:55  *** Arnavion has joined #bitcoin-dev
1243 2016-01-07T21:16:17  *** NL5N has quit IRC
1244 2016-01-07T21:19:45  *** go1111111 has quit IRC
1245 2016-01-07T21:26:17  *** Madars has joined #bitcoin-dev
1246 2016-01-07T21:26:21  <Chris_Stewart_5> Is this documentation explaining how OP_CHECKSIG works still relevant?
1247 2016-01-07T21:26:23  <Chris_Stewart_5> https://en.bitcoin.it/w/images/en/7/70/Bitcoin_OpCheckSig_InDetail.png
1248 2016-01-07T21:26:59  <Chris_Stewart_5> also, is this transaction type specific? I.e. this is how it works for p2pkh only
1249 2016-01-07T21:30:16  *** ceejep has joined #bitcoin-dev
1250 2016-01-07T21:33:11  *** elichai2 has quit IRC
1251 2016-01-07T21:33:37  *** elichai2 has joined #bitcoin-dev
1252 2016-01-07T21:33:53  *** mrkent has quit IRC
1253 2016-01-07T21:36:25  *** prosody is now known as drosodv
1254 2016-01-07T21:41:29  *** kgk has joined #bitcoin-dev
1255 2016-01-07T21:43:18  *** antizionist__ has quit IRC
1256 2016-01-07T21:43:21  *** paveljanik has quit IRC
1257 2016-01-07T21:44:25  *** cybrNaut has quit IRC
1258 2016-01-07T21:44:25  *** cybrNaut has joined #bitcoin-dev
1259 2016-01-07T21:48:24  *** xss has joined #bitcoin-dev
1260 2016-01-07T21:49:35  *** elichai2 has quit IRC
1261 2016-01-07T21:50:16  *** patcon has quit IRC
1262 2016-01-07T21:50:17  *** aj_ has quit IRC
1263 2016-01-07T21:50:17  *** Dr-G2 has quit IRC
1264 2016-01-07T21:50:18  *** thevjm has quit IRC
1265 2016-01-07T21:50:19  *** justanotheruser has quit IRC
1266 2016-01-07T21:50:19  *** risho has quit IRC
1267 2016-01-07T21:50:19  *** TheSeven has quit IRC
1268 2016-01-07T21:50:20  *** Jaamg has quit IRC
1269 2016-01-07T21:50:20  *** nowan has quit IRC
1270 2016-01-07T21:50:20  *** agricocb has quit IRC
1271 2016-01-07T21:50:20  *** kyuupichan has quit IRC
1272 2016-01-07T21:51:36  *** justanotheruser has joined #bitcoin-dev
1273 2016-01-07T21:51:36  *** patcon has joined #bitcoin-dev
1274 2016-01-07T21:51:36  *** aj_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
1275 2016-01-07T21:51:36  *** Dr-G2 has joined #bitcoin-dev
1276 2016-01-07T21:51:36  *** thevjm has joined #bitcoin-dev
1277 2016-01-07T21:51:36  *** risho has joined #bitcoin-dev
1278 2016-01-07T21:51:36  *** TheSeven has joined #bitcoin-dev
1279 2016-01-07T21:51:36  *** Jaamg has joined #bitcoin-dev
1280 2016-01-07T21:51:36  *** nowan has joined #bitcoin-dev
1281 2016-01-07T21:51:36  *** agricocb has joined #bitcoin-dev
1282 2016-01-07T21:51:36  *** kyuupichan has joined #bitcoin-dev
1283 2016-01-07T21:51:51  *** justanotheruser has quit IRC
1284 2016-01-07T21:55:40  *** justanotheruser has joined #bitcoin-dev
1285 2016-01-07T21:55:41  *** murch has quit IRC
1286 2016-01-07T21:55:58  *** treehug88 has quit IRC
1287 2016-01-07T21:55:59  *** murch has joined #bitcoin-dev
1288 2016-01-07T21:56:07  *** Dizzle_ has quit IRC
1289 2016-01-07T21:56:54  *** Dizzle has joined #bitcoin-dev
1290 2016-01-07T22:00:57  *** Cryo has quit IRC
1291 2016-01-07T22:02:06  *** owowo has quit IRC
1292 2016-01-07T22:04:19  *** oneeman has joined #bitcoin-dev
1293 2016-01-07T22:05:23  *** hashtag_ has quit IRC
1294 2016-01-07T22:09:14  *** Greybits has joined #bitcoin-dev
1295 2016-01-07T22:12:06  *** Emcy_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
1296 2016-01-07T22:12:07  *** Emcy_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
1297 2016-01-07T22:14:50  *** iv3c has quit IRC
1298 2016-01-07T22:15:47  *** Emcy has quit IRC
1299 2016-01-07T22:15:54  *** Belxjander has quit IRC
1300 2016-01-07T22:16:41  *** zmachine has joined #bitcoin-dev
1301 2016-01-07T22:17:37  *** Belxjander has joined #bitcoin-dev
1302 2016-01-07T22:17:54  *** Emcy has joined #bitcoin-dev
1303 2016-01-07T22:17:54  *** Emcy has joined #bitcoin-dev
1304 2016-01-07T22:18:22  *** go1111111 has joined #bitcoin-dev
1305 2016-01-07T22:19:19  *** neozaru has joined #bitcoin-dev
1306 2016-01-07T22:19:22  *** CheckDavid has quit IRC
1307 2016-01-07T22:20:42  *** Emcy_ has quit IRC
1308 2016-01-07T22:25:05  *** paracyst has quit IRC
1309 2016-01-07T22:26:07  <jtimon> by the way, would it make sense to create a git label on 3cd836c1 (maybe called last-0.12.99 ) like we do, for example, with release candidates like v0.9.0rc2 ?
1310 2016-01-07T22:26:19  *** iv3c has joined #bitcoin-dev
1311 2016-01-07T22:27:20  <Luke-Jr> branch- makes more sense than last-
1312 2016-01-07T22:27:33  <Luke-Jr> but a non-annotated tag may make sense
1313 2016-01-07T22:29:42  *** chmod755 has quit IRC
1314 2016-01-07T22:30:01  *** xss has quit IRC
1315 2016-01-07T22:30:14  <jcorgan> do any of the block explorers offer their calculated hashrate distribution figures as part of an API?
1316 2016-01-07T22:30:44  <jcorgan> or somewhere else i can get at the numbers underneath something like this: https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/pools
1317 2016-01-07T22:33:41  <jtimon> Luke-Jr: sure, branch-0.12.99, last-0.12.99, whatever
1318 2016-01-07T22:33:48  <jtimon> wumpus: thoughts ?
1319 2016-01-07T22:35:00  <Luke-Jr> branch-0.12 might be clearer
1320 2016-01-07T22:35:13  *** murch has quit IRC
1321 2016-01-07T22:35:14  *** _biO_ has quit IRC
1322 2016-01-07T22:35:56  *** tjader has quit IRC
1323 2016-01-07T22:35:58  <MarcoFalke> last-0.11.99, not last-0.12.99 ?
1324 2016-01-07T22:37:04  <jtimon> MarcoFalke: no, now master is 0.13.99 until we branch 0.13 out of master
1325 2016-01-07T22:37:04  *** GAit has quit IRC
1326 2016-01-07T22:37:24  *** GAit has joined #bitcoin-dev
1327 2016-01-07T22:37:38  *** AtnevRed has joined #bitcoin-dev
1328 2016-01-07T22:38:20  <MarcoFalke> jtimon, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/c12ff995f7d70aafb12f34887fb64aa7482bbc85
1329 2016-01-07T22:38:38  *** won9 has joined #bitcoin-dev
1330 2016-01-07T22:39:47  *** Guyver2 has quit IRC
1331 2016-01-07T22:40:07  *** tjader has joined #bitcoin-dev
1332 2016-01-07T22:40:52  <jtimon> MarcoFalke: oops, you're right. I've been naming my branches wrong for a while then (I hope that's not the reason they weren't merged :p)
1333 2016-01-07T22:41:25  *** fatalhalt has joined #bitcoin-dev
1334 2016-01-07T22:41:26  <jtimon> to me last-0.11.99 is clearer than branch-0.12, but as said, whatever
1335 2016-01-07T22:41:58  <jtimon> all I want is something more memorable than 3cd836c1
1336 2016-01-07T22:42:15  <MarcoFalke> Or just tag with "0.11.99"?
1337 2016-01-07T22:42:28  *** blueness has joined #bitcoin-dev
1338 2016-01-07T22:42:35  *** AtnevRed has quit IRC
1339 2016-01-07T22:42:48  <jtimon> yep, I like just 0.11.99
1340 2016-01-07T22:43:19  <jtimon> or maybe v0.11.99
1341 2016-01-07T22:43:32  <MarcoFalke> I have a tag locally. I can live without having it tagged in bitcoin/bitcoin ^^
1342 2016-01-07T22:44:10  <jtimon> me too, and I suspect we're not the only 2
1343 2016-01-07T22:44:27  <jtimon> of course this is not a big deal, just an idea
1344 2016-01-07T22:44:54  *** Emcy_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
1345 2016-01-07T22:44:55  *** Emcy_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
1346 2016-01-07T22:45:34  *** David________ has joined #bitcoin-dev
1347 2016-01-07T22:47:06  *** Emcy has quit IRC
1348 2016-01-07T22:47:17  *** David________ has quit IRC
1349 2016-01-07T22:50:03  <Yoghur114_2> hypothetical: SW is rolled out, and a script update is being rolled out on top of it - after activation, some miners are - for any reason - left behind and are mining using unupgraded nodes (like BIP66 - sort of), there is now a situation where I might spend upgraded-script transactions (anyone-can-spend to unupgraded nodes) into something that was valid previously, hope for the best it gets picked up by an old miner and gets accepted into, say, a
1350 2016-01-07T22:50:04  <Yoghur114_2> chain 2-3 deep that'll be orphaned some time later, I might then spend those to merchants that haven't upgraded - essentially, I'm now spending money I don't have. Barring all practical reasons this might not happen, and ignoring the fact this chain will be orphaned. Would it be a reasonable solution for a wallet to /not/ accept transactions that have an anyone-can-spend tx they have no consensus frame for (like updated segwit transactions would) in
1351 2016-01-07T22:50:06  <Yoghur114_2> all (or up to some depth) of the transaction's history to prevent that merchant from being defrauded?
1352 2016-01-07T22:50:18  <Yoghur114_2> yeez wall of text, sorry
1353 2016-01-07T22:50:58  *** Emcy has joined #bitcoin-dev
1354 2016-01-07T22:50:59  *** Emcy has joined #bitcoin-dev
1355 2016-01-07T22:51:29  *** NicolasDorier has joined #bitcoin-dev
1356 2016-01-07T22:51:54  <Luke-Jr> Yoghur114_2: current miners will NEVER pick up segwit transactions
1357 2016-01-07T22:52:09  <Yoghur114_2> I mean, that would quite decisively solve any left-over risk of theft while updating, wouldn't it?
1358 2016-01-07T22:52:20  <Yoghur114_2> luke-jr ah yes, but - the adversarial case, then
1359 2016-01-07T22:52:26  <Luke-Jr> it's even theoretically possible that pre-segwit miners may continue to work on the new chain
1360 2016-01-07T22:52:41  *** Emcy_ has quit IRC
1361 2016-01-07T22:53:00  *** akrmn has joined #bitcoin-dev
1362 2016-01-07T22:53:30  <Luke-Jr> Yoghur114_2: the adversarial case basically requires you to be a miner
1363 2016-01-07T22:54:23  <Luke-Jr> anyhow, while we humans talk about it as "anyone-can-spend", actually detecting that condition is not trivial for software
1364 2016-01-07T22:54:31  *** tantalum has quit IRC
1365 2016-01-07T22:56:02  <jtimon> it's also confusing with the anyone can spend sighash
1366 2016-01-07T22:56:11  *** neozaru has quit IRC
1367 2016-01-07T22:56:19  <jtimon> I suggest finding some other term
1368 2016-01-07T22:57:56  <Yoghur114_2> well, it'll simply be "I have no idea what anything with these versions might be, but whatever it is, it'll be valid to me" is it not? They can't derive any meaning from it, and will ignore the implication it might have - but allow it
1369 2016-01-07T22:57:57  <NicolasDorier> actually myself I thought it referred to the sighash before reading the bip
1370 2016-01-07T22:58:33  *** Newyorkadam has quit IRC
1371 2016-01-07T22:59:20  *** blueness has quit IRC
1372 2016-01-07T22:59:30  <Luke-Jr> "I have no idea what anything with these versions might be, but whatever it is, it'll be valid to me" does not exist in the current protocol; it is a new feature being introduced with segwit
1373 2016-01-07T23:00:30  <Yoghur114_2> right - they're pretty easy to detect I would imagine?
1374 2016-01-07T23:01:00  *** Dizzle has quit IRC
1375 2016-01-07T23:01:02  <Yoghur114_2> if nVersion > x then echo 'wat'
1376 2016-01-07T23:01:39  <Luke-Jr> Yoghur114_2: yeah, except all pre-segwit software was released.. a long time ago
1377 2016-01-07T23:01:48  <Luke-Jr> can't change the past
1378 2016-01-07T23:01:57  *** LeMiner has joined #bitcoin-dev
1379 2016-01-07T23:04:14  <phantomcircuit> is there a meta list for the -dev and -discuss lists?
1380 2016-01-07T23:04:25  <Luke-Jr> phantomcircuit: -discuss
1381 2016-01-07T23:04:30  <phantomcircuit> ok
1382 2016-01-07T23:04:52  *** hashtag_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
1383 2016-01-07T23:05:23  *** DougieBot5000 has quit IRC
1384 2016-01-07T23:05:54  <Yoghur114_2> Luke-Jr: I'm not sure why they're relevant?
1385 2016-01-07T23:06:10  <Luke-Jr> …
1386 2016-01-07T23:06:24  <Yoghur114_2> to the specific case in the hypothetical, I mean
1387 2016-01-07T23:06:55  <Yoghur114_2> (ignoring that miners wouldn't mine updated segwits)
1388 2016-01-07T23:07:23  <Luke-Jr> it's too late to implement that
1389 2016-01-07T23:10:54  <jtimon> but we could implement those kind of warnings so that next time is not too late again
1390 2016-01-07T23:13:13  <Yoghur114_2> oh I'm not suggesting to implement that still - was wondering whether that would effectively eliminate another edgiest of edge cases
1391 2016-01-07T23:13:57  <Luke-Jr> potentially, but if you're not careful it might also eliminate fungibility
1392 2016-01-07T23:14:38  <Luke-Jr> /actually/… I think we might have the highest degree of that possible, already
1393 2016-01-07T23:14:46  <Luke-Jr> since nodes will currently reject segwit from their mempool
1394 2016-01-07T23:14:59  <Luke-Jr> and without the parent txns, the descendents won't be accepted either
1395 2016-01-07T23:15:06  <Luke-Jr> so it would never get to the wallet
1396 2016-01-07T23:16:30  <Yoghur114_2> that only applies when unconfirmed, no?
1397 2016-01-07T23:19:46  <Luke-Jr> yes, if you made it apply to confirmed transactions, you break fungibility
1398 2016-01-07T23:20:08  *** Greybits has quit IRC
1399 2016-01-07T23:22:50  *** erasmospunk has joined #bitcoin-dev
1400 2016-01-07T23:24:21  *** benrcole has joined #bitcoin-dev
1401 2016-01-07T23:27:49  <Yoghur114_2> but it'd be just a wallet saying "well, this here transaction I'm receiving has a fishy parent, I'm saying nope until you're another dozen or so blocks down" - which, because of segwit, is now something we can explicitly do - whereas previously the 'fishiness' of transactions was impossible to determine. It technically would break fungibility in the sense that a transaction is treated differently based on some arbitrary indicator - but that wouldn't
1402 2016-01-07T23:27:50  <Yoghur114_2> last longer than some small amount of blocks, until a wallet is sufficiently sure it is not tracking an attacking chain (it might not know about), and it only applies to the window wherein a node hasn't yet upgraded
1403 2016-01-07T23:29:16  <Yoghur114_2> in other words, it would only break fungibility in the same way that altcoin exchange thing... shapeshift? breaks fungibility by not accepting 0-conf nil-fee transactions, and does accept greenaddress txs - so not really at all
1404 2016-01-07T23:31:25  *** djoot has quit IRC
1405 2016-01-07T23:32:07  *** djoot has joined #bitcoin-dev
1406 2016-01-07T23:32:08  *** djoot has joined #bitcoin-dev
1407 2016-01-07T23:32:13  *** MarcoFalke has quit IRC
1408 2016-01-07T23:34:56  *** akrmn has quit IRC
1409 2016-01-07T23:36:45  *** Belxjander has quit IRC
1410 2016-01-07T23:38:08  *** Belxjander has joined #bitcoin-dev
1411 2016-01-07T23:40:19  *** fuc has joined #bitcoin-dev
1412 2016-01-07T23:40:55  *** patcon has quit IRC
1413 2016-01-07T23:42:02  *** MrHodl has quit IRC
1414 2016-01-07T23:43:02  *** mnk has joined #bitcoin-dev
1415 2016-01-07T23:43:16  *** brg444 has quit IRC
1416 2016-01-07T23:43:18  *** brson has quit IRC
1417 2016-01-07T23:44:46  *** benrcole has quit IRC
1418 2016-01-07T23:44:53  *** afk11 has joined #bitcoin-dev
1419 2016-01-07T23:44:57  *** ThomasV has joined #bitcoin-dev
1420 2016-01-07T23:45:34  *** mrkent has joined #bitcoin-dev
1421 2016-01-07T23:48:20  *** meLon has joined #bitcoin-dev
1422 2016-01-07T23:48:46  *** M-mistake has joined #bitcoin-dev
1423 2016-01-07T23:49:44  *** pierre` has quit IRC
1424 2016-01-07T23:49:45  *** pierre` has joined #bitcoin-dev
1425 2016-01-07T23:50:46  *** DougieBot5000 has joined #bitcoin-dev
1426 2016-01-07T23:51:11  *** afk11 has quit IRC
1427 2016-01-07T23:51:51  *** moa has joined #bitcoin-dev
1428 2016-01-07T23:54:00  *** ThomasV has quit IRC
1429 2016-01-07T23:55:59  *** patcon has joined #bitcoin-dev
1430 2016-01-07T23:56:03  *** benrcole has joined #bitcoin-dev
1431 2016-01-07T23:57:56  *** graingert has joined #bitcoin-dev