1 2017-04-18T00:16:42  *** bigreddmachine has joined #bitcoin-dev
  2 2017-04-18T00:19:08  *** chjj has quit IRC
  3 2017-04-18T00:19:45  *** cyphase has quit IRC
  4 2017-04-18T00:21:10  *** bigreddmachine has quit IRC
  5 2017-04-18T00:24:54  <achow101> tomatopeel: yes. It's bytes that should have absolutely zero meaning in human readable ascii. In fact, the only places where you will actually see human readable text when converting bytes in Bitcoin related ata to ascii is in p2p message headers, the coinbase, and some OP_RETURN outputs
  6 2017-04-18T00:24:58  *** bigreddmachine has joined #bitcoin-dev
  7 2017-04-18T00:28:40  *** Dyaheon has joined #bitcoin-dev
  8 2017-04-18T00:32:51  *** chjj has joined #bitcoin-dev
  9 2017-04-18T00:52:51  *** blueness has quit IRC
 10 2017-04-18T01:06:54  *** goksinen has joined #bitcoin-dev
 11 2017-04-18T01:07:32  *** goksinen has quit IRC
 12 2017-04-18T01:08:24  *** goksinen has joined #bitcoin-dev
 13 2017-04-18T01:18:40  *** chjj has quit IRC
 14 2017-04-18T01:26:07  *** goksinen has quit IRC
 15 2017-04-18T01:26:34  *** goksinen has joined #bitcoin-dev
 16 2017-04-18T01:26:39  *** bigreddmachine has quit IRC
 17 2017-04-18T01:27:57  *** starkness has quit IRC
 18 2017-04-18T01:32:26  *** chjj has joined #bitcoin-dev
 19 2017-04-18T01:32:45  *** bigreddmachine has joined #bitcoin-dev
 20 2017-04-18T01:34:05  *** bigreddmachine has joined #bitcoin-dev
 21 2017-04-18T01:35:47  *** blueness has joined #bitcoin-dev
 22 2017-04-18T01:38:52  *** bigreddmachine has quit IRC
 23 2017-04-18T01:40:11  *** cyphase has joined #bitcoin-dev
 24 2017-04-18T02:12:04  *** matrix1233 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 25 2017-04-18T02:14:22  *** e4xit has quit IRC
 26 2017-04-18T02:19:17  *** matrix1233 has quit IRC
 27 2017-04-18T02:27:45  *** nsh has quit IRC
 28 2017-04-18T02:33:14  *** nsh has joined #bitcoin-dev
 29 2017-04-18T02:45:11  *** dermoth_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 30 2017-04-18T02:45:42  *** dermoth has quit IRC
 31 2017-04-18T02:45:45  *** dermoth_ is now known as dermoth
 32 2017-04-18T02:53:07  *** oleganza has joined #bitcoin-dev
 33 2017-04-18T02:58:45  *** subo has joined #bitcoin-dev
 34 2017-04-18T03:02:43  *** subo_ has quit IRC
 35 2017-04-18T03:16:28  *** baldur has joined #bitcoin-dev
 36 2017-04-18T03:21:06  *** baldur has quit IRC
 37 2017-04-18T03:44:07  *** ThomasV has joined #bitcoin-dev
 38 2017-04-18T03:48:10  *** ThomasV has quit IRC
 39 2017-04-18T03:51:19  *** iv3c has quit IRC
 40 2017-04-18T03:52:25  *** matrix1233 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 41 2017-04-18T03:52:28  *** ProfMac has joined #bitcoin-dev
 42 2017-04-18T03:56:51  *** matrix1233 has quit IRC
 43 2017-04-18T04:05:05  *** ThomasV has joined #bitcoin-dev
 44 2017-04-18T04:24:45  *** TheSeven has quit IRC
 45 2017-04-18T04:25:23  *** TheSeven has joined #bitcoin-dev
 46 2017-04-18T04:27:54  *** goksinen has quit IRC
 47 2017-04-18T04:36:10  *** baldur has joined #bitcoin-dev
 48 2017-04-18T04:46:30  *** matrix1233 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 49 2017-04-18T04:50:57  *** matrix1233 has quit IRC
 50 2017-04-18T05:08:00  *** suryab has joined #bitcoin-dev
 51 2017-04-18T05:08:42  <suryab> when I'm creating a p2wkh output in a transaction, does the transaction necessarily have to have a witness associated with it? none of the other inputs/outputs are segwit
 52 2017-04-18T05:09:15  <suryab> i guess i should say, I created an output that is [OP_0, Hash160(pubkey)] and I want to spend that output in another transaction
 53 2017-04-18T05:09:44  <suryab> is that simple script all that needs to be there for me to spend it or does there need to be other information in the output for it?
 54 2017-04-18T05:10:54  <achow101> to create the output, you just put the script in the output. to spend from it, you need to spend from it as specified in the BIPs, by adding stuff to the txwitness field
 55 2017-04-18T05:11:06  <achow101> you do not need a txwitness in the transaction that makes the output
 56 2017-04-18T05:11:20  <suryab> okay cool, thanks
 57 2017-04-18T05:11:30  <suryab> achow101 to the rescue again
 58 2017-04-18T05:16:32  <suryab> so the scriptSig is what is created with spending an output. in the case of p2wkh outputs is the redeemScript just the scripPubKey of the output (i.e. the same OP_0 script?). the bitcoin core segwit dev guide says that the redeeming scriptSig should push only the redeemScript
 59 2017-04-18T05:17:59  *** Fr4n has quit IRC
 60 2017-04-18T05:21:07  <suryab> wait not that's wrong redeemscript is something else
 61 2017-04-18T05:21:33  *** netsin has joined #bitcoin-dev
 62 2017-04-18T05:27:18  *** paveljanik has quit IRC
 63 2017-04-18T05:30:02  *** Fr4n has joined #bitcoin-dev
 64 2017-04-18T05:36:45  <suryab> when trying to spend a p2wkh output, it says the scriptSig must be empty but the witness programm needs to have: <signature> <20-byte-key-hash>. What is the signature calculated over? Looking at the BIP page on github and the segwit dev guide on bitcoin core seems to either be talking about distinct types of outputs or the information is conflicting somehow
 65 2017-04-18T05:37:20  <suryab> should mention this is a version 0 p2wkh
 66 2017-04-18T05:42:21  <arubi> suryab, here are examples for the simple cases: https://github.com/fivepiece/witness-sig
 67 2017-04-18T05:43:02  <arubi> the scriptsig is supposed to be empty for p2wpkh\p2wsh and the redeeming stuff (redeemscript,signature,pubkey) should be in the witness
 68 2017-04-18T05:44:00  <arubi> scriptsig will have the witness programitself (the preimage to a p2sh hash160) if the scritpubkeys for p2wsh\p2wpkh are nested in p2sh
 69 2017-04-18T05:44:32  <arubi> other than that, the signature is done over the exact same data
 70 2017-04-18T05:45:38  <arubi> (I mean, a signature redeeming p2sh(p2wpkh) is the same for just bare p2wpkh, just add the p2sh redeemscript in scriptsig for p2sh() nests)
 71 2017-04-18T05:45:46  <suryab> oh perfect, thanks. i'm not nesting my transactions
 72 2017-04-18T05:45:55  <arubi> you don't have to really
 73 2017-04-18T05:46:03  <suryab> yeah i didn't think so
 74 2017-04-18T05:46:22  <suryab> my main goal in creating these txs is so that I can do my experimenting on testnet and get around the ongoing malleability attack
 75 2017-04-18T05:47:05  <suryab> so i'm hoping that I'm satisfying the minimum required to get around that, but i suppose it depends on how many nodes on testnet are actually updated to accept/realy segwit transactions
 76 2017-04-18T05:47:15  <suryab> relay*
 77 2017-04-18T05:47:34  <arubi> segwit is pretty much supported by testnet nodes
 78 2017-04-18T05:48:53  <arubi> well, sometimes there are miners who don't include segwit transactions, but eventually it'll get mined.  you can also use a local regtest.  I'm off to work, cya around!
 79 2017-04-18T05:49:36  <suryab> thanks for the help!
 80 2017-04-18T05:50:14  *** ThomasV has quit IRC
 81 2017-04-18T05:59:04  *** MoALTz has joined #bitcoin-dev
 82 2017-04-18T06:16:08  <suryab> when creating the witness is the only thing in the witness script <signature hash> <20-byte-key-hash> or is there more to add? more importantly, is the signature hash created in the same way over the entire new transaction with SIGHASH_ALL?
 83 2017-04-18T06:20:44  *** Fr4n has quit IRC
 84 2017-04-18T06:27:10  *** Beef has quit IRC
 85 2017-04-18T06:29:50  *** d9b4bef9 has quit IRC
 86 2017-04-18T06:30:57  *** d9b4bef9 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 87 2017-04-18T06:33:01  *** Fr4n has joined #bitcoin-dev
 88 2017-04-18T06:33:30  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
 89 2017-04-18T06:34:48  *** matrix1233 has joined #bitcoin-dev
 90 2017-04-18T06:39:17  *** matrix1233 has quit IRC
 91 2017-04-18T06:44:27  *** janko33 has quit IRC
 92 2017-04-18T06:44:33  *** janko33_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
 93 2017-04-18T06:58:16  *** bigreddmachine has joined #bitcoin-dev
 94 2017-04-18T06:59:46  *** ThomasV has joined #bitcoin-dev
 95 2017-04-18T07:02:30  *** oleganza has quit IRC
 96 2017-04-18T07:02:40  *** bigreddmachine has quit IRC
 97 2017-04-18T07:12:10  *** ThomasV has quit IRC
 98 2017-04-18T07:15:04  *** bodkan has joined #bitcoin-dev
 99 2017-04-18T07:19:40  *** janko33__ has joined #bitcoin-dev
100 2017-04-18T07:20:10  *** Fr4n has quit IRC
101 2017-04-18T07:20:22  *** janko33_ has quit IRC
102 2017-04-18T07:21:41  *** priidu has joined #bitcoin-dev
103 2017-04-18T07:24:57  *** ongolaBoy has joined #bitcoin-dev
104 2017-04-18T07:45:05  *** ongolaBoy has quit IRC
105 2017-04-18T07:45:30  *** janko33__ has quit IRC
106 2017-04-18T07:54:57  *** janko33 has joined #bitcoin-dev
107 2017-04-18T07:55:05  *** suryab has quit IRC
108 2017-04-18T07:57:18  *** ongolaBoy has joined #bitcoin-dev
109 2017-04-18T08:01:31  *** ThomasV has joined #bitcoin-dev
110 2017-04-18T08:05:01  *** To7 has quit IRC
111 2017-04-18T08:06:44  *** weedcoder has joined #bitcoin-dev
112 2017-04-18T08:14:59  *** bodkan has quit IRC
113 2017-04-18T08:16:40  *** weedcoder has quit IRC
114 2017-04-18T08:22:53  *** matrix1233 has joined #bitcoin-dev
115 2017-04-18T08:25:15  *** matrix1233 has quit IRC
116 2017-04-18T08:35:47  *** cyphase has quit IRC
117 2017-04-18T08:37:48  *** nazarewk has joined #bitcoin-dev
118 2017-04-18T08:38:17  *** bodkan has joined #bitcoin-dev
119 2017-04-18T08:41:03  *** cyphase has joined #bitcoin-dev
120 2017-04-18T08:41:40  *** kadoban has quit IRC
121 2017-04-18T08:47:56  *** nazarewk has quit IRC
122 2017-04-18T08:51:04  *** janko33_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
123 2017-04-18T08:52:57  *** janko33 has quit IRC
124 2017-04-18T08:54:25  *** janko33_ is now known as janko33
125 2017-04-18T09:37:19  *** nikuhodai has joined #bitcoin-dev
126 2017-04-18T09:42:22  *** thrasher` has quit IRC
127 2017-04-18T09:46:52  *** thrasher` has joined #bitcoin-dev
128 2017-04-18T10:05:56  *** nazarewk has joined #bitcoin-dev
129 2017-04-18T10:17:02  *** |Clown| is now known as Guest80217
130 2017-04-18T10:17:05  *** |Clown| has joined #bitcoin-dev
131 2017-04-18T10:19:40  *** Guest80217 has quit IRC
132 2017-04-18T10:26:50  *** d9b4bef9 has quit IRC
133 2017-04-18T10:28:07  *** d9b4bef9 has joined #bitcoin-dev
134 2017-04-18T10:31:57  *** ThomasV has quit IRC
135 2017-04-18T10:36:57  *** ThomasV has joined #bitcoin-dev
136 2017-04-18T10:45:05  *** ThomasV has quit IRC
137 2017-04-18T10:58:28  *** Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-dev
138 2017-04-18T10:59:13  *** steklovata has joined #bitcoin-dev
139 2017-04-18T11:09:58  *** ThomasV has joined #bitcoin-dev
140 2017-04-18T11:23:05  *** ThomasV has quit IRC
141 2017-04-18T11:23:50  *** blueness has quit IRC
142 2017-04-18T11:37:54  *** bodkan has quit IRC
143 2017-04-18T11:38:36  *** bodkan has joined #bitcoin-dev
144 2017-04-18T11:44:45  <tomatopeel> hey I'm going through this series http://davidederosa.com/basic-blockchain-programming , I'm on the 2nd and 3rd part re: serialization of fixed length and variable length data, the author gives no examples of use cases for this though so it's a bit hard to conceptualise. So what are some examples for use cases for serialization of fixed length and variable length data?
145 2017-04-18T11:59:22  *** janko33 has quit IRC
146 2017-04-18T12:02:58  *** ThomasV has joined #bitcoin-dev
147 2017-04-18T12:03:56  *** lavenders has joined #bitcoin-dev
148 2017-04-18T12:09:18  *** lavenders has quit IRC
149 2017-04-18T12:10:02  *** iv3c has joined #bitcoin-dev
150 2017-04-18T12:11:58  *** To7 has joined #bitcoin-dev
151 2017-04-18T12:14:47  *** blackwraith has joined #bitcoin-dev
152 2017-04-18T12:16:20  *** priidu has quit IRC
153 2017-04-18T12:33:27  *** bodkan has quit IRC
154 2017-04-18T12:38:40  *** NewLiberty has quit IRC
155 2017-04-18T12:40:20  *** paveljanik has joined #bitcoin-dev
156 2017-04-18T12:46:42  *** coin_trader has quit IRC
157 2017-04-18T12:46:55  *** arubi has quit IRC
158 2017-04-18T12:47:09  *** coin_trader has joined #bitcoin-dev
159 2017-04-18T12:47:19  *** arubi has joined #bitcoin-dev
160 2017-04-18T12:47:50  <Chris_Stewart_5> tomatopeel: I'm not sure why they talk about fixed length data, but for variable length data we have a 'VarInt' data structure in the protocol
161 2017-04-18T12:49:48  <Chris_Stewart_5> IIRC it is called 'CVarInt' in bitcoin core
162 2017-04-18T12:53:21  *** ProfMac has quit IRC
163 2017-04-18T13:13:48  <tomatopeel> oh ty
164 2017-04-18T13:35:37  <Chris_Stewart_5> tomatopeel: An example of variable length data is script signatures. A multisig script signature requires more bytes than a single signature script signature.
165 2017-04-18T13:54:27  *** agricocb has quit IRC
166 2017-04-18T14:06:28  *** agricocb has joined #bitcoin-dev
167 2017-04-18T14:11:06  *** agricocb has quit IRC
168 2017-04-18T14:12:36  *** bugs_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
169 2017-04-18T14:12:55  *** Sosumi has joined #bitcoin-dev
170 2017-04-18T14:32:16  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-dev
171 2017-04-18T14:53:37  *** CheckDavid has joined #bitcoin-dev
172 2017-04-18T15:06:57  *** bodkan has joined #bitcoin-dev
173 2017-04-18T15:27:03  *** jtimon has joined #bitcoin-dev
174 2017-04-18T15:28:50  *** kadoban has joined #bitcoin-dev
175 2017-04-18T15:31:49  *** tripleslash has quit IRC
176 2017-04-18T15:34:07  *** tripleslash has joined #bitcoin-dev
177 2017-04-18T15:45:57  *** kexkey has joined #bitcoin-dev
178 2017-04-18T15:54:44  *** abpa has joined #bitcoin-dev
179 2017-04-18T16:08:17  *** Soligor has quit IRC
180 2017-04-18T16:20:27  *** steklovata has quit IRC
181 2017-04-18T16:32:30  *** oleganza has joined #bitcoin-dev
182 2017-04-18T16:33:21  *** blueness has joined #bitcoin-dev
183 2017-04-18T16:44:40  *** ThomasV has quit IRC
184 2017-04-18T16:48:49  *** blueness has quit IRC
185 2017-04-18T17:23:47  *** nazarewk has quit IRC
186 2017-04-18T17:45:37  *** petertodd has joined #bitcoin-dev
187 2017-04-18T17:56:48  *** oleganza has quit IRC
188 2017-04-18T18:03:32  *** LeMiner has quit IRC
189 2017-04-18T18:04:45  *** Soligor has joined #bitcoin-dev
190 2017-04-18T18:09:43  *** oleganza has joined #bitcoin-dev
191 2017-04-18T18:20:14  *** suryab has joined #bitcoin-dev
192 2017-04-18T18:21:55  <suryab> when is there anything special that I need to include in inv messages when i am sending transactions that have a witness?
193 2017-04-18T18:22:16  <suryab> well... do i include the txid or the wid in the inv message? or both?
194 2017-04-18T18:31:17  <goatpig> txid afaik
195 2017-04-18T18:31:27  <goatpig> if you inv'ing a witness tx
196 2017-04-18T18:31:41  <goatpig> you need to use the witness tx inv packet
197 2017-04-18T18:31:50  *** aceat64 has joined #bitcoin-dev
198 2017-04-18T18:33:05  <goatpig> which is 1 | (1 << 30)
199 2017-04-18T18:33:22  <goatpig> basically inv_tx type with the witness bit flag
200 2017-04-18T18:38:34  <suryab> okay i guess my new question is that i get bad-txns-vin-empty rejects from most nodes on the network when I just send them a tx message without inv'ing. Is that because of the type of segwit output I'm using (p2wkh) or would that indicate a lack of segwit adoption?
201 2017-04-18T18:39:47  <suryab> is the most common accepted type nesting p2wkh inside of a p2sh?
202 2017-04-18T18:39:52  <suryab> p2sh-p2wkh
203 2017-04-18T18:42:27  <suryab> some testnet block explorers seem to accept it
204 2017-04-18T18:42:42  <suryab> but most nodes, appro 111 of the nodes gave me that reject message
205 2017-04-18T18:47:00  <arubi> I'm sure the type of nesting isn't related
206 2017-04-18T18:47:25  <goatpig> err
207 2017-04-18T18:47:31  <arubi> and block explorers shouldn't be your measure for anything..  it's coincidence that they sometime display the correct data :)
208 2017-04-18T18:47:48  <goatpig> when you ver a node you get to see if its support SW in its services
209 2017-04-18T18:48:38  <goatpig> regardless you should inv before you push a getdata payload
210 2017-04-18T18:49:13  <goatpig> and in particular, the inv type should be inv_tx_witness so at to make sure non supporting nodes don't request the getdata packet
211 2017-04-18T18:50:00  <goatpig> as for your vin-empty issue
212 2017-04-18T18:50:10  <goatpig> it's possible you didn't serialize your tx as SW
213 2017-04-18T18:50:17  <goatpig> are you missing the flag and marker maybe?
214 2017-04-18T18:50:29  <arubi> well I think that the flag is there
215 2017-04-18T18:50:40  <arubi> it "looks" like 0 vin for non segwit nodes
216 2017-04-18T18:50:53  <goatpig> sure but it's suprising to me
217 2017-04-18T18:51:03  <goatpig> the grand majority of nodes on testnet are SW aware
218 2017-04-18T18:51:22  <arubi> yep, that's where I'm lost too
219 2017-04-18T18:51:35  <goatpig> and providing a SW tx from a inv_tx packet should still work
220 2017-04-18T18:51:47  <goatpig> even though it's not "clean" signaling
221 2017-04-18T18:53:17  <arubi> maybe best to see what the transaction being sent is first, maybe it's just not funded correctly and missing any input
222 2017-04-18T18:54:53  <goatpig> at this rate, bounce the tx between 2 of your nodes
223 2017-04-18T19:04:25  *** CheckDavid has quit IRC
224 2017-04-18T19:23:32  <adiabat> arubi: block explorers are a mess but smartbit does seem to work OK with segwit txs
225 2017-04-18T19:24:02  <adiabat> https://testnet.smartbit.com.au/txs/decodetx can be useful to see if their software can parse it
226 2017-04-18T19:25:11  <arubi> adiabat, yep! smarbit does a very good job I agree
227 2017-04-18T19:26:41  *** brianhoffman has quit IRC
228 2017-04-18T19:28:46  *** Sosumi has quit IRC
229 2017-04-18T19:29:07  *** arubi has quit IRC
230 2017-04-18T19:29:32  *** arubi has joined #bitcoin-dev
231 2017-04-18T19:36:21  <suryab> https://testnet.smartbit.com.au/tx/aa3c950a01e7f40bd5c55b5b410f2e8ab3f0c43ebfc09cfd1ef4d0769b592907
232 2017-04-18T19:36:26  <suryab> http://n.bitcoin.ninja/checktx
233 2017-04-18T19:36:53  *** tripleslash has quit IRC
234 2017-04-18T19:36:57  <suryab> this is what i used to see if the outputs are interpretted as segwit outputs first off and the second link i was linked to on this irc channel before as a good place to check
235 2017-04-18T19:37:08  <suryab> check validity of transcations that spend seg wit outputs
236 2017-04-18T19:38:40  <suryab> also i should point out that my local node accepts the transaction when i use the sendtrawtransaction rpc call, i know it does some level of validation before checking it
237 2017-04-18T19:39:48  *** oleganza has quit IRC
238 2017-04-18T19:40:19  <suryab> transaction that I actually sent out: 010000000001010729599b76d0f41efd9cc0bf3ec4f0b38a2e0f415b5bc5d50bf4e7010a953caa0100000000ffffffff0154150000000000001600149eea64b8d79d147b884cc0a8ec7de357f5dfc9df024730440220784c3ae3e62b6301968e8ca2f43890306fbf782d15ff2ae8ca844735c21825f8022003fe8747d572ed8c73feb4202b306ee7211becc53a005ab047dd69d67ab84538012103b561b2cfad4e639a689c05e3cad6a7e76f8e703a9d47bcf03b89ac9e3ceb25ae00000000
239 2017-04-18T19:42:02  <suryab> after some tinkering the checktx link finally accepted as valid and when i sent it out my local node didn't complain. if it's worth anything the validation on checktx link and my node seems to be similar as they both responded the same way to every serialized tx i put into both (in terms of reject/accept)
240 2017-04-18T19:42:30  <suryab> arubi: yes I've been using smartbit as a sort of validation to see if my segwit outputs are being interpretted correctly
241 2017-04-18T19:42:32  *** NewLiberty has joined #bitcoin-dev
242 2017-04-18T19:43:53  <suryab> meant to ref adiabat
243 2017-04-18T19:45:56  *** Dyaheon has quit IRC
244 2017-04-18T19:47:08  <suryab> deserialized for readability: CTransaction((CTxIn(COutPoint(lx('aa3c950a01e7f40bd5c55b5b410f2e8ab3f0c43ebfc09cfd1ef4d0769b592907'), 1), CScript([]), 0xffffffff),), (CTxOut(0.0000546*COIN, CScript([0, x('9eea64b8d79d147b884cc0a8ec7de357f5dfc9df')])),), 0, 1, CTxWitness(CTxInWitness(CScriptWitness(x('30440220784c3ae3e62b6301968e8ca2f43890306fbf782d15ff2ae8ca844735c21825f8022003fe8747d572ed8c73feb4202b306ee7211becc53a005ab047dd69d67
245 2017-04-18T19:47:35  *** Dyaheon has joined #bitcoin-dev
246 2017-04-18T19:49:43  *** blueness has joined #bitcoin-dev
247 2017-04-18T19:51:27  *** tripleslash has joined #bitcoin-dev
248 2017-04-18T20:01:22  *** ThomasV has joined #bitcoin-dev
249 2017-04-18T20:12:50  *** suryab has quit IRC
250 2017-04-18T20:19:42  <arubi> is this redeeming a testnet input?
251 2017-04-18T20:19:55  <arubi> I mean, is the input to this confirmed at all?
252 2017-04-18T20:20:47  <arubi> I don't have it so I'm wondering what's being redeemed here
253 2017-04-18T20:21:25  *** oleganza has joined #bitcoin-dev
254 2017-04-18T20:21:40  *** suryab has joined #bitcoin-dev
255 2017-04-18T20:25:56  <arubi> oh I'm sorry, I missed the link ^, now why is the input txid not found
256 2017-04-18T20:26:03  <arubi> AA3C950A01E7F40BD5C55B5B410F2E8AB3F0C43EBFC09CFD1EF4D0769B592907
257 2017-04-18T20:26:07  <arubi> aa3c950a01e7f40bd5c55b5b410f2e8ab3f0c43ebfc09cfd1ef4d0769b592907
258 2017-04-18T20:26:07  *** ongolaBoy has quit IRC
259 2017-04-18T20:28:21  <arubi> oh, my fat fingered locally.  sorry
260 2017-04-18T20:28:35  *** suryab has quit IRC
261 2017-04-18T20:32:46  *** contrapumpkin has quit IRC
262 2017-04-18T20:34:33  *** blueness has quit IRC
263 2017-04-18T20:41:12  *** segy has quit IRC
264 2017-04-18T20:44:03  *** fatalhalt has quit IRC
265 2017-04-18T20:46:02  *** segy has joined #bitcoin-dev
266 2017-04-18T20:49:44  *** fatalhalt has joined #bitcoin-dev
267 2017-04-18T21:05:04  *** blueness has joined #bitcoin-dev
268 2017-04-18T21:05:13  *** janko33 has joined #bitcoin-dev
269 2017-04-18T21:06:53  *** blackwraith has quit IRC
270 2017-04-18T21:07:17  *** janko33 has quit IRC
271 2017-04-18T21:10:47  *** bodkan has quit IRC
272 2017-04-18T21:20:56  *** blueness has quit IRC
273 2017-04-18T21:24:29  *** earlz is now known as earlz2
274 2017-04-18T21:24:36  *** earlz2 is now known as earlz
275 2017-04-18T21:38:40  *** ThomasV has quit IRC
276 2017-04-18T21:41:03  *** bugs_ has quit IRC
277 2017-04-18T21:51:05  *** Dyaheon has quit IRC
278 2017-04-18T21:52:14  *** Dyaheon has joined #bitcoin-dev
279 2017-04-18T21:53:10  *** segy has quit IRC
280 2017-04-18T21:57:29  *** segy has joined #bitcoin-dev
281 2017-04-18T21:58:17  *** agricocb has joined #bitcoin-dev
282 2017-04-18T22:09:47  *** Guyver2 has quit IRC
283 2017-04-18T22:11:29  *** MoALTz has quit IRC
284 2017-04-18T22:32:57  *** Fr4n has joined #bitcoin-dev
285 2017-04-18T22:37:08  *** suryab has joined #bitcoin-dev
286 2017-04-18T22:37:10  <suryab> back
287 2017-04-18T22:38:06  <suryab> i should've said I'd be gone i probably missed what was said about my question up until someone suggested smartbit block explorer
288 2017-04-18T22:52:10  *** iv3c has quit IRC
289 2017-04-18T22:53:17  *** chjj has quit IRC
290 2017-04-18T23:06:50  *** chjj has joined #bitcoin-dev
291 2017-04-18T23:08:08  *** eenoch has quit IRC
292 2017-04-18T23:09:22  *** eenoch has joined #bitcoin-dev
293 2017-04-18T23:20:47  *** subo_ has joined #bitcoin-dev
294 2017-04-18T23:23:30  *** subo has quit IRC
295 2017-04-18T23:27:05  *** suryab has quit IRC
296 2017-04-18T23:36:02  *** oleganza has quit IRC
297 2017-04-18T23:36:33  *** oleganza has joined #bitcoin-dev
298 2017-04-18T23:38:20  *** Burrito has quit IRC
299 2017-04-18T23:45:53  *** arubi has quit IRC
300 2017-04-18T23:46:46  *** arubi has joined #bitcoin-dev
301 2017-04-18T23:55:04  *** abpa has quit IRC